By: Sonya Cato LIBM 6230 November 21, 2011. Tried at the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court in Pasadena, California The Plaintiff.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
”If a matter is a federal question” Cément BESOMBES Emelie LUNDBERG Alma BLAKE EMWALL.
Advertisements

Chapter 4: Enforcing the Law 4 How Can Disputes Be Resolved Privately?
Burger King Corporation v. C.R. Weaver; M-W-M, Inc.
Litigation and Alternatives for Settling Civil Disputes CHAPTER FIVE.
16.1 Civil Cases.
By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts
A LIBRARY UNDER FIRE By Shannon Brown. HOTALING V. CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS  Plaintiff – Hotaling  Defendant – Church of Jesus Christ.
Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch
History, Structure and Function of the American Legal System
Agustin Del Rio CalNet ID: Date: October 27th, 2008.
U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeals
H o w t h e F e d e r a l C o u r t s a r e O r g a n i z e d H o w d o t h e d if f e r e n t k i n d s o f c o u r ts fi t t o g e t h e r ? Congress.
Copyright Brief Laura McNulty Dr. Rickman November 17, 2011.
Ringgold v. Black Entertainment
The Federal Court System
Lady Justice (Roman goddess Justitia) is a personification of the moral force in judicial systems. 1.Why do you think Lady Justice is blind folded? 2.Why.
Remember Adam Smith and the pillars of a free market system?
CHAPTER SEVEN, SECTION TWO THE JUDICIAL BRANCH: THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM.
Mattel, Inc. V. MGA Entertainment, Inc.. In 2004, MGA Entertainment’s Bratz range of dolls emerged on the market, they presented severe competition to.
History, Structure and Function of the American Legal System 1 Court Systems and Practices.
Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch
Mr. Valanzano Business Law. Dispute Resolution Litigate – ________________________________________________ In some cases, people decided too quickly to.
Unit 1 Part 2.  Using the “Steps in a Typical Mediation Session” handout, write down questions you can use at each stage in the mediation process to.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association The Presumption of Patent Validity in the U.S. Tom Engellenner AIPLA Presentation to.
1 Overview of Legal Process in IP Cases From notes by Steve Baron © Ed Lamoureux/Steve Baron.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Jefferson Parish Hospital Dist. No. 2 v. Hyde (Sup. Ct. 1984) Basic Facts: Exclusive contract between hospital.
TRACY ANN WARD LIBM 6320 DR. RICKMAN A Picture is Worth…? A Case Study of Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp.
Fair Use How Much is Too Much. Maxtone-Graham v. Burtchaell United States Court of Appeals October 15, 1986.
1 Working the IP Case Steve Baron Sept. 3, Today’s Agenda  Anatomy of an IP case  The Courts and the Law  Links to finding cases  Parts of.
8.2 How Federal Courts Are Organized. US District Courts District Courts= federal courts where trials are held and lawsuits begin; 94 district courts.
Las Vegas Confusion Copyright Brief LIBM 6320 Saundra Lamberson.
Section 1.2 The Court System and Trial Procedures.
Copyright Brief Salinger v. Random House Alicia Francis University of Central Arkansas.
Overview of the adversarial nature of a civil trial Chapter 9.4.
Federal and State Courts. Jurisdiction The types of cases a court can hear. Two types of jurisdiction: Original/Appellate. Original: The first step in.
Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch. “The Federal Court System & How Federal Courts Are Organized”
1 Chapter 5: The Court System. 2 Trial Courts Trial courts listen to testimony, consider evidence, and decide the facts in disputes. There are 2 parties.
Chapter 10- The Judicial Branch. JUDICIAL BRANCH  The Judicial Branch was created to help balance the powers of the other two branches.  It played a.
Agenda  Last Night (Week’s) HW  Pass out Notes (6 th and 7 th period)  Civil and Criminal Law Notes  Civil Criminal Law HW Homework  Do Last Week’s.
“The Federal Court System & How Federal Courts Are Organized”
LIBM 6320 Angela Teal Los Angeles Times v. Free Republic 54 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1453 (C.D. Cal 2000) Microsoft Office Clipart, 2011.
Trial Procedures & Courtroom Personnel
Foundations of United States Citizenship Lesson 5, Chapter 6, U.S. National Government 1 What is the function of the judicial branch? Federal courts make.
The Court System Chapter 5. Courts  Trial Courts- two parties Plaintiff- in civil trial is the person bringing the legal action Prosecutor- in criminal.
"You Have Mail" And Other Terms Are Generic Produced by: Asia Green.
Copyright and Plagiarism By Ben Donaldson. What is intellectual property? Intellectual property is property that refers to creations of the mind. It is.
Judicial Review The Supreme Court’s power to overturn any law that it decides is in conflict with the Constitution.
Virginia RULES Teens Learn & Live the Law Introduction to a Virginia Courtroom.
VILLAINS V. HEROES MARVEL WORLDWIDE, INC., ET AL; COUNTER CLAIM KIRBY ET AL., V.MARVEL WORLDWIDE, INC(2011) By: Penny Hartwick LIBM 6320 November 21, 2011.
1 How To Find and Read the Law and Live to Tell (and Talk) About It Steve Baron January 29, 2009.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. ORGANIZATION.
Chapter 3 The U.S. Legal System Chapter 3: The U.S. Legal System
Chapter 5: The Court System
Overview of Legal Process in IP Cases
The Judicial Branch.
Mansourian v. Regents of The University of California, No
A Dispute Between Individuals
Intro to a Virginia courtroom
Today’s Learning Goal:
How To Find and Read the Law and Live to Tell (and Talk) About It
Overview of Legal Process in IP Cases
District and Appeals Courts
Overview of Legal Process in IP Cases
Federal District Courts
The Role of the Judicial Branch (courts)
name: Winnie copyright infringement case
ARENA LAND & INV. CO., INC. v. PETTY 69 F.3d 547 (10th Cir. 1995)
Overview of Legal Process in IP Cases
Overview of Legal Process in IP Cases
Chapter 5: The Court System
Presentation transcript:

By: Sonya Cato LIBM 6230 November 21, 2011

Tried at the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court in Pasadena, California The Plaintiff is Fleischer Studios who sued for copyright and trademark infringement. The Defendants are A.V.E.L.A. Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. A.V.E.L.A Inc. (Microsoft Office Clip Art, 2010)

Fleischer Studios Inc. was created in 1970’s by the family of Max Fleischer. Max Fleischer created the cartoon character Betty Boop in the 1930’s. Max Fleischer transferred his rights in to Paramount Pictures in Fleischer Studios has made attempts to repurchase the right to Betty Boop. Fleischer Studios sued A.V.E.L.A. for copyright and trademark infringement. Fleischer Studios claims that they own the intellectual rights to the Betty Boop character (Kachmar, 2011). (Fleischer v. A.V.E.L.A, 2011) The Plaintiff Photo of Betty Boop, toons/Betty%20Boop.html

The Defendants in this case are A.V.E.L.A. They are being sued for copyright and trademark infringement. A.V.E.L.A. were using the Betty Boop image on their merchandise. A.V.E.L.A. claims that the image of Betty Boop is from vintage posters that they have restored. (Fleischer v. A.V.E.L.A, 2011) The Defendants (Microsoft Office Clip Art, 2010)

The copyright issue at hand is if Fleischer Studios Inc. owns the rights to Betty Boop. In order for Fleischer Studios to prove that they have repurchased the rights to Betty Boop they will have to prove every link in the chain of title. On the issue of trademark infringement Fleischer Studios will first have to prove that they own the rights to Betty Boop. Then they will have to prove that A.V.E.L.A. is attempting to use the Betty Boop image as a trademark for their merchandise. (Fleischer v. A.V.E.L.A, 2011) (Microsoft Office Clip Art, 2010) Copyright Issue

The Copyright Act of 1909 applies to this case since Betty Boop was created in the 1930’s. The Copyright Act of 1909 remains in effect for works that were created before The law will only help protect Betty Boop if Fleischer can prove that they own the rights to her. On the claim of trademark infringement The Trademark Law is being raised. (Fleischer v. A.V.E.L.A, 2011) Applicable Law (Microsoft Office Clip Art, 2010)

On the case of copyright infringement Fleischer Studios lost the claim since they were unable to provide evidence that they owned the rights to Betty Boop. Fleischer Studios was unable to provide evidence in every link in the chain of titles to prove that they repurchased the rights to Betty Boop. There was a dispute over whether Paramount transferred character rights to UM&M. Fleischer lost the copyright infringement case based on this fact (Fleischer v. A.V.E.L.A., 2011). The Verdict Is In (Microsoft Office Clip Art, 2010)

On the trademark infringement claim Fleischer Studios’ claim was dismissed on two accounts. “Ultimately, the Court held that given that A.V.E.L.A.’s use of Betty Boop is functional and aesthetic, and because ruling in Fleischer’s favor would prevent the Betty Boop character from ever entering the public domain, Fleischer’s infringement claim is barred” (Gordon & REES, 2011). “The district court dismissed Fleischer’s trademark- infringement claim, holding that Fleischer did not provide evidence, in time required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that Fleischer owned either the common law or federally registered trademarks” (Fleischer v. A.V.E.L.A., 2011, p.10). The Court’s Decision

Reflection When looking at the evidence that was presented in this case I have to agree with the court’s decision. Fleisher Studios could not prove that they owned the rights to Betty Boop. Since Fleischer Studios was unable to prove every link in the chain of titles this caused them to lose the case. I agree based on the evidence proved that there were no grounds for copyright or trademark infringement. (Microsoft Office Clip Art, 2010)

Fleischer Studios Inc. v. A.V.E.L.A. Inc., No D.C. No. 2:06-cv FMC-MAN.(2011) Gordon & REES LLP, (2011). Retrieved from m?contentID= Images from Microsoft Office Clip Art. (2010) Kachmar, James. (2011). BettyBoop& Chain of Title Issues. Retrieved from copyright-law-the-copyright-misuse-defense-apples- software-license-agreements.htmhttp:// Photo of Betty Boop. Fair Use. Retrieved from rk%20Cartoons/Betty%20Boop.html rk%20Cartoons/Betty%20Boop.html References