Implementing Multi-Site Clusters April 14 20111 Trần Văn Huệ Nhất Nghệ CPLS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Replication for Availability & Durability with MySQL and Amazon RDS Grant McAlister.
Advertisements

Henk Den Baes Technology Advisor Microsoft BeLux
Symon Perriman Program Manager II Clustering & High-Availability Microsoft Corporation SESSION CODE: VIR303.
NetApp Confidential - Limited Use
Site A But what if there is a catastrophic event? Fire, flood, earthquake … Same Physical Location.
High Availability Options for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Shawn Scanlon, GSI.
Mecanismos de alta disponibilidad con Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Por: ISC Lenin López Fernández de Lara.
VERITAS Confidential Disaster Recovery – Beyond Backup Jason Phippen – Director Product and Solutions Marketing, EMEA.
1EMC CONFIDENTIAL—INTERNAL USE ONLY Overview of SQL Server 2012 High Availability and Disaster Recovery (HADR) Wei Fan Technical Partner Management – Microsoft.
1 Disk Based Disaster Recovery & Data Replication Solutions Gavin Cole Storage Consultant SEE.
Oracle Data Guard Ensuring Disaster Recovery for Enterprise Data
VMware vCenter Server Heartbeat – Overview. Why is VMware vCenter Availability Important? What Needs to be Protected? Protecting vCenter Server with vCenter.
June 23rd, 2009Inflectra Proprietary InformationPage: 1 SpiraTest/Plan/Team Deployment Considerations How to deploy for high-availability and strategies.
1 © Copyright 2010 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. EMC RecoverPoint/Cluster Enabler for Microsoft Failover Cluster.
Business Continuity and DR, A Practical Implementation Mich Talebzadeh, Consultant, Deutsche Bank
Module – 12 Remote Replication
1© Copyright 2011 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. EMC RECOVERPOINT/ CLUSTER ENABLER FOR MICROSOFT FAILOVER CLUSTER.
Implementing Failover Clustering with Hyper-V
National Manager Database Services
SharePoint Business Continuity Management with SQL Server AlwaysOn
Workflow Steps Perform a datacenter switchover for a database availability group Version 1.2 (Updated 12/2012)
11 SERVER CLUSTERING Chapter 6. Chapter 6: SERVER CLUSTERING2 OVERVIEW  List the types of server clusters.  Determine which type of cluster to use for.
Implementing High Availability
Microsoft Load Balancing and Clustering. Outline Introduction Load balancing Clustering.
Ronen Gabbay Microsoft Regional Director Yside / Hi-Tech College
Double-Take Software Overview A Platform for Recoverability.
But what if there is a catastrophic event? Fire, flood, earthquake …
Chapter 10 : Designing a SQL Server 2005 Solution for High Availability MCITP Administrator: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Database Server Infrastructure Design.
Module 12: Designing High Availability in Windows Server ® 2008.
Oracle10g RAC Service Architecture Overview of Real Application Cluster Ready Services, Nodeapps, and User Defined Services.
INSTALLING MICROSOFT EXCHANGE SERVER 2003 CLUSTERS AND FRONT-END AND BACK ‑ END SERVERS Chapter 4.
Failover Clustering & Hyper-V: Multisite Disaster Recovery
Hadoop Hardware Infrastructure considerations ©2013 OpalSoft Big Data.
DATABASE MIRRORING  Mirroring is mainly implemented for increasing the database availability.  Is configured on a Database level.  Mainly involves two.
SQLCAT: SQL Server 2012 AlwaysOn Lessons Learned from Early Customer Deployments Sanjay Mishra Program Manager Microsoft Corporation DBI360.
SQLCAT: SQL Server HA and DR Design Patterns, Architectures, and Best Practices Using Microsoft SQL Server 2012 AlwaysOn Sanjay Mishra Program Manager.
Elden Christensen Senior Program Manager Lead Microsoft Session Code: SVR319.
1 Week #10Business Continuity Backing Up Data Configuring Shadow Copies Providing Server and Service Availability.
11 CLUSTERING AND AVAILABILITY Chapter 11. Chapter 11: CLUSTERING AND AVAILABILITY2 OVERVIEW  Describe the clustering capabilities of Microsoft Windows.
Remote Data Mirroring Solutions for High Availability David Arrigo EMC Corporation
Alwayson Availability Groups
You there? Yes Network Health Monitoring Heartbeats are sent to monitor health status of network interfaces Are sent over all cluster.
Complete VM Mobility Across the Datacenter Server Virtualization Hyper-V 2012 Live Migrate VM and Storage to Clusters Live Migrate VM and Storage Between.
Failover Clustering & Hyper-V: Multi-Site Disaster Recovery Symon Perriman Technical Evangelist Microsoft
TRUE CANADIAN CLOUD Cloud Experts since The ORION Nebula Ecosystem.
1 CEG 2400 Fall 2012 Network Servers. 2 Network Servers Critical Network servers – Contain redundant components Power supplies Fans Memory CPU Hard Drives.
Virtual Machine Movement and Hyper-V Replica
© 2009 IBM Corporation Statements of IBM future plans and directions are provided for information purposes only. Plans and direction are subject to change.
SQL Server 2012: AlwaysOn HA and DR Design Patterns, and Lessons Learned from Early Customer Deployments Sanjay Mishra SQLCAT.
DISASTER RECOVERY PLAN By: Matthew Morrow. WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A DISASTER OCCURS  What happens to a business during a disaster?  What steps does a business.
What HADR Option(s) Are Right For You?. Where’s The AlwaysOn?
Deploying Highly Available SAP in the Cloud
Appendix B Advanced Topics in Exchange Server 2010.
All the things you need to know before setting up AlwaysOn Michael Steineke SQL & BI Solution Lead Enterprise Architect Concurrency, Inc.
AlwaysOn In SQL Server 2012 Fadi Abdulwahab – SharePoint Administrator - 4/2013
iSCSI Storage Area Network
ALWAYSON AVAILABILITY GROUPS
Considerations for operating MS SQL in the cloud, in production, DR, or hybrid scenarios. By Nick Rubtsov.
Navigating the options for Data Redundancy
Disaster Recovery Where to Begin
AlwaysOn Mirroring, Clustering
A Technical Overview of Microsoft® SQL Server™ 2005 High Availability Beta 2 Matthew Stephen IT Pro Evangelist (SQL Server)
SQL Server High Availability Amit Vaid.
VMware VM Replication for High Availability in Vembu VMBackup
Introduction to Clustering
Planning High Availability and Disaster Recovery
SpiraTest/Plan/Team Deployment Considerations
High Availability/Disaster Recovery Solution
Distributed Availability Groups
Designing Database Solutions for SQL Server
Presentation transcript:

Implementing Multi-Site Clusters April Trần Văn Huệ Nhất Nghệ CPLS

Overview of Multi-Site Clusters What Are Multi-Site Clusters? What Makes Multi-Site Clusters Unique? Why Use a Multi-Site Cluster? Evaluating the Business Need for a Multi-Site Cluster Storage Challenges for Multi-Site Clusters Synchronous / Asynchronous Replication? Network Challenges for Multi-Site Clusters Choosing the Appropriate Quorum Mode in Multi-Site Clusters Demo: Deploying a Multi-Site Cluster Agenda:

What Are Multi-Site Clusters? A multi-site cluster is a cluster that has been extended so that different nodes in the same cluster reside in separate physical locations Site A Site B SAN

What Makes Multi-Site Clusters Unique? Multiple storage arrays, which are independent in each site Nodes commonly access storage local to their own sites Storage is replicated between sites No “true” shared disk is visible to all nodes Site A Site B Changes are made on Site A and replicated to Site B Replica

Why Use a Multi-Site Cluster? Advantages over cold standby server in a disaster recovery site: Automatic failover Reduced downtime Lower complexity Reduced administrative overhead Automatic synchronization of application and cluster changes Better service continuity than cold standby servers Reduced human error factor Reduced reliance on old, potentially error-prone procedures

Evaluating the Business Need for a Multi-Site Cluster Because of increased cost and complexity, multi-site clusters aren’t for every company or application Evaluate the application type and importance, and consider available alternatives Plan for the application and hardware architecture, and for routine failover and failback testing

Storage Challenges for Multi-Site Clusters ChallengeDescription Requires a separate or third-party data replication solution Hardware (block level) storage-based replication Software (file system level) host-based replication Application-based replication (such as Exchange 2007 Cluster Continuous Replication) Can be either synchronous or asynchronous replication Synchronous: No acknowledgement of data changes made in Site A until the data is successfully written to Site B Asynchronous: Data changes made in Site A will eventually be written to the storage in Site B

What Is Synchronous Replication? When you use synchronous replication, the host receives a “write complete” response from the primary storage after the data is written successfully to both storage locations Primary Storage Secondary Storage Write Request Write Complete Replication Acknowledgement Data Site A Site B

What Is Asynchronous Replication? When you use asynchronous replication, the host receives a “write complete” response from the primary storage after the data is written successfully on the primary storage Primary Storage Secondary Storage Write Request Write Complete Replication Data Site A Site B

Comparing Synchronous and Asynchronous Replication Replication TypeDescription Synchronous Works across shorter distances Results in no data loss Requires high-bandwidth/low-latency connections Allows write latencies to impact performance AsynchronousStretches over longer distances Results in potential data loss on hard failure Assumes large enough bandwidth to keep up with data Does not significantly impact performance

Network Challenges for Multi-Site Clusters Inter-node communications are time sensitive; you might need to configure these thresholds to meet the higher WAN latency DNS replication might impact client reconnect times when failover is based on hostname Some applications might require all of the nodes to be in the same Active Directory site Active Directory replication latency might effect application data availability

Choosing the Appropriate Quorum Mode in Multi-Site Clusters Quorum ModeChoose when: Node and Disk Majority Directed by vendor only No Majority: Disk Only Directed by vendor only Node Majority Limited to two sites Node and File Share Majority Three sites are available

Using Node and File Share Majority in a Multi-Site Cluster File share witness allows a 2-node cluster with no shared disk Single file server can serve as the witness for multiple clusters Third-Party Replication Mechanism Site C File Share Witness SAN Site A Site B SAN WAN

Deploying a Multi-Site Cluster When deploying multi-site clusters: Ensure that the business requirements are met by the solution Use a hardware vendor to create a full solution for multi-site clusters Choose the correct quorum mode to properly maintain functionality in the event of failures Choose the correct storage replication solution to meet these needs

Demo Demo: Multi Site Cluster

Demo Private network: /16 Public network: /24 PC08: DC, Quorum IP: Datakeeper replicate PC09: IP: IP: PC10: IP: IP: Site 1 Site 2 Site 3