This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium This project is funded by the European Union Projekat finansira.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Information and Publicity in programming period.
Advertisements

Module N° 3 – ICAO SARPs related to safety management
European Commission - DG ENV.A CCA Dublin, Ireland CCA Workshop on Safety Reports Tobias Biermann European Commission Environment Directorate-General.
Introduction to Article 45 (5) of the CLP Regulation
Major Accident Prevention Policy (MAPP) and Safety Management System (SMS) in the Context of the Seveso II Directive.
Rule-Making Book II EU Administrative Procedures – The ReNEUAL Draft Model Rules 2014 Brussels, May th Herwig C.H. Hofmann University of Luxembourg.
Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
Jerevan November Tailing dams inspection Juliane Knaul Legal Expert, Agency of Mining, Geology and Minerals of Brandenburg, Germany AGENCY.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Scoping.
This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium This project is funded by the European Union Projekat finansira.
This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium This project is funded by the European Union Projekat finansira.
Enforcement of the Seveso II Directive Enforcement of the Seveso II Directive.
Making Aarhus work in international forums A workshop on promoting the application of the principles of the Aarhus Convention in international forums Geneva,
An Ocean of Opportunity: An integrated maritime policy for the EU 1 Places of refuge: General legal framework and developments within IMO and the EU Alexandros.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium This project is funded by the European Union Projekat finansira.
Seveso II in the UK Mark Maleham tel + 44 (0)
1 Inspection of LCPs: System for Inspection. ECENA Training Workshop Bristol, March 2008.
Joint European Commission – IMPEL Seminar on Environmental Inspections Wednesday 17 November 2010 Hotel Le Meredien, Brussels.
EuropeAid/131555/C/SER/RS Safety Procedures in the Chemical Industry Ernst SIMON, Styrian Regional Government, Austria Belgrade, December 2013.
Ship Recycling Facility Management System IMO Guideline A.962
EuropeAid/131555/C/SER/RS Major Accident Prevention Policy Safety Management System Ernst SIMON, Styrian Regional Government, Austria Belgrade, December.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
Opening seminar for the project “Implementation of the Seveso II Directive (96/82/EC)” Bratislava, Slovakia, April 2003 The “Seveso II” Directive.
This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium This project is funded by the European Union Projekat finansira.
Presentation 4: How can I know if nanomaterials are used in my workplace?
Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection, ROMANIA 1 BERCEN 1 st Exchange program – November 2002 Croatia PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS IN COOPERATION.
Regulatory requirements in the current programming period Funchal, 18 November 2010.
Romanian experience and lessons learnt implementing SEVESO Directive Francisc Senzaconi Magdalena Duta Ghergut.
Sub-regional Workshop on the Implementation of the Convention on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents Erevan, Armenia, March 2003 The.
EU Seveso II Directive Operators obligations & Competent Authorities duties 2.3 Activity workshop Angeliki Tsatsou Dritsa Chemist, TA Key Expert 2 Zagreb.
Jerzy Jendrośka Energy security and legal requirements for environmental protection, public involvement and transboundary co-operation Scientific support.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation – possible approaches and lessons learned from MS/NMS SEVESO II transposition and implementation – possible.
State of implementation of the decision III/6f regarding Ukraine (MOP 2, June, , 2008, Riga, Latvia)
“EU Directive Seveso II, 96/82/EC Transposed to HR legislation 2.3 Activity workshop Angeliki Tsatsou Dritsa Chemist, TA Key Expert 2 Zagreb June.
This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium This project is funded by the European Union Projekat finansira.
Recent developments in EU legislation relevant to the future development of article 6 of the Aarhus Convention European Commission, DG Environment, A2.
EU INITIATIVES ON MINING WASTE. Why an initiative on Mining Waste ? Key environmental issues: l Potential environmental risks during disposal m Safety.
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
The European SEA Directive Simon Marsden School of International Business, University of South Australia Module 1: Basics of SEA.
Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 providing for Minimum Criteria for Environmental Inspections in the Member.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Implementation of the SEVESO II Directive in the Czech Republic Karel Bláha, Pavel Forint Ministry of the Environment.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT meeting, 12 December 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry European Commission The New Legislative Framework - Market Surveillance UNECE “MARS” Group meeting Bratislava,
Twinning project ENEA – ENforcing Environmental Acquis Skopje, 19 th of November, 2015.
1 The Future Role of the Food and Veterinary Office M.C. Gaynor, Director, FVO EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate.
EuropeAid/131555/C/SER/RS Communication to the public Ernst SIMON, Styrian Regional Government, Austria Belgrade, December 2013.
Seveso II Review Stakeholder Consultation Meeting EPSC Position Richard Gowland Technical Director Manchester March
“EU Directive Seveso II, 96/82/EC Notification 2.3 Activity workshop Angeliki Tsatsou Dritsa Chemist, TA Key Expert 2 Zagreb June 2011.
Participation in the Process of Brownfield Regeneration Dagmar Petríková, Matej Jaššo „This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
Update on EU Issues 10 th March 2010 Manchester Conference Centre Health and Safety Executive Major Hazards Policy Team Paul Edwards.
Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Changes to emergency planning requirements SIESO, 13 May 2013 Christina Roberts, Chemical Industries.
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
Evaluation of restrictions: art. 15 and art TAIEX Seminar on the EU Service Directive, 3 May 2007 Carlos Almaraz.
IPA 2007 – Project funded by the European Union Seveso II Directive: Articles 11 & 13 External Emergency Plans and Public Information Tom Pine United Kingdom.
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Overview of public participation in strategic decision-making in the UNECE area David Aspinwall.
Vesa Tanner European Commission Directorate-General Energy
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Art. 17 EGTC Indicators 13th Meeting of the Expert Group on Delegated and Implementing Acts for the ESI Funds 4th July 2013.
Jill Michielssen European Commission, DG Environment
European Commission, DG Environment Air & Industrial Emissions Unit
Meeting of PAP/RAC Focal Points, Split, Croatia, 8-9 May 2019
HSE Requirements for Pipeline Operations GROUP HSE GROUPE (CR-GR-HSE-414) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This rule defines the minimum HSE requirements related to the.
Contingency Planning for Accidental Surface Water Pollution​ GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-705) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This rule sets specific requirements to be.
Presentation transcript:

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium This project is funded by the European Union Projekat finansira Evropska Unija TO WHOM DOES SEVESO APPLY SESSION 3B – ROLE AUTHORITIES/OPERATORS IKE VAN DER PUTTE

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium EU SEVESO II/III DIRECTIVE OPERATORS OBLIGATIONS & COMPETENT AUTHORITIES DUTIES

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium EU SEVESO II/III AIM (ARTICLE 1) Aim: prevention of major accidents involving dangerous substances limitation of consequences to man and the environment, with view to ensuring high level of protection for man and the environment through out the Community

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium EU SEVESO II/III AIM Two important parties to attain aims*: Operators/establishments Competent Authority/ies Efficient and transparent cooperation is imperative to achieve the objectives in areas concerning: Environment, Safety & Health, Civil Protection In SEVESO III also public participation in LUP (articles13 and 15)

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium SEVESO II/III ROLES OPERATES (ΟΝΕ ΟR MORE) ESTABLISHMENTS ACTIVITIES NOTIFIED TO CA SAFETY REPORT EVALUATED CONTAINS INSTALLATIONS & STORAGE INSTALLATION STORAGE OPERATOR ESTABLISHMENT NOTIFICATION Source IPA 2007: Croatia A. Dritsa

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium EU SEVESO II/III ESTABLISHMENTS Two categories of establishments based on substance quantities present: -Lower tier (lower category) -Upper tier (higher category) Hazard: intrinsic properties of chemicals Risk: substance hazards-quantities-paths and duration of exposure-population affected R = ƒ (quality of hazard, quantity of hazard, exposure to hazard)

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium EU SEVESO II/III AIM: PREVENTION All operators (Upper and Lower tier) requirements General obligations Notification Major Accident Prevention Policy-MAPPP Update controls in case of modifications Be available for inspection by the Competent Authority/ies) For Upper tier only Safety Report Safety Management System

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium EU SEVESO II/III AIM: LIMITATION OF CONSEQUENCES For all operators: Info for Land use Planning, when establishing MAPP/Safety Report take in account establishments where Domino effect may be initiated. For Upper tier Emergency Planning Information to the Public

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium SEVESO II/III OPERATOR OBLIGATIONS (1) Art.5/5: Prove to competent Authority, at any time, that all necessary measures as specified in the Directive have been taken Art.6/7: Submit Notification to competent Authority with information on the establishment and dangerous chemicals present Art. 7/8+ Annex III/III: Draw up Major Accident Prevention Policy - MAPPP

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium OPERATOR OBLIGATIONS (2) Art. 9/10 + Annex II/II: Prepare Safety Report including Safety Management System (Upper tier only) and submit to competent Authority Art. 10/11: Review/Revise MAPP and Safety Report in the event of Modification of establishments Article 11/12+Annex IV/IV: Draw up Internal Emergency Plans Art. 14/16: Supply information to competent Authority following a major accident in proper manner

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium SEVESO II/III COMPETENT AUTHORITIES DUTIES (1) Art.6/6: Require Notification from Operator Art.8/9: Identify establishments potent of causing Domino effects Art.9/10: Examine Safety Report Make decision to allow or prohibit use of establishment Communicate conclusions to operator

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium COMPETENT AUTHORITIES DUTIES (2) Art. 11/12+Annex IV/IV: Draw up External Emergency Plans for measures outside establishment Art.12/13: Implement Policy on Land Use Planning,when new establishments sited, modification of existing and new developments adjacent Art.13/14+Annex IV/V : Supply information to the public regularly/electronically, spontaneously and appropriately, on the basis of information on Safety Measures provided by Operator

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium COMPETENT AUTHORITIES DUTIES (3) Art. 15/18 : Supply information to the Commission following major accidents Art. 17/19: Prohibiting from or bringing into use establishments and supplying information to the Commission accordingly upon action only 2 reasons: 1safety measures taken by the operator are seriously deficient 2no submission of Notification (Art. 6/6), Safety Report (Art. 9/10) or other information by the Operator

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium COMPETENT AUTHORITIES DUTIES (4) Art.18/20: Organize system of inspections or other measures of control appropriate to establishment concerned (min 1x/y for UT and 1x/3y LT unless based on systematic appraisal MAHs) Art. 19/21: Exchange information with Commission on experience acquired on major accidents & incidents occurred and 3-yearly report on the implementation.

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium COMPETENT AUTHORITIES DUTIES (5) Art. 21and 22/27: Seveso II Committee of Competent Authorities (CCA) for: - regulatory procedures, adaptation to technical progress - exchanging information with the Commission - providing guidance

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium Operators draw up Major Accident Prevention Policy (MAPP). Lower tier est. make MAPP available to CA anytime and during inspections. Upper tier est. include it in Safety Report Operators’ aims & measures to control hazards as per the Safety Management System: organisation identification/evaluation of major hazards operational control management of change planning for emergencies performance monitoring audit and review MAPP: An obligation for all Operators

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium SAFETY REPORT: AN OBLIGATION FOR UPPER TIER ESTABLISHMENTS Minimum Information contained in Safety Report Information on Major Accident Prevention Policy (MAPP) and on Safety Management Systems (SMS) environment of the establishment description of the installation (s) in the establishment: identification and accidental risks analysis and prevention methods measures of protection and intervention to limit the consequences of an accident Information on land-use planning

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium CONCLUSIONS Both parts aim at preventing accidents and protecting man and the environment The Industry does so by being active and CAs do so by being proactive Their cooperation is imperative for achieving the aim

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium Seveso Directive 2012/18/EU on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous Substances - SEVESO III Seveso III Main purpose – align scope to new international chemicals classification (CLP Regulation transposing GHS classification) Clarify/improve - Inspections - Information to the public - Public participation - Access to justice Main philosophy Seveso II remains

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium Inspections – Art 20 Inspection plan (National, Regional or Local) covering all Seveso establishments, to include general safety assessment info on domino-effects info on particular external risks/hazards procedures for routine/non-routine inspections cooperation between inspection authorities Based on this, competent authority to establish programmes for routine inspections including frequency of site visits

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium Inspections – Art 20 One year (UT)/three year (LT) frequency Unless inspection programme is based on a systematic appraisal of major-accident hazards Systematic appraisal based on (1) potential impact on health and environment and (2) compliance (Note IMPEL: IRAM Easy Tools model) Conclusions sent to operator within 4 months – action! No action may lead to prohibition/closure Additional inspection in 6 months if serious non compliance

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium SEVESO III - Domino Effect Article 9 - Competent authority to identify domino effect also by actively requesting additional information inform operators Article 20 – inspection plan to include lists of establishments with potential domino effect Article 24 – Commission may develop guidance on safety distance and domino effect Annex IV(2)(e) domino effect has to be considered in external emergency plans

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium Land Use Planning - Art 13 Notion of appropriate safety distance For areas of natural sensitivity, other relevant measures can be taken Operators to provide sufficient information on the risks (lower-tier upon request) Public consultation – better procedures and coordination possible with procedures under EIA and SEA Directives

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium Information – Art 14, Annex V All establishments (also LT) - Annex V information permanently available electronically dangerous substances appropriate behaviour in case of an accident last site visit (inspection) or electronic reference indication where more info can be obtained upon request UT - inform on main accident scenarios measures UT - appropriate info from external emergency plans UT - inform if establishment close to other Member State

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium For upper-tier establishments, Member States shall also ensure that: (a)all persons likely to be affected by a major accident receive regularly and in the most appropriate form, without having to request it, clear and intelligible information on safety measures and requisite behaviour in the event of a major accident ; Article 14- Information to the Public: active provision of information – not just on request! Information shall include at least ANNEX V info and supplied to all Buildings and areas of public use (schools, hospitals, neighbouring Establishments)

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium Information - confidentiality Article 22: Any information held by competent authorities - available upon request - in line with Directive 2003/4/EC = strict procedural rules and refusal only for limited Grounds (under Seveso II only safety report and inventory of substances in case of UT)- intellectual property/security? Article 17(e): Competent authorities to inform persons likely to be affected when an accident has happend

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium Public participation – Art 15 Article 15 – sets/refers to detailed procedural rules in relation to participation in land use planning specific individual projects (rules set) general plans and programmes (reference to Directive 2003/35/EC) = inform public, duly take into account comments and motivate final decision Article 12(5) - public concerned must be given early opportunity to give its opinion on external emergency plans

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium Access to justice - Art 23 Administrative AND judicial review of acts/omissions in relation to requests for any information held under the directive At least judicial review of acts/omissions in relation to cases of public participation on specific individual projects No access to justice in relation to public participation on general plans and programmes/external emergency plans, unless otherwise provided under national law

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium References COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances(OJ L 10, , p. 13) – consolidated version DIRECTIVE 2012/18/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 4 July 2012 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, amending and subsequently repealing Council Directive 96/82/EC