SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. The alignment with national plans. The four missions of higher education institutions. AU uniqueness and identities. AU academic excellence. SWOT analysis.
Advertisements

EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
The HR Paradigm Shift Discover Stakeholder Value for the Human Resources Function.
The Trust School Programme is a transformational programme which aims to provide equitable access to excellent education for all Malaysian children and.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Enrollment Management and Student Affairs at Portland State University Enrollment Management and Student Affairs is a student-centered organization, dedicated.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Alexandria, 2005 NQAAC Quality Assurance and Accreditation for Higher Education Dr. Salwa EL Magoli National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee.
The Role of the National Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditation (NAQAAE) in Egyptian Education   The National Authority for Quality Assurance.
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
Academic Planning and Budget Building Meeting 3. * The current model we use must change to meet current as well as new and emerging client and community.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
College Strategic Plan by
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
WASC Accreditation Standards and Process August 31, 2006.
By Assoc. Prof. Teay Shawyun, Ph.D. Strategic Development of Quality Management System within the SPMS (Strategic Performance Management System)
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
EVIDENCE THAT CONSTITUTE A “GOOD PRACTICE IN THE EVALUATION OF POLICIES Education Commission of the States National Center for Learning and Citizenship.
2013 Annual Strategic Action Plan Evaluation. Overview Background Role of SAP Implementation Evaluation process Council feedback Enhancement of SAP.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Charlene M. L. Roach & Gloria Davis-Cooper 34 th Teaching Public Administration Conference 2011 Panel Democratic Learning Experiences.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Welcoming Address Rev. Bancha Saenghiran, f.s.g., Ph.D. Vice President for Academic Affairs Assumption University.
Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.
Strategic Planning and AdvancEd Accreditation In partnership with Quality New Mexico Taos NMSBA Leadership Conference July 13, 2012.
The UWF Strategic Planning Facilitators Robert Dugan, Jim Hurd, Kyle Marrero, Dottie Minear, Stacie Whinnery, and Josh Finley The University of West Florida.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Serving: What does the learner demand of us? Process: What processes do we need to master in order to serve our population? Development: What competencies.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Think Academics: Academic Visioning David Marker Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
East Carolina University’s Conceptual Framework for Preparing Education Professionals.
Committee Meeting, June 9, 2008 Strategic Institutional Research Plan.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Au: Our Aspirations and Perspirations By Rev. Bro. Bancha Saenghiran, Ph.D. April 6, 2005 Mission Hill, Nakornratchasima.
ENCHASE “ENHANCING ALBANIAN SYSTEM OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION: APPLICATION OF THE PROCESS AND OUTCOME BASED METHODOLOGY ”
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Strategic Planning Linked to Long Range Planning Presentation to Faculty and Staff February 13-14, 2008
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Re-affirmation of accreditation in
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
Institutional development and evaluation 09. June 2016.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Measuring Course Quality: Development of a Micro-Analysis Tool
Columbus state university
February 21-22, 2018.
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
University of Nizwa.
A Workshop for New Academic Administrators
Presentation transcript:

SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008

Four Core Elements 1.Identify the “gap,” 2.Feedback, 3.Involvement of personnel, and 4.Performing progressions.

“Gap” Current Status Goal Current Status Goal

Feedback Feedback at two levels (i) Peers or SAR (ii) Internal Audit The feedback should inform what the next step in performing should be. ∴ Feedback provide clear, descriptive, criterion-based information that indicates to the unit where it stands, and what it differs from the desired goal, and how they can move forward

Involvement The improvement of the unit depends on the active involvement of the members of the unit in their own assessment  Develop a shared understanding of the current status, and  What need to be done to move forward  Then, develop strategies and tactics to meet the needs.

Progressions The exercise of SAR & Internal Audit must be linked to performing progression. The performing progression should clearly articulate the goals & sub-goals that constitute progress toward the ultimate goal. The members of the unit must have short-term goals. Success criteria provide the framework within which formative assessment takes place and make possible the interpretation of evidence.

Conclusion The members should have:  Concept  Knowledge, and  Skill of SAR

AU Strategic Plan

Strategic Planning  Environment (i) External (ii) Internal : Au World Thailand

7 Factors Affecting Thai Higher Education Demography Energy & Environment Employment Decentralization Conflict & Violence Post- Modernization Sufficiency Economy

9 Internal Factors Affecting Higher Education  links between higher education and other levels of education,  current solutions to higher education,  governance and management,  development of national competitiveness,  higher education financing,  development of faculty and staff in higher education,  higher education networks,  development of higher education in the southern part of Thailand, and  basic learning structure

Strategic Questions What will Au be 15 years from now ? Where do we go from here ? How do we get there ?

10 Accreditations Criteria of Institution  Mission and Goal of the University, School or Program  Teaching and Learning  Student Development  Research  Faculty and Staff Development  Academic Services  Preservation of Art and Culture  Administration and Management  Finance and Budget  Quality Assurance System

AU Strategic Plan 2003 – 2020

Au Phases of Development  Phase I : Stabilization ( )  Phase II : Raise the Bar of Quality ( )  Phase III : Attain Excellence ( )

( ) Au Strategic Planning ( )

Au Strategic Plan  Phase I : Stabilization ( ) Building, Strengthening, and Stabilizing Au Foundation leading to “Education Excellence”  Phase II : Raise the Bar of Quality ( ) Achieving “Education Excellence” by Raising the Bar of Quality  Phase III : Attain Excellence ( ) Attaining “Education Excellence” through national and international benchmarking

Translation of Strategic Plan  Themes: 1.Teaching and Learning 2.Academic and Research Achievement 3.Stakeholders-University Engagement 4.Resources 5.Processes 6.High-Performing Organization

Theme 1 : Theme 1 : Teaching and Learning P1 1.1 AU will create a positive learning environment that enables students to achieve their full academic potential and to cultivate their personal development. P1 1.2 AU will create a curriculum meeting the highest standards of excellence across the University. P1 1.3 AU will develop a system for academic advising that meets the needs of the students and leads to academic success. P2 1.4 AU’s program develops strong students’ competency of knowledge and skills and effectively prepare students as competent and ethical citizens. P2 1.5 AU will continually improve and innovate on the quality of our program offerings and their delivery and link it to the National Qualification Framework at all levels. P2 1.6 AU will include more international aspects in its curriculum context and content. Strategic Goals

Theme 2 : Theme 2 : Academic and Research Achievement P1 2.1 AU will develop a culture of assessment and evidence-based decision-making across all units in the University. P1 2.2 AU will develop mechanisms to ensure that teaching and learning across the University system, are consistent at the minimum standard of CHE and ONESQA level. P1 2.3 AU graduates and alumni should be recognized leaders in their respective careers. P1 2.4 AU will maintain an emphasis on research as an important component of the teaching mission of the university. P2 2.5 AU will develop mechanisms to ensure that teaching and learning across the University system, are consistent at the minimum standard of TQA level. P2 2.6 AU will initiate and implement interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary research.

Theme 3 : Theme 3 : Stakeholders-University Engagement P1 3.1 AU will develop relationships with community, business and industry and stakeholders. P2 3.2 AU will develop closer effective partnerships with the University’s local, national and international communities and strategic partners.

Theme 4 : Resources P1 4.1 AU will operate planning and review processes that drive achievement of the University’s strategic objectives. P1 4.2 AU will maintain the University’s Commitment to Financial Sustainability P1 4.3 AU will provide an infrastructure that supports teaching, learning, and research of the highest quality. P1 4.4 AU will identify areas of wasted resources and alleviate the concerns so that institutional assets can be used to educate, to research, and to serve the stakeholders and to achieve greater academic and administrative efficiencies throughout the university system. P2 4.5 AU will ensure that the effectiveness and efficiency established in Phase 1 is sustained through university wide use of ICT to support its academic and administrative works.

Theme 5 : Processes P1 5.1 AU will make a concerted university wide effort to achieve an annual growth rate of full-time equivalent students. P1 5.2 AU will identify its traditions, values, culture and other identifiers (academic programs, services, etc.) to create an institutional identity. P1 5.3 AU will provide technologies that will meet and enhance the instructional, administrative and research requirements of faculty, staff and students with a stakeholders’ centered quality strive. P1 5.4 AU will have each school develop or update its own strategic plan by May of each academic year to ensure that it includes the steps necessary to attain or maintain superior academic status by the year P2 5.5 AU will create a distinctive international educational experience for AU students through a blended Thai and Intenrational culture. P2 5.6 AU will nurture the personal and intellectual growth of students by building community in social, civic, and academic realms. P2 5.7 AU will create a community and stakeholders’ centered public service culture.

Theme 6 : Theme 6 : High-Performing Organization P1 6.1 AU will create an academic culture that promotes and rewards higher faculty and students interactions through a clear and open line of communication. P1 6.2 AU will create, maintain and sustain a conducive teaching, learning and research environment that support stakeholders as human assets to reach their full potential. P1 6.3 AU will continuously develop its human resources by focusing on academic and administrative staff development and performance expectations. P2 6.4 AU will maximize the effectiveness of human resources by focusing on academic and administrative staff development and performance expectations. P2 6.5 AU will strive to develop its human capital, information capital and organization capital to be strategic capital assets of AU.

Education Excellence Theme 1: Teaching & Learning Theme 2: Academic & Research Achievement Theme 3: Stakeholders- University Engagement Theme 4: Resources Theme 6: High-Performing Organization Theme 5: Processes

Action Plan  Develop 5-year Plan 1-year Plan Budget  Understand the Au Strategic Plan  Align Strategic Plan Annual Reports SAR Internal Audit Reports of