Higher Education Access Tracker Helping member universities to target, monitor and evaluate outreach programmes Sharon Smith - Director of HEAT project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Una Bennett, Head of MIAP 17 th March 2010 Update to UCAS/MIAP Consultation Event.
Advertisements

Introduction to Impact Assessment
Using data and case studies to inform and change admissions policy and practice Michael Hill Kingston University June 2003.
Evaluating and Measuring Impact Presented by – Date –
Briefing for Governors: Performance in Leeds and the role of governors in improving outcomes Children’s Performance Service March 2014.
Pan Wales Hair & Beauty Network Learning Area Programmes Fran Hopwood.
Ofsted and the inspection of further education and skills
Tackling the issue of 17+ participation, attainment and progression: the role of study programmes Ann Hodgson and Ken Spours.
Joining the dots Supporting & challenging your school Governor Dashboard 1 Paul Charman Director of Strategy & Operations, FFT Chair of Governors, Dyson.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Exploring the impact of involvement in NCSL activity on school improvement Pam Sammons and Qing Gu University of Nottingham School of Education University.
Philippa Wilding and Pat Webb How to demonstrate the impact of pupil premium funding with SIMS.
S-STEM Program Evaluation S-STEM PI Meeting Arlington, VA October 2012.
Hugh Joslin, Director, Kent and Medway Lifelong Learning Network, University of Greenwich; Sharon Smith, Research & Evaluation Manager, Aimhigher Kent.
Joining the dots Closing the Gap Getting a better understanding of the data 1 Mike Treadaway, FFT.
Use of Data At start of each academic year, HODs are provided with the following data GCE and GCSE Broadsheets and summaries Residual data for courses,
Destinations What do you aim to achieve through the publication of destination measures? We have made it very clear that we want to put more information.
The Study Programme Guide for ITE students The Study Programme Guide for ITE students “The aim of Study Programmes is to maximise the potential.
Lessons from Ofsted ITE Inspection overview 2009/10 WMCETT Forum Professional Dialogue seminar 1 st November 2010 Jill Hardman.
LINKING LONDON ACCESS TO HE PRACTITIONER FORUM MARCH 2015 Supporting the learner journey.
ESRC SEMINAR SERIES Higher Vocational Education and Pedagogy HIVE PED A Methodology for Tracking the Progression of Vocational Learners Dr Suzie.
The new competitive environment: How can the use of contextual data aid fair admissions SPA event 19 June 2012 Janet Graham, Director of SPA.
Curriculum and Performance Measures ….an update.  Changes to content and assessment at every Key Stage  Key changes coming up  Possible considerations:
Click to edit Master title style Introduction to the Association of Colleges and The Post 16 Landscape in the UK Issues, Aspirations and Good Practice.
What is an effective induction (within an academic context) and how do you implement it across the whole university or college? Michael Hill Action on.
Widening Participation - the role of universities Jean Baxter Head of School and College Services.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Year 7 Settling – in Evening. Assessment Process and Ability Grouping.
14 – 24 Learning and Skills Strategy (24) KCC / YPLA Strategy & Funding Briefing 14 – 24 Learning and Skills Strategy Delivering Bold Steps A new.
Qualifications Information Review CONSULTATION | 2012 QIR Consultation.
Local Work Kent & Medway Progression Federation Lisa Clements.
Evaluation and Impact of Entrepreneurial Education and Training Malcolm Maguire Transnational High Level Seminar on National Policies and Impact of Entrepreneurship.
The Learner Achievement Tracker (LAT)
Widening Participation in Higher Education: A Quantitative Analysis Institute of Education Institute for Fiscal Studies Centre for Economic Performance.
EYFS – and the OFSTED Framework Sue Monypenny Senior Education Standards and Effectiveness Officer.
CLOSING THE GAPS – REDUCING INEQUALITIES IN OUTCOMES FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE BIRMINGHAM ACHIEVEMENT GROUP SEMINAR DECEMBER 2008 JOHN HILL RESEARCH.
Recognition of Prior Learning for Individuals and Organisations Andy Gibbs October 2013.
NCGE International Entrepreneurship Educators Conference Session A: Where are we now? A Reflection of the UK Paul D. Hannon National Council.
14 – 16 Curriculum Seminar The impact of recent DfE changes on curriculum planning and outcomes for schools.
Key Stage 4 and Key Stage 5 Destination Measures 1 KS4 and KS5 Learner Destinations Stakeholder Group 03 October 2011.
Effective Data Sharing Research Project Linking London; Newham Sixth form College.
ESSENTIAL SKILLS FOR LIVING Patricia Cochrane 24 February 2015.
Working in Partnership for a Greater Manchester North West Youth Employment Convention The Studio, Manchester 23 November 2011 Wendy Cooke Assistant Director.
The Coseley School A Co-operative Trust Closing the Gap Strategies – 2015/16 Believe, Achieve, Excel Closing the Gap Strategies – 2015/16 Believe, Achieve,
restricted external Evaluating the vinspired 24/24 programme Ewan King, director OPM 30 September
HEAT Infographics Training  Setup and review infogram web-tool  Practice generating graphics from sample data  Customising graphics in PowerPoint 
Updates Changes to the accountability measures for 2016 Pupil premium features in East Sussex secondary schools in 2013 Changes to RAISE for 2014 FFT developments.
Using data across the student life-cycle to inform student success provision Mike Kerrigan, Schools, Colleges & Community Outreach 10 th December 2015.
SEF Describing good or better achievement and standards What is laid down, ordered, factual is never enough to embrace the whole truth: life spills over.
Categories Library Analytics Questions Improve individual student performance - user stories from (e..g staff, employers, parents, learners) that generate.
Estimating Effects and Inferring Implications 2016 Academic Academy Sacramento, CA Terrence Willett Senior Consulting Researcher RP Group.
A case study. Content School context Challenges Outcomes Curriculum pathways What works in our context Process Ofsted & progression to HE – a view.
16-19 Accountability Measures. When Outcomes from summer 2016 (for students on 2 year courses). That is enrolments September First publication:
Monitoring Attainment and Progress from September 2016 John Crowley Senior Achievement Adviser.
Governor Data Training. Secondary National Standards National Floor Standards 5 A*-C including English and maths above 40% rising to 50% in Progress.
Hertfordshire County Council The Role of the Secondary Assessment Co-ordinator Day One 5 th July 2005.
Building an evidence base of the impact of researcher development activities Dr. Tony Bromley University of Leeds Co-ordinator Vitae Y&NE Hub Member, Rugby.
SUPPORTING VOCATIONAL LEARNERS INTO HE KIRAN RAMI – UXBRIDGE COLLEGE.
Theory, Practice & Impact in Widening Participation
English and Maths Strategy (overview)
Fair access to higher education: where are we now and what’s next?
The geography of higher education access and participation
Approaches to quantitative analysis on student performance
Year 7 Target Setting and Assessment Evening.
The Care Leaver Progression Partnership Kent & Medway
Access, success and progression in the OfS
To RCT, or not RCT: that is the question
Andrew Jenkins and Rosalind Levačić
Times they are changing: Evaluating outreach in a new era
WP Research and Evaluation Manager
Presentation transcript:

Higher Education Access Tracker Helping member universities to target, monitor and evaluate outreach programmes Sharon Smith - Director of HEAT project Visit:

Higher Education Access Tracker Session:  About HEAT  The Heat track – what is this?  HEAT track outcomes  Challenges: analysis and findings for impact evidence

 Aimhigher legacy database and datasets  Developed by the sector  Members with common aims: Share monitoring and evaluation costs and avoid duplication Share best practice and collaborate in research Provide fit for purpose tools and information Building evidence Targeting Target Setting MonitoringEvaluatingPlanning HEAT History Higher Education Access Tracker Service

HEAT Outputs Higher Education Access Tracker Service Targeting Delivery planning Monitoring Evaluation Individual HEI and Collaborative delivery Student life cycle monitoring Database Advisory Data repository Reporting tool DfE Data Service (ILR) UCAS HESA School and college profiles KS4 and KS5 UCAS applicant KS4 and KS5 trends UCAS institution trends UCAS track HESA track Participant profile Activity delivery Targeting Delivery planning Monitoring Evaluation Reporting 1 Qualitative Research data collection for a common evaluation framework Student life cycle monitoring Database Datasets HEAT track: Participant Tracking Advisory HEAT

Higher Education Access Tracker Service Higher than predicted points Achieved 3 levels of progress Achieved 5 A*-C including English and Maths KS4 (DfE) Achieved 3 A Levels Higher than predicted points KS5 (DfE) Achieved Level 3 qualification (including work-based) FE (SFA) Applied to HE Accepted HE UCAS HE entry HE achievement DLHE PG study HE (HESA & SFA) National context HEAT track – quantitative measures for longitudinal analysis Input from HEAT HEIs Learner attitudes and aspirations Learner outreach engagement Learner Characteristics

Higher Education Access Tracker Service Linking data without a unique reference Fuzzy matching (HESA) NamesSurnamePostcodeDOBStrengthComment YYYYVeryShould be a match YNYYStrongPossible marriage or parents divorce YYNYFairlyStrong when names are rare and distance between postcodes is small NYYYFairlyCould be twins YYYNWeakUnless birth dates are similar e.g. day and month swapped or typo YNNYWeakUnless names are rare and distance between postcodes is small YNYNWeakStrong when names are rare and birth dates are similar

Non-participants In HEAT schools All students in HEAT schools HEAT Participants Higher Education Access Tracker Service Key findings from HEAT track …Comparing achievement in 2010/11: Percentage of students awarded 5 A*-C (including English and Maths)… HEAT Students AverageNational AverageHEAT Schools …Comparing achievement in 2010/11: Percentage of students awarded 5 A*-C (including English and Maths)… HEAT Students AverageNational AverageHEAT Schools 55% 68% 46% …Comparing % of 2010/11 students achieving expected progression from KS2 to KS4 with a focus upon English… Non-Heat students …Comparing % of 2010/11 students achieving expected progression from KS2 to KS4 with a focus upon English… Non-Heat students Non-participants In HEAT schools All students in HEAT schools …KS4 attainment - capped score… HEAT Participants

Achieved 1 st / 2:1 (HEAT) 62% Achieved 1 st /2:1 (national) 60% Ended up level group % Moved up from 4-8 to % Destinations of HEAT cohort after HE (NS-SEC levels) Looking at Polar v3 only… Higher Education Access Tracker Service Key findings from HEAT track National Q1-2 YPR 25% 32% HEAT Q1-2 YPR Comparing HEAT YPR to the national average [2011/2012]… National Q1-2 YPR 25% 32% HEAT Q1-2 YPR HEAT participant success rates Success, attainment & employment destinations… Achieved first degree 84% Achieved 1 st or 2:1 64% HEAT participants [2007/2013] National average [2006/07] Achieved first degree 82% Achieved 1 st or 2:1 65% HEAT participant success rates Success, attainment & employment destinations… Achieved first degree 84% Achieved 1 st or 2:1 64% HEAT participants [2007/2013] National average [2006/07] Achieved first degree 82% Achieved 1 st or 2:1 65% High intensity activity …and the value of intensive WP activity… 42% YPR Low intensity activity 37% YPR High intensity activity …and the value of intensive WP activity… 42% YPR Low intensity activity 37% YPR Achieved 1 st / 2:1 (HEAT) 62% Achieved 1 st /2:1 (national) 60% Ended up level group % Moved up from 4-8 to % Destinations of HEAT cohort after HE (NS-SEC levels) Looking at Polar v3 only… Comparing HEAT YPR to the national average [2011/2012]…

Higher Education Access Tracker Service  Participant and Activity variation  Intensity – intensive for one may not be intensive for another  differing effects and impact depending on the individual  differing “starting” points for individuals – in terms of social, cultural and educational capital  Data evidence has to take into consideration differing capital baselines (see work of NERUPI at Bath)  Introducing a HEAT participant classification system Evaluation challenges Meaningful accurate data Longitudinal PPP Comparators and control groups Context

Higher Education Access Tracker Service HEAT participant classification system Aspiration Academic Attainment Progression to HE Indicators: Q1&2 (POLAR) FSM (DfE) First Gen. HE (HEAT) Acorn Group (CACI) Indicators: KS4 Attainment (DfE) KS4 position in relation to school average (DfE) KS5 Attainment (DfE) Indicator: Progression data (HESA) HEAT Group 1 Low Attainment Low Aspiration Starting Cohort: All Activity Participants Low Attainment : Those who have not achieved 5 or more GCSE and equivalents at grades A*-C (Level 2) including GCSE English and Maths. Those below school KS4 average (level to be decided). Low Aspiration (by proxy): FSM or Q1&2 or First Generation HE or Acorn group (to be decided) HEAT Group 2 Low Attainment High Aspiration HEAT Group 3 High Attainment Low Aspiration HEAT Group 4 High Attainment High Aspiration Progression to HE Indicators: Q1&2 (POLAR) FSM (DfE) First Gen. HE (HEI survey) Acorn Group (CACI) Survey data (HEI survey) Indicators: KS4 Attainment (DfE) KS4 position in relation to school average (DfE) KS5 Attainment (DfE) Indicator: Progression data (HESA) HEAT Group 1 Low Attainment Low Aspiration Low Attainment : Those who have not achieved 5 or more GCSE and equivalents at grades A*-C (Level 2) including GCSE English and Maths. Those below school KS4 average (level to be decided). Low Aspiration (by proxy): FSM or Q1&2 or First Generation HE or Acorn group (to be decided) HEAT Group 2 Low Attainment High Aspiration HEAT Group 3 High Attainment Low Aspiration HEAT Group 4 High Attainment High Aspiration Aspiration?/ Social or Cultural or Economic Capital?/ Academic Attainment/ Educational capital

Higher Education Access Tracker Service We want to hear from you…  Collaborative research? Specific groups, themes  Test methodology?  Common evaluation questions across members  Please contact Sharon Smith or Anna Anthony on