The GNWT Action Plan – The Levelton Report Jan 18, 2011 Yellowknife 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Quality Plans Gillian Sandilands Director of Quality
Advertisements

FCMAT Response & Preparation: Process Outline October 25, 2006.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan Evaluation February 16, 2005.
Sharing Good Practice in Quality
Ensure Vendor/Engineer of Choice Product Quality
Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 2011 Advantage Program.
Samuel Steel Safety Group Meeting Four November 14, 2013 Samuel Safety Systems.
Senior Stakeholder Forum 04/02/2014. Agenda UK-Link Programme Update –Including Data Cleansing Update Nexus Modification Update Faster Switching EU Reform.
Contractor Safety Management
ICAO Provisions for Safety Management
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
1 14. Project closure n An information system project must be administratively closed once its product is successfully delivered to the customer. n A failed.
1 Assessment: Audits. Assessment: Audits - Module 9 2 Learning Objectives At the end of this activity, you will be able to: Develop a process to prepare.
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Route 110 over Route 27 Design-Build Project (PIN , D900027) Town of Babylon, Suffolk County Request.
© The Association of Independent Schools of NSW Preparing for the ASQA Audit.
Purpose of the Standards
QC/QA and the establishment of the Portuguese National System Workshop on QC/QA of GHG Inventories and the establishment of National Inventory Systems.
Conducting the IT Audit
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
REVIEW AND QUALITY CONTROL
EAST DON TRAIL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Project Overview Ward 31 Ravine Meeting November 4, :00 to 9:00 p.m. Presteign-Woodbine United Church.
9 Closing the Project Teaching Strategies
PTCS Service Provider Review 0 Background RTF assumed responsibility for maintaining PTCS specifications in March 2003  Developed PTCS Service Provider.
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
National Disability Advocacy Program (NDAP) Quality Assurance (QA) – report on the FaHCSIA trial.
Presented to: SBAS Technical Interoperability Working Group Date: 21 June 2005 Federal Aviation Administration Certification of the Wide Area Augmentation.
NIST Special Publication Revision 1
Executive Session Director’s CD-3b Review of the MicroBooNE Project January 18, 2012 Dean Hoffer.
Practice Management Quality Control
Fleming College Quality and Risk Management Review Summary November 10, 2005.
@2002 Copyright, Itreya Technologies CMMI kick off July 2005.
Fleming College Quality and Risk Management Review Summary February 2, 2006.
S15: Supervision and review. Objective of supervision and review  To ensure that the audit is done efficiently and effectively so that the audit opinion.
S&I Standards Organization Engagement & Communication Plan DRAFT Standards Support Team 1 September 2011.
Tier I: Module 5 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Element 4: Verification & Certification.
Standards and Interoperability Framework Primer of S&I Phases, Procedures, and Functions.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Audit Program - The Audit Process.
SOLUTION What kind of plan do we need? How will we know if the work is on track to be done? How quickly can we get this done? How long will this work take.
Next steps for GNC Strategy Development.
Development through partnership Infrastructure Delivery Management Toolkit: 2010 Edition Delivery Process 2: Project Management 1.
New Jersey Department of Corrections
UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM t Selection and Employment of Consultants Negotiations with Consultants; Monitoring Performance of Consultants; Resolving Disputes.
1 Chapter 8 karvaytMélKMerag nig kareFVIr)aykarN_ nig karbiTKMerag Project Evaluation, Reporting, and Termination.
LAT-PR GLAST LAT ProjectManufacturing Readiness Review, Oct. 12, 2005 LAT Test Stand Manufacturing Readiness Review 1.Introduction Bill Olson.
29 th May Agenda 9.15 Arrival – Tea/Coffee served 9.30 Breakfast served 9.45 The importance of the Framework within the world of Service Companies
Collaborating for Quality Quality Assurance (QA) & Quality Control (QC) in the Accelerator Project (ACCSYS) Matthew Conlon ACCSYS QA/QC
Accident Investigation SGRP CD Slide # Meeting 1 Northern Ontario Safety Group.
Collaborating for Quality through the Project Quality Plan Matthew Conlon ESS ACCSYS QA/QC Quality Learning & Planning.
QUALITY ASSURANCE MODULE 3. Definitions Quality Assurance - A process/effort that ensures that processes are followed, that the processes of doing right.
Change Management V.N.Bhaskar Rao Engineering & Construction Director Amec Foster Wheeler India Operations.
ALLPIRG/4 MEETING PARTICIPANTS (Montreal , 8 February 2001)
Self Identified Issues
Description of Revision
Change Assurance Dashboard
Engineering Waiver Management
Project Development Quality Program QA/QC – What does ODOT need?
Amendment Invoice Task Force Progress Report
Role and Responsibility for Quality Assurance Vishnu P. Shrestha
Emulsion Task Force Meeting
Amendment Invoice Task Force Progress Report
Quality Assurance for Emulsified Asphalt Surface Treatments
Far Experimental Hall Hutches Civil Construction
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
Amendment Invoice Task Force Progress Report
Executive Project Kickoff
Software Reviews.
DSC Contract Management Committee Meeting
Role and Responsibility for Quality Assurance Vishnu P. Shrestha
Presentation transcript:

The GNWT Action Plan – The Levelton Report Jan 18, 2011 Yellowknife 1

Presentation - Aim To present the Project Team’s plan of action in response to the recently completed Levelton Report which was an audit on the Phase 1 works. 2

Presentation Agenda Background Aim of the Report Scope Findings Recommendations Actions Planned Conclusion Questions 3

Audit Background Phase 1 all works completed prior to 31 March 2010 under the DCBC Phase 2 all works under the GNWT Technical issues (design), fabrication, construction Quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) Due diligence dictated the GNWT review and understand what had taken place in Phase 1 Levelton Consultants assigned the role and commenced April/May 2010 and completed 30 Nov 2010 Audit employed interviews/documentation review/inspections to complete the audit. 4

Aim/Scope of the Audit Aim : To assure the GNWT that the “in place” works were constructed to standard and that all phase 2 works would be based on quality works. Scope: Confirm continuity of design responsibility; Confirm all issues raised in Ph 1 addressed; Confirm fabrication and construction QC/QA followed and certified Confirm general compliance with the contract and specs Identify issues required to close off the Phase 1 works 5

Findings and Recommendations (1) Findings divided into 6 main categories Section 6 of the Report details the formal recommendations. Some further notes in the main body of the report which are germane to the Project. GNWT has grouped the recommendations where they make sense and where one has a direct impact on the other. Due to the audit process- the GNWT has taken action concurrently to the review and has already completed some recommendations, with others well underway. 6

Findings and Recommendations (2) Nothing found in Phase 1 that impacts the safety of the work to date or that would affect construction of Phase 2 Deficiencies were found in Phase 1 document control which, given further time and research, may be remedied Recommendation that Phase 1 works be accepted upon completion of the recommendations GWNT has accepted the Levelton Report and has the resources and time available to address all the recommendations. Our main priority remains to complete the project safely and to a high standard. 7

Action Plan 8

Actions Planned SerElementRecommendationActionNotes 1Phase 1 QC/QA Develop, implement and monitor a QA/QC and document control program In place and operating On going monitoring with regular meetings and checks 9

Actions Planned SerElementRecommendationActionNotes 2aDesignEnsure proper design responsibility established Design continuity review in progress Initial report due end Jan Complete by end Feb

Actions Planned SerElementRecommendationActionNotes 2bDesignInfinity to confirm all design issues raised by the GNWT addressed Infinity will confirm this Initial report due end Jan Complete by end Feb

Actions Planned SerElementRecommendationActionNotes 2cDesignFracture critical and dimensional tolerances Confirm documents Completed in Phase 2 works 12

Actions Planned SerElementRecommendationActionNotes 3aAlignment of piers Outstanding issues to alignment be addressed Independent survey of the piers confirm they are in the exact location they should be Completed by Sub Arctic Survey summer of

Actions Planned SerElementRecommendationActionNotes 3bPier 3 STop of footing to be examined in the area of the suspected depression Expert firms who have this expertise are being contacted. Work to be tendered. Must be done in ice free time. Can be done concurrent to already planned works. 14

15

Actions Planned SerElementRecommendationActionNotes 3cConstr Pier 2S Resolved - Infinity to confirm this issue does not impact future works GNWT will include this into the design review Draft report due end Jan Final report due end Feb

Actions Planned SerElementRecommendationActionNotes 3dConcrete Elms Concrete Elems for Piers 1-4 N accepted No action required Completed 17

Actions Planned SerElementRecommendationActionNotes 4aComplete QC gaps at the AIS Plant The turnover packages produced by AIS to be reviewed Current QC team to review the packages Ongoing. Review due end Feb

Actions Planned SerElementRecommendationActionNotes 4bReview Geocon’s Reports (55) Current QC team to review these QC documents to determine further action required Current QC Team to review and provide comment Ongoing. Review due by end Fen

Actions Planned SerElementRecommendationActionNotes 4dSteel Elms- QC gaps Qualified firm to conduct further review and testing to allow them to extend their certification Ensure testing and reviews of components that were not fully documented in the QCprocess Testing to take place in Mar 2011 and completed by end Apr

Actions Planned SerElementRecommendationActionNotes 5cScour RockScour rock materials and placement be reviewed by a qualified consultant Review completed and plan in place to remediate the situation Review took place in Oct Plan submitted in Oct Work to commence summer of 2011 completed by

Actions Planned SerElementRecommendationActionNotes 6EarthworkContinue with remediation works currently underway with EBA certification Phase 1 works corrected and approaches ready for launch. Phase 1 completed. Phase 2 to commence spring

Summary of Conclusions Levelton and Associated Engineering recommend the GNWT accept the works of Phase 1 provided recommendations are followed. The GNWT and the Project Team accepts the report and will actively pursue all the recommendations to their successful completion. There are sufficient resources to successfully address all the recommendations 23

Questions 24