St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TJC, Institutional Effectiveness And You. Definition Institutional Effectiveness is an ongoing, comprehensive, and institutionally integrated system,
Advertisements

Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.
The Faculty Said… (pt.3) Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – September 14, 2006.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Executive Summary 2009 Findings November 16, 2009.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Faculty Said/Students Said Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenters: LaSylvia Pugh & Pamela G. Senegal – February 17, 2006.
Entering Community College Students: Consciously Creating Critical Connections 2012 FYE Conference San Antonio, TX.
1 This CCSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
The Students Said… (pt.2) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – August 29, 2006.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
Corning CC and CCSSE: What We Experienced and How We Handled It Maren N. Hess Director of Institutional Research AIRPO Winter Conference Syracuse – January.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
In this session, participants will learn what assessment of student engagement has shown St. Louis Community College (STLCC) about transfer success and.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
March 3, TAIR, Waco, TX Now You See Them, Now You Don’t! The Role of Part-Time Students and Faculty in Student Engagement.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
Strategic Conversation: A Commitment to Student Engagement.
ENHANCING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IWU DR. MARY ANN SEARLE VICE PRESIDENT FOR ENROLLMENT & STUDENT AFFAIRS.
Topic #1 – COMPLETERS (Graduation and Transfer) Key AC Evidence Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
2009 Pitt Community College CCSSE Results September 21, 2009 Report to the Campus College CCSSE Results Pitt Community College Dr. Brian Miller, Assistant.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Summary Report Background: The Community College Survey.
David Torres Dean, Institutional Research Riverside Community College District.
Making Connections Dimensions of Student Engagement 2010 Findings.
Office of Institutional Research CCSSE & Active and Collaborative Learning.
SASSE South African Survey of Student Engagement Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
ENGAGING STUDENTS, CHALLENGING THE ODDS 2006 SFCC Findings
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for Merced College Spring 2016 Flex Thursday, 14 January 2016 Presented by the Office of Student Services, Office of Student Equity.
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
CCSSE 2012 Findings for Southern Crescent Technical College.
© 2011 Center for Community College Student Engagement Wyoming Community Colleges Statewide Workshop October 29, 2013.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
This SENSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s SENSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Jackson College CCSSE & CCFSSE Findings Community College Survey of Student Engagement Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Administered:
Student Engagement at Orange Coast College
NSSE 2004 (National Survey of Student Engagement)
The University of Texas-Pan American
The Heart of Student Success
Faculty In-Service Week
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology
Presentation transcript:

St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting

What is Student Engagement? …the amount of time and energy students invest in meaningful educational practices …the institutional practices and student behaviors that are highly correlated with student learning and retention SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 2

The Community College Survey of Student Engagement ( CCSSE ) SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 3 CCSSE is designed to capture student engageme nt as a measure of institutional quality.

Student Respondent Profile SPCCCSSE 2011 Cohort Part-Time Enrollment31%58% Female59%57% Years Old63%58% Minority37%44% SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 4 Source: 2011 CCSSE data Administered in Spring 2011 (planned for Spring 2012) Out of 1,168 SPC survey respondents…

Student Respondent Profile SPC First Generation 17% Working 76% Work: More than 30 Hours 38% Caring for Dependents 57% Caring for Dependents: More than 30 Hours 22% Participating in College Sponsored Activities 15% Participating in College Sponsored Activities: 1-5 Hours 11% SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 5 Source: 2011 CCSSE data Out of 1,168 SPC survey respondents…

CCSSE Benchmarks Active and Collaborative Learning Student Effort Academic Challenge Student-Faculty Interaction Support for Learners

CCSSE Benchmarks  Active and Collaborative Learning. Students learn more when they are actively involved in their education and have opportunities to think about and apply what they are learning in different settings. Through collaborating with others to solve problems or master challenging content, students develop valuable skills that prepare them to deal with real-life situations and problems.  Student Effort. Students’ own behaviors contribute significantly to their learning and the likelihood that they will successfully attain their educational goals. SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 7

CCSSE Benchmarks  Academic Challenge. Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. These survey items address the nature and amount of assigned academic work, the complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students, and the rigor of examinations used to evaluate student performance.  Student-Faculty Interaction. In general, the more contact students have with their teachers, the more likely they are to learn effectively and to persist toward achievement of their educational goals. Through such interactions, faculty members become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, lifelong learning. SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 8

CCSSE Benchmarks  Support for Learners. Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that provide important support services, cultivate positive relationships among groups on campus, and demonstrate commitment to their success. SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 9

CCSSE Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practice Source: 2011 CCSSE data CCSSE Benchmark Scores for St. Petersburg College Compared to Colleges of Similar Size SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 10 Notes: Benchmark scores are standardized to have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 25 across all respondents.

CCSSE Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practice Source: 2011 CCSSE data Historical CCSSE Benchmark Score Trends for St. Petersburg College SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 11 Notes: Benchmark scores are standardized to have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 25 across all respondents.

Aspects of Highest Student Engagement Source: 2011 CCSSE data CCSSE Benchmark Scores for St. Petersburg College Compared to 2011 CCSSE Cohort SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 12 Benchmark Item No.Item Active and Collaborative Learning 4b Made a class presentation Student Effort4dWorked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources Student-Faculty Interaction4kUsed to communicate with an instructor Academic Challenge5eApplying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations Academic Challenge6cNumber of written papers or reports of any length Notes: For Item(s) 4, ‘Often’ and ‘Very Often’ responses are combined; For Item(s) 5, ‘Quite a bit’ and ‘Very much’ responses are combined; For Item(s) 6, ‘5 to 10,’ ‘11 to 20,’ and ‘More than 20’ responses are combined. Notes: Benchmark scores are standardized to have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 25 across all respondents.

Aspects of Highest Student Engagement Source: 2011 CCSSE data A History of CCSSE Benchmark Scores for St. Petersburg College SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 13 Benchmark Item No.Item Active and Collaborative Learning 4b Made a class presentation Student Effort4dWorked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources Student-Faculty Interaction4kUsed to communicate with an instructor Academic Challenge5eApplying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations Academic Challenge6cNumber of written papers or reports of any length Notes: For Item(s) 4, ‘Often’ and ‘Very Often’ responses are combined; For Item(s) 5, ‘Quite a bit’ and ‘Very much’ responses are combined; For Item(s) 6, ‘5 to 10,’ ‘11 to 20,’ and ‘More than 20’ responses are combined.

Aspects of Lowest Student Engagement Source: 2011 CCSSE data CCSSE Benchmark Scores for St. Petersburg College Compared to 2011 CCSSE Cohort SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 14 Benchmark Item No.Item Active and Collaborative Learning 4f Worked with other students on projects during class Student Effort4mTalked about career plans with an instructor or advisor Student-Faculty Interaction4qWorked with instructors on activities other than coursework Academic Challenge9dHelping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) Academic Challenge13h1Frequency: Computer lab Notes: For Item(s) 4, ‘Often’ and ‘Very Often’ responses are combined; For Item(s) 9, ‘Quite a bit’ and ‘Very much’ responses are combined; For Item(s) 13,’Sometimes’ ‘and ‘Often’ are combined. Notes: Benchmark scores are standardized to have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 25 across all respondents.

Aspects of Lowest Student Engagement Source: 2011 CCSSE data A History of CCSSE Benchmark Scores for St. Petersburg College SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 15 Benchmark Item No.Item Active and Collaborative Learning 4f Worked with other students on projects during class Student Effort4mTalked about career plans with an instructor or advisor Student-Faculty Interaction4qWorked with instructors on activities other than coursework Academic Challenge9dHelping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) Academic Challenge13h1Frequency: Computer lab Notes: For Item(s) 4, ‘Often’ and ‘Very Often’ responses are combined; For Item(s) 9, ‘Quite a bit’ and ‘Very much’ responses are combined; For Item(s) 13,’Sometimes’ ‘and ‘Often’ are combined.

SPC Internal Comparisons  Active and Collaborative Learning During the current school year, how often have you: Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions (65.2% very often or often) Participated in a community-based project as a part of a regular course (7.2% very often or often)  Student Effort During the current school year, how often have you: Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources (74.3% very often or often) Used peer or other tutoring services (29.2% often or sometimes)  Academic Challenge During the current school year, how often have you: Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor’s standards or expectations (56.6% very often or often) Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments (22.2% very often or often) Source: 2011 CCSSE data SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 16

SPC Internal Comparisons  Student-Faculty Interaction During the current school year, how often have you: Used to communicate with an instructor (68.3% very often or often) Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework (8.7% very often or often)  Support for Learners How much does this college emphasize: Providing the support you need to help you succeed at this college (75.3% very much or quite a bit) Helping you cope with your nonacademic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) (23.3% very much or quite a bit) Source: 2011 CCSSE data SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 17

CCSSE Special Focus Items 90.3% of students were registered for ALL courses before the first class session(s). 54.1% took part in either an online or on campus orientation prior to the beginning of classes, but 25.8% were not aware of a college orientation. SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 18

SPC Special Focus Items 79.5% of students strongly agree or agree that this year, they have tried to better understand someone else’s views by imagining how an issue looks from his or her perspective. 50.7% of students very often or often learned something that changed his or her viewpoint about an issue or concept. 59.1% of students this year have very often or often considered ideas different from his/her own. 23.7% of students this year have used the academic support services, e.g., tutoring and academic assistance. SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 19

Community College Student: Aspirations and Persistence

Student Aspirations Students’ Goals Indicate which of the following are your reasons/goals for attending this college. A goal (Primary or Secondary) Not a goal Complete a certificate program40%60% Obtain an associate degree93%7% Transfer to a four-year college or university77%23% Obtain or update job-related skills67%33% Self-improvement/personal enjoyment73%27% Change careers47%53% Note: Respondents may indicate more than one goal. Source: 2011 CCSSE data SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 21

Student Persistence Barriers to Returning to College How likely is it that the following issues would cause you to withdraw from class or from this college? Source: 2011 CCSSE data SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 22

Strategies to Promote Learning that Matters The Center describes four key strategies to promote strengthened classroom experiences: Strengthen classroom engagement Integrate student support into learning experiences Focus institutional policies on creating the conditions for learning Expand professional development focused on engaging students

Strengthen Classroom Engagement 1. Raise Expectations Students work hard to meet instructors’ expectations:  56.6% of students “Often” or “Very Often” work harder than they thought they could to meet an instructor’s standards or expectations  38% of students report spending five or fewer hours per week preparing for class SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 24

Strengthen Classroom Engagement 2. Promote Active, Engaged Learning In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you done each of the using activities? Source: 2011 CCSSE data SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 25 Percentage of students responding never

Strengthen Classroom Engagement Source: 2011 CCSSE data 3. Ensure that Students Know Where They Stand During the current school year, how often have you received prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructors on your performance? SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 26

Integrate Student Support into Learning Experiences Student Use and Value of Student Services VeryNot at all Academic advising/planning74%8% Career counseling57%16% Peer or other tutoring52%22% Skill labs (writing, math, etc.)49%22% Rarely/Never Academic advising/planning31% Career counseling54% Peer or other tutoring44% Skill labs (writing, math, etc.)36% How important are the services? How often do you use the services? Source: 2011 CCSSE data SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 27

Focus Institutional Policies on Creating the Conditions for Learning Class Attendance During the current school year, how often have you skipped class? Source: 2011 CCSSE data SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 28

Expand Professional Development Focused on Engaging Students Source: 2011 CCFSSE data  Center of Excellence for Teaching and Learning (CETL) – Offering on-going professional development sessions for fulltime and part-time faculty  Expanded SPD funding for faculty $1500/faculty member over a two-year period  All College Professional Development Day SPC Board of Trustees Meeting 29

Questions…