Rapid Improvement Strategies Shirley M. Moore, RN, PhD, FAAN Associate Dean for Research and Professor of Nursing Case Western Reserve University Cleveland,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Develop an Information Strategy Plan
Advertisements

Process and Procedure Documentation. Agenda Why document processes and procedures? What is process and procedure documentation? Who creates and uses this.
Systems Investigation and Analysis
References Prof. Saul Greenberg, University of Calgary, notes and articles INUSE 6.2 and RESPECT 5.3 Handbook Prof. , University of , Notes and articles.
Systems Development Environment
Project leaders will keep track of team progress using an A3 Report.
The Continuous Quality Improvement Process Empowering staff to develop local level solutions.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
SEM II : Marketing Research
ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Management: Analysis and Decision Making
© 2013 by Nelson Education Ltd.
Rapid Analysis Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.. Analysis takes time and reflection People must be lined up and their views sought. People must be lined up and their.
1 14. Project closure n An information system project must be administratively closed once its product is successfully delivered to the customer. n A failed.
Fundamentals of Information Systems, Second Edition
Chapter 5 Determining System Requirements
1 Rapid Cycle Quality Improvement Course Outline  The Quality Journey  Rapid Cycle Improvement Model  Change Concepts  Teams  Tools  Barrier Busters.
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI): Part 2
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Conducting ONLINE SURVEYS Valerie M. Sue, Ph.D.. ntroduction 1.
1 ©IRWIN a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company 1997 Collecting and Using Marketing Information.
Creating Research proposal. What is a Marketing or Business Research Proposal? “A plan that offers ideas for conducting research”. “A marketing research.
SCC EHR Workshop for Contractors: Implementation Considerations May 25, 2011.
Customer Focus Module Preview
4e Nelson/Quick ©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
Charting a course PROCESS.
Chapter 3 Needs Assessment
Leaders Manage Meetings
Home Career Counseling and Services: A Cognitive Information Processing Approach James P. Sampson, Jr., Robert C. Reardon, Gary W. Peterson, and Janet.
Delmar Learning Copyright © 2003 Delmar Learning, a Thomson Learning company Nursing Leadership & Management Patricia Kelly-Heidenthal
Identification, Analysis and Management
Torrington, Hall & Taylor, Human Resource Management 6e, © Pearson Education Limited 2005 Slide 12.1 The Treatment of Individual Performance Traditionally.
Organizational Change
Perioperative fasting guideline Getting it into practice Getting started.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
© 2010 by Nelson Education Ltd.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
Problem Definition Chapter 7. Chapter Objectives Learn: –The 8 steps of experienced problem solvers –How to collect and analyze information and data.
7-1 Project Management from Simple to Complex. 7-2 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported.
Chapter 7: A Summary of Tools Focus: This chapter outlines all the customer-driven project management tools and techniques and provides recommendations.
FOCUS – Framing, Organizing, Collecting, Understanding, and Synthesizing Paul Friga’s McKinsey Engagement.
Chapter 6 Determining System Requirements. 2 2 What are Requirements? “Requirements are … a specification of what should be implemented. They are descriptions.
1 Course on Quality Change Cycles Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D
Chapter 6 Managerial Decision Making. Programmed Decisions n Routine situations n Decision rules can be developed and applied n Managers formulate decision.
Fundamentals of Information Systems, Second Edition 1 Systems Development.
Quality Tools. Decision Tree When to use it Use it when making important or complex decisions, to identify the course of action that will give the best.
Establishing an Effective CQI Program By: Shannon Bentley, RN,c And Lois Sacher, RN.
Ami™ as a process Showing the structural elements in the Accelerated Model for Improvement™
Fundamentals of Improvement Experience from the Field. How participants put to use, what they learned. A Panel Discussion.
Make Rapid but Lasting Change Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Systems Requirements Determination.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
Key Work of School Boards Name Workshop Facilitator.
Read to Learn Describe the kinds of market research a company may use. Identify the steps in developing a new product.
Read to Learn Describe the kinds of market research a company may use. Identify the steps in developing a new product.
Traditional Economic Model of Quality of Conformance
/0604 © Business & Legal Reports, Inc. BLR’s Training Presentations Effective Decision-Making Strategies.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
IT-465 Introduction to Lean part Two. IT-465 Lean Manufacturing2 Introduction Waste Walks and Spaghetti Charts Outcomes Understand what a waste walk is.
1 Project Management C13PM Session 2 Project Initiation & Definition Russell Taylor Business Department Staff Workroom
Introduction to research
Fundamentals of Information Systems, Third Edition2 An Overview of Systems Development: Participants in Systems Development Development team –Responsible.
Instructional Design Course Evaluation Phase. Agenda The Evaluation Process Expert Review Small Group Review The Pilot Feedback and Revision Evaluation.
Summary of Action Period 2 TN Patient Safety Collaborative: Reducing Physical Restraints Learning Session 3 October 6, 7 & 8 th, 2009.
1 1 for decision makers that want to know what many think & why Engage in 1 hour online, moderated, anonymous & written social brainstorm generating instant.
TM 720: Statistical Process Control DMAIC Problem Solving
Six-Sigma : DMAIC Cycle & Application
© 2013 by Nelson Education Ltd.
PDCA Cycles Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.
Presentation transcript:

Rapid Improvement Strategies Shirley M. Moore, RN, PhD, FAAN Associate Dean for Research and Professor of Nursing Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, OH, USA

Rapid Improvement Strategies  One of the criticisms of CQI is that it can take a long time to plan, test, and evaluate an improvement  Making fast changes lasting and pervasive, rapid improvement strategies speed things up without changing the nature of necessary improvement activities

Objectives  Describe the key focuses of rapid improvement strategies  Compare traditional and rapid improvement strategies  Apply rapid improvement strategies to an improvement initiative

Making rapid improvement work....  Interdisciplinary  Systems approach  Throw away your hats  Take risks  Take ownership

As in the use of traditional improvement strategies, to help develop tests and implement changes using rapid improvement strategies, the PDSA cycle is used as a framework for an efficient trial-and-learning methodology When using rapid improvement strategies, the goal is to speed up cycles, thus making change faster

Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA)  Plan--a change, preferably on a small scale  Do--carry out the plan  Study--the effects of the change, making simple measurements  Act--on what you learn to plan the next round of testing

“Trial and Learning”  Small scale tests  Simple measurements

Five steps to speed up change Wasting time working on the wrong problem Ineffective Meetings Planning and not acting Too much time collecting data Selling change to others 1. Define the right problem 2. Rapid meetings 3. Rapid plans 4. Rapid data collection 5. Rapid whole system change

Define the Right Problem  Postpone benchmarking when problems are obvious  Waiting for data to clarify problems can delay improvement efforts  Using data you “have” may lead to an inaccurate improvement  Focus benchmarking on a “few problems”

Define the Right Problem Creates a focus on the “system” and not the staff  Problem statement: “The inability of the ED to initiate antibiotics in a timely manner.”  Problem restated: “Delay in antibiotic administration for pneumonia patients.”

Define the Right Problem Define the problem in terms of the customers experience, obtain information via:  focus groups  interviews  observations  questionnaires

Define the Right Problem State the problem from different perspectives  Problem statements often include the environment for improvement  Increases focus on the team’s scope Problem statement: “Sixty percent of pneumonia patients get antibiotics in the ED.” Problem statement: “Forty percent of pneumonia patients do not get antibiotics in the ED.”

Define the Right Problem State the problem from different perspectives Team exercise: Have all team members define the problem Compare answers to identify the various ways to approach the problem.

Rapid Meetings Choose a nonparticipating facilitator keep group on track and focused identify team problems Meet before the meetings present team focus and agenda to members for feedback (electronic, telephone, etc) initiates ideas prior to meetings, increases interaction and problem-solving

Rapid Meetings Postpone evaluation of ideas increases amount and creativity of ideas. minimizes “group think” Think it through again improves teams original decisions considers all perspectives

Rapid Meetings Meet between meetings Electronic feedback on issues ( )-- eliminates evaluation of ideas and minimizes group think Allows for “drafts” to be revised, updated and represented More meeting time available for approval of action plans, decision making, and finalizing implementation strategies

Plan Rapidly Start with what “could be” and not “what is”....Ideal system design...Futuring Fits solution to system Generates solutions before understanding constraints, increasing creativity Brainstorm ideal solution, then define realistic improvement approach Minimizes time spent flowcharting the current process

Plan Rapidly Know Your Cast  Champions  Agents  Sponsors  Targets

Collect data rapidly  Write outcomes reports before begin data collection, including tables and figure  Collect only data you need  Representative surveys of customers  Increase speed of data collection by using numerical and subjective data

Collect data rapidly Rely on numerical estimates made by process owners Derive from subjective data based on observations and feedback Involve a cross-section of experts involved in the process Analyze and display outcomes Experts discuss and re-estimate outcomes

Rapid Whole-System Changes  Cross-functional teams--interdisciplinary  Internal and external experts  Unfolding storyboards employees follow team progress understand evolution of change increase involvement and feedback

Rapid Whole-System Changes  Employees need to feel they are capable of change  Employees are more likely to change when they participated in the decision making process and have organizational support  Top down approach  Maintain focus with reminders and updates  Focus on early adopters

Strength of Evidence  Beyond reasonable doubt  Preponderance of evidence  Common Sense

Summary  Application of a set of strategies can be employed to speed up the CQI process  Rapid improvement strategies do not bypass the basic steps of the CQI process - they speed up the planning, measurement and PDSA cycle time  Using rapid improvement strategies often means getting rid of old, ritualistic organizational change behaviors

References Alemi, F., Moore, S. M., Headrick, L., Heckelman, F., Kizys, N., & Neuhauser, D. (1998). Rapid improvement. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 24,