Department of the Environment A History of Power Plant Controls in Maryland What Did We Learn? – Where do We go Next? Part 2 - NOx Issues.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A History of Power Plant Controls in Maryland What Did We Learn
Advertisements

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
U.S. Energy Information Administration Independent Statistics & Analysis 2014 Electricity Forms Re-clearance Vlad Dorjets, Form EIA-860 Project.
Development and Application of PM2.5 Interpollutant Trading Ratios to Account for PM2.5 Secondary Formation in Georgia James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim Georgia.
Steve Moorman Mgr Business Development, Advanced Technologies Babcock & Wilcox CO2 Emission Reduction from Coal Fired Plants FutureGen 2.0 CO2 Capture.
Modeling the New 1-Hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ) and Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) NAAQS Alan Dresser Research Scientist I October 14, 2011.
Previous MACT Sub Categories EPA has recognized differences in other industry rules by using sub-categorization: – Differences in processes – Differences.
The Massachusetts Approach to Power Plant Clean-up Policy Making and Standards Setting to Reach Clean Air Sonia Hamel Massachusetts Executive Office of.
Recent EPA Regulation Development Presented by Bill Luthans to the 56 th Meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee Meeting for the Improvement of Air Quality.
Combined Heat and Power and Air Quality - Guidance for Local Authorities Ed Dearnley Policy Officer.
Title 4 Compliance Options ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul. Band aide Approach  Buy Credits –Have been abundant because of aggressive compliance – could be running.
Ozone in Colorado: Issues and Reduction Strategies Presentation to the Colorado Environmental Health Association October 2,
Air Quality Regulation 7 Briefing for the Garfield County Energy Advisory Board Jim Rada Environmental Health Manager Garfield County Public Health February.
1 Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring, and Investment in Pollution Abatement Meredith Fowlie UC Berkeley UCEI March 24, 2006.
ADEQ Uses of ICF Modeling Analysis Tony Davis, Branch Manager – Air Planning Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Criteria Pollutant Modeling Analysis.
An Emissions Cap Alternative to New Source Review September 27, 1999.
December 4, Utility MACT Air & Waste Management Association/EPA Information Exchange December 4, 2002 William H. Maxwell Combustion Group/ESD.
1 Control Techniques Guidelines Joel Leon September 16, 2011.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
Department of the Environment A History of Power Plant Controls in Maryland What Did We Learn? – Where do We go Next? Part 1 – Background and Historical.
1 Regulatory Concepts Related to the Control of NOx and SOx From Fossil- fired Electric Generating Units Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee Meeting.
ADEM Air Update Ron Gore November, National Issues EPA is delaying many controversial decisions and issues: Implementation of new SO 2 NAAQS Setting.
Pennsylvania Draft Regulations for the Control of Mercury From Coal-fired Electric Generating Units Allegheny Section- AWMA Air Quality Issues Workshop.
Mirant Mid-Atlantic MWAQC Technical Advisory Committee Briefing January 21, 2005.
Massachusetts’ Power Plant Mercury Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection WESTAR Fall Business Meeting - September.
A&WMA Georgia Regulatory Update Conference Current State of the Air in GA Jac Capp, GA EPD, Branch Chief, Air Protection Branch April 16, 2013.
Progress Energy and the Environment Western North Carolina Air Quality Don Cooke April 29, 2003.
UTILITY NSR REFORM TIMEFRAMES EARLY 90’SBEGIN CAAA IMPLEMENTATION MID 90’SNSR REFORM DEVELOPMENT - S/A Principles - EPA Proposals.
Analysis of Existing and Potential Regulatory Requirements and Emission Control Options for the Silver Lake Power Plant APPA Engineering & Operations Technical.
Freeport Generating Project Project Description Modernization projects at Power Plant #2 Developers – Freeport Electric and Selected Development Company.
Implications of the 2008 Ozone Standard Changes Deanna L. Duram, P.E., C.M. August 7, 2008 trinityconsultants.com.
BART Control Analysis WESTAR August 31, 2005 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Todd Hawes
1 Summary of LADCO’s Regional Modeling in the Eastern U.S.: Preliminary Results April 27, 2009 MWAQC TAC June 15, 2009.
Emission Update Verifiable Cost Task Force August 21, 2008.
Air Quality Programs.
Preparation of Control Strategies October 18, 2007 NAAQS RIA Workshop Darryl Weatherhead, Kevin Culligan, Serpil Kayin, David Misenheimer, Larry Sorrels.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
Environmental Issues in System Planning Jim Platts – ISO New England NARUC Summer Meeting – New York City July 15, 2007.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
1 Colorado BART APCD. 2 Class 1 Areas National Parks and Wilderness Areas 12 in Colorado 4 National Parks 8 Wilderness Areas.
Update on EPA Oil and Gas Activities
Massachusetts’ 4-Pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Air Innovations Conference - August.
Earth’s Changing Environment Lecture 4 Improving Air Quality.
Expected Ozone Benefits from EGU NOx Reductions Tim Vinciguerra, Emily Bull, Timothy Canty, Hao He, Eric Zalewsky, Michael Woodman, Sheryl Ehrman, Russell.
Massachusetts Multi-pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection EPA Utility MACT Working Group.
ICI Boilers EPA Meeting November 21, Why control ICI boilers? Important source of SO 2 and NO x emissions Cost-effective emission reductions achievable.
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) CAIR Model Cap and Trade Rules: Unique Elements and Flexibilities Office of Air and Radiation March 2005.
1. Stationary and Area Sources Committee Recommendations OTC Annual Meeting 2010 Baltimore, MD 2.
Preparation of Control Strategies EGU Sector Clean Air Markets Division U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation 17 October 2007.
Reproposal of the Regional Haze Rule and BART Guidelines.
Summary of June 15, 2005 Revisions to RH BART and BART Guidelines.
July 21, Today’s Proposed Action Approve ozone SIP revisions for South Coast and San Joaquin Valley Reasonable Further Progress Transportation.
The Effect of Environmental Regulation upon the Electric Power Industry: A Rating Agency Perspective 23rd February 2005 At the California Public Utility.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
Presented by: Eastern Research Group, Inc. May 10, 2005 Status Report to the Stationary Sources Joint Forum: Task 2: Control Technology Analysis.
Ozone NAAQS Implementation WESTAR Fall Meeting September 29, 2010 Scott Mathias, Associate Director Air Quality Policy Division.
1 Update on New Source Review (NSR) Activities and Priorities for Information Transfer and Program Integration Division April 7, 2004.
Proposed Rulemaking: Additional RACT Requirements for Major Sources of NO x and VOCs (25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 129) Environmental Quality Board November.
Additional RACT Requirements for Major Sources of NO x and VOCs: Final Rule (25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 129) RACT Overview and Implementation Presentation.
1 Clean Air Act Regulation, Technologies, and Costs NARUC/BPC/NESCAUM Power Sector Environmental Regulations Workshop David C. Foerter Executive Director.
First in Service First in Value
A History of Power Plant Controls in Maryland What Did We Learn
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Maryland's Air Quality: Nitrogen Reductions and the Healthy Air Act
Why Are We Pushing for More Federal Rules to Reduce Regional NOx and SO2? NACAA Meeting May 17, 2010.
Background High Electric Demand Day (HEDD) Initiative
ERTAC EGU Overview For the 2016 EGU workgroup
Boiler Sheltered Initiative
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
EPA Technical Analysis of NOx Combustion Controls in the West
Presentation transcript:

Department of the Environment A History of Power Plant Controls in Maryland What Did We Learn? – Where do We go Next? Part 2 - NOx Issues

2014 NOx RACT Requirement In 2014, MDE is required to update NOx RACT (Reasonably Available Control Technology) requirements in the Maryland SIP (State Implementation Plan) RACT must be updated every time a new standard is adopted The current 75 ppb standard was adopted in 2008 The updated NOx RACT SIP is due on July 20, 2014 This rulemaking process is intended to support that SIP submittal

Issues With NOx Emissions The new 75 ppb ozone standard requires us to focus on peak day NOx emissions Healthy Air Act (HAA) annual and “ozone season” caps have not forced units to always run emissions controls when they are needed Linked to lower capacity factors at many units –Coal units are simply not being asked to run as often as they used to run Some units also appear to not always be running their control equipment at a high level of efficiency to insure maximize emission reductions

Very Old Short-Term Emission Limits The HAA used ozone-season and annual caps to drive very significant emission reductions of NOx The short-term limits for NOx in Maryland regulations date back to the 1990s –For the new 75 ppb ozone standards, peak day NOx emissions have become extremely important –Current short-term limits are clearly not appropriate for addressing peak day NOx emissions All short-term limits for all units will need to be updated

Decreasing Capacity Factors Capacity factor HAA Coal Fired Units Capacity Factors of Maryland Coal plants have almost been reduced by 50%

Compliance with the HAA All of Maryland’s power generators fully comply with the Maryland HAA of 2006 The HAA used a regulatory scheme that allowed companies to choose where to control within their “system” to most cost- effectively meet the NOx and SO2 caps set in the Act. –Some units controlled more – some less The HAA set annual caps for SO2 and annual and ozone season caps for NOx –Short-term limits (hourly or daily) were not part of the HAA –Caps were set assuming that Maryland coal plants would continue to operate at pre-2006 levels

The HAA Worked Well The regulatory scheme in the HAA worked very well –Helped bring Maryland into attainment for the PM Fine standard and helped Maryland get very close to meeting the old 85 ppb ozone standard. –The HAA (2006) was designed for these older standards The new 1-hour SO2 standard and the current 75 ppb ozone standard will require an enhanced regulatory scheme that focuses on: –Individual units and –Shorter term (hourly or daily) emission limits

NOx Emissions on Peak Ozone Days Crane is largest peak day contributor by plant Daily NOx Emissions By Plant

NOx Emissions on Peak Ozone Days Daily NOx Emissions By Unit Dickerson and Chalk have single stacks for multiple units Larger units with SCRs (Brandon Shores, Wagner 3, Morgantown and Chalk 1) are the lower peak day emitters Smaller units without SCRs (Crane, Wagner 2, Chalk 2 and Dickerson) are the higher peak day emitters

Raven Power Fort Smallwood Complex –Brandon Shores - Units 1 and 2 –Wagner – Units 1, 2, 3 and 4 –All on one contiguous property C.P. Crane – Units 1 and 2 Brandon ShoresWagner Power Station H A Wagner C P Crane

Brandon Shores Unit 1 Brandon Shores Unit 2 Crane Unit 1 Crane Unit 2 Wagner Unit 2 Wagner Unit 3 Total 2012 Annual NOx Tons 1,4052, , On Annual NOx Limit, Tons 2,4142, ,1158, Ozone NOx Tons , On Ozone NOx Limit, Tons 1,1241, ,630 These two numbers show ozone season tons very close to the ozone season limit Raven System Wide Compliance with MD HAA HAA set annual and ozone season caps and allowed “system-wide” averaging With tougher ozone standard and focus on “peak days” – units that “under-controlled” are now being re-evaluated These two numbers show annual tons very close to annual limit Units with Red font use credits from units in Grey font to meet annual HAA Limit

Brandon Shores UnitCapacity (MW) NOx Controls Old NOx RACT (lb/mmBTU) 30-Day Rolling Average HAA Limit* (Tons) 2012 Annual (Ozone) Average NOx Emission Rate (lb/mmBTU) Brandon 1 (Coal) 700SCR0.502, (0.09) Brandon 2 (Coal) 700SCR0.502, (0.12) Built in 1984 Boiler type - Brandon Shores 1 and 2 are both Babcock & Wilcox wall fired Units Installed 2 Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) control systems in 2002 ($100M, and a cost of around 4% plant efficiency) Total capacity = 1,400 MW

Brandon Shores Unit 1 Ozone Season Versus Non Ozone Season Operation In Ozone Season the SCR is operated at high efficiencies to achieve Maximum NOx Reduction In non Ozone Season the SCR is operated at lower efficiency - or not at all 2010 to 2012 Data

Brandon Shores Unit Very low rates when SCRs are being run efficiently Much higher rates for significant periods when SCRs are not being run efficiently MDE Current Thinking: Allowable rate of 0.06 to 0.10 lb/mmBtu as a 24- hour Rolling Average (24hr RA) Current Controls - SCR

Brandon Shores Unit Very low rates when SCRs are being run efficiently Much higher rates for significant periods when SCRs are not being run efficiently MDE Current Thinking: Allowable rate of 0.08 to 0.11 lb/mmBtu (24hr RA) Current Controls - SCR

Continuous operation of the NOx controls would have reduced 1,650 tons of NOx emissions in Current thinking - 24 Hr Rolling Avg NOx Emission Limit of 0.06 to 0.10 lb/mmBtu for Unit 1 Current thinking - 24 Hr Rolling Avg NOx Emission Limit 0.08 to 0.11 lb/mmBtu for Unit 2 Brandon Shores 1 and 2 - Conclusions

UnitCapacity (MW) NOx Controls Old NOx RACT (lb/mmBTU) 30-Day Rolling Average HAA Limit* (Tons) 2012 Annual (Ozone) Average NOx Emission Rate (lb/mmBTU) Wagner 2 (Coal) 136SNCR (0.43) Wagner 3 (Coal) 359SCR0.501, (0.06) Wagner Power Station Built in Boiler types –Units 2 and 3 are both coal burning Babcock & Wilcox wall fired unit units –Units 1 and 4 are Babcock & Wilcox Gas and Oil units Installed a SCR & SNCR control systems in 2003 & 2008 ($55M) Total capacity = 1,400 MW

Wagner Unit 3 Much higher rates for significant periods when SCRs are not being run efficiently Very low rates when SCRs are being run efficiently MDE Current Thinking: Allowable rate of 0.05 to 0.06 lb/mmBtu (24hr RA) Current Controls - SCR

Operation of SCR at Wagner 3 similar to Brandon Shore SCR’s. Continuous operation of controls could have reduced 213 tons of NOx in 2012 at Wagner 3. MDE Current Thinking - 24 Hr Rolling Avg NOx Emission Limit 0.05 to 0.06 lb/mmBtu. Wagner 3 - Conclusion

Current Controls - SNCR Clearly can see when SNCR is being run with a higher removal efficiency Wagner 2

Wagner 2 - SNCR In Operation Some Operation of SNCR in Ozone Season 2011 No SNCR Operation in the Ozone Season 2012 MDE Current Thinking: Allowable rate of 0.25 to 0.35 lb/mmBtu (24hr RA)

Wagner 2 - SNCR Off The plant operated during 2012 Ozone season even though the SNCR was not operated The 0.25 to 0.35 lb/mmBtu limit would have required operation of the SNCR

The SNCR on Unit 2 ran 28% of time it could have run. The SNCR did not run in the ozone season of 2012 at all. Continuous operation of controls could have reduced 198 tons of NOx in 2012 at Wagner 2. Current thinking - 24 Hr Rolling Avg NOx Emission Limit between 0.25 and 0.35 lb/mmBtu. Wagner 2 - Conclusions

UnitCapacity (MW) NOx Controls Old NOx RACT (lb/mmBTU) 30-Day Rolling Average HAA Limit* (Tons) 2012 Annual (Ozone) Average NOx Emission Rate (lb/mmBTU) CP Crane 1 (Coal)200SNCR (0.411) CP Crane 2 (Coal)200SNCR (0.410) Raven Power – C.P. Crane Built in 1963 Boiler types –Units 1 and 2 are both coal burning cyclone units - Babcock and Wilcox Boilers Installed SNCRs in 2009 ($12 M) Total capacity = 400 MW

Capacity Factors at Crane Dramatic reductions since 2001 to 2007 timeframe Units are simply not being called upon to run as much as they used to be called upon

NOx Emissions on Peak Ozone Days Crane Unit 1 and 2 - Emissions 10 tons per day each

Crane Unit 1 – SNCR On Mixture of coal used in this area that doesn’t represent current operation MDE Current Thinking: Allowable rate of 0.25 to 0.35 lb/mmBtu (24hr RA)

Crane Unit 1 – SNCR Off Mixture of coal used in this area that doesn’t represent current operation The 0.25 to 0.35 lb/mmBtu limit would have required operation of the SNCR

MDE Current Thinking: Allowable rate of 0.25 to 0.35 lb/mmBtu (24hr RA) Hr Avg NOx Lbs/mmBtu Crane Unit 2 – SNCR On Mixture of coal used in this area that doesn’t represent current operation

Data -24 Hr Avg NOx Lb/mmBtu Mixture of coal used in this area that doesn’t represent current operation Crane Unit 2 – SNCR Off The 0.25 to 0.35 lb/mmBtu limit would have required operation of the SNCR

Deeper Reductions at Crane MDE is researching a hybrid SCR/SNCR technology that appears to be well suited for both Crane units Appears to significantly reduce NOx –0.08 to 0.11 lb/mmBtu Very cost effectively –$2000 to $3000 per ton Operational by 2015 to support Moderate area attainment needs

SNCR operation –Unit 1 SNCR ran 14% of time it could have. –Unit 2 SNCR ran 33% of time it could have. Through 2015 –Current thinking – Unit 1 Through Hr Rolling Average NOx Emission Limit of 0.25 to 0.35 lb/mmBtu. –Current thinking – Unit 2 Through Hr Rolling Average NOx Emission Limit of 0.25 to 0.35 lb/mmBtu By 2015 –Current thinking - Both Units 24 Hr Rolling Average NOx Emission Limit of 0.08 to 0.11 lb/mmBtu C.P. Crane – Conclusions

Coal Fired UnitsOld NOx RACT MDE Current Thinking Updated NOx RACT Brandon Unit 1 (SCR) 0.50 lb/mmBTU 30 Day Rolling Average 0.06 to 0.10 lb/mmBTU 24-hr Rolling Average Brandon Unit 2 (SCR) 0.50 lb/mmBTU 30 Day Rolling Average 0.08 to 0.11 lb/mmBTU 24-hr Rolling Average Wagner Unit 2 (SNCR) 0.50 lb/mmBTU 30 Day Rolling Average 0.25 to 0.35 lb/mmBTU 24-hr Rolling Average Wagner Unit 3 (SCR) 0.50 lb/mmBTU 30 Day Rolling Average 0.05 to 0.06 lb/mmBTU 24-hr Rolling Average Crane Unit 1 (SNCR) 0.70 summer/1.50 winter Lb/mm Btu 30 Day Rolling Average 0.25 to 0.35 lb/mmBTU 24-hr Rolling Average By 2015 – 0.08 to 0.11 lb/mmBtu 24-hr Rolling Average Crane Unit 2 (SNCR) 0.70 summer/1.50 winter Lb/mm Btu 30 Day Rolling Average 0.25 to 0.35 lb/mmBTU 24-hr Rolling Average By 2015 – 0.08 to 0.11 lb/mmBtu 24-hr Rolling Average Raven Power – Current MDE Thinking Short-Term NOx Limits

NRG Energy Morgantown - Units 1 and 2 Dickerson – Units 1, 2 and 3 Chalk Point – Units 1 and 2 MorgantownChalk PointDickerson

Compliance with the HAA All of Maryland’s power generators fully comply with the Maryland Healthy Air Act (HAA) The HAA used a regulatory scheme that allowed companies to choose where to control within their “system” to most cost- effectively meet the NOx and SO2 caps set in the Act. –Some units controlled more – some less The HAA set annual caps for SO2 and annual and ozone season caps for NOx –Short-term limits (hourly or daily) were not part of the HAA –Caps were set assuming that Maryland coal plants would continue to operate at pre-2006 levels

The HAA Worked Well The regulatory scheme in the HAA worked very well –Helped bring Maryland into attainment for the PM Fine standard and helped Maryland get very close to meeting the old 85 ppb ozone standard. –The HAA (2006) was designed for these older standards The new 1-hour SO2 standard and the current 75 ppb ozone standard will require an enhanced regulatory scheme that focuses on: –Individual units and –Shorter term (hourly or daily) emission limits

NRG System Wide Compliance with the HAA Morgantown Unit 1 Morgantown Unit 2 Chalk Point Unit 1 Chalk Point Unit 2 Dickerson Units 1 2 & 3 Total 2012 Annual NOx Tons ,7961,4404, On Annual NOx Limit, Tons 2,0942,0791,1661,2231,7368, Ozone NOx Tons , On Ozone NOx Limit, Tons ,567 Units with Red font use credits from units in Grey font to meet annual HAA Limit These two numbers show Ozone Season tons emitted well under Ozone Season limit HAA set annual and ozone season caps and allowed “system-wide averaging With tougher ozone standard and focus on “peak days” – units that “under-controlled” are now being re-evaluated These two numbers show Annual tons emitted well under annual limit

UnitCapacity (MW) NOx ControlsOld NOx RACT 30-Day Rolling Average (lb/mmBTU) HAA Facility Allowance (Tons) 2012 Average NOx Emission Rate (lb/mmBTU) Morgantown Unit #1 Tangentially Coal Fired 640 Low NOx Burners, Over Fired Air, and SCR 0.70 Annual - 2,094 Ozone - 1,053 Annual Ozone Morgantown Unit #2 Tangentially Coal Fired 640 Low NOx Burners, Over Fired Air, and SCR 0.70 Annual - 2,079 Ozone - 1,048 Annual Ozone NRG – Morgantown Built in 1967 Boiler types –Units 1 And 2 are both coal burning T-fired units - manufactured by Alstom Installed SCR control systems in 2007 and 2008 (about $120M) Total capacity = 1,280 MW

Very low emission rates from SCR Unit Morgantown Unit 1 MDE Current Thinking: Allowable rate of 0.05 to 0.08 lb/mmBtu (24hr RA) Current Controls - SCR

Morgantown Unit 2 Very low emission rates from SCR Unit MDE Current Thinking: Allowable rate of 0.06 to 0.10 lb/mmBtu (24hr RA) Current Controls - SCR

Morgantown - Conclusions Both units experience excellent operation and run controls all year long Current thinking - 24 Hr Rolling Avg NOx Emission Limit of 0.05 to 0.08 lb/mmBtu for Unit 1 Current thinking - 24 Hr Rolling Avg NOx Emission Limit 0.06 to 0.10 lb/mmBtu for Unit 2

Unit Capacity (MW) NOx Controls Old NOx RACT 30-Day Rolling Ave. (lb/mmBTU) HAA Facility Allowance (Tons) 2012 Ave. NOx Emission Rate (lb/mmBTU) Chalk Point Unit #1 Wall Fired Fuel: Coal 355 Low NOx Burners, Over Fired Air, and SCR 0.80 Annual – 1,166 Ozone Annual – Ozone Chalk Point Unit #2 Wall Fired Fuel: Coal 355 Low NOx Burners, Over Fired Air, and SACR 0.80 Annual – 1,223 Ozone Annual – Ozone Combined Stack (Both Units 1 & 2) 710As listed above0.80 Annual – 2,389 Ozone - 1,268 Annual – Ozone Chalk Point Built in 1964, Boiler types: –Units 1 and 2 are both coal burning Combustion Engineering Wall fired units –Units 3 and 4 are oil fired Installed a SCR control system on Unit 1 in 2008 ($60M) and a SACR control system on Unit 2 in 2006 ($20M) Total capacity = 2000 MW

NOx Emissions on Peak Ozone Days Chalk Point emissions - 14 tons per day (80% from SACR)

Current Controls – SCR on Unit 1 – SACR on Unit 2 Both Units discharge through a common stack Chalk Point Emissions from Unit 2 SACR Emissions from Unit 1 SCR Combined Emissions from both Units MDE Current Thinking: Allowable rate of 0.1 to 0.15 lb/mmBtu (24hr RA)

Deeper Reductions at Chalk Point 2 In filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, GenOn Energy (now NRG) discussed plans to add SCR control technology at Chalk Point Unit 2 by the 2018 to 2021 timeframe Because of Maryland’s severe ozone nonattainment problems, MDE believes these controls need to be implemented in a timeframe consistent with the CAA’s attainment deadlines SCRs at Chalk Point 2 would significantly reduce NOx –0.08 to 0.10 lb/mmBtu Operational by 2015 to support Moderate area attainment needs

SACR Selective Auto Catalytic system on Unit 2 much less efficient then SCR on Unit 1 –Results in high peak day NOx emissions Current thinking: –Through Hr Rolling Average NOx Emission Limit of 0.10 to 0.15 lb/mmBtu for combined stack. –By Hr Rolling Average NOx Emission Limit of 0.08 to 0.10 lb/mmBtu for combined stack. Chalk Point - Conclusions

Unit Capaci ty (MW) NOx Controls Old NOx RACT 30-Day Rolling Ave. (lb/mmBTU) HAA Facility Allowance (Tons) 2012 Ave. NOx Emission Rate (lb/mmBTU) Dickerson #1 T Fired Fuel: Coal 190 LNCFS III, and SNCR 0.80 Annual – 554 Ozone Annual – 0.26 Ozone Dickerson #2 T Fired Fuel: Coal 190 LNCFS III, and SNCR 0.80 Annual – 607 Ozone Annual – 0.26 Ozone Dickerson #3 T Fired Fuel: Coal 190 LNCFS III, and SNCR 0.80 Annual – 575 Ozone Annual – 0.25 Ozone Combined Stack: Units 1, 2, & 3 570As listed above0.80 Annual – 1,736 Ozone Annual – 0.26 Ozone NRG - Dickerson Built in 1960 Boiler types –Units 1,2, & 3 are both coal burning Combustion Engineering T-fired units Installed a SNCR control systems in 2009 ( $15M) Total capacity = 570 MW

NOx Emissions on Peak Ozone Days Dickerson emissions – Over 12 tons per day from three units

Dickerson Units 1 2 & No operation of SNCR in 2012 MDE Current Thinking: Allowable rate of 0.15 to 0.20 lb/mmBtu (24hr RA) Current Controls - SNCR The 0.15 to 0.20 lb/mmBtu limit would have required operation of the SNCR

Deeper Reductions at Dickerson In filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, GenOn Energy (now NRG) discussed plans to add SCR control technology at Dickerson by the 2018 to 2021 timeframe Because of Maryland’s severe ozone nonattainment problems, MDE believes these controls need to be implemented in a timeframe consistent with the CAA’s attainment deadlines SCRs at Dickerson would significantly reduce NOx –0.08 to 0.10 lb/mmBtu Operational by 2015 to support Moderate area attainment needs

Dickerson – Conclusions Dickerson has not ran SNCR since testing of SNCR showed a % drop in NOx Rate Capacity factor significantly decreased at Dickerson Current thinking –Through Hr Rolling Avg NOx Emission Limit of 0.15 to 0.20 lb/mmBtu –By Hr Rolling Avg NOx Emission Limit of 0.08 to 0.10 lb/mmBtu

Coal Fired Units Old NOx RACT MDE Current Thinking Updated NOx RACT Chalk Point 1 & 2 Common Stack (SCR & SACR) 0.80 lb/mmBtu 30 Day Rolling Average 0.1 to 0.15 lb/mmBtu 24-hr Rolling Average By 2015 – 0.08 to 0.10 lb/mmBtu 24-hr Rolling Average Morgantown 1 (SCR) 0.70 lb/mmBtu 30 Day Rolling Average 0.05 to 0.08 lb/mmBtu 24-hr Rolling Average Morgantown 2 (SCR) 0.70 lb/mmBtu 30 Day Rolling Average 0.06 to 0.10 lb/mmBtu 24-hr Rolling Average Dickerson 1,2 & 3 Common Stack (SNCR) 0.70 Lb/mm Btu 30 Day Rolling Average 0.2 to 0.25 lb/mmBtu 24-hr Rolling Average By 2015 – 0.08 to 0.10 lb/mmBtu 24-hr Rolling Average NRG – Current MDE Thinking Short-Term NOx Limits

Unit Capacity (MW) NOx Controls NOx RACT 30-Day Rolling Average (lb/mmBTU) HAA Facility Allowance (Tons) 2012 Average NOx Emission Rate (lb/mmBTU) Warrior Run #1 Fluid Bed Fuel: Coal 290SNCRn/a Annual – 0.08 Ozone AES Warrior Run Built in 2000 Boiler types –ABB Combustion Engineering coal fired circulating fluidized bed (ACFB) –Well controlled by inherently low emitting design of fluidized bed boiler. Total capacity = 205 MW

AES Warrior Run Very low rates accomplished without use of SNCR MDE Current Thinking: Allowable rate of 0.05 to 0.09 lb/mmBtu

Very low rates accomplished with inherently low emitting design of the fluidized bed boiler Warrior Run is not included in HAA SNCR is not operated Current thinking - 24 Hr Rolling Average NOx Emission Limit – 0.05 to 0.09 lb/mmBtu AES Warrior Run – Conclusions

Alternative NOx RACT Concept Averaging within a system for NOx and ozone makes sense if averaging results in peak day reductions equal to or greater than the reductions from unit-by-unit limits MDE is continuing to analyze an option that may provide flexibility while achieving equal or greater reductions Current thinking – Alternative RACT: –System-wide average rate of 0.10 lb/mmBtu as a 24-hour rolling, and –System-wide average rate of 0.08 lb/mmBtu as a 30-day rolling average … being considered

Next Steps - NOx Continue to analyze hybrid SCR/SNCR system at Crane Continue to analyze SCR controls at Chalk Point and Dickerson Continue to analyze system- wide alternative RACT Continue to work with EPA on start-up/shut-down issues Continue to work with stakeholders on proposed limits Suggest that December meeting focus solely on NOx RACT limits