Reading Your Child’s Cognitive Abilities Test Profile Bonnie O’Regan Advanced Learning Program Facilitator Greenwich Public Schools February 5, 2014 (snowdate:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Another Test? Interpreting Your Child’s CRCT, ITBS, & CogAT Scores: It’s About Improving Achievement! Beaver Ridge ES
Advertisements

Understanding Stanford 10 Results
Reading the CogAT Report: A Parent’s Guide Reading the CogAT Report.
Interpreting Results from the Iowa Test of Basic Skills and the Cognitive Abilities Test (ITBS/CogAT) A Parent Guide.
Assessment at Clarkdale Ellen Auchenpaugh, Academic Coach March 4, 2014.
Chapter 8 Intelligence (only)
Everything you ever wanted to know about Intelligence, but were afraid to ask! Carolyn R. Fallahi, Ph. D.
Gifted Education Testing Guidelines The following are addressed in Bixby Public School District Gifted Education Policy.
PARENT SESSION SPRING 2015 PRESENTED BY: JENNIFER SEELIG MOREHEAD AIG FACILITATOR Second Grade CogAT.
Understanding standardized test Results
Ivy Tech Adjunct Faculty Conference April 4, 2009.
MARCH 12, 2015 Testing at Lees Corner ES. Still Online? Online Testing  Grade Level Common Assessments Mostly in grades 3-6  eCart Windows Grades 3-6.
Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT) and AIG Identification Process Understanding the Student Profile and its Use for Educational Planning and AIG Identification.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
GL Assessment is part of the GL Education Group. In case of enquiries please contact GL Assessment by ing Summary presentation.
Characteristics of Psychological Tests
Introduction to GREAT for ELs Office of Student Assessment Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (608)
1 Normal Distributions Heibatollah Baghi, and Mastee Badii.
Understanding Your Child’s Assessment: What Do Those Tests Really Tell You? Victoria B. Damiani, Ed.D., NCSP Center for Rural Gifted Education Indiana.
Standardized Testing (1) EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Statistics Used In Special Education
Standardization the properties of objective tests.
TKS Student Test Results Spring & Fall Tests Kentucky Performance Rating for Educational Progress (K-PREP) Administered May 2012 Kentucky test aligned.
Dr. Carolyn Ford Cyndi Smith. Activating Strategy – “Can You Pass the Test?” Making the Pieces Fit Together Using the CogAt and/or ITBS to Inform Instruction.
Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT) Miami-Dade County Public Schools NNAT Workshop March 26, 28, & 29, 2007.
What is it? What information does it give us? How can we use this to guide our instruction?
+ GT Parent Orientation Night A general overview of the program.
SAT 10 (Stanford 10) 2013 Nakornpayap International School Presentation by Ms.Pooh.
Scores & Norms Derived Scores, scales, variability, correlation, & percentiles.
CogAT Cognitive Abilities Test ™ Report to Parents What does CogAT measure? CogAT measures cognitive development of a student in the areas of learned reasoning.
Kindergarten Gifted and Talented Information Meeting
STANDARDIZED AND STATE ASSESSMENTS 3W Talk. REASONS TO TEST  To recognize areas of strength and weakness  To look for discrepancies between subjects.
Z-Scores Standardized Scores. Standardizing scores With non-equivalent assessments it is not possible to develop additive summary statistics. –e.g., averaging.
Measures of Variability Percentile Rank. Comparison of averages is not enough. Consider a class with the following marks 80%, 80%, 80%, 90%, 20%, 70%,
Cognitive Abilities Test McKinney ISD
Chapter 8: Intelligence and Individual Differences in Cognition.
End of Grade Test Understanding the Score Report.
Creativity Solving problems by combining ideas or behavior in new ways Convergent thinking- a problem is thought to have one solution and all lines of.
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5: Introduction to Norm- Referenced.
BISD GATE Gifted and Talented Education Identification.
What is NNAT2? The NNAT2 is an evaluation of a students’ nonverbal reasoning and general problem-solving ability. NNAT2 items assess ability regardless.
WCPSS AIG and 3rd Grade Explorers
Created by: AIG Specialists Onslow County Schools.
Thursday, October 22 Objective: Compare and contrast learning theories.
Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)
SAT-10/ARMT Results (Stanford 10),was administered to Alabama students in Grades 3-8 for the first time in April Norm-referenced scores Enable us.
The Normal Distribution and Norm-Referenced Testing Norm-referenced tests compare students with their age or grade peers. Scores on these tests are compared.
PSAT 8/9: Understanding the Score Report
Understanding your Student’s SAT 10 Score Carole McLenithan & Mark Pendergrass May 22, 2015.
Chapter 3.3 – 3.4 Applications of the Standard Deviation and Measures of Relative Standing.
2010 Archdiocese of Chicago Pre Test Workshop Brian Bell.
Parent’s Guide to Individual Profile Report
San Luis Valley Gifted Education Network Meeting October 17, 2013.
Cognitive Abilities Test ™. CogAT ® is key to understanding how your students learn! Cognitive Abilities Test ™
Chapter 9 Intelligence. Objectives 9.1 The Nature of Intelligence Define intelligence from an adaptation perspective. Compare and contrast theories of.
Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)
CogAT Cognitive Abilities Test ™ Report to Parents
The Canadian Cognitive Abilities Test 7 (CCAT 7)
Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)
Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)
Iowa Assessment Program
Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)
CogAT Cognitive Abilities Test ™ Report to Parents
Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)
The MidYIS Test.
Chapter 10: Intelligence & Testing
Third Grade Testing Information
Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)
What Do All These Numbers Mean? Interpreting Gifted Test Scores
Presentation transcript:

Reading Your Child’s Cognitive Abilities Test Profile Bonnie O’Regan Advanced Learning Program Facilitator Greenwich Public Schools February 5, 2014 (snowdate: February 18, 2014)

CogAT: Cognitive Abilities Test What is it? What information does it give us? How can we use this information?

Comprehending problem situations Detecting similarities and differences Making inferences Making deductions Classifying and categorizing objects, events, and other stimuli Creating and adapting problem- solving strategies Using familiar concepts and skills in new contexts CogAT measures important reasoning skills: Cognitive Abilities Test ™

CogAT measures three different cognitive abilities: Cognitive Abilities Test ™ Verbal BatteryQuantitative BatteryNonVerbal Battery Measures flexibility, fluency, and adaptability in reasoning with verbal materials and in solving verbal problems Measures flexibility and fluency in working with quantitative symbols and concepts and the student’s ability to discover relationships and to figure out a rule or principle that explains them Measures fluency and flexibility in reasoning with shapes and visual patterns. Facilitates the assessment of English learners or students whose verbal or mathematical experiences are limited.

CogAt and IQ Cognitive Abilities Test The CogAT is NOT an IQ test, but is a test of reasoning which is one of the variforms of intelligence It has a.79 correlation to IQ. The closer to 1.0 the better the correlation, so it has high correlation Reasoning abilities have substantial correlations with learning and problem solving, both in and out of school

Cognitive Abilities Test Verbal Ability – Best predictor of academic success Quantitative Ability – “number sense” ability to see relationship of numbers Nonverbal Ability – Best predictor of how fast a student learns

Raw Scores Number of Items = the number of questions on the subtests. Number Att. (attempted) = the number of questions the student answered. Number Correct = the total number of items the student answered correctly.

The CogAT allows comparisons of the performance of students with the performance of other students in the nation of the same age who took the same test.

Standard Age Score (SAS) Cognitive LevelSAS Range Very High Above Average Average Below Average73-88 Very Low50-72

Stanines DescriptionStanine Range Very High9 Above Average7-8 Average4-6 Below Average2-3 Very Low1

Understanding Percentile Ranks Juan’s results on a Verbal battery places him 88h from the bottom of his age mates. Juan, as an example, is a student in a group of exactly 100 students also 7.9 years old. A common way to evaluate a student’s performance is to compare it with the performances of some group. Because there are 100 students in his group, one can then say that Juan performed as well as or better than 88 percent of his classmates. Top of the class Bottom of the group The 88 is a PERCENTILE RANK because it represents a relative standing, i.e., it identifies what percentage of Juan’s age mates scored the same as or lower than him. 88th

The CogAT allows comparisons of the performance of students with the performance of other students in the nation of the same grade who took the same test at the same time of year.

Juan’s results on a Verbal battery places him 88th from the bottom of his age mates and 89 th from the bottom of his grade mates Top of the class Bottom of the national group 88th 89th

Understanding Local Percentile Ranks Now, Juan is only being compared to about 650 Grade 2 students in GPS. Juan’s performance on the verbal battery equaled or exceeded the performances of 52 percent of Grade 2 students locally. Even though Juan scored at the 89th national percentile rank on the Verbal Battery, he will have a different local percentile rank because he is being compared to a different group of students Top of the district Bottom of the district 58th

Standard Age Score (SAS) Cognitive Level National SAS Range Greenwich SAS Range Very High Above Average Average Below Average Very Low

A bar graph of the student’s scores appears on the score report as a visual representation of the student’s percentile score.

Ability Profile System

This report shows the results of testing for your child at one particular time on one particular assessment. It is important to always look for multiple pieces of evidence when using assessment data to make decisions.