Application of IIASA GAINS Model for Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution in Europe Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IIASA Janusz Cofala, Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Emission Projections for 2020 Results from a study for the.
Advertisements

Air Pollution and Climate
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Links between climate, air pollution and energy policies Findings from the.
State of model development: RAINS/GAINS International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, A. Chambers, J. Cofala,
W ORKSHOP MINNI Roma, aprile 2013 GAINS-Italy Giovanni Vialetto, Tiziano Pignatelli Technical Unit on Environment Technologies.
Integrated Assessment Modeling, cost-effectiveness, and agricultural projections in the RAINS model Zbigniew Klimont International Institute for Applied.
RAINS review 2004 The RAINS model: The approach. Cost-effectiveness needs integration Economic/energy development (projections) State of emission controls,
Methodology and applications of the RAINS air pollution integrated assessment model Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
National work with the GAINS model: experiences from Sweden and other countries Работы в рамках модели GAINS на национальном уровне: опыт Швеции и других.
The inclusion of near-term radiative forcing into a multi-pollutant/multi-effect framework Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM)
The Clean Air For Europe (CAFE) program: Scientific and economic assessment Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
M. Amann, W. Schöpp, J. Cofala, G. Klaassen The RAINS-GHG Model Approach Work in progress.
Application of air quality strategies of Western Europe for modeling of the transboundary air pollution impact on the Russian Federation with the GAINS.
LINKAGES AND SYNERGIES OF REGIONAL AND GLOBAL EMISSION CONTROL Workshop of the UN/ECE Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling January 27-29, 2003.
1 Introduction, reporting requirements, workshop objectives Workshop on greenhouse gas and ammonia emission inventories and projections from agriculture.
European Commission: DG Environment Overview of projections data use in the European policy-making process TFEIP Workshop on Emission Projections, 30 October.
European Scenarios of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation: Focus on Poland J. Cofala, M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, L.
Baseline emission projections for the EU-27 Results from the EC4MACS project and work plan for the TSAP revision Markus Amann International Institute for.
Workshop on the use of GAINS model for the revision of the Gothenburg Protocol Focus on key measures to improve air quality in Europe and the role of EECCA.
The GAINS model. Rationale Air pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHGs) often stem from the same sources Energy consumption and agricultural activities.
Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol All calculations refer to Parties in the EMEP modelling domain Markus Amann Centre.
EC4MACS European Consortium for Modelling of Air Pollution and Climate Strategies GAINS Greenhouse Gas – Air Pollution Interactions and Synergies DG ECFIN.
Progress in the development of national baseline scenarios M. Amann, J. Borken, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute.
M. Amann G. Klaassen, R. Mechler, J. Cofala, C. Heyes International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Modelling synergies and trade-offs between.
The GAINS model State of play
Transboundary Air Pollution and related Integrated Assessment Modelling Tiziano Pignatelli Enea – Atmospheric Pollution Unit
Co-benefits of Integrated Approach to Air Quality Management and Climate Change Mitigation Role of Integrated Assessment Methods in SEA Dr. Vladislav.
1 JRC – Ispra DG JRC and EC4MACS IPTS Institute for Prospective Technology Studies - Peter Russ - Antonio Soria - Szabolc Szekeres IES Institute for Environment.
Clean Air The revision of the National Emission Ceilings Directive and agriculture FERTILIZERS FORUM 23 June 2015.
GAINS databases Links and interactions with the international reporting processes UNECE TFEIP/EIONET meeting Dublin, Ireland, October, 2007 Z.Klimont.
Impact of the EGTEI proposed ELVs on Emission Scenarios UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution Modelling analysis performed by the.
New concepts and ideas in air pollution strategies Richard Ballaman Chairman of the Working Group on Strategies and Review.
Cost-effectiveness analysis of GAINS Milena Stefanova, ENEA Bologna, 23 marzo 2010 UTVALAMB-AIR Unità Tecnica Modelli, Metodi.
Coordination Centre for Effects Jean-Paul Hettelingh, EC4MACS kick off meeting, IIASA, 6-7 March 2007 EC4MACS Task 3: Ecosystem Impact Assessment by the.
RAINS becomes GAINS and other “future” stories TFIEP Workshop on Emission Projections Thessaloniki, Greece, October, 2006 Zbigniew Klimont EMEP Centre.
Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling Review of the Gothenburg Protocol UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC.
Current knowledge and possible systematic biases Linkages with greenhouse gas policy Fabian Wagner M. Amann, C. Berglund, J. Cofala, L. Höglund, Z. Klimont,
Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution CAFE team, DG Environment and streamlined air quality legislation.
Markus Amann, Janusz Cofala, Zbigniew Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Progress on modelling emission scenarios.
Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) International.
Janusz Cofala and Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Application.
Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenburg,
1 Review of the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) and National Emission Ceilings (NEC) Directives Marianne Wenning DG ENV, Head of Unit,
Use of emissions & other data reported within the LRTAP Convention in the IIASA GAINS model Z.Klimont Center for.
Data sources for GAINS Janusz Cofala and Stefan Astrom.
IIASA analysis of near-term mitigation potentials and costs in Annex I countries.
The links to global problems Presentation at the 25 th anniversary special event of the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution “Past successes.
1 Co-benefits of CDM projects in China CDM and Climate Policy: Multidisciplinary Perspectives MILEN Workshop 18 November 2009 Holmenkollen Park Hotell,
Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development The 14th Annual Community Modeling and Analysis System (CMAS) Conference Co-benefits of energy efficiency.
Baseline emission projections and scope for further reductions in Europe up to 2020 Results from the CAFE analysis M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala,
Comparison of GHG mitigation efforts between Annex 1 countries Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Scenarios for the Negotiations on the Revision of the Gothenburg Protocol with contributions from Imrich Bertok, Jens Borken-Kleefeld, Janusz Cofala, Chris.
TF HTAP, TF IAM, Vienna, February HTAP-GAINS scenario analysis: preliminary exploration of emission scenarios with regard to the benefits of global.
An outlook to future air quality in Europe: Priorities for EMEP and WGE from an Integrated Assessment perspective Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment.
Scope for further emission reductions: The range between Current Legislation and Maximum Technically Feasible Reductions M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala,
1 Emission data needs for assessments and international reporting Joint UNECE and EIONET workshop on emission inventories and projections 9-11 May 2001,
Baseline and MTFR scenarios EECCA and Balkan countries Janusz Cofala and Stefan Astrom.
The GAINS optimization approach – Basic background information Fabian Wagner International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) IIASA workshop.
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Cost-effectiveness Analysis in CAFE and the Need for Information about Urban Air Quality.
Air Quality in EEA and EECCA Europe’s Environment assessment report, th Europe’s Environment assessment report, 2007 (‘the Belgrade report’) Hans.
Air pollution in Europe and Asia From Science to Policy
Progress on modelling emission scenarios
Clean Air for Europe and Research Needs
31 January 2007 GAINS Review Peringe Grennfelt Christer Agren Matti Johansson Rob Maas Simone Schucht Les White With comments from: Helen ApSimon Julio.
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Updating the Baseline and Maximum Control scenarios State of play of the.
M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes,
M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes, Z
Emission Projections for 2020
Environmental objectives and target setting
Tentative Ideas for Co-operation
Presentation transcript:

Application of IIASA GAINS Model for Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution in Europe Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)

Methodology

GAINS model: GHG-Air pollution Interactions and Synergies Objectives Integrated assessment of international emission control strategies: Quantification of national emission control potentials and costs For exogenous projections of activities Balancing of efforts across countries/economic sectors for –different objective functions, and –different exogenous constraints Considering interactions between GHGs and air pollutants Taking into account co-benefits between air pollution control and GHG mitigation

GAINS integrates multiple pollutants and their multiple effects Emissions and control measures for air pollutants PM BC OC SO 2 NO x VOCNH 3 Impacts Health impacts: from fine particulate matter  from ground-level ozone  Vegetation damage: Ozone (agricultural crops)  Acidification (forests, water)  Eutrophication (biodiversity)  Emissions and control measures for air pollutantsand greenhouse gases PM BC OC SO 2 NO x VOCNH 3 CO 2 CH 4 N2ON2O HFCs PFCs SF 6 Impacts Health impacts: from fine particulate matter ()() from ground-level ozone ()() Vegetation damage: Ozone (agricultural crops) ()() Acidification (forests, water)  Eutrophication (biodiversity)  Radiative forcing: - from direct greenhouse gases  - via aerosols and ozone ()()()()()()()()()()()()

Building blocks of GAINS Energy/agricultural projections Emissions Emission control options Atmospheric dispersion Air pollution impacts, Basket of GHG emissions Costs PRIMES, POLES, CAPRI, IEA, nat. projections Simulation/ “Scenario analysis” mode

The GAINS optimization mode Energy/agricultural projections Emissions Emission control options Atmospheric dispersion Costs Environmental targets OPTIMIZATION PRIMES, POLES, CAPRI, IEA, national projections Air pollution impacts, Basket of GHG emissions

Applications for the Revision of the Gothenburg Protocol

Protocol to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone Adopted in November 1999, 26 parties, entered in force in May 2005 Sets country-specific emission ceilings for 2010 for SO2, NOx, VOCs, and NH3 Reductions in Europe (relative to 1990): –SO2 – 63%, –NOx – 41% –VOC – 40% –NH3 – 17%. Based on RAINS analysis Benefits: –Less ecosystems with excessive acidification (78 Mha) and eutrophication (57Mha) –Number of days with excessive ozone levels halved –47,500 fewer premature deaths –Exposure of vegetation to ozone 44% lower Currently under revision; GAINS used as a scientific tool

Current and future (2020) emissions of air pollutants in Europe and Russia, kilotons Europe Russia – European part

Loss of life expectancy due to anthropogenic sources of PM2.5, months 2020 Baseline (4.7 months) 2000 (8.2 months)

Emission control costs of further reductions in health effects of PM

Loss in statistical life expectancy - base year and optimized 75% reduction in health effects from PM

Costs for achieving 75% improvement of health effects from PM

Use of GAINS to explore co-benefits of climate policy for air pollution

Low carbon strategies have significant co-benefits Low CO 2 strategies result in less SO 2, NO x and PM emissions, lower damage to health and vegetation from reduced air pollution, cost savings for air pollution control equipment, which compensate (part of) GHG mitigation costs. CO 2 emissions vs. health impacts (YOLLs) ● EU-27 ● China ● India

On-line calculator on the Internet

Why actively participate in integrated assessment ? 1.Better understanding of preparatory work for the revision of the Gothenburg Protocol 2.Correcting current information in GAINS 3.Possibility of analyzing effects of national pathways and control strategies like: - different demand for energy, - emission reductions, their environmental impacts and costs of technologies from technical annexes - effects of grace periods or derogations in technology implementation 4. Analysis of co-benefits of climate scenarios for air pollution 5. Analysis of costs of reduction of GHG (GAINS GHG Mitigation Efforts Calculator)

The GAINS model is freely accessible on the Internet: Access to on-line versions: –Europe –China and East Asia –South Asia –Annex I countries Policy reports, user tutorials, model documentation.