What CARs can tell us about screening programmes & their population effects: a model for trisomy 21 Ann M Tonks (WMCAR PHE), Adam S Gornall (The Shrewsbury.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cate Langley MSc Lead Midwife, North Powys. A Survey to identify who, how and what maternity data are collected in Welsh Maternity Units.
Advertisements

MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Questionnaire for Individual Women: Child Mortality.
Implementing NICE guidance
Local Improvement following National Clinical Audit The View from a National Clinical Audit Provider – the Health & Social Care Information Centre.
Sexually transmitted infections: epidemiological evidence of need Dr Kirsty Foster Consultant in Health Protection Public Health England Centre, North.
Outcome of Spina Bifida in South Wales over a 10 year period BINOCAR Scientific meeting 2014 N.Gupta, P.Leach, D.Tucker and J.Calvert Cardiff.
Hillingdon Community Health Improving Breastfeeding prevalence with partnership working Jennifer Taubman Breastfeeding Coordinator.
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Pediatrics Journal Club Slides: Potential Impact of CCHD Screening Peterson C, Ailes E, Riehle-Colarusso T, et al.
SCH Medics Journal Club Unexpected collapse in apparently healthy newborns – a prospective study of a missing cohort of neonatal deaths and near death.
The prevalence and risk of Down Syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening B. Boyle, J.K.
Mortality and causes of death among women living with HIV in the UK in the era of highly-active antiretroviral therapy Sara Croxford, A Kitching, M Kall,
Health and Wellness for all Arizonans Arizona Birth Defects Monitoring Program (ABDMP)
 Missed Opportunities for Congenital Syphilis Prevention in Baltimore City Stephanie Atueyi, MPH Candidate 2014 University of Florida April 11 th, 2014.
Genetic screening.
The impact of managed clinical networks on place of birth and newborn transfers Chris Gale On behalf of the Neonatal Data Analysis Unit and the Medicines.
Outcome of diabetic pregnancy Comparison of North East England with Norway December 2000 Gillian Hawthorne.
Michigan Birth Defects Registry Overview and Status.
Register-based research in the Nordic countries
The risk factors of preterm births and their implication for neonatal deaths in South Carolina during Joanna Yoon, MSPH Division of Biostatistics.
Enhanced Prenatal Screening Program
Problems in Birth Registration What is the National Standard? Why is the data so important? Joanne M. Wesley Office of the State Registrar.
Accuracy of reporting abortions with Down syndrome in England and Wales Joan Morris Anna Springett BINOCAR Scientific Meeting Congenital Anomaly Registers:
Causal Pathway of Disease or Disability Environment (pre-exposure) Hazard/agent Behavior/risk factor Exposure Pre-symptomatic phase Apparent disease Death.
Infant mortality and mother’s country of birth- what information is currently available? Nicola Dennis- Knowledge Transfer Facilitator, KIT(WM), PHE.
Diabetes in pregnancy James Penny Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist Surrey & Sussex NHS Trust.
報 告 者 王瓊琦. postpartum depression : identification of women at risk.
Pregnancy Screening Pathway
TEMPLATE DESIGN © THREE YEARS STUDY OF PERINATAL MORTALITY IN A DISTRICT GENERAL HOSPITAL, UK Momena J A, Rao C Anita.
12 JUNE 2012 DUE DATA – IMPROVING MIDWIVES’ USE OF DATA AND ACCESS TO INFORMATION JULIE TINDALE-MIDWIFE Maternity Data Update on issues.
Outcomes of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 43 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto, Canada (2006)
Pulse Oximetry screening for Cardiac malformations in the neonate Majd Abu-Harb September 2014.
International Collaborative Effort on Perinatal and Infant Mortality,
Public Health England: opportunities for better coverage? Professor John Newton, Chief Knowledge Officer, Public Health England.
Maternity Framework Antenatal Access Target and Outcome Measures Data Theme Work Stream Women and Children’s Health Information Programme Lindsay Mathie.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Incidence and management of Shoulder Dystocia – a DGH perspective B. Alhindawi, Y. Abdallah, M. Elsayed.
Evaluation of routine data sources for ascertainment of hypospadias cases Congenital Anomaly Register for Oxfordshire, Berkshire, and Buckinghamshire (CAROBB)
Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Malformations for Undergraduates
Knowledge & Intelligence Team South East updates 5 th March 2015 – 16 th June 2015.
Increased case detection in infants and children Robert Gie Childhood TB Subgroup.
Health Information Solutions Gaining Insights through Data Linkage: The VS-PDD Linked Data Files Presenters: Beate Danielsen & Jan Morgan.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Fetal outcome of prenatally diagnosed congenital abnormality: A Retrospective study” Vallikkannu Narayanan.
ACB Training Course- Plymouth Down’s syndrome screening David Worthington (Laboratory Advisor - National Screening Programme)
Pregnancy & Newborn Screening Developments. What is screening? Screening is: “a public health service in which members of a defined population, who do.
NHS Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme Marie Coughlin Screening Lead January 25 th 2010.
The Impact of Obtaining Documented Informed Consent on MS/MS Screening L.A. Faulkner 1, L.B. Feuchtbaum 2, M. Hanlon 1, F.W. Lorey 2, K. Velazquez 2, and.
Learning to Manage Health Information Measuring the Quality of Maternity Care Professor Suzanne Truttero Midwifery Advisor Department of Health 18 th March.
Dr Heather O Dickinson My web page Department of Child Health University of Newcastle My web page Audit of cancer registrations notified by National Health.
Hospital inpatient data James Hebblethwaite. Acknowledgements This presentation has been adapted from the original presentation provided by the following.
Why? 1 in 100 newborns have congenital heart defects 25% of all CHD are critical (CCHD) requiring intervention in the.
Why did babies die? A review of deaths in Neonatal Units in Wales in 2012 and 2013 Siddhartha Sen Consultant Neonatologist, Royal Gwent Hospital Clinical.
UOG Journal Club: January 2016 Clinical implementation of routine screening for fetal trisomies in the UK NHS: cell-free DNA test contingent on results.
UOG Journal Club: July 2016 Ability of a preterm surveillance clinic to triage risk of preterm birth: a prospective cohort study J Min, HA Watson, NL Hezelgrave,
Croydon Health Services
Figure 1: Classification of CNS abnormality (%)
Helen Green Public Health Registrar (ST3) West Midlands
UOG Journal Club: July 2016 Ability of a preterm surveillance clinic to triage risk of preterm birth: a prospective cohort study J Min, HA Watson, NL Hezelgrave,
UOG Journal Club: January 2016
Congenital Anomalies Register -Of What Value?
Journal Club Notes.
Keerti Singh, C Greaves, L Mohammed, A Kumar.
Obstetric and paediatric HIV surveillance data from the UK and Ireland
Maternal health and early years
Multidisciplinary counselling reduces rate of abortion and improves clinical outcomes of prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease patients.
Obstetric and paediatric HIV surveillance data from the UK and Ireland
UOG Journal Club: April 2017
January 2014 Update Obstetric and paediatric HIV surveillance data from the UK and Ireland.
Down Syndrome : screening evolution and natural history
HIV surveillance in Northern Ireland 2018
Chantal Nelson BORN Annual Conference April 25, 2017
Overview. Perinatal Mortality Surveillance UK Perinatal Deaths for Births in 2017.
Presentation transcript:

What CARs can tell us about screening programmes & their population effects: a model for trisomy 21 Ann M Tonks (WMCAR PHE), Adam S Gornall (The Shrewsbury & Telford Hospital NHS Trust)

Background Congenital anomaly surveillance & screening are both population-based public health activities CARs collect affected cases from the total/target population; including the screened and unscreened cohorts Screening detection rates (DTRs) are needed to provide women with information to make informed choices monitor performance Modelled DTRs for T21 screening tests are available from DQASS for service-based (laboratory) cohorts only There is a paucity of data on the total population effects and performance of screening programmes 2WMCAR T21 BINOCAR 2014

Methods - CARs T21 cases were identified from a regional BINOCAR register (WMCAR) Population-based data using multiple sources and active case-finding Systems that do not actively collect all postnatally identified cases (unscreened and screen –ve cases) will: UNDER-estimate prevalence OVER-estimate detection rates Reliable methodology, generates good quality data and ensures highest possible ascertainment † † Savva G M, Morris J K. Ascertainment and accuracy of Down syndrome cases reported in congenital anomaly registers in England and Wales. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009; 94: F23–F27. 3WMCAR T21 BINOCAR 2014

Methods – T21 WMCAR Setting West Midlands: annual birth population of ≈ 73,500, 15 Acute Trusts T21 screening – combined or quad screening (Jan 2011+) Case definition All cytogenetically confirmed T21 cases: screened (NHS & private) & unscreened Selected by EDD (Jul 2011-Jun 2013) & postcode at delivery All outcomes miscarriages, TOPs (all gestations), & registerable births Affected population, excludes screen +ve cases where karyotyping normal/declined 4WMCAR T21 BINOCAR 2014

Methods – T21 data collection/validation Prospective reporting of cases by Trusts (via Local LCO) or other sources Diagnoses/ascertainment validated with cytogenetics labs (regional & private), NDSCR annual, surrounding CARs Retrospective validation of cases by Trusts (LCOs): a) correctly allocated to Trust at booking b) details of the screening offer/results collected Screened:screening data are confirmed with biochemistry labs Unscreened: choices confirmed in maternal notes or dating USS confirm eligibility – late bookers or IUD at dating Provisional Trust lists of T21 cases are sent to LCOs for cleaning 5WMCAR T21 BINOCAR 2014

Results - CARs 397 cases of T21 (2 years) Total prevalence 25.9 / 10,000 births (95%CI ) Median mat age at EDD (36, IQR 31-40); background (all births) 28 years Live births, n=202 (50.9%) Live birth prevalence 13.1 / 10,000 live births (95%CI ) Mortality: stillbirths and infant deaths, n= 28 6WMCAR T21 BINOCAR 2014

7 Combined (81.5%) DTR72.4% ( ) MOBP90%/2% Quad DTR63.4% ( ) MOBP75%/3% NHS SCREENED n=222 screen-ve n=65 Screen DTR 70.7% ( ) 75.1% DIAGNOSES NHS screening n=118 screen+ve n=157 PND56.3% ( )

Results: combined screening DTR 8WMCAR T21 BINOCAR 2014

Results: maternal ethnic group 9WMCAR T21 BINOCAR 2014 White BritishOther Total affected T Median mat age EDD (IQR) yrs 37 (31-40) 36 (31-39) Screening uptake in eligible, p< % ( ) 46.9% ( ) NHS screen DTR, p= % ( ) 57.8% ( ) Uptake PND in screen +ve77.9%61.5% Population PND rate, p< % ( ) 28.6% ( ) Uptake TOP following PND 85.0% ( ) 90.0% ( )

Results: CAR outcomes (total) 10WMCAR T21 BINOCAR 2014 Prevalence: total & live birth, long term trends Pregnancy outcomes, mortality rates, long term survival Link to exposures (fluoridation) Population PND rates timing of prenatal diagnosis methods of invasive testing Workload/work force planning

Results: screening tests & programme 11WMCAR T21 BINOCAR 2014 Population-based (e.g. Area Team) or service-based (e.g. booked at Trust) Screened cohort: Which type of test? %combined v %quad Test performance (DTR) – observed not modelled Pathway activity – uptake of PND, uptake of TOP Screening Programme: Eligible population size Offer coverage/screening uptake (affected group only) Missed screen (eligible cases screening not offered/completed)

Results: stakeholders 12WMCAR T21 BINOCAR 2014 Trusts: Case list for Annual Antenatal & Newborn Screening Audit Submission Missed screen SSS screen –ve (combined) image review Summary report for Trust Screening Board Area Team: Screening outcomes Screening lab: Own DTR Audit and review of screen –ve cases

Conclusions CARs provide a picture of screening performance and its population effects in affected cases Quantify the benefits of screening, but not the risks. CARs can generate reliable service and population-based screening outcomes for an entire programme or a specific test within it. There is an opportunity to use routinely-collected CAR data to inform other antenatal screening programmes. West Midlands Combined screening DTR did not achieve the NSC MOBP. Population prenatal diagnosis rates varied by maternal ethnic group. 13WMCAR T21 BINOCAR 2014

Acknowledgements All clinical, laboratory, and administrative staff who notify WMCAR, especially Local Screening Co-ordinators WMCAR staff for processing, coding, completing notifications 14WMCAR T21 BINOCAR 2014

15

Trisomy 21 prenatal diagnosis (karyotype) 16Presentation title - edit in Header and Footer

17WMCAR & T21 CKO visit

T21 prenatal diagnosis timing

Invasive procedure activity

Headings are set in 40 pt Arial Large body copy should be set in 18pt Roman Large subheadings set in 18pt Arial Text 20Presentation title - edit in Header and Footer

SURUSS & Private vs NHS