Particulate Matter Monitoring Required by the Utility MATS Eric Swisher| | 610-933-5246 ext. 17 August 22, 2012 Presented to ARIPPA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cathy Beahm Technical Assistance Specialist NH DES, Air Resources
Advertisements

Analyze Immediately Temperature. Hold Times IMMEDIATELY! Between minutes, as close to sample collection time as possible - note both time of collection.
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006.
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006.
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June 2006.
METAL COIL SURFACE MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006 May 2006.
IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
Impacts of the New Boiler MACT Rules Les Oakes King & Spalding.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
ECMPS Reporting Requirements under the MATS Rule
North Carolina Division of Air Quality - Mercury Regulations, Emissions, and Deposition Modeling in North Carolina Presented for 6th Annual Unifour Air.
Mercury Monitoring and Reporting Requirements under the MATS Rule
Harmonization of Parts 60 and 75
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators (HMIWI) Tiffany Miesel & John Glunn Florida DEP, Division.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Mercury from Electric Utilities: Monitoring and Emission Reductions Greg DeAngelo & Tiffany Miesel Florida.
MATS 2015: Are Your Units Ready? Outage Management for Power Plants July 15, 2014 Stephanie Sebor.
Air Emissions Testing Accreditation and Certification Programs and regulations Peter Westlin OAQPS, SPPD, MPG December 2010.
Bill Grimley OAQPS (919) Robin SegallOAQPS (919) Jeff Ryan ORD (919)
Recent EPA Regulation Development Presented by Bill Luthans to the 56 th Meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee Meeting for the Improvement of Air Quality.
Louisiana Department of EnvironmentalQuality LDEQ CAM Plan Overview LDEQ’s 27 th Annual Conference on the Environment Cajundome Convention Center Lafayette,
Wes Thornhill, Chief Industrial Chemicals Section Air Division
Boiler MACT and Other Air Developments 2011 Southern Section AWMA Conference Callaway Gardens, GA Boiler MACT and Other Air Developments 2011 Southern.
The ProRak™ Advantage An introduction to Hg Process Monitoring and Feedback Control.
A History and Status of CEMS Applications in USEPA Regulations Dale Evarts US EPA December 16, 2002 Better Air Quality in Asian Cities 2002
Background OAQPS is developing a new Performance Specification (PS-18) for HCl CEMS to support emissions monitoring in the Portland Cement MACT and Electric.
Sorbent Trap Sampling - Overview
INDUSTRIAL BOILER MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD)
Perspective On Growing EPA Environmental Mandates David Stippler, Indiana Utility Consumer Counselor 2012 NASUCA Annual Meeting Baltimore,
HAPs To Be Regulated: Mercury Only Electric utility steam generating units are uniquely regulated by Congress under 112(n)(1)(A) EPA was required to study.
Air Emission Control Technology UWM Air Pollution Meteorology Class November 20, 2007 Frances A. Hardrick We Energies.
December 4, Utility MACT Air & Waste Management Association/EPA Information Exchange December 4, 2002 William H. Maxwell Combustion Group/ESD.
Robert L. Burns, Jr., Esq. Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC August 1, 2013 Impact of Environmental Regulation on Coal Combustion for Electrical.
Clean Air Markets Program Data
APC Strategy for Mercury CEMS by Trey Lightsey 2010 Annual Meeting & Technical Conference A&WMA – Southern Section Renaissance Riverview Plaza Hotel.
.1 Approach to Utility MATS August 22, 2012 ARIPPA Annual Tech Convention Harrisburg, PA Joel Millard Environmental Regulatory Specialist KVB-Enertec Products.
Results you can rely on What Is New/Updated in Air Quality? TRC Companies, Inc. August 2011 TRC Companies, Inc. August 2011.
Updates PS-11 (PM CEMS), Multi-metals CEMS, Multi-metals Fence Line Monitoring, & CEMS Cost Model.
Our Vision – Healthy Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of the Rules and Applications Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
Air Pollution Solutions Ch. 18. How should we deal with air pollution? Legal, economic, and technical tools can help us to clean up air pollution, but.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Mercury Workshop – February 10, Medical Waste Incinerators and Other Misc. Sources of Mercury John.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC Boiler MACT Compliance Plans: Failure to Develop Plans Is Planning to Fail Susie Bowden|
Utility MATS Compliance: Considerations for Emissions Testing
UTILITY MACT WORKING GROUP STATE AND LOCAL STAKEHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS.
Possible Timeline for Environmental Regulatory Requirements for the Utility Industry Pending EPA air and water pollution regulations for coal plants have.
Update on Hg CEMS They’re here to stay … Jeffrey V. Ryan
NTEC -- April 24, Utility Air Toxics Regulatory Finding National Tribal Environmental Council April 24, 2001 William H. Maxwell U.S. EPA OAQPS/ESD/CG.
Georgia’s 112(g) Experiences Eric Cornwell Acting Manager Permitting Program.
Massachusetts’ 4-Pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Air Innovations Conference - August.
Control of Emissions of Sulfur Dioxide – LAC 33:III.Chapter 15 Dustin Duhon Air Permits Division Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality March 23,
1 Recommendations of the Clean Energy Group on Utility MACT Issues Utility MACT FACA Meeting September 9, 2002 Robert LaCount The Clean Energy Group The.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) November 24, 2009.
Navajo Nation Air Quality Control Program Operating Permit Program Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency Route 112 North/Bldg Fort Defiance,
THE CLEAN AIR ACT (CAA) By: Cody Able. THE CLEAN AIR ACT (CAA)  Draft year: 1968  Amendment years: 1965, 1970, 1977, 1990  This is an Act in The United.
Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR) – Hg Monitoring and Test Methods 2007 Measurement Technology Workshop Robin Segall and Bill Grimley U.S. Environmental Protection.
Air Pollution Challenges Kentucky Coal Association April 29, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Larry S. Monroe, Ph.D. Senior Research Consultant Southern Company Birmingham, Alabama October 22, 2010 Coal-Fired Power Plants Environmental Control Technology.
ARMA Standing Committee Reports Health, Safety, and Environment Committee ARMA Health, Safety, and Environment Committee ARMA Board of Directors Meeting.
Clean Air Mercury Rule. EPA Rule to Control Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric Utilities New Source Performance Standard (CAA 111) Allows for.
Regulatory Roadmap: Power sector environmental rules
Chapter 12 Administrative Controls
The Air Pollution Control Act of 1955
Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee August 4, 2016 Harrisburg, PA
Regulatory Update Mercury & Air Toxics Standards (MATS)
What is the Boiler NESHAP?
Air Monitoring Trends in New Jersey
NACAA Response to EGU MACT Vacatur
EPA/OAQPS Pollutant Emissions Measurement Update 2019
Presentation transcript:

Particulate Matter Monitoring Required by the Utility MATS Eric Swisher| | ext. 17 August 22, 2012 Presented to ARIPPA by All4 Inc.

2 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  Regulatory Background  Regulated Pollutants  Compliance Options for Filterable Particulate Matter (FPM) Presentation Overview

3 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU – National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units Published Final on February 16, 2012 Compliance date of February 16, 2015 Regulatory Background

4 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business. Regulated PollutantSurrogate Nonmercury Metallic HAP Filterable Particulate Matter (FPM) Acid Gases HCl or SO 2 Mercury None Regulated Pollutants

5 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  HCl CEMS (HCl or SO 2 )  Mercury CEMS (analyzer or sorbent trap)  FPM Quarterly Testing (FPM & Non-Hg HAP Metals) Continuous Parametric Monitoring System (CPMS) and Annual Emission Testing CEMS (FPM) Compliance Options

6 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  Quarterly testing for PM/Non-Hg Hap Metals FPM – U.S. EPA Reference Method 5 (RM5)  ~$15K Total Nonmecury HAP Metals – U.S. EPA Reference Method 29 (RM29)  ~$15K Quarterly Testing

7 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  Record parametric data during annual compliance tests.  Establish a parameter range from the parametric data collected during the annual compliance tests.  Monitor compliance using CPMS.  CMPS – PM CEMS that is not certified CPMS & Annual Testing

8 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  PM CEMS must be certified in accordance with 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B, Performance Specification 11 Generation of a correlation curve between the FPM concentration and the unit load Requires at least 15 Paired samples 3 loads, 5 runs per loading level May require more than the minimum number of runs Expensive (~35k-60k) FPM Spiking Ongoing QA/QC PM CEMS

Questions Eric Swisher| | ext. 17