BIOMARKERS/BIOSIGNATURES Standards needed for Translational Research 1.Standardized QUESTIONS in Clinical Trials 2.Standardized PRACTICES in advancing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 FDA Industry Workshop Statistics in the FDA & Industry The Future David L DeMets, PhD Department of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics University of.
Advertisements

1 Testing in the Open Market Testing in the Open Market AAAS Colloquium on Personalized Medicine: Planning for the Future June 2, 2009 Courtney C. Harper,
EU rare diseases registry for Niemann-Pick Disease type A, B and C Tarekegn Hiwot Consultant in Inherited Metabolic Disorders University Hospital of Birmingham.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA’s website for reference purposes only.
DESIGN OF A DISEASE SPECIFIC MASTER PROTOCOL Jeff Allen, PhD Executive Director Friends of Cancer Research.
Clinical Trial Designs for the Evaluation of Prognostic & Predictive Classifiers Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer.
Targeted (Enrichment) Design. Prospective Co-Development of Drugs and Companion Diagnostics 1. Develop a completely specified genomic classifier of the.
Advanced NSCLC Objective response rate -Well defined & widely accepted -Does not correlate well with OS -May be more useful if SD included -Higher RR correlates.
Statistical Issues in the Evaluation of Predictive Biomarkers Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer Institute
Partnering Opportunities & Translational Funding for Neurofibromatosis Neurofibromatosis (NF): - A rare disease - 1:3,000 - Tumor suppressor genes – NF1,
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development Critical Path.
Moving from Correlative Studies to Predictive Medicine Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer Institute brb.nci.nih.gov.
Cancer Nanotechnology: New Opportunities for Targeted Therapies FDA Public Meeting October 10, 2006 Piotr Grodzinski, Ph.D. Director, Nanotechnology for.
Re-Examination of the Design of Early Clinical Trials for Molecularly Targeted Drugs Richard Simon, D.Sc. National Cancer Institute linus.nci.nih.gov/brb.
Research & Innovation Horizon societal challenge 1 Open Info Day Funding Opportunities for SMEs Horizon 2020 "Health, demographic change and wellbeing"
Thoughts on Biomarker Discovery and Validation Karla Ballman, Ph.D. Division of Biostatistics October 29, 2007.
Academic Clinical Trial Do’s & Don’ts for Partnering with Pharma CCAF San Diego, CA April 14, 2014 J. Eric Bubbers, Ph.D.
1 The UK Opportunity: what is experimental medicine? UNLOCK YOUR GLOBAL BUSINESS POTENTIAL Pre- clinical develop- ment Phase I Phase II Phase III Product.
Trastuzumab [Genentech Inc.] Labeling Supplement to Include FISH Testing as a Method to Select Patients for Treatment FDA Clinical Review December 5, 2001.
Figure 4.1 NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Finance Corporate strategy and portfolio decisions Regulatory affairs Marketing and sales + market research.
Cap.org v. FNL FDA: Challenges to Protecting Public Health – Pathology’s Perspective Roger D. Klein, M.D., JD, F.C.A.P. March 7, 2013 Advocacy.
NCI Review of the Clinical Trials Process 6 th Annual National Forum on Biomedical Imaging in Oncology James H. Doroshow M.D. April 7, 2005 Bethesda, Maryland.
TB DIAGNOSTICS R&D: Not Just Technology Peter Mehlape, General Manager GBC Southern Africa Conference 11th October 2010, Johannesburg BD Experience with.
Turning TypeOne to The Plan for a World without T1D JDRF Translational Development: Partnering for Success.
Three Traps to Avoid & Bioinformatics Advantage 1.) In the Discovery Phase Its ok to “Fish” for significant relationships in your data (i.e. look at.
September 13, 2007SGH&M2B International&Training Workshop What does the European Technology Platform “Innovative Medicines initiative” offer? Vitalijs.
Project Funding & New Projects Cancer Care Engineering.
The Rise of Personalized Medicine: Implications for the IVD Industry Linda D. Bentley, Esq. MassMEDIC Diagnostics Industry Update March 31, 2009.
CPTR Overview CPTR 2012 Workshop October 2-4, 2012.
A Third-Party Model for Expanded Access Programs 1. We can deliver large EAPs, far in advance of FDA approval. 2. We can do it in today’s regulatory environment.
Single Patient Use of Investigational Anticancer Agents: An Industry Perspective Gerard T. Kennealey, MD Vice President, Clinical Research, Oncology AstraZeneca.
Jeffrey Cossman, M.D. Standardizing the Evaluation of Diagnostics.
RARE / ORPHAN DISEASES “ARE WE READY FOR THE CHANGE THAT WE NEED TO FIND EFFECTIVE TREATMENTS FOR ORPHAN DISEASE?”
Outline Significance Definitions Challenges Next steps.
Use of Candidate Predictive Biomarkers in the Design of Phase III Clinical Trials Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer.
The Use of Predictive Biomarkers in Clinical Trial Design Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer Institute
Adaptive Designs for Using Predictive Biomarkers in Phase III Clinical Trials Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer Institute.
Using Predictive Classifiers in the Design of Phase III Clinical Trials Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer Institute.
Letters of Intent (LOIs) Through the NCI’s Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) Dr. Patricia M. LoRusso, D.O. Karmanos Cancer Institute Wayne State.
Challenges of Bridging Studies in Biomarker Driven Clinical Trials May 19, MBSW Conference. Muncie, IN. Szu-Yu Tang, Chang Xu, Bonnie LaFleur May.
Initiating phase 1 clinical trials in pediatric oncology National Cancer Institute Perspective Barry Anderson, MD, PhD Pediatric Section Cancer Therapy.
Current Plan for Critical Path Initiative Janet Woodcock, M.D. Acting Deputy Commissioner For Operations November 5, 2004.
Raghu Kannan “THE NEW GOLD STANDARD IN COMPANION DIAGNOSTICS”
UPCOMING CHANGES TO IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTICS (IVDs) AND LABORATORY DEVELOPED TESTS (LDTs) REGULATIONS Moj Eram, PhD November 5, 2015.
Introduction to Design of Genomic Clinical Trials Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer Institute
1 Impediments to Early Initiation of Pediatric Studies in a Clinical Oncology Drug Development Program A Large Pharmaceutical Company Perspective  Corporate.
Laurie E. Locascio, Ph.D. Director, MML/NIST NIST/MML: Measurement Assurance for Biological Systems.
BioMarker Strategies biotrinity 2016 London April Functional Profiling to Guide Cancer Drug Development and Treatment Selection.
NCI Division of Cancer Prevention Ongoing Activities at Frederick Facilities Presented By: Lori Minasian, M.D. Robert Shoemaker, Ph.D. October 1, 2015.
1 Trends in drug development programs in the era of Personalized Medicine Gunnar Saeter, M.D., Ph.D. Head, Institute for Cancer Research Oslo University.
Regulatory and Reimbursement Harmonization An Industry Perspective Adrian Griffin | April 2016.
From the Valley of Death to the Bridge of Life: Models for De-Risking Early Translational Projects from Around the World.
Created by BM|DESIGN|ER SigniPhi SAAS to biomarker discovery stage 1 - SAAS Stage 2 - partner Stage 3 - biomarker discovery.
CLI and Device Intervention Across the Pacific – An FDA View
Partnerships Between Academic Pathology and Biotech/Biopharma
Deputy Director, Division of Biostatistics No Conflict of Interest
Better Science, Better Health: New Healthcare Models
Precision Medicine Market to witness more than 10.5% CAGR from 2017 to 2024
Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation
Gestora brasileiro focada exclusivamente na área da saúde.
ECMCs – Where Do We Fit In?
Forum for Collaborative Research:
Figure 5 Schematic illustration of different clinical trial designs
Comments on design and sequence of biomarker studies
Introduction to TransCelerate
Registration is Open:
Neuroscience Biomarker Program
European Prevention Alzheimer’s Dementia
Patient Engagement through Social Media for Clinical Trials
Vylyny Chat, Robert Ferguson, Tomas Kirchhoff 
Presentation transcript:

BIOMARKERS/BIOSIGNATURES Standards needed for Translational Research 1.Standardized QUESTIONS in Clinical Trials 2.Standardized PRACTICES in advancing pilot studies 3.Standardized VALIDATION/VERIFICATION studies Michael E. Berens, Ph.D.

Develop standardized QUESTIONS in Clinical Trials that position success (“low hanging fruit”) from biomarkers/biosignatures patient stratification for balancing the trial arms for equivalency (survival biomarkers) patient eligibility into clinical trial (is the target present?) tumor response/non-response to therapy (futility marker) to predict failure early Include the ecosystem of players in the design of biomarkers/biosignatures (academic, industry, advocacy, regulatory, philanthropic, etc)

Adopt standardized PRACTICES in advancing pilot studies using clinically-annotated specimens Use specimens from no more than 3 sites to ensure minimal deviation from SOPs Use best-in-class analytical partner matched to the analyte Work in close collaboration with PK and PD correlative endpoints (best-in-class partner) Operate in a parallel, blinded, limited competition model for maximal learning Include the ecosystem of players in the design of PRACTICES that enable biomarkers/biosignatures (academic, industry, advocacy, regulatory, philanthropic, etc)

Conceive, deploy, test, iterate, and improve standardized VALIDATION/VERIFICATION studies with an eye to business development Deploy Laboratory Developed Tests under CLIA (versus FDA) Harmonize test validation requirements between CMS and FDA Portability &reproducibility testing by >3 performance sites Work with regulatory groups on “gold standards” for highly complex or multi-plex analyte tests Support as a thought-leader, FDA’s requirements to launch companion diagnostics with drug trials Include the ecosystem of players in the design of VALIDATION/VERIFICATION studies for biomarkers/biosignatures (academic, industry, advocacy, regulatory, philanthropic, venture funding, etc)