Southern Regional Education Board Using the FRAMEWORK to fit your school’s needs. HSTW Ideal Implementation HSTW.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flinn Elementary School
Advertisements

Mentoring Awareness Workshop
Effective use of protocols: Don't waste my time Bethann M. McCain Educational Consultant, CIU #10.
North, South, East & West Compass Points Collaboration: It’s all about people!
Southern Regional Education Board The will to succeed is only overshadowed by the will to prepare to succeed!
Building Leadership Chapter 3
Welcome Back Review of Day 1 Feedback Agenda Review for Day 2.
Joint Staff School Committee Training. Why do we need a JSSC? Provide orderly and professional means of improving educational programs, conditions within.
Implementing Peer Coaching in PLTs Teacher Leadership for High Student Growth Sara Overby WCPSS Coordinating Teacher for Secondary Literacy,
Whose Job Is It? Part Two © Iowa Association of School Boards At the Board Table Discussion Tool.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Hannah Guldin Chrystol White Aimee Kanemori.  Form an alliance between the teacher and parent “Above all parents need to know that their child’s teacher.
Literature Circles.
Teamwork & Conflict resolution
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Communication Skills Anyone can hear. It is virtually automatic. Listening is another matter. It takes skill, patience, practice and conscious effort.
D ecreasing P atient-Provider C onflict University of Utah Dialysis Program.
Ice Breaker Network Goals and Desired Outcomes By the end of our professional learning together, participants will:  Identify personal Leadership Style.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
New Teachers’ Induction January 20, 2011 Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
EFFECTIVE TEAMING Oregon Response To Intervention Project Cadre 5 October 2009.
Facilitating Reflective Feedback as a Complementary Evaluator “It is when you lose sight of yourself, that you lose your way. To keep your truth in sight.
Have you implemented “Number Talks” in your classroom? What are the pros? What are the cons? Any suggestions?????
Effective Teaming RTI Training 9/23/07. Objectives Each district team will define how it will work together to lead the implementation of RTI. Each district.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
Team Communication and Difficult Conversations Chapter 3.
Providing Leadership for Improving Mathematics Achievement NJ Abbott Secondary Initiative, Grades 6-12 Academic Rigor Gayle Mills November 14, 2005 Southern.
Inquiry and the IB. Stuents do not learn by doing. on what they have done. Rather, they learn by and.
COLLABORATION MODULE #6 Giving and Receiving Feedback An online module developed by Pivot Learning Partners for the West Contra Costa Unified School District.
EngageNY.org Session 1: Building a Change-Focused Culture November, 2013 Network Teams Institute.
Houston County Career Academy Ford PAS Follow up session May 26, 2011.
Communication Skills NM School Health Assistants Janie Lee Hall, School Health Advocate, NW Region Office of School & Adolescent Health Public Health Division,
Activity 5: Lead this Group! Instructions: There are many ways for a leader to respond to situations that have developed within a group. How would you.
Working in Teams, Unit 4 Individual Roles and Team Mission Working in Teams/Unit 41 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010.
Presentation 1 Roles for Discussing Student Work There are four roles for discussing student work: Presenting Teacher Participant Recorder Facilitator.
Coaching Facilitation Institute 2009 Laney Howard: Lauri Brandt:
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Instructional Rounds Toby Boss ESU 6. Agenda Develop Common Understanding of Rounds Focus on Details – What do we do to prepare? – What do we do during.
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
Data Wise A process for working with data to improve teaching and learning.
Examining Student Work in Science Jacque Melin – GVSU
Dealing with Difficult People
Professional Learning Communities AKA Purposeful Learning and Collaboration PLCs.
Experience Protocols Tools that provide framework for discussions By Claire Dean.
Compass Points Activity EastSpeculating: Likes to look at the big picture, the possibilities, before acting. North Acting: Lets do it, likes to act, try.
Marking and Feedback CPD Follow up to marking. Expectations and ground rules Respect the views of others Give everyone space to make a contribution All.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
Collaborative Grouping 6-12 Math Teachers. Workshop Outcomes Participants will gain effective strategies for forming and facilitating a classroom culture.
It’s Good to Talk: Changing Classroom Talk. Aims of the Session: Moving from exploring talk to changing talk in the classroom Consolidating the thinking.
PLC Analysis Westport Middle School Gavin Osborne EPP 610 Dr. Lynne Wheat.
Role of The Reading Specialist. Literacy Program Developer Problems that may be encountered –Teachers feeling overloaded. –Teachers teaching in isolation.
Culture Snapshot Card Sort Analysis Video Questions.
Team Contracts We can work together! Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved. 1.
Module II Creating Capacity for Learning and Equity in Schools: The Mode of Instructional Leadership Dr. Mary A. Hooper Creating Capacity for Learning.
Jeff McCoy, Executive Director of Academic Innovation and Technology
Assessment for Learning
The Learner Centered Classroom
Leadership Compass Michele Rastovich 2016 Prevention Summit
Enterprise High School
Seminar Four Quality Academic feedback: oral and written
Action learning Session Two
4-Corners: Compass 1 ICE BREAKER
HSTW Ideal Implementation
Fishbowl Discussion Directions:
Core Competencies for Primary School Teachers in Crisis Contexts
Session 2, Modified Jigsaw
Compass Activity Just get it done!
Presentation transcript:

Southern Regional Education Board Using the FRAMEWORK to fit your school’s needs. HSTW Ideal Implementation HSTW

Southern Regional Education Board Framework – Not Model  Key Practices provide schools with options  Key indicators provide schools with important data  Network of sharing a key to learning  Constantly learning – Small Learning Communities HSTW

Southern Regional Education Board Ideal Implementation Chart  Developed by Consultants  Made for the ideal setting  Four key areas: Structure, Instruction, Support and Leadership  Plan – Do – Check Format HSTW

Southern Regional Education Board Final Word Protocol  Structured discussion  Person with most recent birthday is first presenter  Person with next birthday is facilitator/timekeeper HSTW

Southern Regional Education Board The Final Word  Beginning speaker. Begin the process by selecting one of the aspects of the article that he or she found of interest and directing others in the group to the idea. For up to two minutes, this first speaker talks about this idea. Others in the group listen without talking.  When the first person is finished (or when time is called) the person to the left has one minute to talk about this same idea—building on ideas proposed by the first speaker. In turn, each member of the group will speak for up to one minute on the same topic. Others in the group listen as each member speaks.  When all have had a chance to speak, the original speaker has one more minute to speak; to give “the final word.”  Repeat the process with the next speaker. HSTW

Southern Regional Education Board Large Group Discussion  Big Ideas  Can this help in your school?  Final Word?  SLC Rubric HSTW

Southern Regional Education Board Coaching in Schools  Coaching from inside a school:  Less about directing and more about providing frameworks for discussions  Less about providing professional learning and more about following up professional development  Good coaches get teachers to  Have the tough discussions in an organized manner  Discuss strategies learned in professional development to ensure implementation.  Less GRITCHING and more deciding! HSTW

Southern Regional Education Board Instructional Review  Session on Tuesday  Part of TAVs  What gets monitored, gets done! HSTW

Southern Regional Education Board Moving to the Next Level  Declarative Knowledge – Describe the strategy  Procedural Knowledge – They can use the strategy on demand Most teachers are at this level and that is good!  Conditional Knowledge – Analyze a situation and select the appropriate strategy to meet student needs. Most teachers need assistance to get to this level and the best assistance is from other teachers working with you! HSTW

Southern Regional Education Board Working Together to Solve School Issues, Analyze Student and Teacher Work and for Professional Learning  Numerous protocols  Tuning Protocol  Five Why  Praise – Question – Polish  Consultancy  Final Word  Standards in Practice  Action Research  HSTW

Southern Regional Education Board Caveat for Protocols  This process, and all quality faculty discussions, require some training and a tremendous level of trust.  It requires teachers to look at their colleagues in a different light.  Trust-building activities  Disagreement is good  We can help each other HSTW

Southern Regional Education Board Collaboration Works…. But Five Dysfunctions of a Team  Absence of trust – invulnerability, personally yes, professionally no  Fear of conflict – artificial harmony, unwillingness to disagree  Lack of commitment – ambiguity, no agreement on goals  Avoidance of accountability - low standards, holding each other accountable  Inattention to results – Yes, but attitude HSTW

Southern Regional Education Board Trust – Easier said then done!  Can I question something you do professionally and it not become personal.  People who trust others are willing to ask for help!  Can I question items taking place that do not focus on the goals? HSTW

Southern Regional Education Board Building Trust  One simple strategy to begin to break down walls.  Compass Points HSTW

Southern Regional Education Board WHAT IS YOUR PERSONAL STYLE COMPASS POINTS  To identify individual styles of working within a group  To identify the value of all styles when working toward a common team goal or product HSTW

Southern Regional Education Board FOUR STYLES NORTH WEST EAST SOUTH WHAT IS YOUR PERSONAL STYLE? HSTW

Southern Regional Education Board NORTH  ACTORS  “Let’s do it” attitude  Like to act, try things, plunge in.  Need to get work done NOW! (Or as quickly as possible)  Product-driven

Southern Regional Education Board SOUTH  CARING  Like to know that everyone’s feelings have been taken into consideration, that their voices have been heard, before acting  Need to have all members share their thoughts and be sure everyone is supported  Brings snacks HSTW

Southern Regional Education Board WEST  DETAILERS  Pay attention to the little things  Like to know the WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE & WHY before acting  Need to get their questions answered before proceeding with the work  Always seeking clarification HSTW

Southern Regional Education Board EAST  SPECULATING  Like to look at the big picture, the possibilities, before acting  Need to express their vision of the project  Always looking for another way  Big Idea People HSTW

Southern Regional Education Board Questions  What are the limitations of our style? (List four adjectives.)  What style do we find the most difficult to work with? Why?  What do others need to know about us that will make our work together more successful?

Southern Regional Education Board Tuning Protocol  Tuning Protocol – Annenberg Institute for School Reform  Great first step  Very structured  Non-threatening

Southern Regional Education Board Tuning Protocol  Requires participants to look at things differently  KEY – Look at the work, not the teacher or the student

Southern Regional Education Board Presentation of the Work – 5 minutes  Assignment  Instruction Provided  Expectations  Other pertinent information  Possibly a problem (i.e. Literacy strategy that did not work)

Southern Regional Education Board Clarifying Questions – 3 minutes  Participants ask questions to elicit more information  Questions should be short  NO FEEDBACK ABOUT THE ASSIGNMENT

Southern Regional Education Board Reflection Time – 1 minute  Participants write down facts and prepare their feedback

Southern Regional Education Board Warm Feedback – 5 minutes  Participants share warm feedback ONLY  Presenter takes notes  Facilitator may focus discussion on the requests from the presenter  What are the strengths, best features of the work

Southern Regional Education Board Cool Feedback – 5 minutes  Present cool feedback only.  Use “I wonder…”  Use questions aimed at work.  What could be improved about the WORK – not the presenter?

Southern Regional Education Board Response  Presenter responds and discusses potential actions to take.

Southern Regional Education Board Consultancy  Inside – Outside Circles  Non-threatening  Can be done with a fairly large group  Discussions are not structured  Requires a strong facilitator to keep people on the topic  NOTE: CAN BE USED TO SOLVE SCHOOL ISSUES

Southern Regional Education Board Process  Teacher presents the assignment and samples of student work and discusses the instruction leading up and following the assignment  Inner Circle of 6-8  Inner circle discuss the assignment by offering suggestions, critiquing, giving positive feedback, etc.  Talk to each other, not the teacher  Outside Circle of all others takes notes of conversation – do not include names of who speaks

Southern Regional Education Board Five Whys – Peter Senge  Simple  Can get bogged down  Addresses issues  Great in classrooms  Great with kids at home!  Can be used with spouse, but may lead to trouble!  Keep focus on what you can do!

Southern Regional Education Board Lets Practice  WAD-UP  Select a facilitator and a volunteer  Select an issue of concern – 3 minutes  Volunteer states the concern  Facilitator asks why is it a concern  Volunteer responds  Facilitator rephrases the response to ask why that is an issue  Continues for 5 why rounds

Southern Regional Education Board P – Q - P  I wonder questions  About the work – not the teacher  Less structured form of Tuning Protocol

Southern Regional Education Board One More for Departments  Standards in Practice  Best in departments at the high school level because participants solve the problem or the assignment  Ideal for analyzing student responses on state assessments  Can work with multiple choice

Southern Regional Education Board Standards in Practice Steps 1.Present the assignment or problem 2.Individual completes the assignment or problem 3.Individual analyzes the demands of the assignment with team discussion following. 4.Team identifies the standards the problem or assignment addresses. 5.Generate a rough rubric 6.Score the assignment using the rubric 7.Analyze the work by comparing the rubric to any provided, comparing scoring and determining how instruction should change.

Southern Regional Education Board Final Thoughts  Remember the five dysfunctions  Teachers working together can completely change a culture of a school  Schools can get entire workshops around any of these protocols. However, a small group can make a big difference.

Southern Regional Education Board Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can change the world, indeed, it is the only thing that ever has!