Aligning Resources to Student Achievement By Allan Odden Iowa Superintendent’s Finance and Leadership Consortium Des Moines, Iowa February 10, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

Chapter 11 Graphic Organizer Jonathan Kniss. The 10 th Amendment makes education largely a state function. The Chain of Command: student, teacher, principal,
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
1 Use of Resources in a Sample of Wisconsin Districts July 12, 2006 Tim Schell, Waunakee Prepared for the Policy Advisory Task Force of the Wisconsin School.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Common Core Standards and the Edmonds School District November 4, 2013.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Ensuring Better Use of School Finance Reform Dollars: Lessons from Kentucky, New Jersey, Texas and Arkansas Lawrence O. Picus USC Rossier School of Education.
RE-THINKING HOW SCHOOLS IMPROVE
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Linda Bragg Office of Title II, III and System Support Division of Educator Quality and System Support.
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
Standards In Practice TM : Instructional Gap Analysis The PowerPoint presentation that follows was created by The Education Trust and can be found, together.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Developing District Level Professional Learning Communities Woodford County Schools Jimmy Adams, Candace James and Sam Watkins.
Middle School Organization To review the effectiveness of the CCS middle school teaching model and investigate current research on programming that will.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
State Role in Supporting Educators C HRIS M INNICH M AY 2012 | SCEE M EETING.
1 Great Things Are Happening In Paramount Schools - Where We Inspire Great Learning Through Great Teaching Great Things Are Happening In Paramount Schools.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
What Does Supplement, Not Supplant Mean?. 2 Fiscal Requirements Supplement, not Supplant –
Angilee M. Downing, M.Ed. Vision: Educational Excellence For All Students.
Allan Odden Anabel Aportela, Sarah Archibald, and Michael Goetz
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Middle School Design Team (MSDT) Phase II: Revised Draft Recommendations Rigor, Relevance, and Responsiveness (R 3 ) April 14, 2009.
STAR3 Project for WS/FCS. STAR3 All students deserve and thrive under a great teacher that cares for their well being. Our responsibility is to provide.
Blended Learning Design: Revised Recommendation
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
The Use of Educational Resources in Wyoming Preliminary Report to the Wyoming Legislature’s Joint Interim Education Committee June 18, 2007 (Revised January.
1 CPRE Conference on School Finance, School Improvement and Teacher Compensation Beyond School Finance Adequacy: Linking School Funding to Improving Schools.
Using Adequate Resources to Double Student Performance Sarah Archibald Allan Odden CPRE Invitational Conference February 21, 2007.
Leading at All Levels to Support MDC Implementation
The Use of Educational Resources in Wyoming: Report to the Wyoming Legislature February 14, 2008 by Allan Odden, Lawrence O. Picus, Michelle Turner Mangan,
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
CURRICULUM RENEWAL EDD 7913 CRN BY JAMIE LEEDER, GENEVIEVE LEYDIG, KEITH MABE NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY APRIL 4, 2013.
Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G Principals Meeting.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
1 (c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies Using Educational Resources More Effectively School Finance: A Policy Perspective, 4e Chapter 7.
Title I Parent Meeting Statesville Road Elementary 22 August 2014.
Chapter 14 Rethinking Special Education. Common-Sense Proposals for Reform 1.Focus on improving general education for all students Improved education.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
On The Right Road Moving Forward From a Lowest Achieving School to a High Progress Rewards School Fitzgerald High School Ben Hill County.
Principal Student Achievement Meeting PLC Visioning and Beyond.
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District Program Evaluations A summary of recommendations from the completed program evaluations March 6, 2009.
PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: K-5 LITERACY CURRICULUM AUDIT Presented by: Dr. Marijo Pearson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction,
Tift County High School ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING SY16 Tap Knowledge – Capture Wisdom - Harness Talents -Sculpt Minds.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Iowa ASCD: Curriculum Leadership Academy, April 2012 Instructional Coaching Through RTI Little by Little:
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
What is the 90/90/90 Research?  The Original Research  169 schools in high-poverty, high minority system  21 schools broke the mold – 90%
PRITZKER STATE OF THE SCHOOL 2016 Dr. Joenile S. Albert-Reese, Principal Ms. Barbara Abdullah-Smith, Assistant Principal.
Doubling Student Performance... and finding the resources to do it Allan R. Odden and Sarah J. Archibald.
Evergreen Heights Elementary
Quarterly Meeting Focus
System Goals Academic Excellence Educational Equity Social and Emotional Learning Improving and Expanding Facilities.
Close Reading and Instructional Rounds
Resource Allocation and District Action Reports: RADAR
Planning for Dramatic Improvement Part B
Additional Staffing Request
Family Engagement Policy
Presentation transcript:

Aligning Resources to Student Achievement By Allan Odden Iowa Superintendent’s Finance and Leadership Consortium Des Moines, Iowa February 10, 2010

Current Fiscal Situation Bad and unlikely to improve in the near future Unemployment is still high Economic growth is still low State and low revenues are tight and not growing much Salaries are frozen with furlough days making things worse 2

Fiscal Implication A second federal stimulus is unlikely Hard to pass tax hikes in a context of high job loss and low salary raises If health care passes, state revenues could be even more squeezed – higher Medicaid costs Unlikely to be more money for K12 education in the near future, meaning this year and even the next –Though likely to be hikes in federal education aid 3

Fiscal Options Could sue on an adequacy basis –Yes, could make the argument –But suing now could make the public think educators don’t “get it” that everyone should tighten their fiscal belt in these fiscal times Could start referendums/movements for tax increases for the schools – OR and WI –Why hike taxes just for schools? –All public services need more funds today –If successful, could create public pushback at educators and strength of their unions 4

Other Options Back to basics: Why are we in education in the first place? What can be done with no more money or very little new money? Are there ways to use money more effectively (which means we’d also identify ways we now use money that is not so effective)? Can we engage in some resource reallocation? 5

Why Are We in Education? To have children learn – to have all children learn Not to get rich, not to sue the state, not to complain about tests, not for many reasons, But to organize schools and ourselves to deliver instruction that is effective in having students achieve, and in today’s context, also to reduce the achievement gaps linked to poverty and ethnicity 6

Why Are We in Education? What makes us feel good? –Having our instructional practice get better –Seeing our students learn more –And having all this happen in collaborative settings, in which we all are engaged, working together to improve instruction, boost student learning and chip away at the achievement gaps linked to poverty and ethnicity 7

Improving Schools Do we know how to improve student Learning? –YES Does it take a lot of money to do so? –NO, not for the main tasks What do we need to work on? –Improving instruction –Figuring out what best instructional practices are –Getting effective instruction into all classrooms 8

Current Situation “Teacher effects” research: –Instructional impacts vary widely across teachers –Some (10-20%) teachers have spectacular impacts on student learning gains –Some (10-20%) teachers have unimpressive impacts – kids lose ground over the school year –Most (60-80%) teachers have modest impacts –Reason for differential effects: Differential instructional practices 9

The “Problem” to Address Culture of autonomy that characterizes schools (Raudenbush, Ed Researcher, 4/09) –Privatized, idiosyncratic view of instruction (teachers work alone) that leads to widespread variation in instructional practice & student learning versus –Collective, systemic view of instruction (teachers work together) that emphasizes teacher collaboration and schoolwide accountability, and produces more widespread effective instruction and better student learning 10

Examples of the Latter There are many, including rural and urban districts – see Odden, Odden and Archibald, Chenoweth, Bryk et al. Core of their success –Focus on instructional practice –Articulate what effective instructional practice is in reading/writing, math, science, and so on –Get that effective instructional practice into more and more classrooms 11

How to Change School Culture 1.Organize teachers into collaborative work groups –Grade level teachers in elementary schools –Content (e.g., math, history) teachers in middle schools –Course (e.g., algebra, biology) teachers in high schools 12

How to Change School Culture 2.Provide each group with appropriate materials –Micro-content standards, one concept for every 2-3 weeks of instruction –Rigorous curriculum – e.g., Everyday Math –Formative assessments – given at the beginning of each 2-3 week curriculum unit -- $15-25/pupil –End-of-unit common assessments –Perhaps “benchmark,” quarterly assessments –Work team leader – maybe $ –Time of an instructional coach -- $$ 13

How to Change School Culture 3.Provide each group with time to meet during the school day –A period a day at least 3 times a week –(Helps if have specialist teachers – art, music, PE, etc. -- $$) –Sometimes back this period up to lunch, time before school starts and/or time after school lets out –Key principal role in designing school schedule – can be done 14

How to Change School Culture 4.Provide ongoing professional development –Find and train instructional coaches –Train PLC leaders with appropriate skills –Provide schools with: Pupil free days for teachers Funds for trainers (central office or consultants) –Focus professional development on: Curriculum linked training – directly relevant Developing/honing 2-3 week curriculum units Emergent view of effective instructional practice Systemic, school wide, not individual plans 15

How to Change School Culture 5.Shift work life of teacher to collaborative work in these teams: a.Collaboratively review formative data to plan instruction/ lesson plans before teaching each curriculum unit b.Teach the unit simultaneously c.Give the common end-of-unit assessment d.Collectively review results after teaching for: All students/classrooms Teachers who had spectacular results Teachers who had below par results Good, bad and average is made public 16

How to Change School Culture 5.Shift work life of teacher to collaborative work in these teams: e.If overall performance not acceptable, redesign unit f.Identify instructional strategies of the most effective teachers – incorporate them into system g.Provide assistance to teachers with below par impacts, and if performance does not improve, counsel out h.Over time, create a view of effective instructional practice that works for that school/district/content area i.Goal: get that instructional practice into all classrooms through this “cycle of continuous instructional improvement” 17

Results of This Work Wider distribution of highly effective instructional practice in classrooms Dramatic improvements in student learning Dramatic reductions in the achievement gaps linked to poverty and ethnicity Teachers with a strong sense of efficacy Students with a strong sense of efficacy 18

Results of This Work When this happens, school people feel good, know they are working hard, but working together, and getting better at teaching and seeing student learning rise And in these tough fiscal times, we need to focus on what makes educators feel good 19

Other Strategies if Affordable 1.Teacher tutors for struggling students 2.Academically focused summer school 3.Extended day programming with a strong homework and tutoring elements Each and everyone of these expand learning time while holding expectations constant for performance 20

What Resources are Needed? Collaborative work time, so need some elective teachers Battery of formative, end-of-unit assessments, benchmark assessments Instructional Coaches Training dollars Tutors 21

Finding the Dollars Periods in the day Resources for electives v. core subjects Paraprofessionals Redirect professional development Use of Title 1 and state poverty linked dollars and some special education funding Technology 22

Shift to a 6 Period Day 6 versus 7 and 8 period days In a 6 period day, teacher teach for five periods and an elective teacher covers the additional period – every core teacher needs an additional 20% of elective teachers In a 7 or 8 period day, teachers still teach 5 periods, so need additional 40% for 7 periods and additional 60% for 8 periods, and instructional minutes are reduced 23

Don’t Over Fund Electives Need elective classes, but Research (Roza) shows in many cases $/pupil for electives are twice+ that for core subjects –Small student numbers –Senior teachers Shift resources from electives –Reduce electives by moving to a 6 period day –Make class sizes the same or even larger –Distribute teacher talent more equitably 24

Rethink Use of Paraprofessionals Many paraprofessionals provide the first extra help for struggling students, but Students in the bottom quartile need trained, teacher tutors Replace 2 paraprofessionals with 1 teacher tutor Paraprofessionals better used for extra help for struggling students in the middle ranges 25

Rethink Professional Development Too little professional development addresses core content – reading, writing, math, science “Audit” professional development to target resources to core content issues Rethink “program improvement” staff in central offices (larger districts) – turn into professional development – trainers, teacher days, school- based instructional coaches “Capture” all pupil-free days – use for systemic professional development 26

Rethink Federal/State Categorical $ Focus use of categorical dollars, particularly central office program improvement staff, on: –Instructional coaches –Teacher tutors –Some extended day programming –Professional development pupil free days –Training 27

Squeeze Textbook Funds Use to purchase/develop: –Clear curriculum/content standards –Formative assessments –End-of-curriculum unit assessments –Common end-of-course tests –Benchmark assessments (on line like NWEA) –Costs: $25 per pupil 28

Use Technology Use distance learning – requires some staff Offer online courses, especially in high school –Iowa is particularly situated to tap this option Investigate the curriculum in virtual schools –Full, comprehensive curriculum programs exist for all grades and all subjects 29

General Suggestion Focus on improving instructional practice with teachers working in collaborative groups – this is exciting for teachers and good for students Take at least some steps to reallocate current resources to provide such collaborative work groups with the time and materials needed for this work by rethinking: –Periods in the day, resources now spent on electives, paraprofessionals, use of current PD dollars, use of Title 1 and some special education funding, use of textbook dollars for formative assessments, how to tap technology, school schedules so teachers have collaborative time 30

Resources Odden and Archibald, 2009, Doubling Student Performance … and Finding the Resources to Do It. Corwin Press, Odden, Ten Strategies to Doubling Student Performance. Corwin Press, Karen Chenoweth, 2007, It’s Being Done Ed Trust: 31

Contact Information Allan Odden Professor of Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis Co-Director, Strategic Management of Human Capital (SMHC) 32