1 Making the Case for Federal Support of the National Writing Project (An Evaluator’s Perspective) NWP Spring Meeting 2006 Inverness Research Associates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
o Nearly all 50 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards and Essential Standards. o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12.
Advertisements

The Legacies Of The National Writing Project (NWP) 30 years of Developing Working Assets For Ongoing Improvement.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
Missouri Assessment Program MAP Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Mari Ann Bihr, Health/PE Consultant NGA Meeting, October 29,
CA Math & Science Partnership Grant (CaMSP) Partnership for Student Achievement.
Action Research Opportunity Or Research Based Action.
An Integrated Mathematics Curriculum A Core Curriculum in Mathematics.
Communities In Schools of Delaware Empowering students to stay in school and achieve in life.
Kindergarten Readiness:
A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.
Center of Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education Cooperative Partners College of Arts and Sciences College of Education Dr. Jack Rhoton East Tennessee.
“When schools become places for teachers to learn, they also become schools on the way to improvement.” (The Harvard Education Newsletter, 1997) Funded.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Supporting PreK Teachers During Act 3 Implementation.
Formative Assessment in Idaho Idaho is committed to the idea that a system of assessment will yield far better information about teaching and learning.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Individual Professional Development Planning for Teachers
 State-led and developed common core standards for K-12 in English/language arts and mathematics  Initiative led by the Council of Chief State School.
IMPACT OF NWP ON TEACHERS’ CLASSROOM PRACTICE: Results of a teacher survey Inverness Research Associates NWP annual meeting 2001.
Pennsylvania Department of Edward G. Rendell Governor, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak Secretary of Education.
Maximizing Reading Gains to Meet AYP Targets: Decision Support Analytics for School Board Providence School District, RI April 2014.
Cindy M. Walker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No
United Way of Greater Toledo - Framework for Education Priority community issue: Education – Prepare children to enter and graduate from school.
Thursday, September 10, 2015 Creative Partnerships for Entrepreneurship Education Consortium for Entrepreneurship Education Conference November 5, 2007.
Development and Publication Earth System Science in the Community.
Research conducted by SRI International California State University, Office of the Chancellor | Policy Analysis for California Education | University of.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Scaling up and sustaining an integrated behavior and reading schoolwide model of supports November 18, 2008.
Superintendent’s Panel on Excellence in Adult Education.
The Science Content, Conceptual Change, and Collaboration (SC4) Mathematics and Science Partnership - Maine U.S. Department of Education MSP Regional Meeting.
The National Writing Project © 2015 Taylor & Francis.
Blue Springs Elementary School Standards Based Report Card Parent Meeting.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
K-12 Mathematics in Rapid City Longitudinal Findings from Project PRIME Ben Sayler & Susie Roth November 5, 2009.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Year 6 Results Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC Cindy Walker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Teacher Algebra Network: Our Model for Professional Development in Three Rural North Carolina Counties Presented by Katie J. Mawhinney and Tracie McLemore.
2007 Grade 3-8 English Test Results. 2 Raising Achievement Over past several years, Board of Regents has voted measures to raise standards and require.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data SLO Process – Step 5 Reviewing and Establishing a Summative.
Secondary Teacher Education and Professional Training (STEP T) for English Language Learners (ELLs) National Professional Development Program 2007:
THE CASE FOR THE NATIONAL WRITING PROJECT AN EVALUATOR’S PERSPECTIVE Inverness Research Associates April 2005.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Math and Science Partnership Program Approaches to State Longitudinal Evaluation March 21, 2011 San Francisco MSP Regional Meeting Patty O’Driscoll Public.
PRIMES Partnerships and Research Investigations with Mathematicians, Engineers, and Scientists Professional Development Model MSP Regional Meeting February.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program Regional Conference Washington D.C December 11, 2006 Getting Results in the Classroom F. Joseph Merlino, PI/PD.
Horizonte Instruction and Training Center Salt Lake City School District School Community Council Meeting November 14, 2012.
WORKING TOGETHER TO IMPROVE SCIENCE EDUCATION PRESENTED BY GIBSON & ASSOCIATES A CALIFORNIA MATH AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP RESEARCH GRANT WISE II Evaluation.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program Improving Math and Science Achievement in Low-Performing, High-Poverty Schools: Implications for Professional.
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION State Policies: Orchestrating the Common Core Mathematics Classroom Ilene W. Straus, Vice President California State.
SD Math Partnership Project An Overview Marcia Torgrude and Karen Taylor.
Teaching Leah Nature of the Work Teachers act as facilitators to help students learn and apply concepts to math, science, english, and history. Teachers.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Planning Next Year’s Staff Development Beryl Johnson Director of Staff Development City of Sacramento ~ Sacramento START Beryl Johnson Director of Staff.
The NWP as a National Infrastructure that Encourages Writing and the Teaching of Writing NWP Annual Meeting 2005 Inverness Research Associates.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference Crystal City, VA July 30, 2010 Jacqueline Jones, PhD Senior Advisor to the Secretary for Early Learning.
Annual Title I Parent Meeting
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
1 Orlando Science Center Inspire Science Learning for Life.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Invitational Institutes build teachers’ leadership capacity and knowledge. Saturday Seminars build community engagement Inservice.
Board of Education Presentation American Indian Education Program Mark Cerutti, Associate Superintendent, Education Services Sonjhia Lowery, Director,
Huntsville City Schools
Ready to Read Ready to Succeed
WELCOME.
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Family Engagement Policy
The Extension Center for Technology Outreach (CTO) at
Evaluating the relationship between intensity of teacher professional development and student achievement in a Northern New Mexico inquiry-based science.
Presentation transcript:

1 Making the Case for Federal Support of the National Writing Project (An Evaluator’s Perspective) NWP Spring Meeting 2006 Inverness Research Associates

2 An educational research and evaluation group located near San Francisco Evaluator of the NWP for over 10 years Evaluator of dozens of federally funded programs, including math and science

3 THESIS The National Writing Project is an important federal investment in the improvement of the nation’s educational system.

4 The National Writing Project is an important federal investment in the improvement of the nation’s educational system. Why is this so? 1.Writing is a basic skill that is vital to the success of US students and US competitiveness. Student writing needs to improve. 2.The NWP knows how to help teachers improve student writing. 3.The NWP has the capacity to provide continuing high- quality professional development to teachers across the nation.

5 Point 1. Writing is a basic skill that is vital to the success of US education and US competitiveness. Student writing needs to improve.

6 Writing is foundational to literacy. Students need to know how to write well to succeed in school and life. Writing strengthens thinking Writing supports reading Writing fosters learning in all subjects, including math and science Writing is fundamental to communication

7 NAEP writing scores show that too few students are proficient Grade 4 Below basic BasicProficientAdvanced Grade 8 Grade 12

8 Point 2. The National Writing Project knows how to help teachers improve student writing.

9 97% of teachers at NWP institutes say— NWP is better than other professional development: What they learn translates into improved writing skills for their students:

10 NWP serves teachers in depth Every year, 3000 teachers at Invitational Institutes receive, on average, about 7 hours per day for 18.5 days. Over 80,000 teachers a year receive, on average, about 4 hours per day for 4 days in other programs. Invitational Institute: 123 hrs All other programs: 16 hrs

11 Institute participants say they gain knowledge and skills for teaching writing

12 Institute participants also get help with teaching reading and using technology

13 NWP institutes promote classroom practices associated with writing achievement These practices are correlated with higher scores nationwide on the 2002 NAEP writing assessment. NWP institute participants report that they:

14 Institutes also promote practices important to reading achievement NWP institute participants report that they: These practices are correlated with higher scores nationwide on the 2002 NAEP writing assessment.

15 Point 3. The NWP has the capacity necessary to provide continuing, high-quality professional development to teachers across the nation.

16 The NWP can provide continuing high- quality professional development to teachers across the nation. A.The NWP is able to function at a large national scale B.The NWP provides US teachers with broad, equitable access to their services C.The NWP is cost effective and leverages federal funding D.The NWP is a national network that provides customized local professional development services

17 A. The NWP is able to function at a large national scale

18 Percentage of teachers in the nation served each year by the NWP 3% of total K-12 teaching force (~1 in 35) 12.5% (~1 out of 8) who are directly responsible for teaching writing

19 Overall scale of work that NWP supports in one year ( )

20 B. The NWP provides US teachers with broad, equitable access to their services

21 NWP current service area covers 2/3 of the nation’s counties and 3/4 of the nation’s districts

22 NWP services actually reached teachers in 850 counties in

23 NWP programs serve large numbers of counties, districts, schools and students ( )

24 Students of NWP summer institute teachers are representative of those attending schools nationwide

25 C. The NWP is cost effective and leverages federal funding

26 On average, over the past five years… The federal cost per teacher contact-hour is $2.27 Sites leverage $3.62 in local funds for every federal $1.00

27 D. The NWP is a national network that provides customized local professional development services

28 Each of the 195 NWP sites creates a program of varied offerings for local teachers The average NWP site offers— 1 Invitational institute 12 Continuity programs 21 Inservice programs 4 Youth and community programs

29 Local sites work with teachers in different contexts (% of all teachers served)

30 The growing importance of partnerships: 43% of all teachers receive inservice in the context of a long-term partnership

31 Partnerships promote a wide range of activities customized for local context 23% of partnership work involved other activities such as coaching TCs, writing assessments,continuity work, other youth and community programs. Partnership work Curriculum development (9%) Teacher workshops (34%) Classroom coaching (11%) Training pre- service teachers (8%) College prep activities (6%) Study groups (9%) Conferences (7%)School planning (7%) Young writers programs (6%)

32 SUMMARY OF POINTS

33 The National Writing Project is an important federal investment in the improvement of the nation’s educational system. Why is this so? 1.Writing is a basic skill that is vital to the success of US students and US competitiveness. Student writing needs to improve. 2.The NWP knows how to help teachers improve student writing. 3.The NWP has the capacity to provide continuing high- quality professional development to teachers across the nation.

34 The NWP is not just another project! A national infrastructure developed over 30 years… The NWP network has accumulated 3,126 “site-years” of experience!

35 National Competitiveness and Investment in Education Infrastructure Long term competitiveness depends upon the health of the nation’s education infrastructure. Federal support of the NWP is an investment in the infrastructure that can support ongoing educational improvement in the US. –A case of a return with compound interest!

36 END