SINGLE OUTCOME AGREEMENTS Raymond Burns 8 th October 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sustainable Development Education
Advertisements

Healthy Schools, Healthy Children?
Kenny Lindsay Manager, Children/Young People Community Learning & Development Dundee City Council.
Better outcomes for children and young people: at home, in the class room, in the community Colin MacLean Director, Schools Scottish Government.
Embedding Public Engagement Sophie Duncan and Paul Manners National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
London Luton Airport Limited working in partnership with Luton Borough Council and the VCS for community benefit.
Tackling Deprivation Together A Plan for Rochdale Borough’s LPSB.
Education Service Assessment and the Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) Assessment and the Curriculum for Excellence: Fife’s perspective Stuart Booker Statistician.
GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY Towards delivery of the London Health Inequalities Strategy London Public Health Network 21 st May 2010 Helen Davies GLA Health.
Health Improvement Performance Management (HIPM) Review Proposed Priority Outcomes Erica Wimbush, Health Scotland 26 October 2007.
Equality in Action: Developing our new Equality Plan.
Involving partners in evidencing impact David Young – North Lanarkshire Council.
Community Safety In Scotland September 2014
ANGUS COMMUNITY PLANNING PARTNERSHIP SOA IMPLEMENTATION GROUP 3 December 2009.
CK0909AW Outcome Based Approach Workshop 30 September 2009 SOA’s & Community Planning Andrew Wilson Community Planning Manager Falkirk Council.
Moving to a Unified Grants Process and a Single Monitoring Framework Jim Gray Acting Head of Community Planning, Corporate Services Dept, Glasgow City.
Improvement Service / Scottish Centre for Regeneration Project: Embedding an Outcomes Approach in Community Regeneration & Tackling Poverty Effectively.
Inequality and SIMD 2009 West Dunbartonshire. SIMD what is it? Snapshot concentrations of multiple deprivation across Scotland Ranking of 6505 Datazones.
City outcomes. City Outcomes: a single set of aims for Sheffield A single set of aims for Sheffield which are of common and mutual interest to – public.
CashBack for Communities Workshop: SCSN Practitioners Event 13 th February 2013.
Induction to Dr Jon Stephenson. What is Partners IN Salford Partners IN Salford is the Local Strategic Partnership for Salford Partners IN Salford is.
Healthy Ireland A framework for improved health and wellbeing Healthy Food for All 20 November 2013 Dr Miriam Owens.
Adult Literacies 2020: Strategic Guidance Clare El Azebbi Policy Manager – Adult Literacies & ESOL
Department of Planning and Community Development Corporate Plan: Government priorities we contribute to Building friendly, confident and safe.
Curriculum for Excellence Aberdeenshire November 2008.
Public Service Reform and the Public’s Health 1. PSR Strategic Overview Ambition is for sustainable economic growth, where all residents contribute to.
Welcome to the Scottish Learning Festival Introductions.
EU Structural and Investment Funds Climate Change and Environmental Protection SWOT Workshop Martin Budd, Hull City Council Nadine Senior, Hull.
Health inequalities post 2010 review – implications for action in London London Teaching Public Health Network “Towards a cohesive public health system.
Mid Wales LTP Stakeholder Workshop 3 rd October Presentation by Ann Elias and Janice Hughes.
LTS Communities Team Anne Gibson, Programme Manager.
GRAND Getting Real about Alcohol ‘N’ Drugs Community responses to alcohol and drug issues ADP Communities Sub-group Presentation to Community Council’s.
LINks Stakeholder Event: 18 th February 2008 Bolton’s Local Strategic Partnership (LSP) Margaret Appleton Bolton Council.
Transforming lives through learning Education Scotland and the Strategic Guidance Alan Armstrong Strategic Director Lifelong Learning Directorate October.
Community Strategy Review Seminar September 15 th 2009 Camden Community Empowerment Network.
The Community Welfare Pathway Roseanne Fearon Head Of Service, Adult Services Social Work Service.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Learning for Sustainability Nicola Sykes, CLD Policy and Improvement team CLDMS Conference 2014.
Mike Welsh Communities Officer North East Ward Dundee City Council.
Southend Together Board - 21 March Southend Local Area Agreement - update Southend Together Board - 21 March 2007.
Advice on Data Used to Measure Outcomes Friday 20 th March 2009.
North West Youth Employment Convention Wednesday, 23 November 2011 Nick Page.
Improving Local Indicators Project 3 rd Consultation Workshop David Hume Chair of Project Board.
Devolution in Greater Manchester October 2015 Alex Gardiner, New Economy.
Single Outcome Agreements
Financial Inclusion: Can you afford not to ? DWP Financial Inclusion Champions Scotland 18 November 2009.
Getting it right for all East Lothian’s children and young people The Children and Young People’s Service Plan
KEITH WOOD COMMUNITY PLANNING MANAGER NEWARK AND SHERWOOD DISTRICT COUNCIL A Presentation to the 3 rd Annual AAP Conference – 6 November 2009 The Role.
CLD Plans and Strategies – first impressions (N=28) Peter Taylor.
PwC 1 July 2015 Department of Education and Training strategic intent Strategic intent Vision Our future Approaches How we will achieve this Together we.
Delivering Regeneration in a New Context Stephen White Housing and Regeneration Directorate 27 August 2009.
Partners IN Salford Delivery & Governance Feedback on the suggestions from recent consultation for discussion by Salford Strategic Partnership Executive.
HALTON LOCAL AREA AGREEMENT ANNUAL REVIEW 9 January 2009.
A New Sustainable Community Strategy for Gloucester Cllr Paul James Chair of the Gloucester Partnership.
A Vision for the future of partnerships in Ealing?: the principles Review of the Local Strategic Partnership Initial Report to LSP Executive 26 May 2010.
Presentation By L. M. Baird And Scottish Health Council Research & Public Involvement Knowledge Exchange Event 12 th March 2015.
Shaw Anderson Glasgow City Council An approach for Glasgow.
Transforming lives through learning Building social outcomes for young people through inspection.
The Children & Young People’s Plan CYPP Jim ForemanLead Member - Children & Young People Our Vision “Our young people will have new hope because they will.
YOUR FUND. £300,000 per annum Source – Area Based Grants Allocations to each Community Area Forum Supports activities which have a quick impact.
‘It’s not always about funding and resources; it’s about working better together. As we’ve got areas of common interest if we can just coordinate our services.
Select Committee for Children & Young People and Independent and Healthy Lives Work Programme 2009/2010 Paul Baldasera 31 March 2009.
Educationeducation Improving Scottish CLDMS Conference Nov 2010 Learning communities: how well are we doing and what do we need to do next?
Children and Young People’s Strategy
New Structures, New Outcomes: the implications of the concordat
GSSW Research Seminar - Engage, Change and Deliver Thursday 9 October 2008 ALAN G BAIRD PRESIDENT ADSW.
VOCAL Prospectus - Inequalities
Regulation 4 - Elements of the Plan
Understanding your Impact on Well-Being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015 Contributing to and Reporting on the 7 Wellbeing Goals, Local Wellbeing.
Director of Public Health Report
Presentation transcript:

SINGLE OUTCOME AGREEMENTS Raymond Burns 8 th October 2008

What did the Concordat say? Scottish Government will not undertake structural reform of Local Government Funding will be made available for a 3 year period ( ) Every Council will produce a SOA by 31 st March 2008 Scottish Government will substantially reduce the no. of funding streams Local Authorities will be able to retain all their efficiency savings.

What happened next? SOA became the new buzzwords Nobody really knew what it meant A couple of Local Authorities participated in a Pilot SOA Screeds and screeds of what it might look like information was produced. In February 2008 COSLA produced “Guidance, Format and Indicators for Scottish Local Government”

What did the Guidance say? Here is a template – use it Here are our 15 National Outcomes – use them Here are our 45 National Indicators and Targets – you don’t have to use all of these – but we suggest you don’t create your own This has to be submitted by 31 st March 2008

Things to remember about our SOA. In Glasgow it is a Community Planning document It has been developed at a City wide level There is a desire to produce a more local level document, with strategies for specific areas It is still “work in progress” – depending on availability of data

How did we do it? Glasgow has 5 themes in its Community Plan – Healthy, Working, Safe, Learning and Vibrant – each with a Theme Champion We took the 15 National Outcomes and allocated them across the 5 themes of the Community Plan We organised 5 facilitated workshops – each chaired by the Theme Champion Each workshop considered its inputs to the range of national outcomes from existing Strategies, Action Plans, etc. and developed local (City-level) outcomes Final wider session to ensure appropriate cross cutting issues were addressed and gaps were filled.

National OutcomesPrimary Cont.Secondary Cont.Mainly tertiary contributions 1. We live in a Scotland that is the most attractive place for doing business in Europe WorkingLearningVibrant 2. We realise our full economic potential with more and better employment opportunities for our people WorkingLearningHealthy 3. We are better educated, more skilled and more successful, renowned for our research and innovation LearningWorkingVibrant 4. Our young people are successful learners, confident individuals, effective contributors and responsible citizens LearningHealthySafe 5. Our children have the best start in life and are ready to succeed HealthyLearningVibrantWorkingLearning 6. We live longer, healthier livesHealthySafeVibrantWorkingLearning 7. We have tackled the significant inequalities in Scottish society All – cross cutting 8. We have improved the life chances for children, young people and families at risk HealthyLearningSafeWorking 9. We live safe from crime, disorder and dangerSafeHealthyVibrant 10. We live in well-designed, sustainable places where we are able to access the amenities and services we need VibrantSafeHealthy 11. We have strong, resilient and supportive communities where people take responsibility for their own actions and how they affect others SafeHealthyLearningWorking 12. We value and enjoy our built and natural environment and protect it and enhance it for future generations VibrantSafeHealthy 13. We take pride in a strong, fair and inclusive national identity All – cross cutting 14. We reduce the local and global environmental impact of our consumption and production VibrantHealthy 15. Our public services are high quality, continually improving, efficient and responsive to people’s needs All – cross cutting

What are the priorities coming out of this process? Healthy - Obesity in children and adults - Alcohol consumption and alcohol related harm - Inequalities in health, particularly those caused by childhood poverty – Smoking. Working - Business productivity and Gross Value Added - Spreading the benefits of improved economic performance - Creating an excellent economic environment Vibrancy - Glasgow’s image/ profile/ Identity - Glasgow’s infrastructure and environment - Involvement (participation in cultural, sporting, volunteering activities) Learning - Life long learning - Adult literacy - Skills attainment - Graduate retention Safe - Crime related to alcohol consumption - Youth crime (victims and perpetrators) - Anti social behaviour

Then what? Workshop sessions identified 24 Local Outcomes to tackle these priorities A number of these Outcomes are similar and contribute to more than one priority themes e.g. reducing alcohol consumption will have safety and health benefits Each local outcome can contribute to more than one National Outcome In some instances we had to align some wide ranging local outcomes to the National Outcome where it made most immediate or direct impact.

Local OutcomesRelevant priorities Related to Local Outcome Contributes to National Outcome Increase the number of Jobs in Glasgow P3, P7, P1510, 11, 22, 24NO2 Improve the Attractiveness of Glasgow as a place to live, invest, work and visit P8, P9, P10, P15 1, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 21, 22, 23, 24 NO1, NO10, NO12, NO13 Improve residents’ aspirations, confidence, decision making capacity and involvement in community life P7, P9, P11, P18 4, 5, 6, 9, 18, 20, 21, 22 NO3, NO4, NO10, NO11, NO12, NO13, NO15

Some of the problems with this approach. Complex matrix of reporters to various local outcomes – multi partner. Different methods of recording, regularity, geography across partners Different levels of timescale from almost immediate impact to generational change Some data accuracy/availability questions. (esp. Equality Groups)

The Good Bits A strategic opportunity for cross sectoral work Has identified greater linkages Has developed more partnership working Better understanding of how other services work

The Hard Bits Sharing of performance data with each other and the public Agreeing the best way of articulating a partnership position Lead of a Theme doesn’t entirely mean ownership of everything within that theme. Survey Timescales Unscientific – whether outputs will lead to outcomes is a subjective judgement

Thank you for listening.