GLOBIOM Methodology and implementation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Medium-term prospects for agricultural markets Update for EU-25 1 European Commission - Agriculture Directorate-General.
Advertisements

Prospects for EU-25 agricultural markets and income Update December 2005.
Prospects for EU-25 agricultural markets and income
Prospects for EU-25 agricultural markets and income
Economics of GHG Management in the LULUCF sector Michael Obersteiner JRC Improving the Quality of Community GHG Inventory… rd Sept
Global biomass availability in light of policy development – iLUC Focus Petr Havlík, Michael Obersteiner, Erwin Schmid, Uwe A. Schneider AND MANY OTHER.
The Impact of Achieving Targets set out in Food Harvest 2020 on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Usage Noel Culleton.
Short term and long term approaches to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from “Land use, Land Use Change, Conversion of Biomass & Transport “ systems Arthur.
EU-wide projections of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture – an Irish example Jasmina Behan Kevin Hanrahan.
Leading Partners in Science Interactions of metrics and alternative policy settings at a country level: a case study from New Zealand Andy Reisinger 1.
The Development of a Forest Module for POLYSYS Burton English, Daniel De La Torre Ugarte, Kim Jensen, Jamey Menard and Don Hodges USFS Forest Products.
Future Land Cover Change and Forests - Global Challenges - Bioenergy versus Deforestation Florian Kraxner E.-M. Nordström, P. Havlík, M. Obersteiner, et.
Assessing Bioenergy Potentials in Rural Landscapes Oludunsin Tunrayo Arodudu Alexey Voinov Iris van Duren.
Arno Becker Institute for Food and Resource Economics (ILR), University of Bonn ImpactsMarket development Policy measures Policy objectives Leading to.
International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade (IMPACT Model) IMPACT Development Team.
Greenhouse gas emission scenarios for agriculture in Finland UNFCCC Workshop on Emissions Projections from Annex I Parties, , Wissenschaftszentrum,
GLEAM - The Global Livestock Environmental Assessment Model
IFIF/FAO Business Meeting - Rome 2006 Agriculture and the Animal Feed Industry.
The LULUCF sector: land use, land-use change and forestry
“And see this ring right here, Jimmy?... That’s another time the old fellow miraculously survived some big forest fire.” ENFA/INSEA FORESTRY…..
ENFA Model ENFA Kick-off Meeting Hamburg, 10 May 2005.
Biofuels, Food Security and Environmental Sustainability: Global Challenges and Opportunities Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Presented to the Technical Society.
Petr Havlík & Michael Obersteiner + >30 collaborators International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Austria International Livestock Research.
Evaluation of Economic, Land Use, and Land Use Emission Impacts of Substituting Non-GMO Crops for GMO in the US Farzad Taheripour Harry Mahaffey Wallace.
Nutrient management in the food chain of China Fusuo Zhang Lin Ma China Agricultural University Feb. 25,2014, Beijing, China-UK Workshop on Nutrient Management.
3.5 Food Resources. And the average resident of an MEDC consumes 3314 calories per day. Yet, the average resident of an LEDC consumes 2666 calories per.
CAPRI EU GHG Monitoring Workshop, 27th-28th February 2003, Copenhagen Projections of herd sizes with the CAPRI system - Wolfgang Britz - Institute for.
Global Futures and Strategic Foresight and the IMPACT Model Keith Wiebe International Food Policy Research Institute Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity.
The world's bioenergy potential in the context of global food and farming trends Fridolin Krausmann Based on research by H. Haberl, K.H. Erb, C. Lauk,
An assessment of the global land use change and food security effects of the use of agricultural residues for bioenergy production Edward Smeets, Andrzej.
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Economics and Social Sciences Hoeltinger, Schmidt, Schoenhart, Schmid Optimal Supply.
Michael Obersteiner IIASA Regional Carbon Budgets: From methodologies to quantification. Beijing, China, November 2004 Coupling Carbon Processes.
Geospatial data in global change analysis: GLOBIOM experience Petr Havlík Environmental Resources and Development Group Ecosystems Services & Management.
Structural changes of global poultry production and the impact on the environment, including on poultry genetic resources Irene Hoffmann and Pierre Gerber,
Liberalization of Trade in Biofuels: Implications for GHG Emissions and Social Welfare Xiaoguang Chen Madhu Khanna Hayri Önal University of Illinois at.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada Managing environmental issues –related to beef an international perspective Tim.
Soil carbon in dynamic land use optimization models Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University.
The Challenge of: Food Security Maggie Gill Chief Scientific Adviser Rural Affairs and Environment.
BIOMASS CARBON ACCOUNTS FOR EUROPE AND GLOBALLY IN GLOBIOM Nicklas Forsell & Stefan Frank, Michael Obersteiner, Petr Havlík….. IIASA – International Institute.
Overview of Economic Methods to Simulate Land Competition Forestry and Agriculture Greenhouse Gas Modeling Forum National Conservation Training Center.
Biofuels, Food Security and Environmental Sustainability: Global Challenges and Opportunities Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte The Politics of Food Conference.
The Role of Biofuels in the Transformation of Agriculture Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte and Chad M. Hellwinckel The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources.
Can Biofuels be Sustainable in an Unsustainable Agriculture? Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chad M. Hellwinckel Chad M. Hellwinckel American Chemical Society.
Biofuels: Impacts on Land, Food, and Prices Mark W. Rosegrant Director Environment and Production Technology Division AAAS Annual Meeting “Session on Biofuels,
Impacts of Agricultural Adaptation to Climate Policies Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University Contributors.
Geoshare Workshop Purdue, 11 Sep 2014 What Geoshare may do for us Hermann Lotze-Campen.
COMPETITIVE ECONOMIC POTENTIALS of NON-FOOD OPTIONS International Food Security Impacts of European Non-Food Options Chris Llull a, Uwe A. Schneider a,b,
Gaseous Emissions from Irish Agriculture Trevor Donnellan FAPRI-Ireland Partnership Teagasc Dublin.
An Evaluation of the Economic and Environmental Impacts of the Corn Grain Ethanol Industry on the Agricultural Sector Western Agricultural Economics Association.
Martin Schönhart 1, Franz Sinabell 2, Erwin Schmid 1 ‘The spatial dimension in analysing the linkages between agriculture, rural development and the environment’
“The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources and Globalization: The Road Ahead”, November15 – 17, 2009, Orlando, Florida Impacts of future energy price.
Bioenergy: Where We Are and Where We Should Be Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chad M. Hellwinckel.
1 Overview of Scotland’s Productive Capacity Alan Renwick and Andrew Midgley.
Food Security: More than Food Production! Brian Lim Researcher – Canadian Baptist Ministries.
Land Use: Globally consistent national mitigation and adaptation Michael Obersteiner.
© John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Exploitation, Conservation, Preservation 4e Cutter and Renwick 2003 Chapter 6: Agriculture and Food Production Food Production.
What are the key issues around land use & what are the trade-offs between food security and GHG mitigation objectives on the land? Pete Smith ClimateXChange.
Is Livestock Production Heading Over The Cliff and Doomed? J M Wilkinson.
Improving livestock water productivity under changing climate Theib Oweis, ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria & Don Peden, ILRI, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Presentation.
Ecosystem Services and Management
Michael Obersteiner IIASA 12th Oct, 2016
Implications of Alternative Crop Yield Assumptions on Land Management, Commodity Markets, and GHG Emissions Projections Justin S. Baker, Ph.D.1 with B.A.
The C sequestration efficiency of soils
Agricultural/Forestry Greenhouse Gas Modeling Forum October 1-3, 2001
Global Livestock Development with Special Focus on Latin America
Implications of alternative metrics on mitigation costs and agricultural GHG emissions Andy Reisinger1 Petr Havlik2,3 Keywan Riahi2 Oscar van Vliet2 Michael.
Biogeochemical Causes and Consequences of Land Use Change
Applying an agroecosystem model to inform integrated assessments of climate change mitigation opportunities AM Thomson, RC Izaurralde, GP Kyle, X Zhang,
Beneficial or Damaging
Presentation transcript:

GLOBIOM Methodology and implementation P. Havlík, M. Herrero, H. Valin, M. Obersteiner International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Austria International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Kenya Agrimonde-Terra: Animal Productions. Food and feed future demand. CIRAD Paris, February 13, 2013

Outline Model overview Livestock sector modelling Scenarios (SSPs) Results 5. Conclusions

1. Model overview

GLOBIOM: Global Biosphere Management Model Partial equilibrium model: Agriculture, Forestry, Bioenergy DEMAND SUPPLY

GLOBIOM Supply functions Demand functions Spatial equilibrium model a la Takayama & Judge Maximization of the social welfare (PS + CS) Recursively dynamic (10 year periods) Supply functions implicit – based on spatially explicit Leontief production functions: production system 1 (grass based)  productivity 1 + constant cost 1 production system 2 (mixed)  productivity 2 + constant cost 2 Demand functions explicit: linearized non-linear functions

Supply Chains Natural Forests Managed Forests Short Rotation Tree Plantations Cropland Grassland Other natural land Bioenergy Bioethanol Biodiesel Methanol Heat Electricity Biogas Wood products Sawn wood Pulp Livestock products Beef Lamb Pork Poultry Eggs Milk Crops Corn Wheat Cassava Potatoes Rapeseed etc… LAND USE CHANGE Wood Processing Bioenergy Processing Livestock Feeding

Main exogenous drivers: Population GDP Technological change Bio-energy demand (POLES team) Diets (FAO, 2006) Output: Production Q - land use (change) - water use - GHG, - other environment (nutrient cycle, biodiversity,…) Consumption Q Prices Trade flows

Spatial resolution Homogeneous response units (HRU) – clusters of 5 arcmin pixels Source: Skalský et al. (2008)

Spatial resolution Simulation Units (SimU) = HRU & PX30 & Country zone Source: Skalský et al. (2008)

Crops - EPIC Processes Major outputs: Weather Hydrology Erosion Carbon sequestration Crop growth Crop rotations Fertilization Tillage Irrigation Drainage Pesticide Grazing Manure Major outputs: Crop yields, Environmental effects (e.g. soil carbon, nitrogen leaching) 20 crops (>75% of harvested area) 4 management systems: High input, Low input, Irrigated, Subsistence

Crops - EPIC Relative Difference in Means (2050/2100) in Wheat Yields [Data: Tyndall, Afi Scenario, simulation model: EPIC]

Grasslands – CENTURY/EPIC Source: EPIC model (t/ha DM)

Forests – G4M Downscaling FAO country level information and forest growth functions estimated from yield tables Source: Kindermann et al. (2008)

2. Livestock in GLOBIOM

Gridded Livestock of the World – Robinson et al. (2011)

Livestock production systems distribution Sere and Steinfeld (1996) classification updated by Robinson et al. (2011)

Livestock sector coverage Livestock categories: Bovines: Dairy & Other Sheep & Goats: Dairy & Other Poultry: Laying hens, Broilers, Mixed Pigs Production systems: Ruminats Grass based: Arid, Humid, Temperate/Highlands Mixed crop-livestock: Arid, Humid, Temperate/Highlands Monogastrics Smallholders Industrial

Production systems parameterization Herrero, Havlík et al. forthcoming

Production systems parameters Livestock numbers 1000TLU Productivity kg/tlu/y FEED GHG emissions GRAZING kgDM/tlu/y Manure STOVER N_Excretion OCCASIONAL Entferm_CH4 kgCO2eq/tlu/y GRAINS ManmgtTot_CH4 Barl ManmgtTot_N2O Corn MansolTot_N2O Puls ManaplTot_N2O Rice ManprpTot_N2O SgMi Soya Whea CerO OlsO CrpO Anim Herrero, Havlík et al. forthcoming

Feed intensity of milk production Herrero, Havlik et al (forthcoming)

Non-CO2 intensity of milk production Herrero, Havlik et al (forthcoming)

3. Scenarios

IAM & IAV (“IPCC”)scenarios matrix approach SSPs x RCPs https://secure.iiasa.ac.at/web-apps/ene/SspDb/dsd?Action=htmlpage&page=about

5 SSPs along 2 dimensions

Shared Socioeconomic reference Pathways (SSPs). (O’Neil, 2012)

World population

World GDP per capita

Semi-quantitative elements: Land use and Agriculture

Crop yield development

Projected feed conversion efficiencies [kg protein product / kg protein feed]

Human diet preferences [kcal/cap/day]

Losses and wastes development in the Oilseeds&Pulses sector [%]

4. Results

Consumption per capita – Ruminant meat – World [kg/cap/y]

Consumption per capita – Monogastric meat – World [kg/cap/y]

Consumption per capita – Dairy – World [kg/cap/y]

Animal calorie consumption in 2050 [kcal/cap/day]

Production – Ruminant meat – World [000 tonnes]

Production – Monogastric meat – World [000 tonnes]

Production – Dairy – World [000 tonnes]

Feed – Coarse grains – World [000 tonnes]

Production – Coarse grains – World [000 tonnes]

Area – Coarse grains – World [mio ha]

Commodity price index

Bovine meat exports [000 tonnes]

Bovine meat imports [000 tonnes]

Bovine meat production by system [000 tonnes]

Average crop yield change over 2000-2050 [%]

Additional nitrogen consumption compared to 2000 [%]

Additional irrigation water consumption compared to 2000 [%]

Cropland expansion 2000-2050 [Mio Ha]

Grassland expansion 2000-2050 [Mio Ha]

Net forest area change 2000-2050 [Mio Ha]

Greenhouse gas emissions - World [Mio tonnes CO2eq]

5. Conclusions

Further reading AnimalChange deliverables Journal articles D2.1. Storylines for livestock sector scenarios in EU, studied SICA regions and global level, consistent with the IPCC AR5 detailed for the livestock sector D2.2. Preliminary scenarios of the developments in agricultural commodity markets, livestock production systems, and land use and land cover Journal articles Havlík, P., Valin, H., Mosnier, A., Obersteiner, M., Baker, J. S., Herrero, M., Rufino, M. C. & Schmid, E. (2013). Crop Productivity and the Global Livestock Sector: Implications for Land Use Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95 (2), 442—448. Valin, H., Havlík, P., Mosnier, A., Herrero, M., Schmid E. and Obersteiner M. Agricultural productivity and greenhouse gas emissions: trade-offs or synergies between mitigation and food security? Environmental Research Letters, under review.

Thank you ! havlikpt@iiasa.ac.at www.globiom.org