Analytical Hierarchy Process ( AHP )

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modellistica e Gestione dei Sistemi Ambientali A tool for multicriteria analysis: The Analytic Hierarchy Process Chiara Mocenni University of.
Advertisements

DECISION MODELING WITH Multi-Objective Decision Making
Multi‑Criteria Decision Making
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) - by Saaty
1 1 © 2003 Thomson  /South-Western Slide Chapter 15 Multicriteria Decision Problems n Goal Programming n Goal Programming: Formulation and Graphical.
1 1 Slide Chapter 10 Multicriteria Decision Making n A Scoring Model for Job Selection n Spreadsheet Solution of the Job Selection Scoring Model n The.
Matrices: Inverse Matrix
Analytic Hierarchy Process Multiple-criteria decision-making Real world decision problems –multiple, diverse criteria –qualitative as well as quantitative.
Analytic Hierarchy Process Multiple-criteria decision-making Real world decision problems –multiple, diverse criteria –qualitative as well as quantitative.
ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
MIS 463 Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2 The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) It is popular and widely used method for multi-criteria decision making. Allows.
Introduction to Management Science
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc Course Arrangement !!! Nov. 22,Tuesday Last Class Nov. 23,WednesdayQuiz 5 Nov. 25, FridayTutorial 5.
Multi Criteria Decision Modeling Preference Ranking The Analytical Hierarchy Process.
Assignment of Weights Other methods, besides arbitrary, for weight assignment exist There are both direct and indirect weight elicitation techniques Source:
MENENTUKAN LOKASI PABRIK YANG IDEAL MENGGUNAKAN AHP PERTEMUAN 12.
Introduction to Management Science
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western EMGT 501 HW Solutions Chapter 14 - SELF TEST 20.
Strategic Project Alignment With Team Expert Choice
Intro to Matrices Don’t be scared….
Table of Contents Matrices - Multiplication Assume that matrix A is of order m  n and matrix B is of order p  q. To determine whether or not A can be.
Game Theory.
9-1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Multicriteria Decision Making Chapter 9.
Multicriteria Decision Making
9-1 Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Multicriteria Decision Making Chapter 9.
Presented by Johanna Lind and Anna Schurba Facility Location Planning using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Specialisation Seminar „Facility Location Planning“
Mrs. Martinez CHS MATH DEPT.
1 1 Slide © 2004 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 17 Multicriteria Decisions n Goal Programming n Goal Programming: Formulation and Graphical Solution and.
TH EDITION LIAL HORNSBY SCHNEIDER COLLEGE ALGEBRA.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 5 Systems and Matrices Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005 Pearson Education, Inc.
Spreadsheet Modeling and Decision Analysis, 3e, by Cliff Ragsdale. © 2001 South-Western/Thomson Learning Multicriteria Decision Making u Decision.
Decision Technology Modeling, Software and Applications Matthew J. Liberatore Robert L. Nydick John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Chapter 9 - Multicriteria Decision Making 1 Chapter 9 Multicriteria Decision Making Introduction to Management Science 8th Edition by Bernard W. Taylor.
If A and B are both m × n matrices then the sum of A and B, denoted A + B, is a matrix obtained by adding corresponding elements of A and B. add these.
Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2 The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Founded by Saaty in It is a popular and widely used method for multi-criteria.
Multi-Criteria Analysis - preference weighting. Defining weights for criteria Purpose: to express the importance of each criterion relative to other criteria.
To accompany Quantitative Analysis for Management, 9e \by Render/Stair/Hanna M1-1 © 2006 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Analytic Hierarchy.
BUSINESS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
4.5 Inverse of a Square Matrix
Operations with Matrices: Multiplication
BASIC OPERATIONS The four basic mathematical operations are: + Addition - - Subtraction × Multiplication ÷ Division.
Matrices Digital Lesson. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company, Inc. All rights reserved. 2 A matrix is a rectangular array of real numbers. Each entry.
Applied Mathematics 1 Applications of the Multi-Weighted Scoring Model and the Analytical Hierarchy Process for the Appraisal and Evaluation of Suppliers.
Constructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System by Considering the Ambiguity in Decision Making Norihiro Saikawa Department of Computer and Information.
To Accompany Russell and Taylor, Operations Management, 4th Edition,  2003 Prentice-Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. Supplement S7 Supplier Selection.
Notes Over 4.2 Finding the Product of Two Matrices Find the product. If it is not defined, state the reason. To multiply matrices, the number of columns.
Systems of Equations and Matrices Review of Matrix Properties Mitchell.
ESTIMATING WEIGHT Course: Special Topics in Remote Sensing & GIS Mirza Muhammad Waqar Contact: EXT:2257 RG712.
MCE: Eigen Values Calculations from Pair Wise Comparisons. Addition to Exercise 2-8.
This Briefing is: UNCLASSIFIED Aha! Analytics 2278 Baldwin Drive Phone: (937) , FAX: (866) An Overview of the Analytic Hierarchy Process.
Analytic Hierarchy Process Multiple-criteria decision-making Real world decision problems –multiple, diverse criteria –qualitative as well as quantitative.
Matrix. Matrix Matrix Matrix (plural matrices) . a collection of numbers Matrix (plural matrices)  a collection of numbers arranged in a rectangle.
Reality of Highway Construction Equipment in Palestine
Supplement S7 Supplier Selection.
L8 inverse of the matrix.
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
A Scoring Model for Job Selection
MATRICES MATRIX OPERATIONS.
Analytic Hierarchy Process Prepared by Lee Revere and John Large
The number 1 ranked item is…
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Quantitative Techniques for Decision Making-4 (AHP)
Objectives Multiply two matrices.
Slides by John Loucks St. Edward’s University.
Agenda for This Week Monday, April 25 AHP Wednesday, April 27
Multicriteria Decision Making
MATRICES MATRIX OPERATIONS.
MATRICES MATRIX OPERATIONS.
Chapter 12 Analyzing Semistructured Decision Support Systems
Presentation transcript:

Analytical Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) By Jennifer McBride Operations Management May 6, 2003

What is AHP ? According to Operations Management 4th Edition by Russell and Taylor III it is a quantitative method for ranking decision alternatives and selection the one given multiple criteria. AHP is a process for developing a numerical score to rank each decision alternative based on how well each alternative meets the decision maker’s criteria.

What does it answer ? The question “Which one do we choose?” or “Which one is best ?” by selecting the best alternative that matches all of the decision maker’s criteria.

What does it use ? Simple mathematics criteria < set by the decision maker > preferences of that criteria < also set by the decision maker> the standard preference table By simple mathematics one must be able to add, divide, and multiple Criteria is anything that seems or is important to the decision maker ex. Price, quality, length, time frame etc. . . Preferences of that criteria mean how important or how much does that criteria mean to the decision maker.

Standard Preference Table PREFERENCE LEVEL Equally preferred Equally to moderately preferred Moderately preferred Moderately to strongly preferred Strongly preferred Strongly to very strongly preferred Very strongly preferred Very strongly to extremely preferred Extremely preferred NUMERICAL VALUE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Notice that it is a ranked scale.

Why not make up your own preference table ? Because the standard preference table has been determined by experienced researchers in AHP to be a reasonable basis for comparing two alternatives.

How is it used ? Say you have two criteria. Cost and quality for product A & B. The cost for A= $60 and the quality is above average. The cost for B=$15 and the quality is right at average. Which do you choose? By making a matrix the price of B is very strongly preferred to A and A is only moderately preferred to B. The matrices of these preferences would look like . . . . This is a very simplistic the problems can be very complex also.

Matrices of A and B Since price B is very strongly preferred to the price of A. The score of B to B is 7 and A to B is the reciprocal or inverse of 1/7 COST A B A 1 7 B 1/7 1 COST A B A 1 7 B 1/7 1 Notice that the reciprocal are the same color of the corresponding. I did this to identify which reciprocals went with which one. QUALITY A B A 1 1/3 B 3 1

Our sample problem Jilley Bean Co. is selecting a new location to expand its operations. The company want to use AHP to help it decide which location to build its new plant. Jilley Bean Co. has four criteria they will base their decision on these are the following: property price, distance from suppliers, the quality of the labor pool, and the cost of labor. They have three locations to decide from.

Matrices given criteria and preferences PRICE A B C A 1 3 2 B 1/3 1 1/5 C 1/2 5 1 PRICE A B C A 1 3 2 B 1/3 1 1/5 C 1/2 5 1 DISTANCE A B C A 1 6 1/3 B 1/6 1 1/9 C 3 9 1 LABOR A B C A 1 1/3 1 B 3 1 7 C 1 1/7 1 Again reciprocals having corresponding colors of each other. Showing that in preference in price A and C are the equally preferred but are preferred over B. WAGES A B C A 1 1/3 1/2 B 3 1 4 C 2 1/4 1

How it is done ~ STEP ONE PRICE PRICE A B C A 1 3 2 + + + B 1/3 1 1/5 + + + B 1/3 1 1/5 + + + C 1/2 5 1 = 11/6 9 16/5 PRICE A B C A 1 3 2 + + + B 1/3 1 1/5 + + + C 1/2 5 1 = 11/6 9 16/5 First sum (add up) all the values in each column.

How it is done ~ STEP TWO PRICE A B C A 1+11/6 = 6/11 3+9 = 3/9 2+16/5 = 5/8 + + + B 1/3+11/6 = 2/11 1+9 = 9 1/5+16/5 1/16 + + + C 1/2+11/6 = 3/11 5+9 = 5/9 1+16/5 = 5/16 = 1 1 1 Next the values in each column are divided by the corresponding column sums. NOTICE: the values in each column sum to 1.

How it is done ~ STEP THREE PRICE A B C Row Average A 6/11 ~.5455 + 3/9~.3333 + 5/8~ .6250 = 1.5038 +3 = .0512 B 2/11~.1818 + 1/9~.1111 + 1/16~.0625 = .3544 +3 = .1185 C 3/11~.2727 + 5/9~.5556 + 5/16~.3803 = 1.2086 +3 = .3803 1.000 Each answer was rounded to the the thousandths to keep uniformity and simplicity in the mathematics. Each row was divided by 3 to find the average because there were three locations if there were 5 then you would have to divide by 5 to find the average. Next convert fractions to decimals and find the average of each row.

How it is done ~ STEP FOUR Find the average for all the criterion by doing steps 1-3 on all the criteria. Arriving at the following Location Price Distance Labor Wages A .5012 .2819 .1790 .1561 B .1185 .0598 .6850 .6196 C .3803 .6583 .1360 .2243 Again all answers were rounded to the thousandths place.

How it is done ~ STEP FIVE Rank the criteria in order of importance ~use the same method used in ranking each criterion. Criteria Price Distance Labor Wages Price 1 1/5 3 4 Distance 5 1 9 7 Labor 1/3 1/9 1 2 Wages 1/4 1/7 1/2 1 Using the Standard preference table to determine each ones’ rank.

How it is done ~ STEP 6-9 Repeat steps 1-4 with the new matrices. You should arrive at the following : Criteria Price Distance Labor Wage Row Average Price .1519 .1375 .2222 .2857 .1933 Distance .7595 .6878 .6667 .5000 .6535 Labor .0506 .0764 .0741 .1429 .0860 Wage .0380 .0983 .0370 .0714 .0612 1.000

Row average= preference vector for the criteria Price .1993 Distance .6535 Labor .0860 Wage .0612 Clearly the price of the land is #1, followed by distance to suppliers, labor pool quality, and last cost of wages.

FINAL CALCULATIONS Take the criteria matrix and multiple it by the preference vector CRITERIA Price .1993 Distance .6535 Labor .0860 Wage .0612 Location Price Distance Labor Wages A .5012 .2819 .1790 .1561 B .1185 .0598 .6850 .6196 C .3803 .6583 .1360 .2243 X Location A score = .1993(.0512) + .6535(.2819) + .0860(.1790) +.0621(.1561) = .3091 Location B score = .1993(.1185) + .6535(.0598) + .0860(.6850) + .0612(.6196) = .1595 Location C score = .1993(.3803) + .6535(.6583) + .0860(.1360) + .0612(.2243) = .5314

And the results are . . . LOCATION Score A .3091 B .1595 C .5314 1.0000 Based on the scored Location C should be chosen for Jilley Bean Co. to built a plant.

How is AHP is used in real life ? Expert Choice a company that specializes in AHP design software and performs services with it. Some of their clientele are: Ford Motor Company Sprint PCS Department of Agriculture (USDA) Navy National Health Service of the United Kingdom Ferrari SpA in Italy To learn more about Expert Choice and their customers go to http://www.expertchoice.com

How is AHP is used in real life ? The USDA used it for the selection of bridge materials across the nation in several states. To learn more about this single project go to http://www.srs4702forprod.vt.edu/pubsubj/abstract/ab9760.htm

Is there anything AHP cannot be used for ? Not really as long as the decision maker has set criteria and set preferences of that criteria AHP can be used. If you had set criteria for which clothes to wear and had preferences of that criteria you could use AHP to decide which outfit would be best for you to wear.

References Russell, Roberta S. and Taylor III, Bernard W. Operations Management 4th edition. Upper Saddle river, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2003. Expert Choice Client List <http://expert choice.com/customers/client list.htm Smith, Bush and Schmoldt. The Selection of Bridge Materials Utilizing the Analytical Hierarchy Process. 5 March 2003. <http://www/srs4702.forprod.vt.edu/pubsubj/abstract/ab9760.