MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA2036-8 Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 1 Welcome MER Parachute DeceleratorSystem Preliminary Design Review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
January 22, 2009 Ares I-X Crew Module and Launch Abort System (CM/LAS) Jonathan Cruz Deputy Project Manager Jonathan Cruz Deputy Project Manager.
Advertisements

Martian Landing Craft A Modified Egg Drop.
Concept Overview for 2 mt Case “2 mt case”: integrated payloads of no more than 2 mt can be landed on the surface of Mars; extension of current Mars EDL.
Introduction to Parachute Systems
International Planetary Probe Workshop 10
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
DOC-TAS-EN-002 ExoMars-2018 DM Entry Decent Landing LSSWS# December 2014 Turin.
C ONCEPTUAL M ODELING AND A NALYSIS OF D RAG -A UGMENTED S UPERSONIC R ETROPROPULSION FOR A PPLICATION IN M ARS E NTRY, D ESCENT, AND L ANDING V EHICLES.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
CURIOSITY: Big Mars Rover for Big Mars Science! Artist’s Concept. NASA/JPL-Caltech.
Copyright 2011 | Company Proprietary Parachute Development for Venus Missions Christopher Kelley – Airborne Systems Robert Sinclair – Airborne Systems.
Mission Mars ENTRY, DESCENTAND LANDING. What are we going to Talk about? ?
Mars EDL CubeSat Mission Jekan Thanga 1, Jim Bell 1 Space and Terrestrial Robotic Exploration Laboratory School of Earth and Space Exploration (SESE) Arizona.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Atul Kumar Presentation Week 3: February 1 st, 2007 Aerodynamics Team Re-Entry vehicle analysis - Lifting body 1.
Parachutes Supersonic portion – Hemisflo Ribbon Most practical for velocities up to Mach 3 Subsonic portion – Ringsail Parachutes Historically proven success.
Miniaturization of Planetary Atmospheric Probes Tony Colaprete NASA Ames.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Intercollegiate Rocket Engineering Competition Spring 2015 EML Ethics and Design Project Organization.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Why Venus? The 2013 Planetary Science Decadal Survey recommends the Venus In Situ Explorer mission as highest-priority within New Frontiers class. Venus.
IPPW- 9 Royal Observatory of Belgium 20 June Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics Obtaining atmospheric profiles during Mars entry Bart Van Hove.
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
EJECTION SEAT BY AJESH KUMAR.M.V NO:4401.
1 Project Name Solar Sail Project Proposal February 7, 2007 Megan Williams (Team Lead) Eric Blake Jon Braam Raymond Haremza Michael Hiti Kory Jenkins Daniel.
A Simple Entry, Descent, and Floating System for Planetary Ballooning Daisuke Akita Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Titan Mariner Spacecraft Study Titan Team! IPPW-5 June 24, 2007.
K. Mease 10/11/06 1 Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Henry Samueli School of Engineering University of California, Irvine K. D. Mease Professor SAE Aerospace.
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
EXTROVERTSpace Propulsion 02 1 Thrust, Rocket Equation, Specific Impulse, Mass Ratio.
Ryan Mayes Duarte Ho Jason Laing Bryan Giglio. Requirements  Overall: Launch 10,000 mt of cargo (including crew vehicle) per year Work with a $5M fixed.
Amanda Verges & Dr. Robert Braun Evaluation of the Mars Pathfinder Parachute Drag Coefficient Langley/JPL Parachute Drag Coefficient Reconstruction The.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
What does it take to LAND on Mars? Whitney Eggers Emmett, Idaho Aaron McKinnon, Boise, Idaho Mentors: Behzad Raiszadeh, Eric Queen Whitney Eggers Emmett,
LATLAT Beam Test Workshop 20th March GLAST Program Beam Test Workshop CU Outer Shipping Container Michele Pinchera
Structural Design Considerations and Airspeeds
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Tim Lorenzana 1/16/2008 Avionics Recovery/Termination.
Team PM8 Eventus Slide 1. Commercial spaceflight has seen increased activity as more privately owned companies invest in the venture. To avoid a catastrophic.
Structures and Mechanisms Subsystems AERSP 401A. Introduction to Structural Estimation Primary Structure: load-bearing structure of the spacecraft Secondary.
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology August 4, 2015 Austin Nicholas Landing Site Considerations Related to the Potential Sample.
AAE 450- Propulsion LV Stephen Hanna Critical Design Review 02/27/01.
STRATEGIES FOR MARS NETWORK MISSIONS VIA AN ALTERNATIVE ENTRY, DESCENT, AND LANDING ARCHITECTURE 10 TH INTERNATIONAL PLANETARY PROBE WORKSHOP June,
HIAD Mission Infusion: Technology Development & Potential Utilization
Coming Home. De-orbit burn The craft spins itself 180 degrees so that it is facing backward with respect to its velocity The engine is fired, decelerating.
Mars Exploration Rovers Entry, Descent, Landing and Deployment.
Multi-Mission Earth Entry Vehicle: Aerodynamic and Aerothermal Analysis of Trajectory Environments Kerry Trumble, NASA Ames Research Center Artem Dyakonov,
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
High Altitude Free Fall: Theoretical Analysis of Physical Hazards Impacting Human Subjects V. Rygalov, Ph.D., J. Jurist, Ph.D., Space Studies Students.
Team Member Travis Noffke Decelerator System
Preliminary reconstruction of martian atmospheric structure from Phoenix entry measurements Paul Withers and David Catling Abstract P54B-08.
Review of Past and Proposed Mars EDL Systems. Past and Proposed Mars EDL Systems MinMars Mars entry body design is derived from JPL Austere Mars entry.
Space Shuttle  Presentation by:  Adjunct Professor Walter Barry  Space Shuttle launch  Orbit  Re-entry  Private Enterprise.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
Technical Resource Allocations
Critical Design Review Presentation
Space Express Sub-Orbital Mission
November 7, 2014.
November 7, 2014.
Final Readiness Review
RUAG Reusable Payload Fairing
2019 First Nation Launch – PDR Virtual Review
Rocketry Trajectory Basics
Plantation High SL team 1
University of Iowa USLI
Parachutes Changed Supersonic portion of descent
Presentation transcript:

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 1 Welcome MER Parachute DeceleratorSystem Preliminary Design Review

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 2 Program Objectives MER Parachute Deceleration Subsystem (PDS) is to deliver the landing vehicle, in the atmosphere of Mars, to a point and flight condition where Rocket Assisted Descent and Airbag Impact Attenuation Systems can complete the descent to the surface Resultant design should retain as much heritage as possible with previous Mars programs (MPF / MPL / MSP01 / Viking)

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 3 Operational Sequence 1) Direct Entry from Hyperbolic Approach 2) Cruise Stage Separation: E- 15 minutes 3) Atmospheric Entry: ~125 km altitude 4) Parachute Deploy: ~10 km A.G.L., ~E+ 240 s 5) Heatshield Jettison: 20 s after chute deploy 6) Bridle Descent: 20 s after heatshield jett., 10 s to complete 7) Radar Acquisition of Ground: ~2.4 km A.G.L 8) Airbag Inflate: ~4 s prior to retrorocket ignition 9) Rocket Ignition: ~160 meters A.G.L 10) Bridle Cut: ~15 meters A.G.L, 0 m/s vertical velocity 11) First Contact w/ Ground: ~E+ 360 s

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 4 General Design Requirements Parachute Assembly –Decelerates the Entry Vehicle from supersonic flight conditions –Establishes stable vertical trajectory to permit Heat Shield jettison and Lander deployment –Provides final descent velocity and stability for Rocket Assisted Descent and Airbag Impact Attenuation Systems

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 5 General Design Requirements Mortar Deployment Assembly –Interfaces with Backshell structure –Provides deceleration parachute structural attachment points –Packages and protects the Deceleration Parachute Assembly –Ejects the packed parachute from the stowed configuration –Accelerates parachute beyond the recirculating wake for controlled and reliable inflation

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 6 Design Requirements (Level 3) RequirementAssessment PDS shall ensure parachute deployment at a maximum Mach number of 2.23 and a minimum Mach number of Within Viking heritage EDL shall ensure that the parachute is deployed at a dynamic pressure of at least 500 Pa and no greater than 830 Pa Determined as low risk (Workshop) PDS shall ensure that the nominal ref area (S 0 ) of the full open parachute with suspended payload is  m 2 at Mach number 0.3 in the Martian atmosphere Baseline: 140% MPF chute size, 1.6 Viking Band under consideration PDS shall ensure parachute deployment at a maximum Angle of attack of 10 degrees. Viking, MPF, MSP01 limit 15 degrees PDS shall tolerate a maximum payload spin rate of 4 RPM during descent. Same as MPF

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 7 Driving Level 4 Requirements

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 8 Parachute Inflation Dynamics Parachute Inflation Force Predictions –825 kg Vehicle / 783 Pa / Mach ,760 Lb Maximum Zero Degree Angle Of Attack Initial Condition 12,365 Lb Maximum 10 Degree Angle Of Attack Initial Condition

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 9 Parachute Inflation Dynamics Parachute Inflation Force Predictions –825 kg Vehicle / 500 Pa / Mach ,350 Lb Maximum Zero Degree Angle Of Attack Initial Condition 10,622 Lb Maximum 10 Degree Angle Of Attack Initial Condition

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 10 Parachute Inflation Dynamics Maximum parachute force of 12,500 lb now used for design calculations –Additional case studies to be conducted –Need refined inertial properties for entry vehicle Results indicate maximum parachute opening loads and subsequent transient load history influenced by initial position of Lander relative to parachute and respective placement to flight path velocity vector –Interacting inertial forces of Lander and parachute at the beginning of parachute inflation –Dynamic phenomena noted in analysis of Viking and Pathfinder systems –Effects can be minimized by stability of entry vehicle

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 11 Structural Design Factors –Guidance from Document NWC TP 6575 Parachute Recovery Systems Design Guide as applied to ejection seat and crew module parachutes permanently packed in well-protected containers and Pioneer experience on MPF/MPL/MSP01 Design Factors Safety Factor: 1.50 Ultimate Design Factor: –Definition: Margin of Safety (MS) defined as: MS = (Available Strength / Required Strength) where Required Strength = Design Load x Design Factor Structural Analysis

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 12 Structural Analysis Preliminary Parachute Load Analysis

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 13 Estimated MER Design Loads –Loads have increased because of increase in chute area and deployment conditions. –Preliminary Estimates: Mortar Reaction Load: 17,000 lb (MPF = 11,000 lb) Peak Inflation Load: 12,500 lb (MPF = 7,904 lb) maximum dynamic pressure condition of 783 Pa, M = 1.9, 825 kg entry vehicle) Deployment Assembly

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 14 Deployment Assembly Mortar System - Introduction –Design Heritage Mars Explorer Rover (MER) Mortar Deployer Subsystem (MDS) design will be based on the successful Mars Pathfinder Mortar Deployer System (MDS) developed by General Dynamics (formerly Primex/Olin) as part of the Pioneer Aerospace team –Major Requirements Summary 100 ft/s < muzzle exit velocity < 130 ft/s (Mars) Dual initiators for gas generator Operational temperature range: -35C + 10C Ejection mass of 34.5 lbm (37 lbm max) Max parachute opening load 15,000 lbf

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 15 Deployment Assembly Mortar System - Introduction (cont’d) –Principal Similarities - Pathfinder vs. MER Same propellant, initiators and design approach Very similar parachute deployment velocity Development, LAT and qualification approach –Principal Differences - Pathfinder vs. MER Deployment mass (34.5 lbm vs lbm) Parachute volume (1620 in. 3 vs. 953 in 3 ) Larger parachute inflation load (15,000 lbf vs. 12,000 lbf - MSP01)

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 16 Deployment Assembly Bridle Deployment Bag Mortar cover Not shown gas generator NSI Mars Pathfinder PDS Shown 2.5 “ diam. increase from MPF for 40% area growth

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 17 Deployment Assembly MER Mortar Deployer Subsystem ICD

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 18 Deployment Assembly Mortar Subsystem – Design –Mortar System OD increase from 8.4" to 10.9" (nominal) –Gas Generator 12 grams of WC230 (same as previous) Design change to improve manufacturability proposed - exterior cap configuration to improve access for burst shim braze 2 Each NSI (CFE) –Cover Same design approach –Mortar Tube Same design approach Will interface with Backshell Interface Plate (changes identified) Structural evaluation will result in increased load/pressure capability for some features (Proposed)

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 19 Deployment Assembly Mortar TubeGas Generator Sabot Cover MPF shown

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 20 Deployment Assembly Mortar Subsystem –Earth/Mars Performance Deployment subsystem performance will be different in Earth and Mars environments Primary performance effects due to –Atmospheric backpressure (1 atm vs atm) Work delta = 2.94 kj (2169 ft-lbs) Earth environment system performance reduction offset by system operating characteristics –Backpressure results in higher pressure under sabot –Presence of air behind sabot causes higher tube delta p

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 21 Deployment Assembly Mortar Subsystem –Anticipated gas generator performance –Anticipated mortar tube pressure –Anticipated reaction load Loads and velocity expected to meet requirements

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 22 Parachute Assembly Mass Properties –Current Best Estimates, requirement  28 kg Mass Properties

MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 23 Mortar Ejection Velocity Analysis MER Analysis Input Summary