Effective and Scientific Implementation of EBP Initiatives in Community Corrections: Motivational Interviewing, Progression Matrix, and B.SMART, Chad Dilworth.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SISEP Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai
Advertisements

Using the PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) E-12
Heather J. Gotham, PhD Mid-America ATTC UMKC School of Nursing
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
Dean L. Fixsen, Karen A. Blase, Michelle A. Duda, Sandra F. Naoom, Melissa Van Dyke National Implementation Research Network Implementation and System.
April 10, 2013 SPDG Implementation Science Webinar #3: Organization Drivers.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Prepared by the Justice Research and Statistics Association IMPLEMENTING EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES.
VTPBiS Universal School Coordinator Orientation. Agenda Introductions Review Morning and Answer Questions Define Coordinator responsibilities and competencies.
The Process of VTPBiS Implementation Getting From Here to There! Vermont.
SWIFT School Wide Integrated Framework for Transformation
The CMSD Pyramid of Success – Implementing the Integrated Systems Model Leadership Team Training – August 2006 The Pyramid of Success: Creating a climate.
Continuing QIAT Conversations Planning For Success Joan Breslin Larson Third webinar in a series of three follow up webinars for.
RE-EXAMINING THE ROLE OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING EVALUATION THROUGH AN IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE LENS MICHELLE GRAEF & ROBIN LEAKE NHSTES June.
Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill University of Oregon University of Connecticut Scaling.
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS

Allison Metz, Ph.D., Karen Blase, Ph.D., Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D., Rob Horner, Ph.D., George Sugai, Ph.D. Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.
VTPBiS Intensive Level Wraparound Webinar Presented by: Jesse Suter February 4, 2015.
Barbara Sims, Co-Director National SISEP Center FPG Child Development Center University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Greensboro.NC March 20, 2013 Implementation.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
Evidence-Based Practices Implementation for Capacity Chad Dilworth EBP Implementation Specialist Ty Crocker EBP Implementation Specialist.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
V Implementing and Sustaining Effective Programs and Services that Promote the Social-Emotional Development of Young Children Part I Karen Blase, Barbara.
Implementation Science 101 Vestena Robbins, PhD Kentucky Dept for Behavioral Health, Developmental and Intellectual Disabilities.
Implementation Science Vision 21: Linking Systems of Care June 2015 Lyman Legters.
SectionVideo/PresentSlidesTotal Time Overview + Useable Intervention8:30 min Stages7:19 min Teams PDSA Terri present Drivers8:50 min Lessons Learned +
Certificate IV in Project Management Introduction to Project Management Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Implementation Drivers March 23, 2012
MiBLSi Systems of Support for Training October 9,
Improving Outcomes for All Students: Bringing Evidence-Based Practices to Scale March 25, 2009 MN RtI Center Conference Cammy Lehr, Ph.D. EBP & Implementation.
Coaching for Competence Margie McGlinchey SPDG Regional Mtg. October 1, 2009 Steve Goodman Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Co-Directors.
The Ohio Parole Board’s implementation of Select Strategies Presented by: Cynthia Mausser Chair.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University.
Northeast & Caribbean Implementation Center “New-Hampshirizing” Implementation Research Making It Work for Your System September 2013.
Massachusetts Part C Department of Public Health (LA) 62 programs, 38 vendor agencies 6 Regions 6 Regional Specialists.
Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Jon Potter Oregon RTI David Putnam Oregon RTI.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University.
Integrated System for Student Achievement SISEP in Illinois.
: The National Center at EDC
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. &
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Welcome To Implementation Science 8 Part Webinar Series Kathleen Ryan Jackson Erin Chaparro, Ph.D University of Oregon.
Barbara Sims Debbie Egan Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase Michelle A. Duda Using Implementation Frameworks to Identify Evidence Based Practices 2011 PBIS.
Connecting Resources, Impacting Lives FRCA Quarterly Fall Retreat Tuesday, November 3, 2015 Chris Rubino Director, Strengthening Families Programs.
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. National Implementation Research Network Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
COACHING AT THE BUILDING LEVEL Lori Newcomer – University of Missouri.
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
SunCoast Region Transformation Implementation Team November 2, 2012.
Understanding Implementation and Leadership in School Mental Health.
Michelle A. Duda Barbara Sims Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase October 2, 2012 Making It Happen With Active Implementation Frameworks: Implementation Drivers.
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION: EXPLORATION
ND State Personnel Development Grant North Dakota Scaling- up and Implementation Science Framework (ND-SISF )
VTPBiS Universal School Coordinator Orientation. Agenda Introductions Review Morning and Answer Questions Define Coordinator responsibilities and competencies.
Min.cenmi.org Michigan Implementation Network Providing Support through District Leadership and Implementation Team April 29, 2010 Michigan Implementation.
Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller
RDQ 5 District Coaching Capacity Discussion Leader: George Sugai, University of Connecticut.
An Introduction to Implementation Tools to Help Build Implementation Capacity SPDG Evaluators May 2012 Michelle A. Duda, Dean L. Fixsen,
Performance Management -Uttam Acharya
Performance Management -Uttam Acharya
The Process of VTPBiS Implementation
State and District Role in
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
Bringing RTI to Scale in Oregon
Installation Stage and Implementation Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Effective and Scientific Implementation of EBP Initiatives in Community Corrections: Motivational Interviewing, Progression Matrix, and B.SMART, Chad Dilworth Valarie Schamper Alexandra Walker

2 Steps to Traditional Implementation 1.Train 2.Pray

Funding History

Effective Programs Effective Implementation Outcomes that Benefit Individuals and Society X

Paper – nothing really changes Process – procedures change, not outcomes Performance – procedures & outcomes change Fixsen et al. (2005). Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature.

3 Levels of Implementation Paper Level – creating new policies and procedures about the EBP – 80-90% of the people dependent innovations in business stop at the paper level (Rogers, 2002) Process Level – EPB is in agency policy and procedure and other official processes (training, supervision, etc). – Training is didactic only – Supervision is uninformed by training, etc Performance Level – EBP is deeply integrated into organizational culture and outcomes/results are seen as a result

Letting it happen – Recipients are accountable Helping it happen – Recipients are accountable Making it happen – Purposeful use of implementation practices and science – Implementation teams are accountable Based on Greenhalgh, Robert, MacFarlane, Bate, & Kyriakidou, 2004

 Using Implementation Science to implement EBPs in an effective and sustainable way to produce outcomes  Syringe and Serum  The science for the innovation is different than the science for the preparation for when, where, how, and with whom the innovation is used

 The serum is like the innovation  The syringe is like Implementation Science

Systems Intervention Facilitative Administration Decision Support Data System Coaching Training Selection Technical Adaptive Fidelity Measurement STAFF COMPETENCY DRIVERS ORGANIZATION SUPPORT DRIVERS LEADERSHIP DRIVERS Adapted from ©Fixsen & Blase, 2007

Face to Face Coaching MI 101 Training Face to Face Coaching MI 102 Training

Face to Face Coaching Phone Coaching Face to Face Coaching Tape SubmissionCommunities of Practice

Implementation Strategy for EBP in Community Corrections

EBPS IN COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS

Implementation is a PROCESS, not an EVENT (Stages of Implementation) 1.Exploration 2.Installation 3.Initial Implementation 4.Full Implementation 5.Innovation 6.Sustainability

Progression Matrix BSMARTBSMART

Expected Timelines (Pending Review from EBP Steering Committee) Progression MatrixB.SMART 3-5 Programs at a time 2 Months of Planning (Prior to Installation) 3 Months of Installation Internal coaching/fidelity measurement Start now Finish in Fall/Winter of Programs at a time 3 Months of Planning (Prior to Installation) 3 Months of Installation Internal coaching/fidelity measurement Start Spring 2014 Finish in Spring/Summer of 2017

THE PROGRESSION MATRIX

Implementation Team Teams are sustainable; each member has a role A group that knows the innovations, implementation, and improvement cycles very well. Will develop plans and processes to ensure the successful implementation of an innovation The Team will meet regularly, planning and revising occurs at all stages of the implementation to ensure the implementation is being done effectively and adapting to changes in the environment and available resources.

Progression Matrix – Planning Phase 1.5 day training with implementation team – Review drivers – Develop plan that addresses each area – Work through a case plan – Begin revision of level system – Schedule coaches trainings – Review coaching and fidelity checklist – Sugai’s Law

Sugai’s Law For every 1 new initiative, stop 2 current ones

Progression Matrix – Planning Phase Implementation Team work at the program – Revise level system and any related policies – Train staff – Inform clients – Develop coaches – Sugai’s Law – Case plan development – practice – Updating orientation materials

Progression Matrix – Planning Phase.5 day training – 3-4 weeks later – Present revised level system for feedback – Discuss training, coaching and switch over schedule – Problem solving

Progression Matrix – Planning Phase Between.5 day training and initial installation (flipping the switch) – Deciding which current clients will be placed on matrix – Switching existing clients over – Providing coaching and feedback to CMs – Finalize staff training process – Finish informing clients and answering questions

Progression Matrix – Initial Installation Flip that switch! - Day one of the PM – All new clients placed on the PM – Existing clients switched over to PM with updated case plans

And now for the hard part!! Regular coaching and feedback Review fidelity and implementation measures Identifying roadblocks and challenges Practice-Improvement Cycle Support from leadership TEASE: Go to presentation on lessons learned from EPIC for a more detailed discussion of the challenges of moving from initial to full implementation

Behavioral Shaping Model and Reinforcement Tool B.SMART

B.SMART – Exploration Phase 3 focus groups – Over 100 stakeholders All levels of participants – from line level staff to administration, board members and referral agencies 4 Regional Working Groups – Southern, Western, Metro-Central, Metro-North Statewide Steering Committee – One chair and two vice chairs from each region – Probation, Parole and DCJ

Regional Working Group (RWG) Meetings – Reviewed existing sanction and incentive models – Reviewed the literature/research on sanctions and incentives – Developed concept models for both – Created lists of behaviors to sanction and incentivize B.SMART – Exploration Phase

Statewide Steering Committee (SSC) Meetings – Met monthly throughout 2012 – Set criteria for models using the literature Adoption of the 7 principles for managing offender behavior Sanctions and incentives not tied together Inclusive of staff at all levels Simple – Reviewed concept models created by RWG – Finalized both a sanctions and incentives model for testing and piloting

Where are we today? Began testing sanctions at one facility (CCTC) on July 1 st Hope to begin full pilot of B.SMART (both sanctions and incentives) in five programs in the spring of 2014

B.SMART Installation Plan 3-5 Programs at a time 3 Months of Planning (Prior to Installation) 3 Months of Installation Internal coaching/fidelity measurement Start Spring 2014 Finish in Spring/Summer of 2017