SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE PRACTICE IN JAPAN -A CASE STUDY IN HITACHI GROUP- SOFTWARE CHARACTERISTICS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES DEVELOPMENT PLAN AUDIT SOFTWARE INSPECTION DOCUMENT INSPECTION QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN THE TESTING STAGE TESTING STRATEGIES QUALITY TARGET MANAGEMENT QUALITY PROBE (QP) PRODUCT INSPECTION DISTRIBUTION OF SOFTWARE FAULTS SYSTEM TEST SYSTEM SIMULATION TEST Hitachi Systems & Services,Ltd. Quality Assurance Department Takamasa Nara
SOFTWARE CHARACTERISTICS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE POINTS TO CONSIDER AGGREGATE OF ALL LOGIC DIFFICULTY IN ACCURATE DESIGN OF LOGIC DIFFICULTY IN RELIABLE TESTING OF LOGIC INVISIBILITY INVISIBILITY OF SOFTWARE INVISIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STRUCTURED DESIGN METHOD AND DESIGN REVIEW SYSTEMATIC TESTING METHOD DESIGN AND NOTATION METHODS VISUALIZATION OF QUALITY AND PROGRESS STATUS
SOFTWARE CHARACTERISTICS POINTS TO CONSIDER MEETING THE NEEDS OF THE USER ●DIFFICULTY IN UNDERSTANDING THE NEEDS OF THE USER ●DIFFICULTY IN UNDERSTNDING THE CONDITIONS FOR USE GREAT DEPENDENCE ON INDIVIDUALS ●REDUCTION IN DEPENDENCE ON INDIVIDUALS ●EDUCATING INDIVIDUALS ●REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS, DEFINITION TECHNIQUE ●TESTING UNDER USER CONDITIONS ●STANDARDIZATION AND AUTOMATION OF DEVELOPMENT METHODS ●RE-USE AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER ●EDUCATION, TRAINING
SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES
DEVELOPMENT PLAN AUDIT ●PROJECT PLAN ―INSUFFICIENT STAFF AND ORGANIZATION ―UNDERESTIMATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT TIME AND MANPOWER ●QUALITY PLAN ―DETERMINATION OF NECESSARY QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS AND QUALITY TARGET VALUES ―METHODS AND PROCEDURES TO REALIZE QUALITY TARGET VALUES AT EACH PHASE
SOFTWARE INSPECTION ITEM EXPLANATION INSPECTION ORGANIZATION SCOPE THE INSPECTION ORGANIZATION MUST BE INDEPENDENT OF THE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING DEPARTMENTS IN ORDER TO MAKE FAIR JUDGEMENTS ●INSPECTION MUST BE FROM THE CUSTOMER’S VIEWPOINT: ―PRODUCTS WHOSE QUALITY DOES NOT MEET THE PREDETERMINED ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA ARE REJECTED ●INSPECTION INVOLVES ACTIVITIES TO ENSURE QUALITY FOR THE CUSTOMER AFTER DELIVERY SCOPE ●IN HOUSE -INSPECTION OF INDIVIDUAL PROCESSES -QUALITY CONTROL FOR ALL PROCESSES FROM BASIC DESIGN TO FINAL INSPECTION ●OUTSIDE -QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITES -LIAISON FOR CUSTOMER NEEDS AND COMPLAINTS
DOCUMENT INSPECTION 1.INTERNAL DOCUMENT INSPECTION 1.1 DOCUMENT ●FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATIONS ●DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS ETC. 1.2 AIMS ●ANTICIPATIVE QUALITY CONTROL OF PROGRAMS ●QUALITY CONTROL AT DESIGN PROCESSES (EVALUATION OF DOCUMENTS) ●PROGRESS CONTROL AT DESIGN PROCESSES 2. EXTERNAL DOCUMENT INSPECTION 2.1 DOCUMENT ●MANUALS ETC. 2.2 AIMS ●ASSURING SOFTWARE PRODUCT QUALITY ●CONSISTENCY WITH THE INTERNAL DOCUMENTATION ●EVALUATING UNDERSTANDABILITY AND USABILITY
QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN THE TESTING STAGE ●TESTING STRATEGIES ●FORECASTING DEFECTS AND MANAGEMENT OF TARGET VALUES
TESTING STRATEGIES 1.SETTING TARGET NUMBER OF ERRORS FOR EACH TEST PROCESS 2.IMPORTANCE OF CODE REVIEW 3.SYSTEMATIC TESTS ●USE EXTERNAL SPECIFICATION AND INTERNAL SPECIFICATION TESTS ●TECHNIQUE FOR SETTING TEST ITEMS MUST BE BASED ON CLEAR AND APPROPRIATE TEST CRITERIA ●USE TEST COVERAGE MEASURES AND TECHNIQUES 4.REUSING TESTING TECHNIQUES AND REDUCING TEST LABOR REQUIREMENTS 5.SYSTEM TESTING
QUALITY TARGET MANAGEMENT 2.DRAWING MANAGEMENT CURVE 1.SET QUALITY TARGET 6.TARGET REVIEW 3. MONITOR 5. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 4. QUALITY ESTIMATION ●FORECASTING ERRORS BY GROWTH CURVE (FRCST) ●QUALITY PROBE〔QP〕
QUALITY PROBE〔QP〕 PURPOSE: MEASURE AND ESTIMATE SOFTWARE QUALITY DURING TEST STAGE BY QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT METHOD: ●SAMPLING TEST 〔10%~20% OF TEST ITEMS〕 ●OPERATIONAL USE BY INSPECTORS ●ANALYSIS AND ESTIMATION OF THE RESULT -HIDDEN BUGS ESTIMATE 〔QUANTITATIVE〕 -IDENTIFYING WEAK POINTS OF DESIGN 〔QUALITATIVE〕
PRODUCT INSPECTION PURPOSE: JUDGING WHETHER THE SOFTWARE PRODUCTS ARE ACCEPTABLE METHOD: ●JUDGEMENT IS MADE FROM THE CUSTOMER’S POINT OF VIEW ●PRODUCT INSPECTION USES A COMPUTER TO RUN THE SOFTWARE PRODUCTS ●IF IT FAILS, THE DESIGN DEPARTMENT IMPROVES QUALITY AGAIN, AND INSPECTION IS REPEATED
Distribution of Software Faults 21.9 53.8 (QA Dpt.)
SYSTEM TEST AIMS: ●TEST AS A TOTAL SYSTEM -RUN TEST IN ACTUAL OR SIMULATED USER ENVIRONMENTS -ABNORMAL TEST WITH ERRORS, ABNORMAL OPERATIONS AND OVERLOAD DATA EXPECTED TO OCCUR IN THE ACTUAL ENVIRONMENT -PERFORMANCE EVALUATION TEST FACILITIES OF HITACHI’S SYSTEM TEST CENTER:(REFERED TO AS SST) ●HARDWARE EQUIPMENT INCLUDING 17 LARGE SCALE COMPUTERS ●NETWORK EQUIPMENT ●SIMULATORS(INCLUDING MULTIPLE TERMINAL SIMULATORS, AND HARDWARE ERROR SIMULATORS ●SUPPORT TOOLS
SYSTEM SIMULATION TEST