North Carolina Legislative Commission On Global Climate Change December 11, 2006 Recycling Energy: Profitable Climate Change Mitigation by Tom Casten Alliance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DIRECTION DE LA RECHERCHE Marc FLORETTE Jeudi 29 mai 2008 The advantage of mCHP as a high efficiency gas solution for the residential market Gas industry.
Advertisements

Captive Power Plants, 2004 Recycling Energy A Bridge to the Future Thomas R. Casten Chairman WADE World Alliance for Decentralized Energy.
DISTRICT HEATING: AN OVERVIEW PRESENTED BY: NIELSEN SYSTEMS APRIL 8, 2011.
Platinum Energy, Inc. Slide No. 1 PROJECT EVALUATION Joseph A. Orlando, Ph.D, PE Platinum Energy, Inc. Springfield, Virginia
NARUC 2015 Winter Meeting February 16, 2015 Combined Heat and Power and the Clean Power Plan Bruce Hedman Institute for Industrial Productivity.
Heating with Biomass Timothy A. Volk, SUNY ESF SUNY Global Center February 8, 2013.
RED | the new greenwww.recycled-energy.com Profitably Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions MIT Energy Initiative Seminar Series Thomas R. Casten, Chair Recycled.
The CEO Coalition Sustainable Technologies, Practices, & Public Policies Recycled Energy Cost Effective Sustainable Energy Thomas R. Casten Chairman &
Electrical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran M. Poursistani N. Hajilu G. B. Gharehpetian M. Shafiei CHP Systems.
State and Local Initiatives to Combat Global Warming AB A Framework for Change James N. Goldstene California Air Resources Board October 22, 2008.
Mark Hopkins United Nations Foundation June 2009.
Tenth Annual Midwest Energy Conference March 7, 2007 How Best Satisfy Midwest Electric Load Growth? Thomas R. Casten Chairman Recycled Energy Development.
Combined Heat and Power (CHP) The Draft New Jersey Energy Energy Master Plan calls for the development of 1,500 MW of CHP generation over the next ten.
COMBINED HEAT & POWER J.R. Simplot Mountain Home, Idaho.
Energy Efficiency: A Capital Offense Comments to MIT NESCAUM Symposium Thomas R. Casten, Chairman Recycled Energy Development, LLC August 12, 2009 RED.
Advanced Biomass-based Combined Heat and Power System Combined Heat & Power in the Pacific Northwest October 15, 2002 Nathan E. Carpenter Manager, Energy.
Darden School Social Responsibility and Entrepreneurship April 2, 2007 Recycling Energy: Profitably Mitigating Climate Change Tom Casten Chair, Recycled.
1 EERMC Public Meeting on Combined Heat and Power September 17, 2013.
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
Renewable Energy Integration
Green investment scheme and climate change mitigation policy in Ukraine Stavchuk Iryna Climate change program coordinator National ecological centre of.
Neeharika Naik-Dhungel, EPA CHP Partnership Program Central Pennsylvania AEE Meeting January 26, 2012 Combined Heat and Power: CHP Partnership and the.
COGENERATION Allison M. Selk 12/8/04 CBE 562.
Katrina Pielli U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CHP Partnership
Cogeneration.
Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation IPCC WORKING GROUP 3.
Climate Action Reaping the Benefits of Climate Action: A Key Starter for Jobs Creation and Competitive Growth Doha, 27 November 2012 Ana Maria Danila DG.
Waste Heat to Power Workshop February 15, 2006 Recycling Energy: Affordable Clean Energy Thomas R. Casten Chairman & CEO Primary Energy, LLC.
1 RED | the new greenwww.recycled-energy.com 1/15/08 West Virginia: Opportunities to Capture Waste Energy Presentation to Senate Committee on Economic.
Proprietary work product, not for reproduction 1 BIOMASS GASIFIER 20 MW POWERPLANT Energy & Environmental Integrators Note! This system can be scaled from.
Rory McIlmoil, Downstream Strategies. Introduction to distributed energy The case for distributed renewable energy Opportunities for developing distributed.
RED | the new greenwww.recycled-energy.com Profitably Reducing Carbon Emissions in Maine Presentation to Governor Baldacci’s Energy Efficiency Summit Thomas.
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 13 Energy Efficiency Module 13: SUPPLY-SIDE MANAGEMENT.
Pollution Probe August 2, 2006 Profitably Reducing CO 2 by Recycling Energy Some ‘Convenient Truths’ Thomas R. Casten Chairman & CEO Primary Energy, LLC.
RED | the new greenwww.recycled-energy.com 1 Energy and Science Technology and Engineering Challenges to Energy Recycling Sean Casten, President & CEO.
Distributed Generation Programs, Incentives and Interconnections Ian Loughran, P.Eng. DSM Program Leader Renewable Energy Programs
Capturing Energy Waste
Modern Grid Initiative November 15, 2006 Energy Recycling – Enhancing the Grid Thomas R. Casten Past Chairman & CEO Primary Energy, LLC.
WADE 5 th Intl Conference, 2004 Recycling Energy with CHP and Decentralized Energy A Bridge to the Future Thomas R. Casten Chairman WADE World Alliance.
Co- and Poly- generation Martin Hannemann Andi Prah Nuri Feichtinger Paul Polterauer.
Energy Efficiency – The First Fuel The Danish Experience Jiangsu - May 21st 2015 Counsellor Christian van Maarschalkerweerd – Embassy of Denmark.
Lina Murauskaitė New Challenges in the European Area: Young Scientist’s 1st International Baku Forum May 20-25, 2013, Azerbaijan, Baku Integration of Renewable.
3 rd Annual Waste Heat to Power Workshop, 2007 Thomas R. Casten Chairman, Recycled Energy Development, LLC Waste Heat to Power September 25, 2007.
RED | the new greenwww.recycled-energy.com 1 CHP: One of the answers (but not the question) Presentation to Efficient Enterprises: Powering American Industry.
No energy wasted Example of an energy strategy in urban areas Brussels, 22nd June 2006.
CAEM – Competitive Energy Markets Optimal Provision of New Electric Load Thomas R. Casten Chairman & CEO Primary Energy, LLC Scott Tinker, Director Bureau.
Brussels, Dec 1, Making an inefficient energy system in Europe more efficient Sven Werner, professor Halmstad University, Sweden Partly based on.
And the Technologies to use it. Tina Kaarsberg, PhD House Science Committee, Energy Subcommittee For For Producing Energy:
1 Distributed Energy Resources: Bringing Energy Closer to Home Presentation by the Industry Task Force on Distributed Generation July 28, 2005.
Technology details, potential and experiences of Trigeneration
1 Closing the Biomass Power Cost-Price Gap B.R. Bock 3/5/04 Southern Bio-Products Conference Green Power Track Biloxi, MS.
Overview of Distributed Generation Applications June 16, 2003 Harrisburg, PA Joel Bluestein Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc.
Beyond Mandates, Does Green Pave the Way? Marlene Santos Vice President, Customer Service Florida Power & Light Company October 17, 2009.
Efficient Power Generation Dick Munson Recycled Energy Development Midwest Media Project 10 July 2007.
The Broward County Green Workforce Innovation Project White Paper April 2010.
Michael R. Walker Research Director IGCC Financing Project Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University PH: , FX:
10 th Annual IOF WV Symposium November 9, 2006 Energy Recycling – A Convenient Truth! Thomas R. Casten Past Chairman & CEO Primary Energy, LLC.
Clean Energy Technologies Dick Munson Recycled Energy Development Congressional Distributed Energy Caucus 27 March 2007.
Recycling Waste Energy August 18, 2007 Presentation to Senator Reid by Energy Recycling Industries Presenter: Thomas R. Casten Chairman, Recycled Energy.
HRM Council Environment & Sustainability Standing Committee July 7, 2011.
Chapter 4 An Enduring Energy Future. Cont. キ Central electric generating stations will continue to be part of the electricity supply system in order.
FUEL CELLS.
RED | the new green Presentation to the Business Council for Sustainable Energy & the House Climate Change Caucus Thomas R. Casten Chairman, Recycled.
Assessing Market Barriers to Distributed Generation
Energy Conservation CERD /12/2017
Utility Owned Generation? (UOG)
Closing the Biomass Power Cost-Price Gap
Plug & Play CHP? Is Your Pocket About to be Picked?
Anna Garcia Air Innovations Conference August 2004
How Small Developers and EPC Contractors Can Add PPA Financing to their Arsenals John Langhus, VP Business Development Midwest Solar Expo 2019 New Energy.
Presentation transcript:

North Carolina Legislative Commission On Global Climate Change December 11, 2006 Recycling Energy: Profitable Climate Change Mitigation by Tom Casten Alliance for Clean Technology Founder, former CEO Trigen & Primary Energy

Commission Mission  Reach consensus on what NC can do to alleviate or prepare for the effects of climate change  Solicit ideas from experts  Take advantage of economic opportunities  Actions taken will shape the direction of NC economy for decades

Presentation Summary  The central generation of electricity is not optimal  The better option – local generation that recycles energy waste – faces regulatory barriers, is denied benefits it creates  The Alliance for Clean Technology (ACT) proposes a suite of policies to encourage ‘clean technology’  ACT believes governments can profitably mitigate climate change with a ‘blue box’ energy policy – recycling waste energy

Introducing the Alliance for Clean Technology (ACT)  ACT is new, a coalition of local power developers, WWF, Greenpeace, Sierra Club, Suzuki Foundation, unions, and gas and electric distribution utilities  Mission is polices that induce deployment of clean technology to profitably reduce greenhouse gas emissions  These policies will reduce pollution, improve industrial competitiveness, preserve good jobs and lower societal heat and power costs

An Inconvenient Truth  Al Gore describes global warming as an ‘Inconvenient Truth’ – a reality that we would rather not face.  Why inconvenient? Conventional wisdom assumes energy conversion is optimal; thus mitigating climate change will increase energy costs Conventional wisdom assumes energy conversion is optimal; thus mitigating climate change will increase energy costs  Why wrong? The energy system is not optimal The energy system is not optimal Electric generation efficiency peaked in 1960, creates 38% of US GHG Electric generation efficiency peaked in 1960, creates 38% of US GHG

Conventional Central Approach 1960 Data (& 2003 Data) Pollution Fuel 100 units Power Plant = 67 units Waste Energy 33 units Electricity End User Waste Heat Transmission Line Losses 3 units (7.5%)

45 Years with no efficiency gains

We Have Better Electric Generation Options Local generation can recycle energy to reduce costs and pollution

ACT’s ‘Convenient Truth’ Energy Recycling Eases All Problems  Recycling industrial waste energy could produce 20% of US electricity, fuel free  Combining heat and power generation (CHP) produces electricity with half the fossil fuel of conventional central generation  Recycling waste energy will improve US competitive position

What is Recycled Energy?  Recycled energy is useful energy derived from: Exhaust heat from power generation or industrial processes Exhaust heat from power generation or industrial processes Tail gas that would otherwise be flared Tail gas that would otherwise be flared Pressure drop in steam or any gas Pressure drop in steam or any gas  Promoting energy recycling is a ‘blue box’ energy policy

Decentralized Generation Option Combined Heat and Power Pollution Recycle Waste Heat CHP Plant End User Site 33 units Waste Energy = 66 units Useful Work 33 units Electricity 33 units Thermal Energy Fuel 100 units

Industrial Energy Options Electricity Steam Hot Water End User Site Energy Recycling Plant Electricity Process Fuel Finished Goods Waste Energy Saved Energy Input

Backpressure Turbine-generators Extract Electricity from Gas/Steam Pressure Drop Low Pressure steam out Extracted kWh reduces steam price High Pressure steam in Potential applications save money at industrial plants, hospitals, universities, and district energy systems and natural gas city gates

Industrial Energy Recycling 90 MW Recycled from Coke Production

Local CHP Plants that recycle waste heat Denmark Electric Efficiency

Energy Recycling Impact on the Grid  Local generation reduces grid loading, line losses and need for new T&D  Local generation stabilizes voltages and reduces vulnerability to extreme weather and terrorists  Only local generation can recycle waste energy; it is not economic to recycle waste energy from remote generation plants

What About Economies of Scale? Skeptics claim local generation will raise capital costs

Economies of Scale? Central versus Decentralized Generation Transmission & Distribution $1380 $138 $1, % Generation Central Generation $890 Local Generation $1,200 Savings (Excess) of Central vs. Local Generation $310 Central generation capital as a % of local capital 74% Total / kW of Generation $2,270 $1,338 $1, % KW required/ kW Load % Total costs/ kW New Load $3,269 $1,432 $1, %

Future Generation Options Renewable Energy Options Central Generation Options No incremental fossil fuel line Recycled Energy Options Avg. Industrial Power Price 5.5¢ / kWh (33% efficiency) (50% efficiency) (100% efficiency) (net fossil savings) Avg. Retail Power Price 8.1¢ / kWh

Comparative Deployment of Combined Heat and Power in 2004 ACT Target of 30% CHP in US

NC Industry Recycling Potential  Steel Blast furnace gas, exhaust heat, pressure drop Blast furnace gas, exhaust heat, pressure drop  Refineries and chemical factories  Natural gas pumping station exhaust  Pressure drop at gas delivery points  Glass & fiberglass factory exhaust heat  Sewage gas, landfill gas, biomass, construction waste, recycled carpet, other  All process thermal users, housing complexes, all central chilling users

ACT Definition of Clean Technology  Over 57% delivered fossil efficiency (versus 33% for US central generation)  GHG emissions less that one unit of coal-equivalent per unit of electricity (equal to 100% coal efficiency)  No limits on size, technology, fuel, or location

Two Barriers to Clean Technology  Barriers to local generation: Interconnection costs and hassle Interconnection costs and hassle Standby charges Standby charges  Many clean technology benefits are not available to the facilities that create the benefits: T&D avoidance T&D avoidance Line loss avoidance Line loss avoidance Health and environmental savings Health and environmental savings

ACT Proposals to spur Clean Technology  Require distribution utilities to interconnect with clean technology plants, add to rate base  No standby charges for clean tech facilities  Permit clean technology as ‘pollution control’  Statewide standard offer for clean technology to satisfy expected load growth, no size or time limits Pay current market wholesale price for power and, Pay current market wholesale price for power and, Pay half of calculated benefits that clean technology creates – roughly 4 to 6 cents per kWh Pay half of calculated benefits that clean technology creates – roughly 4 to 6 cents per kWh

Stimulating Recycling of Industrial Waste Energy  State insure risk of industrial shutdown  Provide limited loan guarantees for new industrial energy recycling plants Payable only if host ceases to provide waste energy Payable only if host ceases to provide waste energy Covers risk of industries ceasing production, creates a virtuous cycle Covers risk of industries ceasing production, creates a virtuous cycle Will trigger an industrial boom in NC Will trigger an industrial boom in NC Costs offset with added income taxes Costs offset with added income taxes

Recycled Energy Benefits  New Investment  Job Creation  New Revenue Streams for NC Industry  Improved Industrial Competitiveness  Public Sector Gains

Conclusions: A Convenient Truth Energy Recycling Solves Multiple Problems  NC can ‘mine’ industrial waste energy, create added revenue streams for industry Recycle to provide affordable, clean energy Recycle to provide affordable, clean energy  Requires unconventional, innovative governance Remove barriers to efficiency Remove barriers to efficiency Pay part of T&D and health savings to facilities that create those savings Pay part of T&D and health savings to facilities that create those savings Treat energy recycling as pollution control devices for environmental permits Treat energy recycling as pollution control devices for environmental permits

Denmark Changed in Two Decades Source: Danish Energy Center

Thank you