Implementation of the Horizontal Priority “Sustainable Development” of the National Strategic Reference Framework, by Implementing Activities/sub-activities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Armand Racine Consultant Chemicals Branch
Advertisements

December 2005 EuP Directive : A Framework for setting eco-design requirements for energy-using products European Commission.
Formats envisaged in the Common Provisions Regulation for major projects Third Meeting of the Expert Group on Delegated and Implementing Acts for the ESI.
1 COMMISSIONER HÜBNER Cohesion Policy & Environment.
ENEA, 12. September 2005 WWF Handbook and Score-card Presentation by Stefanie Lang,
Inaugural Discussions on the Global Programme on Sustainable Ship Recycling Dhaka, Bangladesh – 12 January 2008 Donata Rugarabamu Secretariat of the Basel.
Implementation of waste management plans in Serbia 2013 workshop on Waste Policy Implementation May 2013 Copenhagen.
Objectives Terminal Objective
Sustainable Approaches: Industrial Ecology and Pollution Prevention Chapter 21 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Towards the Romania of PRINCIPLES OF PROGRAMMING The social and macroeconomic policy of Europe is the policy of Romania EU projects represent a.
Cohesion Policy and Climate Change Viktoria Bolla DG ENV Unit C.1 ‘Climate strategy, International Negotiation and Monitoring of EU Action’ Tallinn, 4.
Voluntary instruments Daniel Hajek 1.Environmental labelling 2.EMAS 3.Cleaner productions 4.Green public procurement 5.Voluntary agreements Voluntary.
PROYECTO NEREIDAS VISIÓN EUROPEA DE LOS PROYECTOS TEN-T ALEXIO PICCO – CIRCLE Malaga 03/04/2014.
The LIFE Integrated Projects
EU Environmental policy priorities for the period till 2010 Based on the 6 th Environment Action Programme By Nikos Sakkas, LEI Crete, 2002.
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
1 “Environmental Auditing in the Republic of Macedonia” “Environmental Auditing in the Republic of Macedonia” State Audit Office Nada Sekulovska Gorast.
1 UNGC Module 3 – Session 3 THE UN GLOBAL COMPACT MODULE 3 THE ENVIRONMENTAL PRINCIPLES Session 3: Principle 9.
The Revision of the Waste Framework Directive Key suggested amendments by the Rapporteur.
ISO General Awareness Training
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study Meeting on Prevention and Remediation in Selected Industrial Sectors: Mega-Sites, Ottawa, Canada 12-16, June 2005 The State of Remediation.
European Union Environmental Law and Policy
QUALITY, ENVIRONMENTAL AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY POLICY.
‘ Social injustice is killing people on a grand scale ’ ‘ A new approach to development ’ economic growth is without question important, particularly for.
Definition of Ecotourism  Ecotourism Kenya defines Ecotourism as, “the involvement of travelers in environmental conservation practices that address.
Ship Recycling Facility Management System IMO Guideline A.962
Energy & Environment Report for 2008 – 2009 Ian Rowe Manager (Health, Safety & Environment)
EU Policies and Demolition
Information by the Managing Authority on thematic evaluation of EU structural funds in Iruma Kravale Head of Strategic Planning Unit, European.
EU Transport Policy Regional Meeting on Sustainable Transport Policies in South Eastern Europe Budapest, June Wioletta Szymanska Project Manager.
GREATER BIRMINGHAM & SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP AREA Priority Axes 4 & 6 - Calls Workshop Supporting the shift towards a low carbon economy.
EU Legislation in the field of environment – key developments in 2007 and rd ECENA Plenary Meeting 18 September 2008.
Capacity Development for the CDM (CD4CDM) First National Workshop - SURINAM Sustainable Development Impact Evaluation Miriam Hinostroza.
How Green is my university? Sustainability in HE in Wales EAUC Conference 24th March 2010 Professor Phil Gummett Chief Executive.
Innovation Division. Innovation Its embedded novelty, providing qualitative increase in the efficiency of processes or products demanded by the market.
Managing Authority of EU Funds – Ministry of Finance 1 Methodology of selection of project applications for EU funds including preparation of appraisal.
PNOs-Suppliers Technical Interfaces Heidelberg, 3 March 1998 DR 1 INTEGRATING ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS IN THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS DANILO RIVA.
1. Sustainable Development. International commitment. COORDINATION. A LONG-TERM VISSION. Policies Enhance the economic growth. Certainty and Economic.
Brownfields in Baltic States - Lifelong Educational Project CZ/08/LLP-LdV/TOI/ Legal aspects of brownfield redevelopment in Latvia Edmunds Teirumnieks.
1 Third BERCEN Plenary Meeting Brussels, December 2004 Agenda item 13 Key achievements in environmental enforcement and compliance - discussion on.
Promoting Regional Green Development BRUNEI DARUSSALAM’S BRUNEI DARUSSALAM’SPERSPECTIVE ASEAN-China Environmental Cooperation Forum Naning, China 22 October.
. Environmental Performance Reviews (EPR) Programme Antoine Nunes United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Belgrade, Serbia 2 December 2015.
ICZM PROTOCOL INDICATORS THE MEDITERRANEAN PROTOCOL ON INTEGRATED COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT: What indicators are needed? Marko PREM Director a.i.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation ( ) Presentation to Directors Meeting DK 22 May 2012.
ReFINE Research for Future Infrastructure Networks of Europe ECTP OG 10 -April 28, 2010 Brussels.
Recommendations for Observing the Horizontal Priority “Information Society” in Selection and Appraisal of Project Applications for EU Funds Viesturs Krievāns.
1. Rabka-Zdroj for more than a hundred years is a spa town famous for its large resources of medicinal mineral waters. › Disadvantage: geographical location.
11/06/20161 Transport sector - Preparing for next programming period: SEA as part of ex-ante conditionality and ex-ante evaluation Adina Relicovschi Senior.
Information by the Managing Authority on evaluations of EU funds in 2009 Monitoring Committee meeting 25 March 2009.
Ministry of Finance Financial management and control of the Operational Programmes, co- financed under the Structural funds and the Cohesion fund of EU.
Managing Environmental Issues
Environment Sector Working Group Cross-Sectoral Environmental Strategy
Overview of the Programme Achievements of previous period
Sustainable rural development through organic production encouragement in state and local strategies in Bulgaria Organic production creates strong connections.
Viera Šimkovicová, waste management expert, Slovak Republic
Supporting Data for a KfW Financed Investment Project on the Montenegrin Coast 18 May 2017, Wien ●
Cohesion policy and the environment
Private sector development and SDGs in Albania
EMFF Funding opportunities for the environment
Task 1.2 Review existing and new financing instruments relevant for MSFD implementation.
Workshop with the 8 PAF related Proposals & the Habitats Committee
SCP in the 7th Environmental Action Programme
The evaluation process
A quick word on water and rural development policy after 2013
The environmental dimension of the EMFF
EU Marine Strategy DG Environment B.1.
Bulgaria – Capital Budgeting And Fiscal Institutions
Biodiversity, Natura 2000 & Green Infrastructure in the Regional Policy Mathieu Fichter European Commission, DG Regio Team leader "sustainable.
Environment in Cohesion Policy framework for
Presentation transcript:

Implementation of the Horizontal Priority “Sustainable Development” of the National Strategic Reference Framework, by Implementing Activities/sub-activities Financed by EU Funds

Objectives of Sustainable Development (SD) Reduction and control of environmental pollution Ensuring of good-quality living environment Preservation of biological diversity Rational use of natural and energy resources Elimination of threats of the surrounding environment to the health of people Increasing awareness about nature protection

MAIN PRINCIPLES (I) Project application appraisal criteria Compliance with environmental requirements stipulated in legislation, inter alia, environmental impact assessment is an eligibility criterion for project applications. The specific criterion of SD project applications depends on the impact of the activity/sub-activity on environmental quality.

MAIN PRINCIPLES (II) Eligible expenditure Eligible expenditure: Expenditure of environmental impact assessment Expenditure of measures which compensate for activities that have an impact on the environment General activities aimed at promoting SD

MAIN PRINCIPLES (III) Performance indicators For all activities/sub-activities in the framework of which projects will be implemented which have impact on SD, corresponding performance indicators shall be envisaged. Performance indicators derive from SD objectives. The indicators shall be measurable, both the existing level and the level to be achieved shall be indicated.

Division of activities/sub-activities according to their impact on SD The objective of the activity/sub-activity corresponds to some SD objective. The objective of the activity/sub-activity does not correspond to SD objectives, but the activity in general has impact on SD. The objective of the activity/sub-activity does not correspond to SD objectives, but individual projects may have impact on SD. The activity/sub-activity does not have direct impact on SD.

PROJECT APPLICATION APPRAISAL CRITERIA (I) The objective of the activity/sub-activity corresponds to some SD objective Restricted project selection (projects are not “homogenous”) – SD criterion is an eligibility criterion, because priority is given to achievement of sectoral objectives according to policy planning documents. A project shall list activities aimed at achievement of SD objectives and performance indicators. Restricted project selection (projects are “homogenous”) – SD criterion is a quality criterion, higher valuation is given to projects with bigger effect on achievement of SD objectives. A project shall list activities aimed at achievement of SD objectives and performance indicators. Open project selection – SD criterion is a quality criterion for achievement of SD objectives. A project shall list activities aimed at achievement of SD objectives and performance indicators.

PROJECT APPLICATION APPRAISAL CRITERIA (II) The objective of the activity/sub-activity does not correspond to SD objectives, but the activity in general has impact on SD Restricted project selection – SD criterion is the quality criterion “Will project implementation eliminate or reduce impact on environment”. A project shall list activities aimed at achievement of SD objectives and performance indicators. Open project selection – SD criterion is a quality criterion for achievement of SD objectives. A project shall list activities aimed at achievement of SD objectives and performance indicators.

PROJECT APPLICATION APPRAISAL CRITERIA (III) The objective of the activity/sub-activity does not correspond to SD objectives, but individual projects may have impact on SD SD criterion shall be envisaged as a quality criterion by giving additional (“bonus”) points. for projects to be implemented in a sphere connected with SD objectives for “environmentally friendly” projects for projects which envisage general activities aimed at promoting SD (green procurement, recycling of paper etc.) A project shall list activities aimed at achievement of SD objectives and performance indicators.

PROJECT APPLICATION APPRAISAL CRITERIA (IV) The activity/sub-activity does not have direct impact on SD Applicable to all operational programmes and activities It is recommended to give priority, in addition to already established criteria, to a project that envisages implementation of several measures. Examples: –Best available techniques –Replacing of printed materials with electronic data carriers –Using of recycled paper –Information activities on environmental protection going further than minimum requirements, innovative technologies – Informing of the society Implementation of “green procurement”

PROJECT APPLICATION APPRAISAL CRITERIA – EXAMPLES (I) The objective of the activity/sub-activity corresponds to some SD objective Rehabilitation of dump sites that do not meet requirements of legal acts Categorization of dump sites by their degree of hazard and potential environmental pollution: Category I – dump sites operation of which has low threat potential – 1 point Category II – dump sites operation of which has medium-level threat potential - 2 points Category III – dump sites operation of which has high threat potential - 3 points

PROJECT APPLICATION APPRAISAL CRITERIA – EXAMPLES (II) The objective of the activity/sub-activity does not correspond to SD objectives, but the activity in general has impact on SD IMPROVEMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE IN SMALL PORTS The project improves shipping safety The project reduces the risk of environmental pollution The project ensures better organization of surrounding environment of the port Restricted project selection – eligibility criterion, project shall indicate performance indicators

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS CORRESPONDING TO THE APPRAISAL CRITERION The objective of the activity/sub-activity does not correspond to SD objectives, but the activity in general has impact on SD IMPROVEMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE IN SMALL PORTS Shipping safety measures will be implemented (indicate particular measures) – XX (number and type) Measures aimed at reducing the risk of environmental pollution will be implemented (indicate particular measures) – XX (number and type) Measures aimed at better organization of surrounding environment of the port will be implemented (indicate particular measures) – XX (number and type)

PROJECT APPLICATION APPRAISAL CRITERIA – EXAMPLES (III) The objective of the activity/sub-activity does not correspond to SD objectives, but individual projects may have impact on SD Co-financing of the investments in micro and small- sized enterprises operating in the specially assisted areas Implementation of the project will reduce pressure on the environment in one of the following ways (2 points): Ensuring economical use of energy resources Optimization of waste generation Introduction of production and recycling methods which reduce impact on environment during product life cycle Compliance with principles of “green procurement”.

PROJECT APPLICATION APPRAISAL CRITERIA – EXAMPLES (IV) The activity/sub-activity does not have direct impact on SD The project envisages full or partial substitution of printed materials with electronic data carriers or publishing the information on websites. The project envisages printing of materials on recycled paper. The project envisages information activities on environmental protection, which exceed minimum requirements / innovative methods are used for informing the society on SD objectives and principles. The project envisages using of “green procurement”.