Children Have the Right to Say! Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say! Dr. Michael.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACTFL’s Alignment of the Standards with the Common Core
Advertisements

Understanding American Citizenship
ELA Common Core – What We Know So Far….
Balanced Literacy How our instructional practices will support the implementation of Common Core.
Process Skill Writing / Writing Process. Students use elements of the writing process (planning, drafting, revising, editing, and publishing) to compose.
Module 2 Text Comprehension
Family Literacy Night. Why revise? Align with Common Core State Standards Reflect the current Reading and Writing Workshop philosophy as well as the Mathematics.
Key Ideas and Details Ask and answer questions to demonstrate understanding, referring to the text as the basis for the answers. Integration of knowledge.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Nevada Joint Union High School District Nevada Union High School September 23, 2013 Louise Johnson, Ed.D. Superintendent.
Literacy-in-CTE Julie Anderson Sal Cassaro Sherry Cole Kristin Gunson Jennell Ives Steve Shilling Mark Wreath CTE Literacy Leadership Team.
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades K–5: Focus on Instructional Shifts Activity 1.
Supplemental Instructional Materials Aligned to the Common Core State Standards It will take a number of years to develop new curriculum frameworks and.
English Language Arts in Illinois
“I’m ready for my close- up Mr. DeMille!” CLOSE READINGS By: Kimberley Cooper.
Foreign language and English as a Second Language: Getting to the Common Core of Communication. Are we there yet? Marisol Marcin
Saluda County Schools  Will CCSS cause a shift in administrator behaviors?  Will CCSS cause a shift in teacher behaviors?  Will CCSS cause.
Educator’s Guide Using Instructables With Your Students.
Keeping KUD’s Concise What do your students need to KNOW, UNDERSTAND and DO to master unit content?
Welcome to Implementing the Common Core State Standards
AND THE NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS Common Core as it Relates to Middle School Science.
General Considerations for Implementation
1 Summer 2012 Educator Effectiveness Academies English Language Arts Transitioning to the CCSS by Making Strategic and Informed Choices in the Classroom.
Standards! What are we writing? What are we practicing?
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What does it look like and sound like when students use evidence to support their thinking?
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
Funded by the Library of Congress.
Inquiring Minds Want to Know: Using Inquiry to Build for the ELA CCSS COSA, Fall 2013
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/ Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
Common Core National State Standards Math Language Arts Science, Social Studies, and other subject areas. Two foci: Reading and Writing.
Welcome Parents Thank you for coming! Grab a 6 th Grade Standards Handout. Sit wherever you would like.
Meeting the Challenge of Common Core: Planning Close Reading CFN 604 October 21 st, 2014.
Grade 8 – Writing Standards Text Types and Purposes (1b) Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence. Support claim(s) with.
ERIKA LUSKY JULIE RAINS Collaborative Dialogue in the Classroom
Introduction to the ERWC (Expository Reading and Writing Course)
4 Transforming Our Use of Images in ELT. MEXTESOL’s OBJECTIVES * Promote the professional development of English teachers * Assist teachers in updating.
Close Reading of Complex Texts in the 3-8 Modules
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) & NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES (NGA CENTER) JUNE 2010.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
Health Sciences Alignment to English Language Arts and Mathematics Common Core State Standards Lori Matyjas CT State Department of Education November 12,
1 TEXT-BASED SYNTHESIS WRITING: INFORMATIVE / ARGUMENT OPINION NARRATIVE Silver Shores Elementary.
Bradley Introducation to the Common Core Standards.
ELACC7W1 Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence.
Common Core State Standards in English/Language Arts What science teachers need to know.
PENNSYLVANIA COMMON CORE STANDARDS 1.5 Speaking and Listening Students present appropriately in formal speaking situations, listen critically, and respond.
Argumentative Writing Grades College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing Text Types and Purposes arguments 1.Write arguments to support a.
COMMON CORE CONTENT STANDARDS Module 1: Read and Know the Standard.
Funded by the Library of Congress.
Children Have the Right to Say! Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say! Dr. Michael.
Amy Jo Southworth Bay Shore High School Library Common Core wiki: bshscommoncore.wikispaces.com.
Exploring the Literacy Standards: CCSS & Main Idea.
+ PARCC Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
Constructive Conversation Smart Start Lessons
Winston - Salem / Forsyth County Schools ELA Module Two: Writing.
Common Core.  Find your group assignment.  As a group, read over the descriptors for mastery of this standard. (The writing standards apply to more.
Applying the Reading Anchor Standards: Spring 2016 Instructional Leadership College and Career Ready Standards for Literacy.
Shifts in ELA/Literacy
Middle School English Language Arts Learning Targets: I can…
Common Core Strategies with Primary Texts
Balanced Literacy How our instructional practices will support the implementation of Common Core.
Balanced Literacy How our instructional practices will support the implementation of Common Core.
Read-Listen-view Essay Rationale
Debate Unit 1 Standards Comprehension and Collaboration
AVID and The Common Core
Michigan Reading Standards
Team Composition Group Director: Cooperation and Time Management Group Artist: Conceptualization and Design Group Stenographer: Copying Standards Atop.
Phases of the Moon Mini Research Project.
Using the 7 Step Lesson Plan to Enhance Student Learning
Presentation transcript:

Children Have the Right to Say! Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say! Dr. Michael Kopish & Dr. Alison Wenhart Plymouth State University

Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

Standards Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say! Standards Influencing Social Studies

Learning Progression Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

What questions come to mind when you view this image? Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

What questions come to mind when you view this image? Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

+ Keys for Designing Issues-Based Units Aims for planning: Controversial issues Current events Relevant to students Guide instruction through questions: Policy level issues Sub issues (e.g., factual, definitional, ethical, legal) Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

Types of Issues-Based Questions for Planning Type of Issue:Questions: Policy: Should schools adopt zero tolerance policies to promote school safety? Sub-issues Factual Which offenses are most often subject to zero tolerance policies? Definitional What is a “zero tolerance” policy? Ethical Is justice applied fairly to youth? Do zero tolerance policies in schools push youth into the prison system? Legal To what extent does the U.S. Constitution protect youth against unreasonable punishment? Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

Matching Appropriate Methods and Strategies All teachers make pedagogical choices to best match appropriate methods and strategies to standards, objectives, and skills. Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

KNOWLEDGE OF INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES Best practices from the field of social studies Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

Reading Strategies Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

Reading Strategies Monitoring Comprehension Using graphic organizers Answering questions Generating questions Summarizing Activating Prior Knowledge RAFT Paired Reading QAR Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

Strategy: Question-Answer Relationship Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

QAR - Example Type of QAR QuestionIssue CategoryExample In the book – The answer is stated directly in the text. FactualWhich offenses are most often subject to zero tolerance policies? Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

Alignment of QAR Strategy to Common Core Standards Strategy for Reading: Question and Answer Relationship Reading 1- Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text. Reading 2 - Determine central ideas or themes of a text and analyze their development; summarize the key supporting details and ideas. Reading 6 – Assess how point of view or purpose shapes the content and style of a text. Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

Participation Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

Infographic of Roman Technology Multimodal text for a unit on Rome. Skill of reading multimodal text is transferable across content area. Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

Writing Strategies Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

Recommend three types of writing for middle school students

Strategy Attributes: Expository Writing Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

Expository Writing Strategy Example Type of Expository Writing Issue Category Example Process AnalysisPolicy Should schools adopt zero tolerance policies to promote school safety? Example Assignment Prompt: The lines of youth and adult blur in a pool of blood, but violent crimes in schools trigger cries for appropriate justice and an end to the age of violence. A question shoots. Should schools adopt zero tolerance policies to promote school safety? As a reporter for an online newspaper, your task is to write an informational process analysis article to explain how zero tolerance policies in schools will or will not decrease school safety. This article must convey your clear claim towards this justice process and its implications, while informing and helping the public understand the related process steps, complex ideas, and information. The article will demonstrate an effective selection, logical organization, and analysis of content. Also, it must contain relevant online news and expository appropriate elements, signal phrases, and graphics. This article will be 2-4 pages and written with careful attention to the conventions of Standards of English. Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

Alignment of Expository Writing to Common Core Standards Expository Writing Writing 2 - Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content. Writing 6 - Use technology, including the Internet, to produce and publish writing and to interact and collaborate with others. Writing 7 - Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects based on focused questions, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation. Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

Discussion Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

Discussion Methods Analyze and evaluate main ideas, issues, points of view Delineate speakers argument Evaluate multiple and competing perspectives Make and support claims with evidence Pose and respond to questions Structured Academic Controversy xX X X X Socratic Seminar X X X XX Deliberation X X X X X Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

Discussion Method: Structured Academic Controversy Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

Structured Academic Controversy 1.Students must argue one side of an issue, 2.listen to the other side and ask clarifying questions. 3.Students will then switch sides and argue from the opposing position. 4.Eventually students will come up with an agreed upon solution. Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say! Ideas for Discussion: Any controversial issue (i.e. laws, policies, etc.)

Yes, schools should adopt zero tolerance policies to promote school safety. No, schools should not adopt zero tolerance policies to promote school safety.  School violence is at a crisis level and increasing  Zero tolerance is clear discipline for students and is consistently applied to all students  Removal of students will create a better school climate for students who remain  Zero tolerance policies deter students from bad behavior  Parents support zero tolerance to ensure student safety  Zero tolerance policies unfairly impact students of color and students with disabilities  Zero tolerance policies are not developmentally appropriate for adolescents and forces students out of school during important years  Zero tolerance policies divert student and educational resources to security technology and security personnel  Zero tolerance policies place tremendous strain financially and on the mental health of students and families  Disciplinary alternatives may be better suited to promote school safety Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!

Alignment of SAC to Common Core Standards Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say! Structured Academic ControversySpeaking and Listening 1 - Prepare for and participate effectively in a range of conversations and collaborations with diverse partners, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively. Speaking and Listening 2. Integrate and evaluate information presented in diverse media and formats, including visually, quantitatively, and orally. Speaking and Listening 3 - Evaluate a speaker’s point of view, reasoning, and use of evidence and rhetoric.

Kopish and Wenhart (2013) Children Have the Right to Say!