Alice and Bob’s Excellent Adventure

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of Washington
Advertisements

Quantum Computation and Quantum Information – Lecture 2
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information – Lecture 3
Use of Time as a Quantum Key By Caleb Parks and Dr. Khalil Dajani.
University of Queensland
Puzzle Twin primes are two prime numbers whose difference is two.
Quantum Computing MAS 725 Hartmut Klauck NTU
1 quantum teleportation David Riethmiller 28 May 2007.
Short course on quantum computing Andris Ambainis University of Latvia.
Chien Hsing James Wu David Gottesman Andrew Landahl.
1 EPR Pairs and Quantum Teleportation 2005/08/11.
Superdense coding. How much classical information in n qubits? Observe that 2 n  1 complex numbers apparently needed to describe an arbitrary n -qubit.
Avraham Ben-Aroya (Tel Aviv University) Oded Regev (Tel Aviv University) Ronald de Wolf (CWI, Amsterdam) A Hypercontractive Inequality for Matrix-Valued.
Review from last lecture: A Simple Quantum (3,1) Repetition Code
Efficient many-party controlled teleportation of multi-qubit quantum information via entanglement Chui-Ping Yang, Shih-I Chu, Siyuan Han Physical Review.
Dirac Notation and Spectral decomposition Michele Mosca.
CSEP 590tv: Quantum Computing
Quantum Computing Joseph Stelmach.
Quantum Mechanics from Classical Statistics. what is an atom ? quantum mechanics : isolated object quantum mechanics : isolated object quantum field theory.
Dirac Notation and Spectral decomposition
Introduction to Quantum logic (2) Yong-woo Choi.
New Approach to Quantum Calculation of Spectral Coefficients Marek Perkowski Department of Electrical Engineering, 2005.
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information – Lecture 2 Part 1 of CS406 – Research Directions in Computing Dr. Rajagopal Nagarajan Assistant: Nick Papanikolaou.
ROM-based computations: quantum versus classical B.C. Travaglione, M.A.Nielsen, H.M. Wiseman, and A. Ambainis.
Quantum Information Processing
CSEP 590tv: Quantum Computing Dave Bacon June 29, 2005 Today’s Menu Administrivia Complex Numbers Bra’s Ket’s and All That Quantum Circuits.
Presented by: Erik Cox, Shannon Hintzman, Mike Miller, Jacquie Otto, Adam Serdar, Lacie Zimmerman.
Quantum Computing MAS 725 Hartmut Klauck NTU
IPQI-2010-Anu Venugopalan 1 Quantum Mechanics for Quantum Information & Computation Anu Venugopalan Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha Univeristy Delhi _______________________________________________.
Quantum Error Correction Jian-Wei Pan Lecture Note 9.
QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT AND IMPLICATIONS IN INFORMATION PROCESSING: Quantum TELEPORTATION K. Mangala Sunder Department of Chemistry IIT Madras.
A Few Simple Applications to Cryptography Louis Salvail BRICS, Aarhus University.
1 Introduction to Quantum Information Processing CS 467 / CS 667 Phys 667 / Phys 767 C&O 481 / C&O 681 Richard Cleve DC 2117 Lecture.
QUANTUM COMPUTING an introduction Jean V. Bellissard Georgia Institute of Technology & Institut Universitaire de France.
Quantum Information Jan Guzowski. Universal Quantum Computers are Only Years Away From David’s Deutsch weblog: „For a long time my standard answer to.
October 1 & 3, Introduction to Quantum Computing Lecture 1 of 2 Introduction to Quantum Computing Lecture 1 of 2
Solving mutual exclusion by using entangled Qbits Mohammad Rastegari proff: Dr.Rahmani.
1 hardware of quantum computer 1. quantum registers 2. quantum gates.
You Did Not Just Read This or did you?. Quantum Computing Dave Bacon Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of Washington Lecture 3:
Bell Measurements and Teleportation. Overview Entanglement Bell states and Bell measurements Limitations on Bell measurements using linear devices Teleportation.
1 Introduction to Quantum Information Processing CS 667 / PH 767 / CO 681 / AM 871 Richard Cleve DC 2117 Lecture 20 (2009)
QUANTUM COMPUTING What is it ? Jean V. Bellissard Georgia Institute of Technology & Institut Universitaire de France.
1 Modeling Quantum Information Systems Paul E. Black National Institute of Standards and Technology Andrew W. Lane University of Kentucky.
Quantum Computing and Quantum Programming Language
Quantum Computing Reversibility & Quantum Computing.
CSEP 590tv: Quantum Computing Dave Bacon July 20, 2005 Today’s Menu n Qubit registers Begin Quantum Algorithms Administrivia Superdense Coding Finish Teleportation.
8.4.2 Quantum process tomography 8.5 Limitations of the quantum operations formalism 量子輪講 2003 年 10 月 16 日 担当:徳本 晋
IPQI-2010-Anu Venugopalan 1 qubits, quantum registers and gates Anu Venugopalan Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha Univeristy Delhi _______________________________________________.
Quantum Computers The basics. Introduction 2/47 Dušan Gajević.
Richard Cleve DC 2117 Introduction to Quantum Information Processing QIC 710 / CS 667 / PH 767 / CO 681 / AM 871 Lecture (2011)
Quantum Teleportation What does the future hold?.
Beginner’s Guide to Quantum Computing Graduate Seminar Presentation Oct. 5, 2007.
Attendance Syllabus Textbook (hardcopy or electronics) Groups s First-time meeting.
Quantum gates SALEEL AHAMMAD SALEEL. Introduction.
Richard Cleve DC 3524 Introduction to Quantum Information Processing CS 467 / CS 667 Phys 667 / Phys 767 C&O 481 / C&O 681 Lecture.
Postulates of Quantum Mechanics
Introduction to Quantum Computing Lecture 1 of 2
Quantum Teleportation
Lecture on Linear Algebra
Quantum One.
Chap 4 Quantum Circuits: p
Introduction to Quantum logic (2)
Quantum Computing Joseph Stelmach.
Richard Cleve DC 3524 Introduction to Quantum Information Processing CS 467 / CS 667 Phys 667 / Phys 767 C&O 481 / C&O 681 Lecture.
Presentation transcript:

Alice and Bob’s Excellent Adventure Presented by: Lacie Zimmerman Adam Serdar Jacquie Otto Paul Weiss

What’s to Come… Brief Review of Quantum Mechanics Quantum Circuits/Gates No-Cloning Distinguishability of Quantum States Superdense Coding Quantum Teleportation

Dirac Bra-Ket Notation Inner Products Outer Products

Bra-Ket Notation Involves Vector Xn can be represented two ways Ket |n> Bra <n| = |n>t is the complex conjugate of m.

Inner Products An Inner Product is a Bra multiplied by a Ket <a| |b> can be simplified to <a|b> <a|b> = =

An Outer Product is a Ket multiplied by a Bra Outer Products An Outer Product is a Ket multiplied by a Bra |a><b| = = By Definition

Postulates of Quantum Mechanics

Postulate 1 State Space: The inner product space associated with an isolated quantum system. The system at any given time is described by a “state”, which is a unit vector in V.

Postulate 1 Simplest state space - (Qubit) If and form a basis for , then an arbitrary qubit state has the form , where a and b in have . Qubit state differs from a bit because “superpositions” of a qubit state are possible. Reminiscent of the title, not clear if in either. a squared and b squared represent prob of being in either state.

Postulate 2 The evolution of an isolated quantum system is described by a unitary operator on its state space. The state is related to the state by a unitary operator . i.e.,

Postulate 3 Quantum measurements are described by a finite set of projections, {Pm}, acting on the state space of the system being measured. The index m refers to the measurement outcomes that may occur. The projections satisfy the completeness equation If the state of the system is immediately before the measurement, then the probability that result m occurs is given by ; if the result m occurs, then the state of the system immediately after the measurement is

Postulate 3 If is the state of the system immediately before the measurement. Then the probability that the result m occurs is given by . The index m refers to the measurement outcomes that may occur. The projections satisfy the completeness equation If the state of the system is immediately before the measurement, then the probability that result m occurs is given by ; if the result m occurs, then the state of the system immediately after the measurement is

Postulate 3 If the result m occurs, then the state of the system immediately after the measurement is

Postulate 4 The state space of a composite quantum system is the tensor product of the state of its components. If the systems numbered 1 through n are prepared in states , i = 1,…, n, then the joint state of the total composite system is .

Quantum Uncertainty and Quantum Circuits Classical Circuits vs. Quantum Circuits Hadamard Gates C-not Gates Bell States Other Important Quantum Circuit Items

Classical Circuits vs. Quantum Circuits Classical Circuits based upon bits, which are represented with on and off states. These states are usually alternatively represented by 1 and 0 respectively. The medium of transportation of a bit is a conductive material, usually a copper wire or something similar. The 1 or 0 is represented with 2 different levels of current through the wire.

Circuits Continued… Quantum circuits use electron “spin” to hold their information, instead of the conductor that a classical circuit uses. While a classical circuit uses transistors to perform logic, quantum circuits use “quantum gates” such as the Hadamard Gates.

Hadamard Gates Hadamard Gates can perform logic and are usually used to initialize states and to add random information to a circuit. Hadamard Gates are represented mathematically by the Hadamard Matrix which is below.

Circuit Diagram of a Hadamard Gate When represented in a Quantum Circuit Diagram, a Hadamard Gate looks like this: H Where the x is the input qubit and the y is the output qubit.

C-Not Gates C-not Gates are one of the basic 2-qubit gates in quantum computing. C-not is short for controlled not, which means that one qubit (target qubit) is flipped if the other qubit (control qubit) is |1>, otherwise the target qubit is left alone. The mathematical representation of a C-Not Gate is below.

Circuit Diagram of a C-Not Gate When represented in a Quantum Circuit Diagram, a C-Not Gate looks like this: Where x is the control qubit and y is the target qubit.

Bell States Bell States are sets of qubits that are entangled. They can be created with the following Quantum Circuit called a Bell State Generator: H With H being a Hadamard Gate and x and y being the input qubits. is the Bell State.

Bell State Equations The following equations map the previous Bell State Generator: So we can write:

Other Important Quantum Circuit Items Controlled U-Gates Measurement Devices

Controlled U-Gate A Controlled U-Gate is an extension of a C-Not Gate. Where a C-Not Gate works on one qubit based upon a control qubit, a U-Gate works on many qubits based upon a control qubit. A Controlled U-Gate can be represented with the following diagram: U n Where n is the number of qubits the gate is acting on.

Measurement Devices These devices convert a qubit state into a probabilistic classical bit. It can be represented in a diagram with the following: M x A measurement with x possible outcomes has x wires coming from the device that measures it.

Cloning of a Quantum State

Can copying of an unknown qubit state really happen? Cloning Can copying of an unknown qubit state really happen? By copy we mean: Take a quantum state Perform an operation End with an exact copy of

Using a Classical Idea A classical CNOT gate can be used for an unknown bit x Let x be the control bit and 0 be the target Send x0  xx where  is a CNOT gate Yields an exact copy of x in the classical setting

Move the Logic to Quantum States Given a qubit in an unknown quantum state such that Through a CNOT gate we take  Note if indeed we copied we would thus end up with which would equal

Limits on Copying Note that: only at ab=0 and for a and b being or

Proving the difficulty of cloning Suppose there was a copying machine Such that can be copied with a standard state This gives an initial state which when the unitary operation U is applied yields

…difficulty cloning Let By taking inner products of both sides: From this we can see that: = 0 or 1 Therefore this must be true: or Thus if the machine can successfully copy it is highly unlikely that the machine will copy an arbitrary unknown state unless is orthogonal to

Final cloning summary Cloning is improbable. Basically all that can be accomplished is what we know as a cut-n-paste. Original data is lost. The process of this will be shown in the teleportation section soon to follow.

Distinguishability To determine the state of an element in the set: This must be true: - Finding the probability of observing a specific state , let be the measurement such that

Distinguishability cont. Then the probability that m will be observed is: - Which yields Because the set is orthogonal If the set was not orthogonal we couldn’t know for certain that m will be observed.

Cloning and Distinguishability Take some quantum information Send it from one place to another Original is destroyed because it can’t just be cloned (copied) Basically it must be combined with some orthogonal group or distinguishing the quantum state with absolute certainty is impossible.

Superdense Coding Pauli Matrices Alice & Bob The Conditions How it Works

Pauli Matrices

Superdense Coding THE CONDITIONS… Alice and Bob are a long way from one another. Alice wants to transmit some classical information in the form of a 2-bit to Bob.

Superdense Coding HOW IT WORKS… Alice and Bob initially share a 2-qubit in the entangled Bell state which is just a pair of quantum particles.

Superdense Coding HOW IT WORKS… is a fixed state and it is not necessary for Alice to send any qubits to Bob to prepare this state. For example, a third party may prepare the entangled state ahead of time, sending one of the qubits to Alice and the other to Bob.

Superdense Coding HOW IT WORKS… Alice keeps the first qubit (particle). Bob keeps the second qubit (particle). Bob moves far away from Alice.

Superdense Coding HOW IT WORKS… The 2-bit that Alice wishes to send to Bob determines what quantum gate she must apply to her qubit before she sends it to Bob.

Superdense Coding The four resulting states are:

Superdense Coding HOW IT WORKS… Since Bob is in possession of both qubits, he can perform a measurement on this Bell basis and reliably determine which of the four possible 2-bits Alice sent.

What is it used for? Teleportation Circuit

Teleportation Teleportation is sending unknown quantum information not classical information. Teleportation starts just like Superdense coding. Alice and Bob each take half of the 2-qubit Bell state: Alice takes the first qubit (particle) and Bob moves with the other particle to another location.

Teleportation Alice wants to teleport to Bob: She combines the qubit with her half of the Bell state and sends the resulting 3-qubit (the 2 qubits-Alice & 1 qubit-Bob) through the Teleportation circuit (shown on the next slide):

Teleportation Circuit { Single line denotes quantum information being transmitted Double line denotes classical info being transmitted Top 2 wires represent Alice's system Bottom wire represents Bob’s system

Teleportation Circuit { Initial State

Teleportation Circuit C-Not gate { After Applying the C-Not gate to Alice’s bits:

Teleportation Circuit Hadamard gate { After applying the Hadamard gate to the first qubit:

Teleportation Circuit { Measurement devices After Alice observes/measures her 2 qubits, she sends the resulting classical information to Bob:

Teleportation Circuit { Bob applies the appropriate quantum gate to his qubit based on the classical information from Alice:

Bob finally recovers the initial qubit that Alice teleported to him. Teleportation Bob finally recovers the initial qubit that Alice teleported to him.

Conclusion Brief Review of Quantum Mechanics Quantum Circuits/Gates Classical Gates vs. Quantum Gates Hadamard Gates C-not Gates Bell States

Conclusion, cont. No-Cloning Distinguishability of Quantum States Superdense Coding Pauli Matrices The Conditions How it Works

Conclusion, cont. Quantum Teleportation What is it used for? Teleportation Circuit

Special Thanks to: Dr. Steve Deckelman Bibliography http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inner_product_space http://vergil.chemistry.gatech.edu/notes/quantrev/node14.html http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_operator http://vergil.chemistry.gatech.edu/notes/quantrev/node17.html http://www.doc.ic.ad.uk/~nd/surprise_97/journal/vol4/spb3/ http://www-theory.chem.washington.edu/~trstedl/quantum/quantum.html Gudder, S. (2003-March). Quantum Computation. American Mathmatical Monthly. 110, no. 3,181-188. Special Thanks to: Dr. Steve Deckelman