1 VV scattering in P-TDR (CHAPTER 13.2 Vol 2.2) A simple summary of what we intend to put in our chapter CPTweek / PRSsession 10/31/05 Sara Bolognesi (TORINO)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
Advertisements

E. Maina - VV at LHC with Phase - Les Houches Boson Boson Scattering at LHC with PHASE.
Recent Results on the Possibility of Observing a Standard Model Higgs Boson Decaying to WW (*) Majid Hashemi University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Tau dilepton channel The data sample used in this analysis comprises high-p T inclusive lepton events that contain an electron with E T >20 GeV or a muon.
Visible and Invisible Higgs at 350 GeV Mark Thomson University of Cambridge =+
Jörgen Sjölin Stockholm University LHC experimental sensitivity to CP violating gtt couplings November, 2002 Page 1 Why CP in gtt? Standard model contribution.
Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson at DØ Michele Petteni Imperial College London On behalf of the DØ Collaboration Michele Petteni Imperial College.
1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
Summary of Results and Projected Precision Rediscovering the Top Quark Marc-André Pleier, Universität Bonn Top Quark Pair Production and Decay According.
Top Physics at the Tevatron Mike Arov (Louisiana Tech University) for D0 and CDF Collaborations 1.
LHC pp beam collision on March 13, 2011 Haijun Yang
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
S. Martí i García Liverpool December 02 1 Selection of events in the all-hadronic channel S. Martí i García CDF End Of Year Review Liverpool / December.
Status Report on hbb Analysis Jyothsna Rani for the hbb group Andy, Avto, Marine, Tim, Boris All D0 Meeting 28 th January th January 2005.
Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) Introduction to Single-Top The measurement.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Dec. 17, 2004M. Garcia-Sciveres -- WW Scattering1 WW scattering Dec. 17 LBL ATLAS analysis meeting Motivation Theoretical Introduction Review of MC analyses.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
Search for Invisible Higgs Decays at the ILC Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
Search for a Z′ boson in the dimuon channel in p-p collisions at √s = 7TeV with CMS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Search for a Z′ boson in the.
1 HEP 2008, Olympia, Greece Ariadni Antonaki Dimitris Fassouliotis Christine Kourkoumelis Konstantinos Nikolopoulos University of Athens Studies for the.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Sensitivity Prospects for Light Charged Higgs at 7 TeV J.L. Lane, P.S. Miyagawa, U.K. Yang (Manchester) M. Klemetti, C.T. Potter (McGill) P. Mal (Arizona)
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
1 ttbar Cross-Section Studies D. Jana*, M. Saleem*, F. Rizatdinova**, P. Gutierrez*, P. Skubic* *University of Oklahoma, **Oklahoma State University.
Measurement of the branching ratios for Standard Model Higgs decays into muon pairs and into Z boson pairs at 1.4 TeV CLIC Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic,
Alex Melnitchouk DPF conference - May Search for Fermiophobic Higgs in the h   Channel DPF 2002, Williamsburg Alex Melnitchouk (Brown University)
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs at the Tevatron presented by Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations Moriond.
Measurements of Top Quark Properties at Run II of the Tevatron Erich W.Varnes University of Arizona for the CDF and DØ Collaborations International Workshop.
Liu Minghui Nanjing MC study of W polarization and ttbar spin correlation Liu Minghui, Zhu Chengguang April 27, 2008.
1 EPS2003, Aachen Nikos Varelas ELECTROWEAK & HIGGS PHYSICS AT DØ Nikos Varelas University of Illinois at Chicago for the DØ Collaboration
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
1 Higgs, Top and Boson Boson Scattering Six fermion simulations at the LHC E. Maina U. Torino MCWG Frascati Feb 27, 2006.
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
1 TOP MASS MEASUREMENT WITH ATLAS A.-I. Etienvre, for the ATLAS Collaboration.
Top Quark Physics At TeVatron and LHC. Overview A Lightning Review of the Standard Model Introducing the Top Quark tt* Pair Production Single Top Production.
Single Top Quark Studies, L. Li (UC Riverside) ICHEP 08, July Liang Li University of California, Riverside for the CDF, DØ and H1 Collaborations.
Lake Louise (February 2002) Ivo van Vulpen 1 Z boson pair production Ivo van Vulpen Outline: LEP and its operation between ZZ production & final.
SM Higgs decay to dimuons Ashok Kumar, Suman Beri Panjab University – Chandigarh INDIA-CMS meet March 3-5, 2005 Chandigarh.
ATLAS Higgs Search Strategy and Sources of Systematic Uncertainty Jae Yu For the ATLAS Collaboration 23 June, 2010.
Kinematics of Top Decays in the Dilepton and the Lepton + Jets channels: Probing the Top Mass University of Athens - Physics Department Section of Nuclear.
1 Diboson production with CMS Vuko Brigljevic Rudjer Boskovic Institute, Zagreb on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Physics at LHC Cracow, July
LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group: Vector Boson Fusion Sinead Farrington University of Oxford Co-contacts: A. Denner, C. Hackstein, D. Rebuzzi, C.
Top Higgs Yukawa Coupling Analysis – Status Report Hajrah Tabassam Quai-i-Azam University, Islamabad ON BEHALF OF: R. Yonamine, T. Tanabe, K. Fujii, KEK.
Vector boson scattering at CMS (LHC)
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
1 Reinhard Schwienhorst, MSU Top Group Meeting W' Search in the single top quark channel Reinhard Schwienhorst Michigan State University Top Group Meeting,
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
Higgs boson production in association with a photon in Vector Boson Fusion at LHC Emidio Gabrielli Uppsala University and Helsinki Institute of Physics.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Suyong Choi (SKKU) SUSY Standard Model Higgs Searches at DØ Suyong Choi SKKU, Korea for DØ Collaboration.
Eric COGNERAS LPC Clermont-Ferrand Prospects for Top pair resonance searches in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics october 2007, Grenoble.
1 Donatella Lucchesi July 22, 2010 Standard Model High Mass Higgs Searches at CDF Donatella Lucchesi For the CDF Collaboration University and INFN of Padova.
Measurement of SM V+gamma by ATLAS
Vector Boson Fusion at CMS
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
Status of the H4l CSC Note (HG2)
Greg Heath University of Bristol
A preliminary study of the Vector Boson Fusion Process with FAMOS
Experimental and theoretical Group Torino + Moscow
Outline Physics Motivation Technique Results
C.M.S.:.
Presentation transcript:

1 VV scattering in P-TDR (CHAPTER 13.2 Vol 2.2) A simple summary of what we intend to put in our chapter CPTweek / PRSsession 10/31/05 Sara Bolognesi (TORINO) The TORINO group: E.Accomando, A.Ballestrero, R.Bellan, S.Bolognesi, G.Cerminara, E.Maina, C.Mariotti

2 The chapter structure 13.2 Heavy Higgs boson and VV scattering WW scattering in the absence of Higgs boson Semileptonic final state Signal definition and simulation Six fermions final state processes VV-fusion signal selection at qq -> qqVV -> qqVW -> qqqq  qq -> qqVV -> qqVZ -> qqqq  Data Analysis Signal topology Main backgrounds Signal selection: Results CPTweek / PRSsession 10/31/05 Sara Bolognesi (TORINO) would it be better not to separate the “no Higgs” and the “heavy-mass Higgs” case? since in our analysis we study both the cases already done already done in CMSJET and in FAMOS we are moving to ORCA qq -> qqVV -> qqVW -> qqqq  qq -> qqVV -> qqVZ -> qqqq  partonic level:

Heavy Higgs boson and VV scattering  In absence of the Higgs particle  If the Higgs boson exists nature of V L V L coupling is an indication of the Higgs mass range (useful for a light Higgs) heavy Higgs = resonance in the M(VV) spectrum we need to verify the unitarity of the VV fusion process at high M(VV) unitarity violation at TeV -> new physics must be revealed CPTweek / PRSsession 10/31/05 Sara Bolognesi (TORINO) in any case through a comparison of the measured  (VV->VV) with the SM predictions precise knowledge of the signal xsec is essential: any deviation from the expected xsec = new physics

4 p p q q   q’ q W / Z V V V q tag Semilept. final state qq -> qqVV -> qqVW -> qqqq  qq -> qqVV -> qqVZ -> qqqq   clear experimental signature thanks to the isolated high p T muons  quite high BR Our signal channels are CPTweek / PRSsession 10/31/05 Sara Bolognesi (TORINO)  (VV->VW) * BR(V->jj) * BR(W->  ) ~ 170 fb  (VV ->VZ) * BR(V->jj) * BR(Z->  ) ~ 25 fb Hopefully we will have also the qq -> qqVV -> qqVW -> qqqqe channel with PHASE + FAMOS

Signal definition and simulation For a correct  (VV) calculation generation of signal together with all the irreducible backgrounds EVBA approximation six-fermions approach CPTweek / PRSsession 10/31/05 Sara Bolognesi (TORINO) bosons off mass shellness spin correlations in the bosons decay interference with all irred. backgr. Gauge invariance so you need a “signal definition” to isolate the signal from this background at partonic level and “a posteriori”

Six fermion final state processes  qq->qqVZ->qqqq  simulated with MadEvent in the “production times decay” approximation = only on shell bosons (with zero width)  qq->qqqq  simulated with PHASE at O(  6 EW ) 2 bosons produced without undergoing scattering single top and ttbar EW production Higgsstralhung, TGC, QGC -> 3 bosons outgoing “non resonant” diagrams a study on this approximation validity is on-going (comparison between MadEvent and PHASE) no EW top contribution no “non resonant” diagrams CPTweek / PRSsession 10/31/05 Sara Bolognesi (TORINO)

VV fusion signal selection To separate the signal from the irreducible background at partonic level  qq -> qqqq   qq -> qqVZ -> qqqq ... we are working on the signal definition at partonic level... request for two on-shell bosons reject EW top contribution reject events with three on-shell bosons in the final state 100% 28 % 25 % 23 % CPTweek / PRSsession 10/31/05 Sara Bolognesi (TORINO) perc. of signal in simulated events

Data Analysis A model indipendent analysis  no Higgs  no degrees of freedom beyond the SM  no assumption on the mechanism to restore unitarity A “CONSERVATIVE” APPROACH  M(H) = 500 GeV CPTweek / PRSsession 10/31/05 Sara Bolognesi (TORINO) same analysis cuts valid for any mass (but optimized in the no Higgs case)

Signal topology  pTpT E tag quarks quarks from boson decay

Main backgrounds CPTweek / PRSsession 10/31/05 Sara Bolognesi (TORINO) xsec (pb)generatorsubmitted ev.process pp -> jjWW -> jjqq  pp -> jjZW -> jjqq  pp -> jjZZ -> jjqq  pp -> jjWZ -> jjqq  pp -> W + n jets ->  + n jets pp -> Z + n jets ->  + n jets sign + irr. backgr. pp -> qqqq  sign+irr.backgr. pp -> qqVZ -> qqqq  MadEvent AlpGen PHASE MadEvent ~ ( ) ? submitted to the production not yet generated already producted (Digi + SimHits) j = q / g (q always producted via EW) (producted via QCD) pp -> tt -> 1  + X 250k 9 3 × k × k 250k / 125k~ 0.7 ~ k / 325k we can use one of the producted samples (noHiggs / mh500) 622

Signal selection A preliminar set of cuts has been already studied and optimized with CMSJET and FAMOS signal final state reconstruction background rejection !!! we are moving to ORCA !!! CPTweek / PRSsession 10/31/05 Sara Bolognesi (TORINO) choose the right quarks from the boson decay (high p T, central, near one to the other) ask for central, isolated and quite high p T muons and high MET (> 20 GeV) ask for at least 4 jets with p T >30 GeV cut against top events (b-tagging) requests on jet tag kinematic (very high ,  and energy) cut against jets occupancy (signal = pure EW process) request for high p T V and high M(qqVV) L1 trigger: |  |<2.4, first indication from W+4jets: W/Z+n jets will be the most problematic background p T  > 20 GeV (inclusive muon) p T  > 5 GeV (di-muons)

12  Signal reconstruction efficiency as a function of M(VV) CPTweek / PRSsession 10/31/05 Sara Bolognesi (TORINO) Results (1) 10 % 50 % 30 % 1 TeV  qqqq  final state  qqqq  final state NO HIGGS CASE: CMSJET FAMOS

Results (2)  M(VV) resolution and M(V->jj) resolution for the two channels M(Z->  ) resolution M(W->  ) resolution  Number of signal and background events VS reconstructed M(VV)  Significance (S/√B) VS reconstructed M(VV) CPTweek / PRSsession 10/31/05 Sara Bolognesi (TORINO) qqqq  final state OSCAR_2_4_5 !! VERY PRELIMINARY !! ORCA_7_6_1

14 Some open issues  estimate of theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section calculation through a comparison of various signal samples of the qqqq  final state with different MC input parameters scale PDF set (CTEQ5L) top mass 175 GeV  how to calculate the backgrounds cross section from data not yet considered, probably not ready for the P-TDR through a comparison between MadEvent and Phase in the qqqq  final state CPTweek / PRSsession 10/31/05 Sara Bolognesi (TORINO)