Proposed Modification to Method for Determining Reasonable In-Season Demand for the Surface Water Coalition: Use of the USDA Crop Data Layer Presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Minnesota Agriculture Profile Presented By:. Regional Patterns of Agriculture Production Forest Production/Mining Sugarbeets Dairy, Corn, Alfalfa, Soybeans.
Advertisements

Minnesota Agriculture Profile Presented By:. Regional Patterns of Agriculture Production Forest Production/Mining Sugarbeets, wheat, diversified Dairy,
Historical CU Analyses: A Case Study Introduction - Overview Crop ET – Weather/Climate Data Water Supply Analysis Crop Information Using StateCU Recap.
Overview of Protocol for Determining Reasonable In- Season Demand & Predicting Demand Shortfall Presented by Mat Weaver Spring 2009.
FSA’s ACRE* Program and the Calculation of Yield, Price, and Revenue Guarantees * Average Crop Revenue Election.
Snapshot of Northeast Ohio Environment. Overview Topography Watersheds Parks and Conservation Areas Land Cover (developed areas, forests, wetlands, agriculture)
Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Adam Freihoefer Wisconsin Department of Natural.
RMA Crop Production and Revenue Insurance Products Lesson Overview In this lesson, we will learn about: – Wyoming acres of annually-planted crops, and.
In your assigned groups: 1.You will be loaned $ You must set aside $200 (transportation) and $300 (living expenses) each round (year) 3.You must.
North American Croplands Richard Massey & Dr. Teki Sankey.
Draft Protocol for Determining Reasonable In-Season Demand and Reasonable Carryover “Overview and Approach” Dave Tuthill Director, IDWR May 4, 2009.
DETERMINING LAND DEVELOPMENT EFFECT ON SURFACE RUNOFF USING GIS.
NUTRIENT RUNOFF EFFECTS ON JORDAN LAKE Brianna Young, Jennifer Jackson and Emily Nurminen.
Has EO found its customers? Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit GLC2000 Land Cover Classification.
Data Storage and Processing GIS Topics and Applications.
DISCLAIMER The purpose of the following material is to promote the awareness of risk management concepts and to highlight USDA’s risk management products,
CURRENT ALABAMA AGRICULTURE AND RURAL LIFE. Various Land Uses 2004, in acres Open Water Developed Barren Wetlands Deciduous Forest Evergreen Forest Mixed.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Integrating Cropland Management into.
Let’s pretty it up!. Border around project area Everything else is hardly noticeable… but it’s there Big circles… and semi- transparent Color distinction.
@ 2007 Austin Troy. Geoprocessing Introduction to GIS Geoprocessing is the processing of geographic information. Perform spatial analysis and modeling.
GIS Tools Workflow of GIS Tools to Determine Properties Suitable for Migratory Bird Foraging Sites.
Crops and Crop Production in North Dakota Joel Ransom.
Based on USDA-NASS Data Maps Excel Chart Excel Chart Excel Chart Excel Chart Crop Layers Crop Layers Crop Layers Crop Layers Bar Chart Bar Chart Bar Chart.
Habitat Analysis in ArcGIS Use of Spatial Analysis to characterize used resources Thomas Bonnot
North American Croplands: US Updates 21 May 2015 Richard Massey; Dr. Teki Sankey.
ESRM 250 & CFR 520: Introduction to GIS © Phil Hurvitz, KEEP THIS TEXT BOX this slide includes some ESRI fonts. when you save this presentation,
SWC Methodology - TWG February 19, 2015 Settlement Document Subject to I.R.E. 408.
RMA Crop Production and Revenue Insurance Products Lesson Overview In this lesson, we will learn about: – Wyoming acres of annually-planted crops, and.
Comparison of Agricultural Water Use Estimates Available for the CFWI Region For the HAT.
Minnesota Agriculture Profile Presented By:. Regional Patterns of Agriculture Production Forest Production/Mining Sugarbeets, wheat, diversified Dairy,
Conversion of Forestland to Agriculture in Hubbard County, Minnesota By: Henry Rodman Cory Kimball 2013.
Acreage Estimation ITEM CROPLAND DATA LAYERS - In Season Post Season Total CDL's2148 ESTIMATES PRODUCED State.
Agricultural Water Use Reporting and Surveys North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Cooperating with the United States Department.
Thematic Workshop on Standardization and Exchange of Land Use and Cover Information Wednesday, April 27, 2005 Chicago, Illinois.
Lu Liang, Peng Gong Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley And Center for Earth System Science,
Development and Land Use Change: Central Potomac River Watershed
SWC Methodology - TWG February 11, 2015 Settlement Document Subject to I.R.E. 408.
Economics of Groundwater Use in the Beryl-Enterprise Area.
Universal Soil Loss Equation
RMA Crop Production and Revenue Insurance Products Lesson Overview In this lesson, we will learn about: – Wyoming acres of annually-planted crops, and.
North American Croplands Teki Sankey and Richard Massey Update: 11/20/2014.
An Adaptive Management Model for the Red River Basin of the North.
Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Explosion
North American Croplands: Updates Richard Massey; Teki Sankey.
Supplementing Existing BP & FIL Data with Crop BP &FIL Background – Current BP & FIL grids not showing BP & FIL values in areas designated NB3 by LANDFIRE.
NR 143 Study Overview: part 1 By Austin Troy University of Vermont Using GIS-- Introduction to GIS.
Linkages between Southern Pine Beetle Outbreaks and Forest Density Dahl Winters December 6, 2006.
North American Croplands Teki Sankey and Richard Massey Update: 8/21/2014.
Indicator Relationships for Regression Calculations Presented by David Hoekema Surface Water Methodology Technical Working Group Date: February 19, 2015.
GIS Predictive Modeling for Determining ADR Attributed to Cancer in Nevada.
4/25/2017 VIC-CropSyst Sep 16, 2011 Template I-Grey curve.
MODIS-based Cropland Classification in North America Teki Sankey and Richard Massey Northern Arizona University.
Terrain Susceptibility Kyle Renner GIS in Water Resources 2015
North American Croplands Teki Sankey and Richard Massey.
Proposed Modification to Method for Determining Reasonable In-Season Demand for the Surface Water Coalition: July 1 Prediction of Reasonable In-Season.
Soil type Vegetation type / Forest density Land Use Fire activity Slopes Support NWS Flash Flood Warning Program: Development of Flash Flood Potential.
-gSSURGO- Using the Soil Data Management Toolbox Steve Peaslee USDA-NRCS National Soil Survey Center Lincoln, Nebraska March.
Agricultural Land Use as it Relates to Land Slope James Plourde, Dr. Bryan Pijanowski Human-Environment Modeling & Analysis Laboratory Purdue University.
US Croplands Richard Massey Dr Teki Sankey. Objectives 1.Classify annual cropland extent, Rainfed-Irrigated, and crop types for the US at 250m resolution.
Soil Water Management Through Cropping Systems Chris Augustin NDSU Soil Health Extension Specialist
Lecture 18: Spatial Analysis Using Rasters Jeffery S. Horsburgh CEE 5190/6190 Geographic Information Systems for Civil Engineers Spring 2016.
CM (g) REASONABLE CARRYOVER Hearing officer guidelines for calculations In determining a reasonable amount of carry-over storage water, the Director.
Graduate Students, CEE-6190
RMA Crop Production and Revenue Insurance Products
Nutrient Runoff Effects on Jordan Lake
Emma Gildesgame, Katie Lebling and Ian McCullough
Land Use Land Cover Change in the Big Sioux River Watershed: Driving Forces, Connections and Consequences Dinesh Shrestha, Dr. Darrell Napton Department.
Evaluating Land-Use Classification Methodology Using Landsat Imagery
GIS Aspect We used GIS to extract the watershed basin we were going to focus on so that we could obtain the NLCD landcover data for the catchments the.
Agriculture media Planning Guide
Presentation transcript:

Proposed Modification to Method for Determining Reasonable In-Season Demand for the Surface Water Coalition: Use of the USDA Crop Data Layer Presented to the SWC Methodology Technical Working Group by Matt Anders February 11, 2015 Settlement Document Subject to I.R.E. 408

What is Cropping Pattern? Acreage of each crop type grown by SWC members. Used in the Methodology for calculating Reasonable In-Season Demand (RISD): ∑(% Crop x Irr. Acres x ET Crop) / Project Efficiency = RISD

Current Method Data Source: USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). Download tabular crop acreages by county. Calculate crop type averages for by county. Assign crop type percentages to each SWC member based on land area in each county. Drawbacks NASS tabular data are adjusted to protect farmer privacy. Incomplete data since average does not reflect current cropping patterns. Uncertain if county-wide cropping patterns represent SWC member cropping patterns.

Proposed Method: CDL Data Source: USDA National Agricultural Statistic Service (NASS) Download digital Crop Data Layer (CDL) Calculate percentages by crop type for each SWC member. Alternative Methods ET Idaho Delayed availability. METRICDelayed availability and not annually produced.

Processing CDL Downloaded digital Crop Data Layer (CDL) for Data Speckling

Processing CDL Data Smoothing Options Filter 3 by 3 pixel filter. Each pixel in the dataset is assigned a value based on values of neighboring pixels. Zonal Statistics A polygon dataset determines zones. The majority value within each zone is assigned to all pixels in the zone. Based on testing decided to use Zonal Statistics.

Processing CDL Smoothed CDL with Zonal Statistics Overlaid IDWR Irrigated Lands dataset. Assigned the majority crop within each irrigated land polygon to all pixels that fall within the polygon.

Processing CDL Problems with Smoothing IDWR Irrigated Lands dataset not available for every year of CDL data. Used current or most recent Irrigated Lands dataset. Field assigned one crop even if it has multiple crops

SWC Member Irrigated Lands Dataset created by SWC Member Burley Minidoka TFCC Dataset created by IDWR based on water right permissible place of use (PPU) A&B AFRD2 Milner NSCC

Acres for Each SWC Member Processed in ArcGIS with a geoprocessing model CDL_Processing” script in the “CDL_Toolbox.tbx Step 1:Clip CDL with SWC Irrigated Lands Dataset

Acres for Each SWC Member Step 2:Group by Raster Value CDL Attribute Description:generic_cdl_attributes.dbf RISD Group NameRaster ValueRaster Value Description Alfalfa36Alfalfa Barley21Barley Corn1 Developed - Semi Irr Developed/Open Space Developed/Low Intensity Dry Beans42Dry Beans Oats28Oats Pasture/Hay Other Hay/Non Alfalfa --- Historical value no longer used Grass/Pasture --- Historical value no longer used Peas53Peas Potatoes43Potatoes Spring Wheat23Spring Wheat Sugarbeets41Sugarbeets Winter Wheat24Winter Wheat z_Non-Crop Fallow/Idle Cropland Forest Open Water Perennial Ice/Snow Barren Deciduous Forest Evergreen Forest Mixed Forest Shrubland --- Historical value no longer used Woody Wetlands Herbaceous Wetlands z_Developed - No Irr Developed/Med Intensity Developed/High Intensity z_OtherAll other values

Acres for Each SWC Member Step 3: Calculate Acres by RISD Group (acres.xls) Step 4: Compute 3-Year Average (CDL_summary.xlsx) Discussion: Average data to reduce influence of a single year while still being representative of the current cropping pattern. 7 years of data did not indicate a clear relation between cropping pattern and water supply (CDL_summary_SWSI.xlsx), so decided to use a shorter average.

Comparison of Method Results NASS County Data: Average A&BAFRD2BIDMilnerMinidokaNSCCTFCC Alfalfa20.2%42.5%40.4%27.8%36.9%14.0%29.5% Barley11.6%3.3%3.7%12.0%11.9%20.1%12.7% Dry Beans3.4%4.4%2.9%9.2%2.1%3.6%16.7% Silage/Grain Corn3.6%5.7%27.8%14.9%9.1%2.0%11.2% Oats0.2%0.4% 0.1%0.8%0.2% Potatoes12.2%11.9%10.2%10.5%7.1%13.7%6.3% Sugarbeets12.6%11.7%4.0%9.6%12.0%23.0%6.7% Spring Wheat13.2%5.2%5.3%8.3%14.6%15.0%4.2% Winter Wheat23.0%14.9%5.2%7.5%5.5%8.4%12.5% CDL Data: 3-Year Average A&BAFRD2BIDMilnerMinidokaNSCCTFCC Alfalfa19.2%26.6%16.8%20.9%29.9%22.4%22.6% Barley31.1%5.6%4.3%15.4%13.2%6.9%10.9% Corn3.1%28.1%6.8%11.2%2.7%31.3%19.1% Developed - Semi Irr0.9%2.6%4.9%0.4%5.5%2.5%4.6% Dry Beans8.4%2.5%7.6%13.0%3.0%3.6%11.2% Oats0.1%0.7%0.1%0.3%0.2%0.1%1.0% Pasture/Hay2.6%17.1%5.3%1.6%9.0%11.9%15.0% Peas0.1%0.0% 0.4%0.1% 1.6% Potatoes8.7%3.3%10.7%7.6%11.9%7.3%2.8% Spring Wheat3.7% 4.1%3.7%3.6%1.8%0.7% Sugarbeets18.7%4.4%20.6%10.5%12.0%5.6%3.0% Winter Wheat3.5%5.5%18.7%15.0%8.8%6.5%7.4% Change: (NASS County Data: Average ) - (CDL Data: 3-Year Average) A&BAFRD2BIDMilnerMinidokaNSCCTFCC Alfalfa-1.0%-15.9%-23.6%-6.9%-7.0%8.4%-6.9% Barley19.5%2.3%0.6%3.4%1.3%-13.2%-1.9% Corn-0.5%22.4%-21.0%-3.7%-6.4%29.3%8.0% Developed - Semi Irr--- Dry Beans5.0%-1.9%4.7%3.7%0.9%0.0%-5.5% Oats-0.1%0.3%-0.3%0.2%-0.5%-0.1%0.8% Pasture/Hay--- Peas--- Potatoes-3.6%-8.6%0.5%-2.9%4.9%-6.4%-3.5% Spring Wheat-9.4%-1.4%-1.2%-4.6%-11.0%-13.1%-3.5% Sugarbeets6.1%-7.3%16.6%0.9%0.0%-17.5%-3.7% Winter Wheat-19.6%-9.4%13.5%7.6%3.4%-1.9%-5.0%

Information on Website CDL folder Input CDL Datasets CDL_swc_2007_30m_zs.tif(re-sampled from 56 m pixels to 30 m) CDL_swc_2008_30m_zs.tif (re-sampled from 56 m pixels to 30 m) CDL_swc_2009_30m_zs.tif (re-sampled from 56 m pixels to 30 m) CDL_swc_2010_zs.tif CDL_swc_2011_zs.tif CDL_swc_2012_zs.tif CDL_swc_2013_zs.tif Processing Output Output by company and year from the geoprocessing script. GIS Folder Geoprocessing Script:CDL_Toolbox.tbx ArcMap Project:CDL-SWC-TWG.mxd CDL Attribute Key:generic_cdl_attributes.dbf Geoprocessing Script Grouping Calculation:CDL_Toolbox.tbx

Information on Website Irrigated Acres folder Shapefiles of the irrigated acres used for each SWC member BurleyBID_POU_2013.shp Minidokaminidoka acres 3-13.shp TFCCTFCC_2013.shp A&BAB_SW_clip_IDWR_Irr2010.shp AFRD2AFRD2_snake_clip_IDWR_Irr2010.shp Milnermilner_clip_IDWR_Irr2010.shp NSCCnorthside_clip_IDWR_Irr2010.shp Loose files CDL Method Comparison Results (Slide 12):CDL_Comparison_Method_Results.docx This PowerPoint:CDL_Cropping_Pattern.pptx

Questions? (208)