TAKLIMAT AUDIT PRESTASI AKADEMIK (ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT) SECTION 3 : THE INTERNAL QUALITY AUDIT SECTION 4 : THE INSTITUTIONAL AUDIT MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Advertisements

Agency reviews: purpose and stages of the review process Achim Hopbach.
University of the Western Cape HEQC /Finnish Project October 2008 Vincent Morta Quality Manager.
Ms Leigh Tabrett PSM is Assistant Director-General (External Portfolio Relations) in the Queensland Department of Education, with responsibilities for.
Internal verification and external standards moderation.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Quality Enhancement Cell Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director.
EMS Auditing Definitions
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.
The Academic Assessment Process
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Internal Audit
How to write a Report On Assessment Source: AUN Secretariat.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
PRO-EAST Workshop1 Achievement of Learning Outcomes: Assessment Methods and Procedures Ian Freeston Engineering Council UK IET Academic Accreditation Committee.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.
ROADSHOW MQA 2008 : KOD AMALAN AKREDITASI PROGRAM (CODE OF PRACTICE FOR PROGRAMME ACCREDITATION, COPPA) 16 OKTOBER 2008 – 13 NOVEMBER 2008 SESI 3 : KERTAS.
MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Verification: Quality Assurance in Assessment Verification is the main quality assurance process associated with assessment systems and practice - whether.
SESSION 2 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT FOR ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMME ACCREDITATION.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT (APA) 17/10/ The National Higher Education Strategic Plan (PSPTN) 7 strategic thrusts : 1.Widening Access and Increasing.
Vaal University of Technology (formerly Vaal Triangle Technikon ) Ms A.J. GOZO Senior Director: Library and Information Services.
AN OVERVIEW MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY. MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) pzv/09/09/08 2 Malaysian.
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
Quality Assurance of Malaysian Higher Education COPIA – Code of Practice for Institutional Audit COPPA – Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation.
QAA Summative Review Staff Briefing Leeds College of Art 8 September 2010.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
Name Position Organisation Date. What is data integration? Dataset A Dataset B Integrated dataset Education data + EMPLOYMENT data = understanding education.
ENQA procedures for external review – the Bulgarian experience Vilnius,30 May 2009, Hrs.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Edita Trečiokienė Grundtvig 3: Grants to Participate in Adult Education Training Activities The Quality of Training Activities applied for and possible.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Pharmacy School Self Study Prof. Abdalla Elkhawad UMST.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
Development of the Egyptian Code of Practice for Student Assessment Lamis Ragab, MD, MHPE Hala Salah, MD.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
The Role of the Internal and External Evaluators in Student Assessment Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
30/10/2006 University Leaders Meeting 1 Student Assessment: A Mandatory Requirement For Accreditation Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chair-Person National Quality.
Attendance Advisory Panels 1. Outcomes Understanding of the purpose of Attendance Advisory Panels (AAPs) as part of a plan for restoring attendance Familiarity.
Dr. Harini Methuku Scientific College of Design 1.
Some business of External QA: Transparency (reports), measuring impacts, follow up implementation, expected benefits, strategies for the future Josep Grifoll.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Performance Management System
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Guidelines for Self-Assessment at Program Level
Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance
Program Assessment Processes for Developing and Strengthening
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Fort Valley State University
Presentation transcript:

TAKLIMAT AUDIT PRESTASI AKADEMIK (ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT) SECTION 3 : THE INTERNAL QUALITY AUDIT SECTION 4 : THE INSTITUTIONAL AUDIT MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY 1NAJMI/17Nov2008V2

Content Internal Quality AuditInternal Quality Audit Internal Quality Audit Task ForceInternal Quality Audit Task Force Self-Review Portfolio (MQA-03)Self-Review Portfolio (MQA-03) Institutional AuditInstitutional Audit The Audit VisitThe Audit Visit The Audit ReportThe Audit Report Findings & JudgmentsFindings & Judgments 2NAJMI/17Nov2008V2

Internal Quality Audit (IQA) Self review conducted by HEP.Self review conducted by HEP. Concern with HEP own objectives & its success in achieving them.Concern with HEP own objectives & its success in achieving them. Based on:Based on: – guidelines on good practices – 9 areas of evaluation 9 areas of evaluation9 areas of evaluation 3NAJMI/17Nov2008V2

Self-Review Activities Data collectionData collection – accurate & consistent Data reviewData review Analyse data to identify HEPs strength, areas of concern & opportunities.Analyse data to identify HEPs strength, areas of concern & opportunities. Develop strategies to ensure:Develop strategies to ensure: – strengths maintained – problems addressed Make recommendations for quality enhancementMake recommendations for quality enhancement 44NAJMI/17Nov2008V2

Focus of the Self Review Self-questioning on each area can be structured as follows: i.What actions are we taking in relation to this area? ii.Why were these actions chosen? iii.How do we check their effectiveness? What performance indicators do we have? iv.Are the indicators effective? v.What do we do as a result of the review? vi.Can we measure the degree of achievements? What are the actual outcomes? vii.Can we improve on the existing actions, even on those that are already effective? 55NAJMI/17Nov2008V2

Effective Quality Management HEP policy & procedures should be in writingHEP policy & procedures should be in writing Approved through institutional processesApproved through institutional processes Published & accessiblePublished & accessible Implemented by HEPImplemented by HEP 6NAJMI/17Nov2008V2

Internal Quality Audit Task Force HEP forms a self-review task force. CoordinatorCoordinator Members:Members: –Administrators –Heads of departments and programmes –Senior or junior academics –Students –Alumni –Other stakeholders 77NAJMI/17Nov2008V2

Consists of:Consists of: Part A: General Information on HEPPart A: General Information on HEP Part B: Information on 9 areas of evaluationPart B: Information on 9 areas of evaluation –May use template provided in Section 3 Part C: Self Review ReportPart C: Self Review Report – Should include the following: Strengths of HEP in meeting its goals;Strengths of HEP in meeting its goals; Areas of concern that need to be addressed;Areas of concern that need to be addressed; Strategies for maintaining and enhancing the strengths;Strategies for maintaining and enhancing the strengths; Steps that have been taken to address the problem areas; andSteps that have been taken to address the problem areas; and Conclusions and recommendations for change.Conclusions and recommendations for change. The Self-Review Portfolio (MQA-03) 88NAJMI/17Nov2008V2

9 The Institutional Audit The Institutional Audit External independent auditExternal independent audit Assess institutional effectivenessAssess institutional effectiveness Variety of purposes:Variety of purposes: – comprehensive assessment of HEP – specific aspects of HEP NAJMI/17Nov2008V2

The Role Players The Liaison Officer (from HEP)The Liaison Officer (from HEP) –Link between HEP & MQA Representatives of the HEP (Auditees)Representatives of the HEP (Auditees) Audit panelsAudit panels –Selection guided by characteristics of HEP, type of audit, expertise & experience of the panel MQA OfficerMQA Officer –Coordinator & resource person 10 NAJMI/17Nov2008V2

The Audit Visit The purpose: To verify HEP’s Self Review PortfolioTo verify HEP’s Self Review Portfolio to acquire further insight into HEP’s operationsto acquire further insight into HEP’s operations Qualitative assessment of factors not easily documentedQualitative assessment of factors not easily documented 11 NAJMI/17Nov2008V2

THE AUDIT TIMELINE THE AUDIT TIMELINE 12 NAJMI/17Nov2008V2

The Audit Report The Oral Exit ReportThe Oral Exit Report –The report is presented by the Chairperson at the end of the visit – Exit Meeting -HEP areas of strengths; -HEP areas of strengths; -Areas of Concern; -Areas of Concern; -Opportunities for improvement -Opportunities for improvement The Draft ReportThe Draft Report –Draft Report prepared by chairperson with the help of panel members –Draft Report is sent to HEP for verification of facts and feedback 13 NAJMI/17Nov2008V2

The Audit Report The Final Audit ReportThe Final Audit Report –Conclusions made through interpretations of specific evidences and observed facts. –The report will assist HEP in continual quality improvement. – Will include commendation, affirmation and recommendation 14NAJMI/17Nov2008V2

FINDINGS AND JUDGMENT The panel may propose one of the following:- For Academic Performance Audit (APA)For Academic Performance Audit (APA) –Highlight affirmation, commendation and areas of concern. –Indicate the performance of institution on all 9 areas of evaluation. –No specific decision (pass or fail). For continuation or cessation of Programme AccreditationFor continuation or cessation of Programme Accreditation –Maintain Accreditation. –Cease Accreditation. For Self-Accreditation StatusFor Self-Accreditation Status –Grant Self-Accreditation status –Not granted Self-Accreditation Status MQA Institutional Audit Committee will make decisions base on proposal by the panel of assessors. 15NAJMI/17Nov2008V2

Appeal All appeals can be made in relation to: a) factual contents of the reports; b) substantive errors within the report; or c) any substantive inconsistency between the oral exit report, the final audit report and the decision of the MQA. 16NAJMI/17Nov2008V2

Follow Up The purpose is: To get feedback on the report and the audit process, and on the extent to which the HEP considers the Report to be authoritative, rigorous, fair and perceptive;To get feedback on the report and the audit process, and on the extent to which the HEP considers the Report to be authoritative, rigorous, fair and perceptive; To ensure corrective actions are taken if required; andTo ensure corrective actions are taken if required; and To have a dialogue with those responsible for follow up action as to how the recommendations will be integrated into the HEP and department’s continual quality improvement plan.To have a dialogue with those responsible for follow up action as to how the recommendations will be integrated into the HEP and department’s continual quality improvement plan. 17NAJMI/17Nov2008V2

INSTITUTIONAL AUDIT PROCESS INSTITUTIONAL AUDIT PROCESS 18 NAJMI/17Nov2008V2

COMPARISON OF PROGRAMME ACCREDITATION AND INSTITUTIONAL AUDIT PROCESSES COMPARISON OF PROGRAMME ACCREDITATION AND INSTITUTIONAL AUDIT PROCESSES 19 NAJMI/17Nov2008V2

Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA) 14 B, Menara PKNS-PJ 17, Jalan Yong Shook Lin Petaling Jaya, Selangor Tel: NAJMI/17Nov2008V2