D OCUMENT O UR W ORK (DOW) VDSS O UTCOME R EPORT VAdata: Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Northern Kentucky Health District Northern Kentucky Planning Process.
Advertisements

From QA to QI: The Kentucky Journey. In the beginning, we were alone and compliance reigned.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
Information Sharing 1. Overview Inquiries into sexual violence incidents are extremely sensitive. Collecting and sharing information on GBV can be dangerous,
VA DATA R EPORTS VAdata: Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System.
H OUSING S TABILIZATION R EPORTS F OR DHCD, HUD, AND E MERGENCY S OLUTIONS G RANT VAdata: Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System.
Kathy Keeley Northland Foundation Strengthening Communities April 14, 2011 Writing Result Measures and Program Evaluation.
VSTOP & V ICTIM F UND D ATA & R EPORTS VAdata: Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System.
Introduction to Strengthening Families: An Effective Approach to Supporting Families Massachusetts Home Visiting Initiative A Department of Public Health.
Strengthening Families: An Effective Approach to Supporting Families.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
D OCUMENT O UR W ORK S URVEYS VAdata: Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System.
Developing a Logic Model
The Lumina Center Grantseeking Workshop Series Presents Outcomes & Evaluations April 20, 2006.
Bridgeport Safe Start Initiative Update Meeting September 23, 2004 Bridgeport Holiday Inn.
The Academic Assessment Process
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
C OMMUNITY E NGAGEMENT D ATA C OLLECTION F ORM VAdata: Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System.
How to Write Goals and Objectives
Intervention and Review Measuring outcomes for each child 1 P21.
Develop Systematic processes Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation.
Measuring for Success Module Nine Instructions:
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Strengthening Families: An Effective Approach to Supporting Families.
1 Qualitative Evaluation Terms Coding/categorization The process of condensing qualitative data through the identification of common themes. Data Matrix.
that keep families strong
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
Performance Measures AmeriCorps Project Director Training Saratoga, NY October 7 th – 9 th, 2013.
Indicators of Success -- Applying the TOC What will change? You must be able to test your theory!
The Evaluation Plan.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
H OTLINE D ATA C OLLECTION F ORM VAdata: Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System.
Outcome Based Evaluation for Digital Library Projects and Services
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
Presentation Title (Master View) Edward G. Rendell, Governor | Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak, Secretary of Education | Estelle G. Richman, Secretary of Public.
Prepared by the North Dakota State Data Center July HNDECA and ECCS Evaluation Dr. Richard Rathge Professor and Director North Dakota State Data.
SafeStart Collaborative Lead Agency: San Francisco Child Abuse Prevention Center Partner Agencies: -APA Family Support Services -Instituto Familiar de.
How Schools and Communities Can Better Serve Young People Building Effective Youth-Adult Partnerships.
EFNEP Youth Meeting June 11, 2015 Connie Schneider Marilyn Townsend Melissa Tamargo.
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
Welcome 2011 California Statewide Medical and Health Exercise.
Illinois Department of Children & Family Service/Chicago State University STEP Program - NHSTES May THE STEP PROGRAM Supervisory Training to Enhance.
1 A QTS Web Training Writing Consumer Education & Referral Outcomes.
VA DATA R EPORTS VAdata: Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System.
Making it Count! Program Evaluation For Youth-Led Initiatives.
O VERVIEW OF VA DATA Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System.
H OTLINE D ATA C OLLECTION F ORM VAdata: Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System.
C OMMUNITY E NGAGEMENT D ATA C OLLECTION F ORM VAdata: Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
Welcoming, caring, respectful, and safe learning and working environments and student code of conduct A presentation for EIPS leadership, COSC, EIPS staff,
Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation P21 Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation Measuring outcomes.
April 2016 CSA Conference How to Use the Family and Children’s Trust Fund (FACT) Research Portal to Identify and Target Program Needs.
Outcomes Workshop 2013 Lake County Consolidated Application.
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
Assessment/Evaluation Make evaluation a central part of planning – not an afterthought 1) Determine Needs 2) Determine Desired Outcomes 3) Determine Activities.
D OCUMENTING O UR W ORK S URVEYS VAdata: Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System.
VSTOP AND V ICTIM F UND D ATA AND R EPORTS VAdata: Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System.
D OCUMENTING O UR W ORK S URVEYS VAdata: Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System.
VAdata Reports VAdata: Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System.
Hotline Data Collection Form
2016 VAdata Changes Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System.
Overview of VAdata Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System.
Monterey County Health Department
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
SUCCESSFUL MEASURING JAMES HARDIN, DIRECTOR, HEALTH IMPACT
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
BOOTCAMP SOCIAL INNOVATION ACCELERATOR TO CREATE LASTING CHANGE
Presentation transcript:

D OCUMENT O UR W ORK (DOW) VDSS O UTCOME R EPORT VAdata: Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System

If you are unfamiliar with the Documenting Our Work surveys and data, please go to the VAdata Training Modules and review Module 5 – Documenting Our Work before continuing with this module. VAdata Training Modules

D OCUMENTING O UR W ORK The Documenting Our Work (DOW) project was initiated by Family Violence Prevention and Services Act (FVPSA) staff at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the National Resource Center on Domestic Violence

W HAT IS DOW? DOW is national initiative to develop tools to gather outcome data on the impact and value of services provided by local domestic violence programs. It requires a specific type of data collection—collecting data directly from survivors.

W HAT ARE “ OUTCOMES ”? Outcomes are the changes, benefits, learning or other effects that can happen as a result of services. Outcomes help to document that our services make a difference to survivors.

W HY D O O UTCOMES M ATTER ? In many cases, evaluation processes have included only “outputs,” a focus on the numbers of “things” that staff do (ex., # of support group sessions) or “things” that survivors receive (ex., # of nights of shelter). While those are important data, they do not assess whether or not their delivery has achieved the intended results. The purpose of an “outcome” is to focus on how the delivery or receipt of those “things” has impacted the survivor.

P OTENTIAL V ALUE OF O UTCOME -B ASED E VALUATION Clarifies the purpose of the service Keeps staff focused on the impact of services rather than just checking off that things got done Identifies effective services Indicates when changes to services are needed Emphasizes long term planning Provides empirical evidence that the services are doing what they were intended to do Assists in grant writing and fundraising Promotes accountability

V IRGINIA ’ S DOW SURVEYS TRACK THESE FVPSA OUTCOMES : As a result of contact with the domestic violence program: 1. 75% or more of domestic violence survivors will have strategies for enhancing their safety % or more of domestic violence survivors will have knowledge of available community resources.

H OW VDSS AND D OMESTIC V IOLENCE P ROGRAMS ARE CURRENTLY USING DOW IN V IRGINIA

S TATEWIDE O UTCOME M EASURES The VDSS Office of Family Violence worked with local domestic violence programs and other statewide partners to develop new domestic violence outcomes starting in FY The data from the Documenting Our Work surveys are included in the VDSS Outcome Report.

DOW O UTCOMES FROM THE VDSS R EPORT Survivors of domestic violence know more about domestic violence and its impact. Survivors of domestic violence know more about the resources in their community available to them. Survivors of domestic violence are safer. All survivors receiving services are welcomed and respected. Survivors have power over their lives. Children exposed to domestic violence are emotionally healthy.

P ROTECTIVE F ACTORS O UTCOMES VDSS also created a set of outcomes to reflect how the work of Domestic Violence Programs impacts families and improves the protective factors correlated for increased success. These outcomes are not required to be a part of your VDSS work plan but may be useful in your work with other family and youth-serving organizations. These data originate from the Documenting Our Work surveys and are included in the VDSS Outcome Report.

P ROTECTIVE F ACTORS O UTCOMES FROM THE VDSS R EPORT Survivors with children receiving services improve parental resilience Clients report improvements in their social connections because of help they received. Clients report improvement in their concrete supports in times of need. Children’s social and emotional competence improved as reported by the parent.

W HY SHOULD WE INCORPORATE VDSS DOW OUTCOMES IN P ROGRAM P LANNING ? Both VDSS and FVPSA require that the data from the surveys be collected and reported, and these data have been validated by researchers. For these reasons, it is the hope of VDSS that DVPs will use these outcomes in their program planning.

U TILIZING VDSS DOW O UTCOMES IN DV P ROGRAM P LANNING

1. Review agency needs assessments and VDSS Statewide and/or Protective Factors Outcomes. Do any of the outcomes address identified needs (survivors needs, community needs, etc.)? Things to consider: What are the outcome priorities for your agency and your community? Are they achievable? Do they address your agency mission/vision? Are they realistic? Are they measurable?

2. Select outcome(s) and develop objectives that relate to those outcome(s). Outcomes are about the participants – not the program (ex., “Survivors of domestic violence are safer.”) Outcomes identify the intended impact on participants’: o Skills o Attitudes o Knowledge o Behavior o Status, and/or o Life condition

3. Select activities that are likely to result in the desired outcomes. For example, some activities that might support survivor safety as an outcome (“Survivors of domestic violence are safer”) could be: o Advocates will provide survivors with safety planning within 8 hours of entering shelter. o An element of safety planning will be included in every support group for survivors. Note: For some activities, it may not be appropriate to utilize DOW surveys to assess outcomes. For example, survivors participating in support group are a subset of all survivors completing DOW surveys. Because survivors who DO NOT participate in support group are also completing surveys, you would not be able to assess support group outcomes from DOW surveys.

4. Based on the identified need and selected activities, quantify the desired outcome. It is not realistic to set a goal of 100%. It is realistic to assume that some survivors will not respond with the intended impact. Also, results are based on surveys where some survivors may skip questions, and may, occasionally, mark an unintended response. One way to set a numeric goal is to review the most recent data and ask yourself: o What is realistic? o What is optimistic? o What goal is attainable but also challenging?

5. Develop a data collection method.  Utilizing VAdata Tools Distributing and collecting DOW surveys is a requirement of VDSS. The VDSS Outcome Report, the DOW Community Survey report, and the DOW Shelter report are available on VAdata. These reports automatically summarize survivor feedback and provide outcome measures for the VDSS Outcomes, as well as the Protective Factor Outcomes. Most of the data collected by the DOW surveys replicate evidence- based data. For these reasons, it is recommended that to the degree possible, DVPs rely on DOW surveying rather than creating new surveys for survivors.

 Recommended survey strategies In order to assure that the widest diversity possible, it is recommended that DVPs strive to survey 100% of community- based service recipients (who receive services on at least 3 occasions) and 100% of shelter residents, recognizing that participation is always voluntary. It is also recommended that each person be surveyed only once (unless services are terminated and then resumed, in which case a new survey would be appropriate).

6. Develop a data review process. Deciding on a data review process is a part of program planning and should occur in advance of beginning new activities or making changes to current service delivery. o At what intervals will you review your DOW data? o Who will be involved in the review? o How will you share your findings and with whom? o How will you use the results to improve your project/program?

7. S HARE YOUR DOW O UTCOME D ATA Suggestions for sharing your information: County/City officials, Board of Directors, community partners and the general public are interested in your work. Share stories of your program’s success quantified by outputs and qualified by outcomes and survivor comments. Invisible programs miss out on many levels of community support. Brainstorm opportunities to let people know about your good work.