Bidders’ Conference Convened by Dirigo Health Agency June 18, 2012 Solicitation to Select Designated Survey Vendors.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Advisory Council April 1, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
Advertisements

1 EEC Board Meeting May 10, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
Medicaid Division of Medicaid and Long-Term Care Department of Health and Human Services Managed Long-Term Services and Supports.
Brian A. Harris-Kojetin, Ph.D. Statistical and Science Policy
Perkins Postsecondary Reserve Fund Grants WELDING PROGRAM OF STUDY.
Health Care Workforce Development Encouraging Pursuit of Careers in Health Care Pre-Application Conference January 14, 2010.
New York State Workforce Investment Board Healthcare Workforce Development Subcommittee Planning Grant Overview.
Procurement.
Bidder’s Conference January 7, 2014 State of Vermont Agency of Human Services Pharmacy Benefits Management (PBM) RFP.
Welcome to the Business and Operational Planning for School-Based Health Centers RFP Workshop April 12, 2010.
More About The DDD Assessment “A new way to assess and plan for supports and services for people with developmental disabilities” Aging & Disability Services.
1 Money Follows the Person Working Group August 26, 2011.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Introduction to Vocational Rehabilitation for Medical Providers.
One Health Plan’s Initiatives to Improve Patient Experiences: What the Physicians Had to Say Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Professor of Medicine, UCLA CAHPS PI, RAND.
1 Public Hearings: May , 2013 Child Care Development Fund Massachusetts State Plan Federal Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015.
2012 Implementation: A QUALITYstarsNY Recruitment Session.
Implementing CG-CAHPS: Issues and Strategies Dale Shaller, MPA Shaller Consulting Group September 18, 2011.
Update on CAHPS ® Surveys AHRQ ANNUAL MEETING Lunch and Learn Session #46 SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 Judith Sangl, ScD AHRQ CAHPS Project Officer.
CAHPS Overview Clinician & Group Surveys: Practical Options for Implementation and Use AHRQ ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 18, 2011 Christine Crofton, PhD CAHPS.
MaineHealth ACO in Context W 5 Who? What? Why? When? HoW? 1.
Overview.  Accreditation is both a status and a process  Status:  Status: Accreditation provides public notification that standards of quality are.
DIRIGO HEALTH AGENCY’S MAINE QUALITY FORUM Statewide Patient Experience Survey August 2012 Patient Experience Matters.
CAHPS® Survey to Evaluate the Patient’s Experience with the Medical Home Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine RAND Health Program November 18,
ESRD-CAHPS Field Test Beverly Weidmer, M.A. RAND Corporation CAHPS RAND Team.
REVIEW OF CMS “INITIAL APPROVAL” OF RHP PLAN AND FOLLOW-UP REQUIREMENTS May 8, 2013 REGION 10.
UPC Database Planning Services RFP Pre-Proposal Conference April 6, 2011 Kyle McClurg, IDOA Strategic Sourcing Analyst.
1 Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with.
MDCH/DELEG Michigan Nursing Corps Request for Proposals Webinar March 15, 2011 Collaboration of Michigan Department of Community Health and Michigan.
Survey Updates and Quality Improvement Resources Julie A. Brown, RAND Corporation AHRQ 2012 Annual Conference Bethesda, MD September 9, 2012.
Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene WB&A Market Research Executive Summary THE 2003 MARYLAND MEDICAID MANAGED CARE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY.
1 Doing Business with the University of North Texas System September 2015.
Assessing CAHPS Clinician & Group Survey Results What Can CAHPS Database Do For You Janice Ricketts, CAHPS Database Manager, Westat 2011 AHRQ Annual Conference.
Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 National Training and Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreements (NCA) Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) HRSA Objective.
State Webinar #2: Customizing the Record Review Worksheet.
Documents posted at QRIS 2011 Program Quality Improvement Grant RFP Bidder’s Conferences February & March 2011 Wendy Valentine Director,
Fee For Service Program Alabama Medicaid Program Changes.
Overview of CAHPS ® and the National CAHPS ® Database Assessing Patients’ Experiences with Care: Using CAHPS ® as a Standardized Quality Metric Dale Shaller,
Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Small, Local and Minority Business Enterprise (SLMBE) Program.
A PRESENTATION TO THE ADVISORY COUNCIL OF THE DIRIGO HEALTH AGENCY’S MAINE QUALITY FORUM MAY 11, 2012 Patient Experience Matters.
CCMEP A Certification Program for CME Professionals Serving the Public - Advancing the Profession.
Project Updates Maine Quality Forum Advisory Council June 14, 2013.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Pharmacy Benefits Management Request for Proposal Pre-Proposal Conference October 13, :00AM Molly Martin, Department of Administration FSSA.
Assessing Patient-Centered Medical Homes from the Patient Perspective: Developing the CAHPS ® Clinician & Group PCMH Survey Patricia Gallagher, PhD Center.
Assessing Patient Satisfaction Ron D. Hays UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research RAND Health Program AUA Foundation Summer.
ACHIEVING HEALTH CARE COVERAGE SUCCESS IN 2014 AND BEYOND: Stakeholder Input on Strategies for Marketing, Eligibility, Enrollment and Retention Katie Marcellus.
CAHPS PATIENT EXPERIENCE SURVEYS AHRQ ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 2012 Christine Crofton, PhD CAHPS Project Officer.
CAHPS® Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Ernest Moy Center for Quality Improvement & Patient Safety.
Mark Leeds Director of Long Term Care and Community Support Services April 26, 2012 Maryland Medicaid Advisory Committee: Balancing Incentive Program.
Assessing Patient-Centered Medical Homes from the Patient’s Perspective: Developing the CAHPS ® PCMH Survey Patricia (Trish) Gallagher, PhD Center for.
External Grantee Evaluation Services RFP Pre-Proposal Conference March 17, 2011 Kyle McClurg, IDOA Strategic Sourcing Analyst.
Open Public Meeting February 28, pm – 5 pm 1 Ashburton Place, Boston MassHealth Demonstration to Integrate Care for Dual Eligibles.
The Hospital CAHPS Program Presented by Maureen Parrish.
HOW TO DO BUSINESS WITH THE CITY OF ATLANTA Department of Procurement Presented by: Keith O. Brooks, CPPO.
Thank you for your interest in establishing a new Scarlet & Gold Event Committee in your region to raise funds to support the Marine Corps Scholarship.
Prevention Services for Maine’s Public Health Districts RFP# Bidder’s Conference March 28, 2016 Attachment A.
GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) SOLICITATION NO. DEXR Maryland – Statewide Victims Services Needs Assessment.
Who We Are We can’t do it alone! What We Do
MLTSS Delivery System SubMAAC
State of Review and Discussion of Current and Proposed National Background Check Program (NBCP) Implementation Presentation to
Who We Are We can’t do it alone! What We Do
From the Dry Run and National Implementation of the
Board of Early Education and Care Planning and Evaluation Committee
THE OFFICE OF PROCUREMENT CONTRACT TRAINING MAY 2018
Commonwealth of Virginia Health Information Technology
Funding Opportunity Announcement Number: HRSA
Indian Policies and Procedures (IPPs) OASIS December 7, 2017
Presentation transcript:

Bidders’ Conference Convened by Dirigo Health Agency June 18, 2012 Solicitation to Select Designated Survey Vendors

Agenda Purpose of Bidders’ Conference Goals of the initiative Expectations of the solicitation Subsidy payments Timelines Q & A

Purpose of Bidders Conference Provide overview of the project’s goal Review expectations of the solicitation Clarify issues NOTE: Presentation not exhaustive of all requirements identified in RFP and its Appendices Answers to questions raised at the Bidders’ Conference are not binding. Bidders should submit all questions in writing following the conference. Final responses to written comments will be posted on the Dirigo Health Agency project website on June 27, 2012

Goals of the Initiative Promote patient experience as a vital component of care quality Expand the number of primary and specialty care practice sites collecting patient experience data Apply a consistent tool and approach for assessing patient experience Compare survey results to regional and national benchmarks Publicly report findings at the practice site level for use by consumers Enhance the use of patient experience survey data by practice sites to improve quality

Why Designate Survey Vendors?  Maximize consistency in survey administration  Ease participation by practice sites  Serve as a vehicle for awarding practice-site subsidies

Eligibility to Submit Bids Minimum requirement  Experience using CAHPS protocol for sampling and administering a CAHPS survey instrument Preference  NCQA-certified vendor, or  Certified by CMS for administration of the H-CAHPS survey or Medicare Advantage and Prescription Drug Plan CAHPS surveys

Review Project Features Target population Practice site Survey instruments Modes of administration Sample frame and size Practice-site subsidy Registration Field Period

Target Population Adult patients (18 and older) of primary care and specialty care practice sites Parents of children (<18) who are patients of pediatric practice sites only

Practice-Site Practice site is the unit of analysis Practice site is defined as the place where one or more clinicians practice together and provide primary or specialty care at a single geographic location, whether single geographic address or separate office suites at the same address.

Survey Instruments Adult Primary Care Practice Sites CG-CAHPS Adult PCMH, version 2.0 Child Pediatric Practice Sites [Note correction] CG-CAHPS Child PCMH, version 2.0 Adult Specialist Practice Sites CG-CAHPS Adult PCMH, version 2.0.  This version is modified and includes all CG-CAHPS core items and a subset of supplemental items.

Modes of Administration Mail only Telephone only Mixed mode of mail with telephone follow-up Mixed mode of with mail follow-up Mixed mode of with telephone follow-up

Practice Recruitment Participation in the survey is voluntary Survey vendors will be responsible for contacting and enlisting practice site participation DHA will conduct outreach activities to promote the survey effort among physicians and practice groups There also will be limited public promotion to increase awareness of the survey effort in general

Sample Frame Sample drawn at single point in time at practice site level Patients who had at least one visit with a provider at the practice site in the 12 months prior to sample selection. “Provider” includes physician, nurse practitioner or physician assistant who independently manages a patient caseload.

Sample Size # Providers at Practice Site* # of Completed Surveys Required** *Provider means physician, nurse practitioner or physician assistant who independently manages a patient caseload ** Based on Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality guidelines for practice site sampling.

Practice-Site Subsidy Available to all participating practice sites that:  Use a Designated Vendor  Follow DHA Survey Guidelines  Submit a signed DUA with CAHPS allowing Dirigo Health access to survey results for public reporting Flat subsidy amount per completed survey Amount of subsidy based on preferred rate established thru RFP solicitation Subsidy level expected to be 60-90% of preferred rate Subsidy paid to the vendor in 2-3 installments Vendor balance bills practice after receipt of subsidy

Registration Vendors must register practice sites in advance of survey administration Registration requirements  Signed Data Use Agreement  Name of participating practice site, number of providers by practice site Data obtained through registration is used to determine initial practice site subsidy payments to vendor

Field Period Survey administration will occur over a three-month period (September 2012 – November 2012 )

Data Submission CAHPS Online Reporting System Maine’s Use of CAHPS Database Data Use Agreements Data Submission

CAHPS On-Line Reporting System National repository of data for selected CAHPS surveys Two major applications  Benchmarking  Benchmarking to evaluate health system performance and support quality improvement  Research  Research on consumer assessments of quality Funded by AHRQ and administered by Westat through the CAHPS User Network

Maine’s Use of CAHPS Database DHA plans to use the CAHPS Database to analyze and aggregate comparative site-level results and national benchmarks for state-level reporting. Benefits –  Minimizes costs of analyzing and aggregating survey data  Streamlines data submission and encourages practices to submit their data to CAHPS Database to view their own practice data for benchmarking.  Composite measures available through CAHPS database for public reporting.

Maine’s Use of CAHPS Database Practice sites will include DHA as a data user in the required data use agreement (DUA) with CAHPS Database. Vendors will submit survey results to the CAHPS Database following submission guidelines. DHA will access results from CAHPS Database to publicly report practice-level findings.

How it will work Signed agreement between practice sites and CAHPS must authorize DHA to have access to site level information for statewide public reporting. Vendors responsible for ensuring DUAs are signed and submitted to CAHPS and DHA to establish subsidy eligibility. Vendors must provide DUA documentation in DHA practice registration system to receive estimated initial subsidy payments. Vendors will submit survey results through the CAHPS PCMH Clinician & Group Survey Data Submission process following CAHPS guidelines and recommendations. Final subsidy payments made to vendors based on CAHPS Database confirmation of surveys submitted.

Public Reporting Practice sites must agree to have practice site level survey results publicly reported as a condition of receiving a subsidy. Practice site level survey data will be publicly reported on the DHA website. Design of public reporting website will be developed with input from stakeholders.

Proposal Contents Section 1 - Organizational Qualifications and Experience  Applicant entity  Sub-contractors  Experience of senior staff responsible for work  Methods for assuring compliance with terms of RFP  Evidence that qualifying criteria are met  Experience with similar survey projects, especially CAHPS and PCMH, with emphasis on experience in Maine  Experience using CAHPS Database  Historical response rate by mode

Proposal Contents Section 2 – Specifications of Work to be Performed  Strategy for practice-site recruitment  Opt in/out for new business  Sampling method  Mode(s) of survey administration  Method for obtaining Data Use Agreement  Adherence to CAHPS Survey Administration guidelines  Understanding of Data Submission requirements  Post survey validation

Proposal Contents Section III – Cost Proposal  Calculated as cost per completed survey  Separate bid for each mode that Vendor plans to use  Identify break breaks based on level of participation

Proposal Contents Section IV – Economic impact within Maine  Activities that have direct and positive impact on Maine  Employment of Maine residents  Subcontracting/partnering with Maine businesses  Payment of Maine taxes or licensing fees

Proposal Contents Section V – Required Proposal Attachments Evidence of NCQA-Certification or CMS Training (if applicable) Resume of person(s) responsible for project oversight Marketing materials

Scoring Organization qualifications & experience (30 points) Approach to work (40 points) Cost proposal (25 points) Economic impact within Maine (5 points)

Timeline ActivityDue Date Receipt of written questionsJune 22, 2012 Responses postedJune 27, 2012 Receipt of proposalsJuly 6, 2012 Estimated start of contractAugust 6, 2012 Estimated contract end dateApril 30, 2013

Questions?? Responses to q uestions addressed during the Bidders’ Conference are not binding. Bidders are advised to submit their questions in writing by 5:00 pm on June 22. Final responses to written comments will be posted on the Dirigo Health Agency project website on June 27, l