NOAA Fisheries, Southwest Region Protected Resources Division Santa Rosa, California Science, Service, Stewardship Melanie D. Harrison, Ph.D Technical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Quality Indicators
Advertisements

Measuring Water Pollution
SWAMP Team Members Contact Information Karen Taberski: , Nelia White:
Limnology 101 Dan Obrecht MU Limnology
Melanie D. Harrison, Ph.D Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) March 6, 2013 NOAA Fisheries, Southwest Region Protected Resources Division Santa Rosa, California.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Low Impact Development and Stormwater Management in Pennsylvania Catherine Chomat, P.E. F. X. Browne, Inc Brian Oram, PG Wilkes University Dr. Robert Traver,
Bioassessment and biomonitoring: some general principles.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND WATER QUALITY IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER Jeffery S. Horsburgh David K. Stevens, Amber Spackman Jones, David G. Tarboton,
Hydrology River Ecosystems and Humans. Dimensions of river ecosystems Longitudinal Lateral Vertical Temporal 2.
Goals Develop models to relate “stream health” to land use change and climate change Parameterize models using data from study sites, past work, and newly.
Common Monitoring Parameters. Step 1 Consider purpose/objectives of monitoring Assess use attainment Characterize watershed Identify pollutants and sources.
Assessing Aquatic Ecosystems & Measurement. Aquatic Ecosystem Assessment The health of an aquatic ecosystem can be determined by examining a variety of.
Analyzing Stream Condition Using EMAP Algae Data By Nick Paretti ARIZONA PHYCOLOGY ECOL 475.
Diatoms as Bioindicators of Water Quality Cassandra Messina April 19, 2005 ECOL 475.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
“Habitat Assessment Using the QHEI “ Edward T. Rankin June 6 City of Columbus, Level 3 Training Course Columbus, Ohio Senior ResearchScientist
Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals.
Water Quality.
Water Quality.
Lake Erie HABs Workshop Bill Fischbein Supervising Attorney Water Programs March 16, 2012 – Toledo March 30, Columbus.
Ecosystem Forecasting Testbed David J. Schwab NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory.
What It All Means: What we monitor Why we monitor those things Why it matters to monitor those things How to use the data Water Quality and Volunteer Monitoring:
King County Normative Flow Project Parametrix, King County, Herrera, & Foster Wheeler Normative Flow Studies King County Department of Natural Resources.
Drinking Water, Wastewater & Water Quality Special emphasis on NC streams.
Changing Focus on Watershed Issues < 1960’s: Water supply and flooding > 1960’s: Land use effects on water quality > 1980’s: Riparian and aquatic ecology.
Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – February 2004 Part 1 – Water Quality Assessment.
The Great Miami River Created By: Vidya Misra, Ke’Avonna Williams, and Kristin Cummings.
NC Division of Water Quality Water Quality Assessments and Local Watershed Plans.
Physical Properties Discharge rate, temperature and other physical attributes of the stream.
R I O Hs - Rio Grande Silvery Minnow Index of Habitat Health Joel D. Lusk and Cyndie Abeyta U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bosque Hydrology Group Water.
1 Factors influencing the dynamics of excessive algal blooms Richard F. Ambrose Environmental Science and Engineering Program Department of Environmental.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
Fish Assemblages of the Wabash River Mark Pyron. Wabash River Fishes 1.Large river 2.High diversity 3.History of human impact 4.Fish assemblages respond.
Measuring Water Pollution A Quick Overview. How do you measure the quality of a moving, ever changing fluid medium?
Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.
Freshwater and Society Module 1, part C. Developed by: Updated: U?-m1c-s2 Water quality degradation
Conceptual Modeling as a Tool for Developing a Watershed Management Plan An aid to understanding linkages Barbara Washburn California Watershed Assessment.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Pollution and Monitoring
OLC-OST Environmental Protection Program Research and Educational Collaboration Charles Jason Tinant, OLC Robert Pille, OLC Delinda Simmons, OST EPP Hannan.
January 27, 2011 Summary Background on Delta Flow and Habitat Relationships Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
Setting Standards: The Science of Water Quality Criteria EA Engineering, Science, and Technology ® Presented by: James B. Whitaker Review of Annex 1 of.
The Blue Planet The Blue Planet Indicators of Water Quality.
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
EPA HWI Comments on CA Assessment June 26, 2013 HSP Call 2 major categories of comments: – Report writing (we will work on this) – Content/Analysis/Discussion.
K aren Worcester Staff Environmental Scientist with thanks to M. Thomas, D. Paradies, L. Harlan, and P. Meertens California Central Coast Regional Water.
Detecting Ecological Effects of Development in the Wappingers and Fishkill Watersheds Karin Limburg, Karen Stainbrook, Bongghi Hong SUNY College of Environmental.
Case Study Development of an Index of Biotic Integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highland Region McCormick et al
New Mexico Watershed Watch Your school name and river name This project funded by the NM Dept. Of Game & Fish and the Sports Fish Restoration Program.
Abstract Man-made dams influence more than just the flow of water in a river. The build up of sediments and organic matter, increased residence times,
ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
NCSCOS 3.0 Science 8.  What factors indicate the QUALITY of Water?  How do we know if the water in lakes, ponds, streams, etc., is healthy or not? 
BeforeAfter Eutrophication. Eutrophication – nutrient enrichment of waters Major nutrients -phosphorus and nitrogen Consequences -increased plant growth.
Dissolved Oxygen Pollution Types.
Tools for Tracking Healthy Watersheds
Watershed Health Indicators
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Watersheds and Hydrology
AQUATOX v. 3.1 Host Institution/URL
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program Using Multiple Lines of Evidence to Assess Biostimulatory.
US Environmental Protection Agency
Water Quaility Video Water Quality in NC.
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
Simplified Hydrologic (Water) Cycle
Watersheds and Hydrology
Water Pollution.
Aquatic Ecology Envirothon
IBI’s: An Introduction
Presentation transcript:

NOAA Fisheries, Southwest Region Protected Resources Division Santa Rosa, California Science, Service, Stewardship Melanie D. Harrison, Ph.D Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) March 6, 2013 Water Quality Metrics and Assessment Methods

Introduction Science, Service, Stewardship  Numerous designated beneficial uses for the Russian River  Goal is to protect existing and future beneficial uses for humans and the environment.  Numerous metrics have been used to predict changes in water quality due to ecological restoration.  Need to link the appropriate response metrics with key drivers in the watershed to meet water quality objectives.  Develop evaluation tools to assess the response of variables to changes in water quality over time.

Water Quality Metrics  Scale  Site  Reach  Watershed  Can vary depending protecting designated beneficial use of interest  Ex. Cold water habitat for listed species  Ex. Municipal and domestic supply  Can vary depending on pollutant of interest  Nutrients  Metals Science, Service, Stewardship  Most common metric categories include multi-metric approach:  Water Quality parameters  Biological parameters  Hydrologic parameters

Common Water Quality Metrics Science, Service, Stewardship Variables Water temperature (°C) Dissolved Oxgyen (mg/L) pH Turbidity Specific Conductance (µS/cm Sulfate (mg/L) Total Suspended Solids (mg/L) Total Nitrogen (mg/L) Total Phosphorus ( mg/L) Organophosphate (mg/L) Organic Carbon (mg/L Total Mercury (Hg) (mg/L) Methyl-mercury (MeHg) (µ/L) Aluminum (mg/L) Soil oxygen demand (SOD) Biological oxygen demand (BOD) Pollution-Specific Metrics Maximum concentrations Minimum concentrations Average and or weighted concentrations Standard deviations 10 th percentile concentrations 25 th percentile concentrations 50 th percentile concentrations 75 th percentile concentrations 90 th percentile concentrations LCD50, and EC50 Response Biotic sensitive to physical changes in stream temperatures Biotic community sensitive to changes in DO, chemical transformation occur Sensitive indicator of habitat conditions nutrient impairments inorganic pollutants toxicity Indicator of stream capacity to support anaeobic conditions Variables Barium Sediment (kg/mg)

Bioindicators: Index of Biotic Integrity Science, Service, Stewardship Response Sensitive to varying degrees in varying degrees to pollutants and other stressors Effects of sub-lethal doses of toxins are reflected in changes in community composition and structure *Responds rapidly to changes in the environment that can be detected at shorter scales than other bioindicators (fish and macroinverts) *Responds to nutrients, organic pollution, acidification, salinity Sensitive to nitrogen limitation, siltation, pH, temperature, toxic algae blooms Index Metrics Species richness Species composition % Tolerant individuals Function feeding groups *Biomass (chlorophyll –A, AFDM) % Algal cover Total abundance Toxicity test Bioaccumulation Factor (BAF) Bioindicators Fish Benthic Macroinvertebrates * Algae Diatoms Soft-bodied

Hydrologic Metrics Science, Service, Stewardship  Hydrology is a key controllers of biogeochemical processes in a watershed.  Hotspots are created where hydrological flow paths converge with substrates or other flow paths containing complementary or missing nutrients.  Example: Overland flow produced by storm runoff in the semi-isolated Hanson Ponds input Hg and P into the system.  Application that ‘connectivity’ is important for floodplain biogeochemistry.  Increase frequency and duration of connectivity  Controls on DO, temperature, organic matter processing, and etc.

Hydrological metrics Science, Service, Stewardship Watershed/ Hydrodynamics Stream flow velocity (ft/s) River discharge (cfs) Metrics Maximum Peak flow Median flow Minimum flow Duration of high-flow Frequency of high-flow events Loading rates (mass/unit time) Water residence time (t) Frequency of connectivity and/or floodplain inundation (n) Duration of connectivity (d) Water depth (m) Response Controls flux of nutrients and, chemicals, and sediment Alters distribution, form and quality of constituents Channel form response rapidly to changes in flows

Other Metrics Science, Service, Stewardship  Land use/Land cover  Agricultural (distal)  Extent of riparian vegetation/buffer (% riparian cover) (proximal)  Water velocities  Nutrient processing  Sediment distribution  Climate  Precipitation  Temperature

Water Quality Assessment Methods/Tools  Existing Water Quality Standards  Water Quality-based assessment thresholds  Numeric thresholds for chemical constituents and water quality parameters  Ex. California and Federal Drinking standards  Ex. California Toxic Rules to Protect Human Health and Aquatic Life  Water Quality Objectives  Numeric  Narrative  North Coast Index Biotic Integrity (IBI)  Existing data  SWAMP Data Base  Water Quality Models  AQUATOX  WASP7  Hydrodynamics Models  Nutrient s  Sediment Transport Models  Fate and Transport  Metals  Use to provide a more detailed assessment of the fate and transport of nutrients and metals and predict changes in water quality due to controlling variables.

Thank You/Questions Science, Service, Stewardship  North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board  Stephen Bargsten  Steve Butkus  Mark Neely  Permit Resource and Management Department: Amy Lyle  Endangered Habitat Conservancy: Michael Beck and Nancy Schaefer  NMFS: John McKeon, Brian Cluer, and Michael Donahue