Soil Information Working Group (SIWG) W. Eckelmann, S. Bialousz, F. Carré, B. Jones, M. Kibblewhite, J. Kozak, Ch. Le Bas, G. Toth, G. Varallyay, M. Yli.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research and Innovation Why does ERA Need to Flourish ERA - State of Play Octavi Quintana Trias Brussels, 19th April 2013.
Advertisements

EU funds’ evaluation plan , Latvia
Report on the activities of the Digital Soil Mapping Working Group Endre Dobos.
EEA draft annual work programmes 2016 and 2017 André Jol EEA Head of Group Climate change impacts, vulnerability and adaptation 9th EIONET workshop on.
MSFD Interactions EMODNET Chemistry 2 Kick-off meeting Giordano Giorgi Trieste (Italy), 3-5 June 2013.
Joanna Fiedler Enlargement and Neighbouring Countries Unit DG Environment European Commission REReP → RENA Vision of the European Commission PEIP Regional.
1 18 March 2010AGNA meeting EASAC update Yves Morier.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE Transport Division 1 TRANS-EUROPEAN RAILWAY (TER) PROJECT 2 nd Expert Group Meeting (Budapest, 23 September.
European Commission - DG Environment Workshop on P&P and NP, September 1-2, Brussels CAFE and the NECD review Stefan Jacobi European Commission, DG Environment,
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Component 5.2 Harald Marent, Veronika Koller-Kreimel, Austrian Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management Edith Hödl-Kreuzbauer,
Support for the coordination of activities TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS Taking Account of Strategic Research Agendas in the Research Themes of the FP7 Co-operation.
ETC/CCA Main activities June June 2015 Silvia Medri (CMCC) ETC/CCA Manager Eionet WS on CCIVA Copenhagen, June 2015 European Environment Agency.
Large Combustion Plants Ex-post assessment of the LCP Directive Initial ex-ante evaluation of the IED – Chapter III and BAT Daniel Martin-Montalvo Alvarez.
ESBN Plenary Meeting October 2005 Report of ESBN SC.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
1 Sharing information on implementation of national strategies and reporting on progress towards biodiversity targets between global, regional and national.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use INSPIRE Orthoimagery TWG Status Report Antonio Romeo ESRIN 15/02/2012.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
INSPIRE and the role of Spatial Data Interest Communities (SDIC)
Expert Meeting Methods for assessing current and future coastal vulnerability to climate change 27 – 28 October 2010 Draft conclusions.
Introduction to the EEA and the EIONET
Forum for Air quality Modelling FAIRMODE ew. eea
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
JRC’s Follow-up work to improve GES assessment
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
SEEA EEA Technical Recommendations
D2 NIS REVIEW PROCESS March 2014: Draft Manual endorsed by WG GES
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
[draft] Conclusions, actions & next steps
MIWP Action ”Priority List of E-Reporting Datasets”
WP 2: Align / synchronise progress reporting under both directives
Chemical Monitoring mandate
TG-DATA meeting. 7-8 June 2017, Copenhagen
Legal framework of territorial classifications and typologies for European statistics – state of play NUAC meeting, Brussels June 2015 Gorja Bartsch.
Review of Decision 2010/477/EU and MSFD Annex III
Technical review of Commission Decision 2010/477/EU concerning MSFD criteria for assessing GES Work flow and progress 20/21 October th WG GES.
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
Development of a protocol for identification of reference conditions, and boundaries between high, good and moderate status in lakes and watercourses (REFCOND)
State of play endocrine disruptors
19th meeting of the WG GES 22/03/2018
RIS3 of North-West Development Region (RO)
MSFD list of criteria elements
LUCAS Task Force The way forward.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
INSPIRE Objectives & beneficiaries
Work plan and next steps – RDE-LDV working group
MSFD list of criteria elements
Meeting of Water Directors Future Work Programme of the CIS
The Estonian experience with ex-ante evaluation – set-up and progress
1.
WG GES: Decision review progress
WFD – CIS Working group A ECOSTAT
[draft] Conclusions, actions & next steps
Water Directors meeting Mondorf-les-bains, June 2005
HELCOM WORK Submitted by the Contracting Parties in HELCOM that are also EU member states Name Surname.
WG E on Priority Substances
Agenda item 2.1 – Overall Progress Report
Water scarcity and drought
Green Infrastructure: Working method
4th Meeting of the MIG-P, Brussels, June 2016
Draft CIS work programme
Projects under Pillar I of White Paper on Climate Change Adaptation
Common Implementation Strategy for the
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Implementing the ESS Vision 2020
Marine Strategy Coordination Group 14 November 2011, Brussels
31st WG GW Meeting summary and deadlines 25/26 Oct 2016, Bratislava
Presentation transcript:

Soil Information Working Group (SIWG) W. Eckelmann, S. Bialousz, F. Carré, B. Jones, M. Kibblewhite, J. Kozak, Ch. Le Bas, G. Toth, G. Varallyay, M. Yli Halla, M. Zupan, R. Baritz, J. Boixadera, E. Van Ranst Common Criteria for Risk Area Identification according to Soil Threats

SIWG Members Special area of interest Auxilliary Data: S. Bialousz and R. Baritz ThreatErosionSOM declineSalinizationCompactionLandslides Task LeaderB. JonesM. KibblewhiteG. VarallyayS. BialouszF. Carré ContributorsChr. Le Bas J. Kozak R. Baritz M. Zupan M. Yli Halla E. Van Ranst (comments) G. Toth J. Boixadera (comments) P. Bielek Chr. Le Bas JRC Experts W. Eckelmann (Chair)

Mandate/Objectives (1) Following the Soil Thematic Strategy, the Commission is preparing a Soil Directive, which is expected to ask for the identification of risk areas for soil threats like erosion, organic matter decline, salinization, compaction and landslides. In order to combat all these soil threats, the EU Member States are proposed to identify risk areas for these threats, based on common criteria.

Mandate/Objectives (2) 1)What should be the level of detail for soil information (maps or data) used as basis for risk identification? 2)In the case models are used: what input data at least are required to assess baseline information or a trend? 3)How should the models be calibrated? 4)What can be the potential contribution of existing EU data sets or monitoring activities to risk area identification? Questions to be answered by the SIWG:

Working Plan (1)

Working Plan (2)

Expected Results (1) 1)Definition of different approaches for risk area identification, 2)Definition of common criteria for (Tier 1) risk area identification (information basis to supplement a Technical Annex of the draft Directive), 3) Identification of required, available and lacking data.

Expected Results (2) Approaches to risk area identification can be:

Application of the 2-Tiers approach No mandate of the SIWG to provide suggestions for the (national) implementation (e.g. monitoring) within risk areas 1:250,000 ?

Time Table Meeting of ESB SC at DGENV:28. April 2005 (Mandate received) 1st meeting, Brussels:25. / 26. May st draft task papers:12. to 20. June st summary writing status:28. June nd meeting, Brussels: 30 June / 01. July st draft report:29. July 2005 Final draft report:06. September 2005 Report Appendix 'Auxilliary data‘: 16. September 2005

Result presentations acc. to Threats Erosion: Bob Jones Soil Organic Matter Decline: Mark Kibblewhite Compaction: Christine Le Bas Salinization / Sodification: György Varallyay Landslides: Florence Carré (absent) and for Auxiliary Data: Stanislav Bialousz

What to do next? At the end of the first activity of the SIWG some work remains to be done: Publishing of the SIWG Report e. g. after additional modifications, Updating of the metadata about soil information relevant to threats at member state and regional level, Acquiring of data more up to date instead of ongoing manipulating with old and less accurate or even obsolete data, Providing a framework to help making national soil information more comparable across administrative boundaries, Defining methodological details for risk area delineation, as well as for (Tier 2) modeling and / or monitoring, Improving links to other soil related institutions e. g. to EEA and/or EIONET.