1 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2013 Tiffany Franks Assistant Director, Office of Planning & Analysis October 25, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ANDREA BROWN DIRECTOR, PROGRAM ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH How to Use Student Survey Data (NSSE) to Improve Your Teaching.
Advertisements

Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
2008 National Survey of Student Engagement – SUNY Oneonta Patty Francis Steve Perry Fall 2008.
Maximizing Your NSSE & CCSSE Results
1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.
Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.
1 NSSE Results Indiana University Kokomo Sharon K. Calhoon Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Presentation to Clerical.
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
2012 National Survey of Student Engagement Jeremy D. Penn & John D. Hathcoat.
Student and Faculty Perceptions on Student Engagement: ISU’s NSSE and FSSE Results 2013 Ruth Cain, Assessment Coordinator Dan Clark, Department of History.
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
National Survey of Student Engagement Department of Institutional Research and Planning December 2006.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Basic Reports and Data Dissemination Strategies Regional Users’ Workshop October 6-7, 2005.
Urban Universities: Student Characteristics and Engagement Donna Hawley Martha Shawver.
1 Student Characteristics And Measurements of Student Satisfaction Prepared for: The Faculty Council Subcommittee on Retention The Office of Institutional.
1 Student Learning Assessment Assessment is an ongoing process aimed at understanding & improving student learning Formative Assessment – Ongoing feedback.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Okanagan.
2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015
Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
BCSSE 2013 Institutional Report Concordia University Chicago BCSSE 2013 Institutional Report Concordia University Chicago Elizabeth Owolabi, Ph.D. Director.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Results from The College at Brockport 2014 NSSE Survey Presentation to President’s Advisory Council– 3/4/15.
An Introduction: NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Before & After: What Undergraduates and Alumni Say About Their College Experience and Outcomes Angie L. Miller, NSSE & SNAAP Research Analyst Amber D.
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
Camille Kandiko, Indiana University Bloomington Jon Acker and William Fendley, The University of Alabama Lawrence Redlinger, The University of Texas at.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
NSSE and the College of Letters and Sciences Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis November 7, 2008.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
1 Presentation of Results NSSE 2005 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
NSSE at Gallaudet AY Report prepared by OAQ/Retention; JLD/LB/PH; 06/2015.
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
The Satisfied Student October 4 th, Today’s Presentation  Present data from Case’s Senior Survey and the National Survey of Student Engagement.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
Diversity at Stetson: Perspectives of Students and Faculty John Tichenor Associate Professor of Decision and Information Science.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE): Overview of 2008 Results for Rutgers University.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2007.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
NSSE Results for Faculty
UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
UTRGV 2018 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
UTRGV 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
GGC and Student Engagement
Presentation transcript:

1 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2013 Tiffany Franks Assistant Director, Office of Planning & Analysis October 25, 2013

NSSE 2013WSU Participation What is NSSE? – Annual survey that collects data about student participation in activities and programs that promote learning & personal development – Results from NSSE can be used to identify aspects of the undergraduate experience that can be improved through changes in policies and practices NSSE is administered every other year (odd years) at WSU to first-year students and seniors, last administered in spring 2013

NSSE 2013WSU Participation For 2013, 1,254 and 3,305 invitations to take NSSE were sent to first-year students and seniors, respectively Survey responses for first-year students totaled 262 (21%), and 842 for seniors (25%)

NSSE 2013 Participation 568 postsecondary institutions participated in NSSE 2013, with 335,702 students, 41% first- year students and 59% seniors Overall response rate was 30%, 27% for first- year students and 33% for seniors

NSSE 2013 WSU Participation cont. First-year respondents were 62% female and 92% were enrolled full-time Senior respondents were also 62% female, and 78% were enrolled full-time

NSSE 2013 WSU Participation cont. Freshmen Race/Ethnicity

NSSE 2013 WSU Participation cont. Seniors Race/Ethnicity

NSSE 2013 Participation Other demographics of all NSSE participants: – 29% were 24 years or older – 35% lived on campus – 46% were first generation college students – 34% began college at another institution other than where they took NSSE WSU Participants: – 38.2 were 24 years or older – 6% lived on campus – 43% were first generation college students – 46% began college at another institution other than where they took NSSE

Changes to NSSE 2013 NSSE updated and revised the survey for 2013; 23% are new items, 22% were left unchanged, and 50% were modified, either a major or minor modification

Changes to NSSE 2013 Instead of using “benchmarks”, NSSE is now using “Engagement Indicators and Measures of Participation in High Impact Practices” Longitudinal comparisons of individual questions & historical benchmarks are somewhat limited due to different scoring metrics and deletion of some survey items

Changes to NSSE 2013 cont. There are 10 different engagement indicators which fall under one of four “themes”

NSSE Engagement Indicator Scoring Each Engagement Indicator is scored on a 60 point scale (never=0, sometimes=20, often=40, very often=60) Mean comparisons are given for each Engagement Indicator for WSU peer institutions (n=10), institutions with the same Carnegie Classification (Research University- High Research Activity, n=36) and all NSSE institutions (n=567)

WSU Peer Institutions Comparison peer institutions were selected by the President and the President’s Executive Team and approved by the Kansas Board of Regents. WSU peer institutions are: – Florida Atlantic University (Boca Raton, FL) – Oakland University (Rochester Hills, MI) – Portland State University (Portland, OR) – University of Akron (Akron, OH) – University of Arkansas at Little Rock (Little Rock, AR)

WSU Peer Institutions cont. WSU Peer Institutions continued: – University of Colorado Denver (Denver, CO) – University of Nebraska at Omaha (Omaha, NE) – University of Nevada, Reno (Reno, NV) – University of South Alabama (Mobile, AL) – Western Michigan University (Kalamazoo, MI)

WSU Results and Peer Comparisons cont. Mean Comparisons of First-Year Students for questions relating to Academic Challenge

WSU Results and Peer Comparisons cont. Mean Comparisons of First-Year Students for questions relating to Learning With Peers

WSU Results and Peer Comparisons cont. Mean Comparisons of First-Year Students for questions relating to Experiences With Faculty

WSU Results and Peer Comparisons cont. Mean Comparisons of First-Year Students for questions relating to Campus Environment

WSU Results and Peer Comparisons cont. Mean Comparisons of Seniors for questions relating to Academic Challenge

WSU Results and Peer Comparisons cont. Mean Comparisons of Seniors for questions relating to Learning With Peers

WSU Results and Peer Comparisons cont. Mean Comparisons of Seniors for questions relating to Experiences With Faculty

WSU Results and Peer Comparisons cont. Mean Comparisons of Seniors for questions relating to Campus Environment

High Impact Practices High Impact Practices are activities with positive associations with student learning and retention, demand time and effort, facilitate learning outside of the classroom, require meaningful interactions with faculty and students, encourage collaboration with diverse others, and provide frequent and substantive feedback

High Impact Practices cont. NSSE founder George Kuh suggests all undergraduate students experience at least 2 High Impact Practices during their education Students were asked 6 questions regarding High Impact Practices (first-year students only asked questions 1-3) Seniors’ responses include their entire time at WSU, not just the current academic year

High Impact Practices cont.

High Impact Practices High Impact Practices at WSU

High Impact Practices at WSU First-Year Students

High Impact Practices at WSU Seniors

Perceived Gains Among Seniors Students reported how much their experience at WSU contributed to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in 10 areas:

Satisfaction with WSU Students rated their overall experience at WSU and whether they would attend WSU again:

NSSE Caveats As with all surveys, NSSE also has some caveats: – Survey is voluntary, which leads to lower response rates and may not be a representative sample of the student population – Different methodologies used when selecting comparison groups (may not be selecting schools that would be appropriate for NSSE comparisons) – Lack of awareness or interest in student engagement

Using NSSE Data NSSE data can be used in a variety of ways: – Self-studies for accreditations – Assessment & Improvement – Faculty & Staff development – Institutional Advancement – State System Performance Reviews

Using NSSE Data at WSU NSSE is used at WSU in several ways: – Results for specific questions posted on the Voluntary System of Accountability College Portrait (on WSU home page), all institutions participating in the College Portrait that use NSSE also report this data – Performance Indicators for Kansas Board of Regents Foresight 2020

Using NSSE Data at WSU cont.

Student Interaction with Campus Faculty and Staff 52.0% of seniors believed that the campus staff were helpful, considerate, or flexible 75.0% of seniors believed that faculty are available, helpful, or sympathetic 93.0% of seniors reported that faculty members provided prompt feedback on their academic performance 61.0% of seniors discussed readings or ideas with faculty members outside of class

Questions? Any questions? You may also questions that may arise later to