© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/1 Chapter 3 Demand Theory
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/2 The Budget Constraint Attainable consumption bundles are bundles that the consumer can afford to buy. Attainable consumption bundles satisfy the following inequality known as the budget constraint. p 1 x 1 + p 2 x 2 ≤ M
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/3 Figure 3.1 Attainable consumption bundles
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/4 Opportunity Cost, Real Income and Relative Prices Rewriting the budget constraint by solving for X 2 gives: x 2 = M/p 2 – (p 1 /p 2 )x 1 Where: M/p 2 is real income P 1 /P 2 is the relative price The relative price shows that the opportunity cost of good 1 is P 1 /P 2 units of good 2. P 1 /P 2 is the absolute value of the slope of the budget line.
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/5 Endowments Rather Than Money Sometimes an endowment of goods is assumed rather than cash. Sally owns apples x 1 0 and eggs x 2 0. Her budget constraint is: p 1 x 1 + p 2 x 2 ≤ p 1 x p 2 x 2 0 p 1 x 1 + p 2 x 2 ≤ p 1 x p 2 x 2 0 Solving for x 2: x 2 = (p 1 x p 2 x 2 0) /p 2 – (p 1 /p 2 )/x 1 x 2 = (p 1 x p 2 x 2 0) /p 2 – (p 1 /p 2 )/x 1 As before, the budget constraint depends upon relative prices and real income (the endowment).
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/6 Figure 3.2 The budget line with endowments
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/7 The Choice Problem The non-satiation assumption implies that utility maximizing consumption lies on the budget line. The consumer choice problem is: maximize U(x 1, x 2 ) by choice of x 1 & x 2, subject to constraint p 1 x 1 + p 2 x 2 = M
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/8 The Choice Problem In principle we refer to the solution (x 1 *, x 2 * ) as endogenous variables, as these variables are determined within the model. The actual values of X 1 * and X 2 * depend on the exogenous variables in the model, (p 1, p 2 and M) and on the specific form of the utility function.
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/9 Figure 3.3 Non-satiation and the utility- maximizing consumption bundle
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/10 Demand Functions X 1 * = D 1 (p 1, p 2, M) X 2 * = D 2 (p 1, p 2, M) These demand function equations simply say that the choice of X 1 * and X 2 * depend upon the prices of all items in the consumption bundle and the budget devoted to that bundle.
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/11 Anna’s optimal choice when both goods are perfect substitutes
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/12 Graphic Analysis of Utility Maximization Assume indifference curves are smooth and strictly convex. Interior solutions are where quantities of both goods are positive. Corner solution is one where the quantity of one good is positive and the quantity of the other is zero.
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/13 Interior Solution An interior solution is described by: 1. P 1 x 1 * + P 2 x 2 * Ξ M, the optimal bundle lies on the budget line. 2. MRS(X 1 *, X 2 * ) Ξ P 1 /P 2, the slope of the indifference curve equals the slope of the budget line at the optimal bundle.
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/14 Figure 3.5 The utility-maximizing consumption bundle
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/15 Figure 3.6 Essential goods
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/16 Corner Solutions A corner solution graphically lies not in the interior between the two axis, but at a corner where the budget line intersects one of the two axes. For example, if at the point where the budget line intersects the X 2 axis, the budget line is steeper than the indifference curve, only good 2 will be purchased.
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/17 Figure 3.7 Inessential goods
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/18 Excise Tax Versus Lump-Sum Tax Given a choice between a lump sum tax and an excise tax that raises the same revenue, the consumer will choose the lump sum tax (see Figure 3.8).
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/19 Figure 3.8 Excise versus lump-sum taxes
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/20 Figure 3.9 Cash transfer versus in-kind transfers
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/21 Figure 3.10 Optimal consumption with endowments
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/22 Figure 3.11 Normal and inferior goods
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/23 Figure 3.12 Engel curves
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/24 Figure 3.13 The consumption response to a change in the price of another good
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/25 Consumption Response to a Change in Price The price-consumption path connects the utility maximizing bundles that arise from a change in the price of p 1 or p 2. Note that when p 1 changes, M and p 2 are assumed to be constant. Likewise if p 2 were to change, M and p 1 are assumed to be constant.
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/26 Figure 3.14 The price-consumption path and the demand function
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/27 Elasticity Elasticity is a measure of responsiveness of the quantity demanded for one good to a change in one of the exogenous variables: price or income.
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/28 Figure 3.15 The need for a unit-free measure of responsiveness
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/29 Own-Price Elasticity Own-price elasticity ( E ll ) relates to how much the one good changes when its own price changes. E ll = % change in x 1 / % change in P 1 OR
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/30 Elasticity If we allow changes in the exogenous variables to approach zero we obtain marginal or point elasticity.
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/31 Elasticity Arc elasticity measures discrete changes in x 1 when there is a discrete change in p 1,p 2 or M). By allowing changes in the exogenous variables to approach zero gives marginal or point elasticity. Price elasticity of demand for a good is the elasticity of quantity consumed per capita with respect to the price of the good.
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/32 Income Elasticity The income elasticity of demand is the elasticity of quantity consumed per capita with respect to income per capita.
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/33 Income Elasticity Formula
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/34 Cross Price Elasticity The cross price elasticity of demand for good 1 with respect to the price of good 2, is the elasticity of per capita consumption of good 1 with respect to p 2.
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/35 Cross Price Elasticity Formula