Trevecca Nazarene University 2012-13.  Why have a General Education curriculum?  How is General Education assessed?  What were the results of last.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. Creativity and Innovation 2. Communication and Collaboration
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
Ability-Based Education at Alverno College. Proposed Outcomes for Session 1. To introduce you to Alvernos approach to designing integrative general education.
ELD STANDARDS Academic language development Language-based Reflective of the varying stages of second language acquisition Representative of social and.
Essential Skills Task Force Defining the Essential Skills Presented to State Board October 18, 2007.
Assessment Report Biology School of Science and Mathematics Rey Sia, Chair Laurie B. Cook, Assessment Coordinator.
What Behaviors Indicate a Student is Meeting Course Goals and Objectives? “Indicators”
Assessment of General Education Patricia E. Beeson Vice Provost for Graduate and Undergraduate Studies February 11, 2008 University of Pittsburgh.
University Mission Learning-centered environment Integration of teaching research, service, and co-curricular experiences Prepare students to be responsible.
General Education Revision. Mission & Purpose Mission Rooted in the tradition of liberal arts education, FGCU’s General Education Program provides students.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
Working with Rubrics: Using the Oral Communication, Writing, and Critical Thinking Rubrics VALUE Rubrics Ashley Finley, Ph.D Senior Director of Assessment.
I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand. Confucius.
Content Standard 1: Learn and develop the essential skills and technical demands unique to the visual arts. Benchmarks A. Show skill, confidence, and sensitivity.
General Education Task Force II April 30, 2014 Faculty Assembly, H-Wing Auditorium GE II Website:
General Education Models General Education Reform Committee Lloyd Duman Carol Lindsay Sherry Simkins Karen Ruppel Bob Vogeler Peter Zao Bob Murray.
Graduation Portfolio Modules 1 Modules Module 1What is GPS? Module 2What are Performance Outcomes? Module 3How are Performance Outcomes Connected to Our.
NMU Towards the 21 st Century Mitchell Klett Alan Willis Ruth Watry Laura Reissner Gary Brunswick.
Introduction to Student Learning Outcomes in the Major
Streamlining Assessment at Westmont presented by Tatiana Nazarenko, Dean of Curriculum and Educational Effectiveness Program Review Committee: John Blondell,
October 22, 2009 Report to the Faculty Senate Professor John Stevenson Senator Sandy Jean Hicks UCGE-Subcommittee on Assessment of General Education (SAGE)
Formative and Summative Assessment
COLLEGE-READY LEARNER CRITICAL THINKER ADAPTABLE & PRODUCTIVE LEADERRESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKER SKILLED COMMUNICATOR HISD.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
LEARNING PROFILE Title of Degree Program PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS (Description, Unique Experiences, Inputs, Outcomes) (EXAMPLES) Year Established. Accreditation.
Assessment of Student Learning Faculty In-service June 5, 2006.
Georgia Milestones End of Grade (EOG) Assessment Grades 3, 4, and 5 Whitney Shook, Assistant Principal/Testing Coordinator Lori Dunagan, Curriculum Support.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Outcomes-based Education at UC. Created, Implemented, Maintained and Assessed by Faculty (Supported by Everyone!)
Student Learning Outcomes: Interpretations, Validity, and Factor Development Krista Soria and Laura Gorny This project was funded by the Undergraduate.
University College: Assessment, Planning and Outcomes
Pierce College CSUN-Pierce Paths Project Outcomes Report 2013.
Trevecca Nazarene University  Why have a General Education curriculum?  How is General Education assessed?  What were the results of last.
Intentional Learning Goals and the Carleton Curriculum LTC January 13 and January 14 Mary Savina, Clara Hardy, Carolyn Sanford, Nelson Christensen.
LeMoyne-Owen College December 15, 2009 Mimi Czarnik, Professor of English and Dean of Humanities Becky Burton, Associate Professor of Biology Alverno College,
General Education Assessment Report. Outcomes B-2, B-3, B-8, C-1, C-4, C-5  Methodology: The assessment for each of these outcomes used the Measure of.
Marion H. Martinez, Ed.D. Associate Commissioner for Teaching, Learning and Instructional Leadership August 25,
Professional growth Objectives 1)Pilot program 2)Familiarize/re-familiarize ourselves with new Standards and Indicators 3)Consider the importance of data.
Integration & Inquiry Transitioning to the Common Core & Next Generation of Science Standards CaMSP Learning Network Sacramento, California February 27.
Assuring quality for the teaching of intercultural communication in Europe: perspectives and challenges Sharon Millar and Célio Conceição.
© International Baccalaureate Organization 2006 The Middle Years Program At a Glance.
Pilot Training for Volunteers General Education Assessment Committee.
Global Competences Project Global Perspective Civic Engagement Environmental Perspective.
The Oregon Diploma The Goal, History, What’s new?, Credits, Credit By Proficiency, Essential Skills and Personalization of the Diploma.
N O The Standard Course Level Approach to Assessment of General Education DCC General Education Characteristics Writing Skills Oral Communications Analytical.
Images from Gallery.html.
National Educational Technology Standards for Students: The Next Generation.
Blueprint for GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS. The Minister’s reform agenda is based on the following belief: “All students are entitled to an excellent education.
1 Orientation 101 General Education Program Student Learning Outcomes.
General Education Curriculum Assessment Why, What, How.
Briar Hill School Data Summary Fall Student Diversity: ESL, Special Education Based on 194 students % of Population Gifted 5% Other Mild/moderate.
>>> It is of the utmost importance for myself, as a teacher, to exhibit a thorough understanding of teacher standards >>> It is of the utmost importance.
SUMMARY OF SMALL GROUP MEETING DISCUSSIONS MUHAMMAD DAWOOD, HERMAN GARCIA, DAVID SMITH, KATHRYN STONER, MARK A WALKER.
Developing Program Learning Outcomes To help in the quality of services.
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U.
CORE COMPETENCIES CORE COMPETENCIES ARE SETS OF INTELLECTUAL, PERSONAL, AND SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL PROFICIENCIES THAT ALL STUDENTS NEED TO DEVELOP IN ORDER.
Arkansas State University – Jonesboro Institutional Priority “Develop a culture of learning to enhance institutional outcomes”
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Orange Coast College Office of Institutional Effectiveness ISLO Update to Institutional Effectiveness Committee 4/25/2014 ISLO GE SLO Local AA/AS.
Competencies for the 21 st Century LEMA VISION MISSION & STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLO)
National Educational Technology Standards For Students.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Middle Years Programme (MYP)
Report from Curriculum Committee 4/3/2017
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Grade 6 Outdoor School Program Curriculum Map
A new “pre-graduation expectation” for graduating seniors
MYP 101 The Basics of the IB Middle Years Program
Foundation of Discipline-Specific Knowledge and Understanding
Presentation transcript:

Trevecca Nazarene University

 Why have a General Education curriculum?  How is General Education assessed?  What were the results of last year’s assessment?

 General Education Curriculum ◦ Develop skills for life-long learning

 General Education Curriculum ◦ Develop skills for life-long learning ◦ Expand the learner’s worldview

 General Education Curriculum ◦ Develop skills for life-long learning ◦ Expand the learner’s worldview ◦ Locate the Major within human knowledge Major/Minor General Education Body of Knowledge

Institutional Educational Goals General Education Outcomes Institutional Educational Goals 1. Leadership, Service 2. Disciplined reflection 3. Factors shaping civilization 4. Appreciates global diversity 5. Write, speak, use technology 6. Think critically 7. Engenders wholeness 8. Productive influence General Education Outcomes 1. speak, write 2. Holy Bible 3. Wesleyan-Holiness tradition 4. Systematic problem-solver 5. Global civilization 6. Modes of thinking 7. Christian faith and knowledge 8. Cultural diversity 9. Stewards of resources

 Outcomes Assessment Cycle

 Third-party standardized test ◦ Norm-referenced: 32 doctoral/research universities ◦ Criterion-referenced: skills, content  Multiple and varied approaches ◦ Self-generated content questions ◦ Self-generated survey questions ◦ Samples of student work

 ETS-Proficiency Profile ◦ Measures 4 skills:  Critical Thinking  Reading  Writing  Mathematics ◦ In 3 contexts:  Humanities  Social Science  Natural Science Humanities Social Science Natural Science

 Norm-referenced: Seniors; 301institutions of all types ◦ TNU Total Score: 47 th percentile (n=235) CohortPercentile Traditional63 Non-traditional20 Combined47

 Norm-referenced: Seniors; 32 doctoral/research univ. ◦ TNU Total Score: 27 th percentile (n=235) CohortPercentile Traditional42 Non-traditional17 Combined27

Met or exceeded the criterion for 4 of 8 assessment measures Complete report:

 1: …demonstrate competency in oral and written communication exhibiting an awareness of content, purpose, and audience while accurately using Standard English (written). ◦ Goal: 4.5 average score for all papers ◦ Actual mean: 4.44%

 4: …will use the scientific method, scientific inquiry, and perform basic mathematical and statistical tasks to analyze and solve problems.  Two measures were used ◦ ETS PP Natural Sciences context score ◦ ETS PP Mathematics skill score ◦ Goal: 67 th percentile for each area ◦ Actual: Natural Sciences, 80 th (met) Mathematics, 60 th (not met) CohortNtl SciMath Traditional8060 Non-Trad5623 Combined8060

 6: …demonstrate an understanding and practice of various intellectual modes of thinking.  Two measures were used ◦ Science Lab report score (met) ◦ ETS PP Critical Thinking competency: 15% will score “proficient” and 25% will score “marginally proficient” ◦ Actual: 4% proficient, 28% marginally proficient (not met) ◦ Affinity group: (8% proficient, 20% marginally proficient) (Norm-reference: 34 th percentile) CohortProficientMarginally Proficient Traditional5%29% Non-trad.1%25% Combined4%28%

Criterion measures

 8: …demonstrate an understanding of cultural diversity with a capacity to positively engage others.  Three question were asked ◦ Q1…value perspectives different than mine ◦ Q2…comfortable socializing with (different) ethnic groups ◦ Q3…understand cultures outside USA ◦ Goal: 80% will agree/strongly agree Q1 IdeasQ2 SocialQ3 Cultures Agree/St. Agree68%42%41%

 Norm-referenced: Seniors/all institution types ◦ Critical Thinking: 34 th (95% c.i.: 20-54) ◦ Reading: 47 th (95% c.i.: 30-71) ◦ Writing: 58 th (95% c.i.: 58-94) ◦ Mathematics: 33 rd (95% c.i.: 17-52)

 Norm-referenced: Seniors/all institution types ◦ Humanities: 33 rd (95% c.i.: 18-59) ◦ Social Sciences: 22 nd (95% c.i.: 22-66) ◦ Natural Sciences: 50 th (95% c.i.: 27-75)

 Criterion –referenced classifications SkillClassification ProficientMarginalNot Proficient Reading 169%20%11% Reading 244%16%40% Critical Thinking4%28%68% Writing 177%17%7% Writing 223%44%33% Writing 39%37%54% Math 152%29%19% Math 226%27%47% Math 36%14%81%

 Criterion –referenced classifications SkillClassification ProficientMarginalNot Proficient Reading 169%70%20%17%11%13% Reading 244%42%16%19%40%39% Critical Thinking4% 8%28%20%68%71% Writing 177%66%17%25%7% 9% Writing 223%22%44%37%33%41% Writing 39% 37%28%54%63% Math 152%59%29%23%19% Math 226%33%27%25%47%42% Math 36%10%14%18%81%72%

 Combining traditional and non-traditional student scores will affect assessment results  Emphasize mathematical concepts across the curriculum  Embrace diversity—ethnic, cultural, and ideological—and help students respond and reflect in Christ-like ways  Will UR-QEP improve critical thinking skill?

Excellence Good Enough Indifference PastPresentFuture

Discussion