New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority A business unit of the Ministry of Health

National Health Committee A regulators perspective on the integration of complementary medicines into the management of chronic diseases. Dr Stewart S Jessamine Principal Technical Specialist Medsafe

The Case For Regulation Evidence based practice requires evidence of: –Safety – –Quality –Efficacy Medicines are not items of ordinary commerce –Oversight by an expert authority is necessary.

Current Regulatory Controls

Balancing Expectations Regulation IndustryRegulator Consumers

Shared Expectations Products: Safe High Quality Effective Predictable Accessible Regulation: Simple Risk based Cost efficient Transparent Equitable

International Requirements WHO - support registration and quality controls for complementary medicines USA - DSHEA limits claims, introducing quality controls,proposing to introduce active regulation. Europe – increasing regulatory controls on complementary medicines, herbal and traditional medicines and adverse reactions monitoring. Australia – pre-market approval, standards, quality (GMP), claims limited by evidence, controls over advertising, adverse reactions monitoring Canada – new legislation, registration, quality (GMP), controls over claims, adverse reactions monitoring

Risk Assessment Risk identification: Intrinsic – risk arising from the ingrediants themselves e.g. aristolochia. Extrinsic – risk arising from the way goods are manufactured e.g. spiking with sildenafil. Inappropriate use - risk arising from misuse, abuse e.g. 1,4 butandiol, misinformed use, and inappropriate claims e.g. lyprinol. Risk Management Strategy –Legislation introducing: Minimum quality standards Ingredient safety requirements Adverse reactions monitoring Appropriate therapeutic claims

Scope and Coverage of the Regulatory Scheme Manufacture, import, supply, promotion and export of therapeutic products in New Zealand and Australia Prescription medicines, non-prescription medicines, complementary medicines, medical devices and other therapeutic products

Key Elements of the Regulatory Framework for Medicines Compliance with standards Licensing of manufacturers Product licensing Post-market monitoring and surveillance

Risk Classification for Medicines Class I –Contain only ingredients from permitted list; no scheduled medicines –Product not for prevention or treatment of a serious disease –Excludes products required to be sterile (e.g. injections, eye drops) All other medicines are Class II medicines

Licensing of Manufacturers Agency will license New Zealand and Australian manufacturers Manufacturers audited for compliance with manufacturing principles Licence issued subject to conditions Annual fee and declarations to maintain licence Certain medicines or persons exempt

Product Licensing For Class I complementary medicines –Simple, internet based application system –Relies on sponsor self-assessing product against a set of requirements –No pre-market evaluation by agency –No delay to market entry For Class II complementary medicines –Sponsor submits application for evaluation by agency –Data requirements depend on characteristics of product

Product Licensing (continued) Export-only PL available (internet-based application) Each PL has a unique identifier Product licence document sets out particulars of product and conditions subject to which licence is issued

Product Licensing (continued) PL may be varied PL may be revoked or suspended Certain medicines exempt from PL requirement Separate PL for each separate product (some grouping possible)

Ingredients Permitted in Class I Complementary Medicines New list at start-up of joint agency List will include ingredients currently permitted in Listable medicines in Australia, plus those added as a result of Permitted Ingredients List project Process for adding new ingredients to list

Expert Advisory Committee on Complementary Medicines Appointed by Ministerial Council Members chosen for their expertise Provide advice to the Managing Director

Post-market Monitoring and Surveillance Product testing programme Adverse reactions monitoring Complaints investigations Recalls

Fees and Charges Agency to operate on full cost recovery Fees and charges prescribed in Rules Fees and charges model is under development Consultation to occur on a set of proposals

Review of Decisions Merits review –Internal review –Review by independent merits review tribunal Judicial review –Existing judicial review arrangements maintained –Review in one country or the other –Decision has effect in both countries

Next Steps Exposure drafts of regulatory requirements Rules finalised after stakeholders consulted Bills passed 2005 Treaty ratified Agency opens doors mid-2005

Keeping up to date …… Subscribe to Medsafe service for news and site updates: