High-Cadence EUV Imaging, Radio, and In-Situ Observations of Coronal Shocks and Energetic Particles: Implications for Particle Acceleration K. A. Kozarev.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Heavy Ion Abundances in Large Solar Energetic Particle Events Spring AGU 2006, SH43B-04 Heavy Ion Abundances in Large Solar Energetic Particle Events Spring.

Advertisements

The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory SHINE 2005, July 11-15, 2005 Transient Shocks and Associated Energetic Particle Events Observed.

SEP Data Analysis and Data Products for EMMREM Mihir I. Desai & Arik Posner Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, Texas Mihir I. Desai & Arik Posner.

On the link between the solar energetic particles and eruptive coronal phenomena On the link between the solar energetic particles and eruptive coronal.

THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC TRANSPORT OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLES IN THE INNER HELIOSPHERE CRISM- 2011, Montpellier, 27 June – 1 July, Collaborators:

R. P. Lin Physics Dept & Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley The Solar System: A Laboratory for the Study of the Physics of Particle.

Hot Precursor Ejecta and Other Peculiarities of the 2012 May 17 Ground Level Enhancement Event N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2, N. V. Nitta 3, I. Usoskin 4,

Flare Luminosity and the Relation to the Solar Wind and the Current Solar Minimum Conditions Roderick Gray Research Advisor: Dr. Kelly Korreck.

MHD modeling of coronal disturbances related to CME lift-off J. Pomoell 1, R. Vainio 1, S. Pohjolainen 2 1 Department of Physics, University of Helsinki.

Weaker Solar Wind Over the Protracted Solar Minimum Dave McComas Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, TX With input from and thanks to Heather Elliott,

Strength of Coronal Mass Ejection- driven Shocks Near the Sun and Its Importance in Predicting Solar Energetic Particle Events Chenglong Shen 1, Yuming.

SH13A-2240 Automatic Detection of EUV Coronal Loops from SDO-AIA Data Alissa N. Oppenheimer¹ ( ), A. Winebarger², S. Farid³,

SEP Acceleration Mechanisms Dennis K. Haggerty and Edmond C. Roelof Johns Hopkins U./Applied Physics Lab. ACE/SOHO/STEREO/Wind Workshop Kennebunkport,

Electron Acceleration at the Solar Flare Reconnection Outflow Shocks Gottfried Mann, Henry Aurass, and Alexander Warmuth Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam,

STEREO AND SPACE WEATHER Variable conditions in space that can have adverse effects on human life and society Space Weather: Variable conditions in space.

Coronal Loop Oscillations and Flare Shock Waves H. S. Hudson (UCB/SSL) & A. Warmuth (Astrophysical Institute Potsdam) Coronal loop oscillations: introduction.

SDO/AIA science plan: prioritization and implementation: Five Objectives in 10 steps [session no.]1 I: C1/M8/C10 Transients: Drivers & Destabilization.

Vincent Surges Advisors: Yingna Su Aad van Ballegooijen Observations and Magnetic Field Modeling of a flare/CME event on 2010 April 8.

30-Day Science Plan Angelos Vourlidas, Russ Howard SECCHI Consortium Meeting IAS 8 March 2007.

The Hunt for a Link : Quantitative Connections Between Magnetic Fields and EIT Coronal Wave/CME Properties Prepared by James R. Robertson J.R. In conjunction.

Coronal Loop Oscillations Seen in Unprecedented Detail by SDO/AIA Rebecca White and Erwin Verwichte University of Warwick, Centre for Fusion, Space and.

CME-driven Shocks in White Light Observations SOHO/LASCO C3 – CME May 5 th, 1999 CME-driven Shock We demonstrate that CME-driven shocks: (1) can be detected.

SEPs and Solar Radio Bursts S. Krucker and H. Hudson Time-of-flight analysis of SEP propagation Connectivity of the SEP field lines SIRA relevance.

Energetic Neutral Atoms from Solar Flares H. S. Hudson 1, S. Frewen 1, R. P. Lin 1, A. L. MacKinnon 2, J. C. Raymond 3, and A. Y. Shih 1 1 University of.

Coronal Loop Oscillations and Flare Shock Waves H. S. Hudson (UCB/SSL) & A. Warmuth (Astrophysical Institute Potsdam) Coronal loop oscillations: (Fig.

DOPPLER DOPPLER A Space Weather Doppler Imager Mission Concept Exploration Science Objectives What are the most relevant observational signatures of flare,

Constraints on Particle Acceleration from Interplanetary Observations R. P. Lin together with L. Wang, S. Krucker at UC Berkeley, G Mason at U. Maryland,

The nature of impulsive solar energetic particle events N. V. Nitta a, H. S. Hudson b, M. L. Derosa a a Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory.

SDO/AIA science plan: prioritization and implementation: Five Objectives in 10 steps [C1]1 I: C1/M8/C10 Transients: Drivers & Destabilization Chair(s):

EUV vs. B-field Comparisons Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Coauthours: Leon Golub, Aad Van Ballegooijen, Maurice Gros. HMI/AIA Science.

F1B: Determine the Dominant Processes of Particle Acceleration Phase , Open the Frontier UV Spectroscopic determin- ation of pre/post-shock density,

CME Workshop Elmau, Feb , WORKING GROUP C: ENERGETIC PARTICLE OBSERVATIONS Co-Chairs: Klecker, Kunow SUMMARY FROM SESSION 1B Discussion of.

Solar Origin of energetic particle events Near-relativistic impulsive electron events observed at 1 AU M. Pick, D. Maia, S.J. Wang, A. Lecacheux, D. Haggery,

Modeling suprathermal proton acceleration by an ICME within 0.5 AU: the May 13, 2005 event K. A. Kozarev 1,5 R. M. Evans 2, M. A. Dayeh.

Long-Lasting 3 He-Rich Solar Energetic Particle Sources R. Bučík, D. E. Innes, U. Mall, A. Korth (MPS) G. M. Mason (JHU) R. Gómez-Herrero (UAH) STEREO.

Pietro Zucca, Eoin Carley, Shaun Bloomfield, Peter Gallagher

Shock wave formation heights using 2D density and Alfvén maps of the corona ABSTRACT Coronal shock waves can produce decametric radio emission known Type.

The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…

Modeling Coronal Acceleration of Solar Energetic Protons K. A. Kozarev, R. M. Evans, N. A. Schwadron, M. A. Dayeh, M. Opher, K. E. Korreck NESSC Meeting,

IHY Workshop A PERSONAL VIEW OF SOLAR DRIVERS for Solar Wind Coronal Mass Ejections Solar Energetic Particles Solar Flares.

Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.

195 Å image – behind 195 Å image – Sun- Earth line – SOHO/ EIT image 195 Å image – Sun- Earth line – SOHO/ EIT image 195 Å image – ahead SECCHI Extreme.

Elemental Abundance variations of the Suprathermal Heavy Ion Population over solar cycle 23 M. Al Dayeh, J.R. Dwyer, H.K. Rassoul Florida Institute of.

New inferences on the physical nature and the causes of coronal shocks Alexander Warmuth Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam.

Solar Radio Monitoring at Nançay Observatory - spectrography and imaging K.-L. Klein, A. Kerdraon, A. Lecacheux

Quasi-periodic upflows in the solar active region Hui Tian High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research ASP research review 2010/10/27.

SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Detailed comparison of active regions AR9906 and AR0069 in the build-up to the SEP events of 21 Apr 2002 and 24 Aug 2002 D.

Effective drift velocity and initiation times of interplanetary type-III radio bursts Dennis K. Haggerty and Edmond C. Roelof The Johns Hopkins University.

Solar origin of SEP events and dynamical behaviour of the corona Monique Pick, Dalmiro Maia, and S. Edward Hawkins LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, Meudon,

Fast Magnetosonic Waves and Global Coronal Seismology in the Extended Solar Corona Ryun Young Kwon, Jie Zhang, Maxim Kramar, Tongjiang Wang, Leon Ofman,

Flare Ribbon Expansion and Energy Release Ayumi ASAI Kwasan and Hida Observatories, Kyoto University Explosive Phenomena in Magnetized Plasma – New Development.

Stuart D. BaleFIELDS SOC CDR – Science Requirements Solar Probe Plus FIELDS SOC CDR Science and Instrument Overview Science Requirements Stuart D. Bale.

ISSI, Beijing, China. The famous example of the decaying kink oscillations of coronal loops observed with the TRACE ISSI, Beijing,

Karl-Ludwig Klein

Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.

1 SEP sources investigations with PHI aboard Solar Orbiter (SO) R. Bucik, D.E. Innes, J. Hirzberger, S.K. Solanki first ever investigations of the SEPs.

Interplanetary proton and electron enhancements associated with radio-loud and radio-quiet CME-driven shocks P. Mäkelä 1,2, N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2,

CME-driven Shocks in White Light Observations Verónica Ontiveros National University of Mexico, MEXICO George Mason University,USA Angelos Vourlidas Naval.

An Introduction to Observing Coronal Mass Ejections

R. Miteva1, K.-Ludwig Klein1, Ines Kienriech2,

Dong Li Purple Mountain Observatory, CAS

Elemental Abundance variations of the Suprathermal Heavy Ion Population over solar cycle 23 M. Al Dayeh, J.R. Dwyer, H.K. Rassoul Florida Institute of.

Particle Acceleration at Coronal Shocks: the Effect of Large-scale Streamer-like Magnetic Field Structures Fan Guo (Los Alamos National Lab), Xiangliang.

Coronal and interplanetary radio emission as a tracer of solar energetic particle propagation Karl-Ludwig Klein (F Meudon)

Difficult to relate EIT waves to other phenomena due to cadence

XRT Particle Acceleration at Magnetic Reconnection Sites

SMALL SEP EVENTS WITH METRIC TYPE II RADIO BURSTS

SEP EVENTS AND THE ROLE OF FLARES AND SHOCKS

High-cadence Radio Observations of an EIT Wave

V. Grechnev1, A. Uralov1, I. Kuzmenko2, A. Kochanov1, V

Presentation transcript:

High-Cadence EUV Imaging, Radio, and In-Situ Observations of Coronal Shocks and Energetic Particles: Implications for Particle Acceleration K. A. Kozarev 1,2, K. E. Korreck 2, V. V. Lobzin 3, M. A. Dayeh 4, R. Ebert 4, M. A. Weber 2, N. A. Schwadron 5 (1) Boston University, Boston, MA, USA (2) Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA, USA (3) University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia (4) Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, USA (5) University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA 2011 EGU General Assembly, April 6, 2011 Vienna, Austria

Outline - Background - The June 12 and 13, 2010 events - Observations - Interpretation - Conclusions - Future work

Outline - Background - The June 12 and 13, 2010 events - Observations - Interpretation - Conclusions - Future work

Background - Energetic particles accelerated and released by mechanisms related to flares and CMEs in the solar corona; Shocks of particular interest. - Remote observations of coronal shocks have been difficult, due to limited spatial and temporal coverage. Main problem was time cadence. - The Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) provides ultra-high cadence observations of coronal EUV phenomena; Main questions: 1. Can coronal shocks be detected with EUV observations? 2. If so, what can we learn about their efficiency in accelerating/releasing particles into the heliosphere. - Ultimate goal - identify remote EUV wave observables that can be used in modeling and predicting SEP fluxes at 1 AU; This study: Characterize two EUV off-limb waves, attempt to relate wave/shock signatures to particle production and release.

Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA)‏ image:

Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA)‏ logT~6.3 logT~6.1

Outline - Background - The June 12 and 13, 2010 events - Observations - Interpretation - Conclusions - Future work

June 12, 2010 – AIA base difference movies AIA/193 AngstromAIA/211 Angstrom

June 13, 2010 – AIA base difference movies AIA/193 AngstromAIA/211 Angstrom

June 12 and 13, Remote Observations by SDO/AIA and Learmonth Observatory Kozarev et al., submitted to ApJ Letters - Fast coronal waves observed in 193 and 211 Angstrom by AIA; Waves seen over ~5 minutes in AIA field of view. - Wavefront positions measured along radial profiles. - Simultaneous emission of metric radio type II bursts - attributed to shock-accelerated electrons

Wave and shock positions from EUV and radio - EUV wavefront 'nose' positions - shock positions from type II emission, assuming a Newkirk electron density model

EUV and radio kinematics

Thermal and density response of June 13 wave - Performed differential emission measure (DEM) analysis on four regions before and during the June 13 EUV wave - Solutions from two regions significant (R2, R3)‏ - No significant change in temperature profiles, increase of emission measure during wave - Brightening due to density increase - Density ratios - r > Wave possibly a weak shock

Proton observations – GOES and SOHO

Particle observations – STEREO Behind Ahead CIR Figure: STEREO Science Center

Multipoint particle observations – STEREO and ACE CIR Shock? High Fe/O - impulsive

Outline - Background - The June 12 and 13, 2010 events - Observations - Interpretation - Conclusions - Future work

Relevance of magnetic geometry for particle production and release PFSS field lines overlaid on SDO/AIA images

Wave and shock positions from EUV and radio - EUV wavefront 'nose' positions - shock positions from type II emission, assuming a Newkirk electron density model

June 12 and 13, 2010 events: Interpretation - Coronal EUV waves on both days associated with type II radio bursts. - No clear driver on June CME driver seen on June DEM analysis shows wave related to a slight density jump r~ Propagation through model magnetic fields agree with radio emission locations: open geometry and lateral propagation source on June 12, closed geometry and electron acceleration at the shock nose on June Detection of impulsive protons and electrons from June 12 event up to 50 MeV reached ACE and STEREO-A right away; STEREO-B saw a CIR during both events. - Further impulsive particle detections at low energies related to June 13 event at ACE/GOES and STEREO-A. - IP shock possibly related to June 13 event arrived at STEREO-A on June 14.

Conclusions - EUV wave signatures related to coronal shocks - Weak driven coronal shock observed during June 13 event - Magnetic geometry important for particle production/release - Impulsive in situ particle fluxes seen during both events - EUV remote observations potentially helpful in characterizing energetic particle production and release in the solar corona!

Future Work - Perform onset analysis of in situ particle observations for the June 12 and 13, 2010 events - Improve EUV wave detection and kinematic measurements algorithms: limit human interaction - Expand the magnetic geometry analysis to identify shock-to- field angles and shock particle acceleration efficiency - Analyze additional events with EUV, radio, in situ observations

Thank You!