Module 24 STEPS 17, 18, & 19 Project Implementation Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
US Army Corps of Engineers Budgeting Process
Advertisements

Bill Dawson Chief, Policy and Policy Compliance U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bill Dawson Chief, Policy and Policy Compliance U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
US Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division Northwestern Division 1 System Flood Control Review: Regional Agency Review Briefing Lonnie Mettler Northwestern.
Compliance Supplement  What is the Compliance Supplement  Important sections of the CS  For what should or should not be used  New Information for.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Vertical Team Roles & Responsibilities Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
Bradley J. Berg | Rev Introduction to the Interlocal Cooperation Act AWPHD Annual Membership Meeting October 10, 2012.
AIWW Deep Creek Bridge Replacement Information Update
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® West Onslow Beach/ Topsail Beach West Onslow Beach/ Topsail Beach Coastal Storm Damage Reduction Project Town.
1 Grant Award Process Monika Lacka U.S. EPA Region 5.
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Philadelphia District How to start the Corps’ Project Delivery Engine Local Sponsor Identifies A Problem and Requests Corps.
THE PROJECT TEAM TYPICAL REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PROJECT TEAM TRADITIONAL TEAM ORGANIZATION AND VARIATIONS THE OWNER’S TEAM THE DESIGN.
Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
Engineer Circular Requests to Alter USACE Projects
Module 23 STEPS 15 & 16 Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) and Other Decision Documents Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Module 2 Course Objectives & Goals Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Module 5 Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11. Civil Works Project Delivery Process Step 10 Division Engineer's Transmittal Letter Step 6 Negotiate.
Federal Funding Process LYNDA HOFFMAN, WATERWAYS DIVISION MANAGER.
Module 25 STEPS 20 & 21 CONSTRUCTION and OPERATION & MAINTENANCE Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Module 12 STEPS 6 & 7 Negotiation of PMP/FCSA and Execution of Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Briefing to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board on Status of the FCSA July 12, 2013 Central Valley Integrated Flood Management Study.
Module 22 STEPS 11, 12, 13 & 14 Washington Level and Administration Review Processes Module 22 STEPS 11, 12, 13 & 14 Washington Level and Administration.
Module 9 STEP 2 Congressional Study Resolution/ Authorization Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Module 10 Step 3 Initial Study Funding (incl. Civil Works Budget Process) Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Indiana University East March 10, 2009 Teresa Miller, Manager Office of Research Administration – Grant Services.
GSFC Procurement Operations Division Effective March 1, 2006 Updated August 22, 2012 Appointment and Training of Contracting Officers and Other Buying.
Unit 8:COOP Plan and Procedures  Explain purpose of a COOP plan  Propose an outline for a COOP plan  Identify procedures that can effectively support.
Module 29 Interagency & International Support Program Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
1 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Indian River Lagoon North Restoration Feasibility Study Public Meeting September.
Module 27 Continuing Authorities Program Module 27 Continuing Authorities Program Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Module 11 STEPS 4 & 5 Conduct Reconnaissance Study & Report Certification Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAFCA Board Update Dan Tibbitts Senior Project Manager Common Features Levee Programs Branch Sacramento District.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® US Army Corps of Engineers Watershed Authorities, Policies and Procedures Michael Greer Regional Technical.
The CDM Project Cycle. The first step -- submit a PIN (template on Description of Project Proponent Type of Project Location of.
WB Carbon Finance Project Cycle and Role of Key Players Introduction to Carbon Finance March 10, 2004.
Civil Works Transformation Foundations of SMART Planning
Programmatic Regulations PDT Workshop COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN April 18, 2002.
Module 20 STEP 10 Division Engineer’s Transmittal Letter
Welcome To: PCC4: Economic Analysis In Planning U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Planners Core Curriculum.
Building Strong! May Deep Draft Navigation Cost Sharing Jeremy LaDart Office of Water Project Review HQUSACE.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11 AUTHORIZATION AND APPROPRIATION OR “It Takes Two to Tango"
BUSINESS AFFAIRS – CONTRACTS TRAINING PROCESSING CONTRACTS THROUGH WSU’s OFFICE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRS.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Planning Products & Milestones Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
US Army Corps of Engineers Chicago District FY04tpr\skbcongressional Civil Works Program Missions Missions Process Process Select Authorities Select Authorities.
Winter Leader Conference February 4, 2009 “ Building Strong “1 Budgets and Appropriations: Restoring our Infrastructure Budgets and Appropriations: Restoring.
Chapter 11: Alternative Approach - Purchasing Systems.
Request to Alter USACE Projects
US Army Corps of Engineers PLANNING SMART BUILDING STRONG ® U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CIVIL WORKS TRANSFORMATION: SMART PLANNING AND RESCOPING CHARETTES.
1 DELEGATIONS & PROCESSING  Delegations  Processing  Common Issues – Problems  Unique Situations / Future Attractions Steve Cone (CECW-PC) SAD Water.
1 Natomas Levee Improvement Program Crediting Issues Before the Central Valley Flood Protection Board February, 2009 Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency.
1 Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting April 13, 2005 Project Manager.
BUILDING STRONG ® Levee Safety Program  Levee Safety Program Implementation Guidance provided by HQUSACE in 2007 (Post Hurricane Katrina) ► Designate.
2 West Sacramento, California Project General Reevaluation Report Letter of Support for the West Sacramento General Reevaluation Report Agenda Item 4G:
BUILDING STRONG ® PLANNING SMART ® US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Partnering Opportunities for Water Supply and Distribution Planning Beverley.
US Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento DistrictIntroductionIntroduction Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Phase II Supplemental Authorization –
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® OVERVIEW OF THE CIVIL WORKS PROCESS Planning Principles & Procedures – FY 11.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® BUILDING STRONG SM The Louisville Engineer District CORPS 101 Brandon R. Brummett, P.E., PMP Outreach Coordinator.
1 Calcasieu River & Pass, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting February 2, 2005 Project Manager Mireya Laigast, Civil Engineer,
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
US Army Corps of Engineers PLANNING SMART BUILDING STRONG ® PCoP Webinar Series Section 7001: Preparing the 2017 Annual Report to Congress on Future Water.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency The Approved Application, NOGA, Budget, and Provisions & Assurances Sorting It All Out.
Role of LAF in projects with new implementation modalities
Mahoning County Informational Meeting USACE Programs, Authorities, and Ohio Silver Jackets Program Presented by: Ashley Stephens 16 August 2016.
Continuing Authorities Program
Budget and Appropriations 101
Partnering with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
PRIP 101 Revolving Fund and the Plant Replacement and Improvement Program (PRIP) ER Nov-18.
Module 27 Continuing Authorities Program
TOTAL COST CONTROL ON CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
Presentation transcript:

Module 24 STEPS 17, 18, & 19 Project Implementation Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11

OBJECTIVESOBJECTIVES This module will provide an overview of: — The purpose of the PPA — Guidance on PPA development — Components of the PPA package — PPA review process — Congressional Appropriations — PPA Approval and Execution

STEP 17 Project Partnership Agreement (PPA) Draft and Approval

What is a PPA ? — Legally binding document (contract) — Executed between Corps & Non-Federal Sponsor(s) — Establishes terms of funding, construction, and OMRR&R of the project

Brief History of PPA’s — Prior to Letter of Assurance — Flood Control Act Section 221 Agreement — Supplemental Appropriation Act 1985: – Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) process – Required cost sharing (but not defined) – Required financing plan — WRDA Further defined project cost sharing – Model Project Cooperation Agreements (PCA) developed by task forces

PPA Evolution — Letter of Assurance — Section 221 Agreement — Local Cooperation Agreement — Project Cooperation Agreement...now to

PPA Guidance - Specifically Authorized Projects – ER , Project Cooperation Agreement for New Start Construction (WRDA 2007 will require changes) – Series of Policy Guidance Letters – Annual Program Budget EC for CW Action – EC , Delegation of Review, Approval, and Signature Authority for Project Cooperation Agreements for Specifically Authorized Projects

— CONSTRUCTION COST SHARING : Flood Risk Management – varies from 50/50 to 65/35 Ecosystem Restoration – usually 65/35 Inland Navigation - 50/50 (Inland Waterways Trust Fund) Deep Draft Navigation - proportional to depth of construction: Non-Federal share is 10% to Depths of 20 feet; 25% between 20 and 45 feet; and 50% over 45 feet. Recreation - 50/50 PPA Guidance - Specifically Authorized Projects

PPA Required For: — New Start: - Construction Project - Separable Element — Deficiency Correction — Reconstruction Projects

PPA Modifications Not Required: — Changes during construction for technical or cost reasons — Modifications due to Section 902 issue — Change in method of Non-Federal Payment — Recreation facilities added at full Non-Federal expense

Development of PPA — Sponsor requirements discussed in Feasibility Phase — Model provided to sponsor — Tailor PPA for unique project aspects — Floodplain Management Plan now a legal requirement (WRDA 99) — Actual negotiation during PED

PPA Package — Draft PPA – Certificate of Authority – Lobbying Certificate – Unsigned Disclosure Form — List of PPA Deviations and Reasons — Signed Certificate of Legal Review — Federal/non-Federal Allocation Table

PPA Package (cont.) — Non-Federal Financial Analysis: – Financial Plan – Sponsor’s Self-Certification of Financial Capability — PPA Checklist (6 Copies of PPA package w/2 copies of Decision Document to RIT)

Washington Review: — Based on PPA package — Regional Integration Team - HQ PPA review — Consistency with Approved Decision Document — Environmental Requirements are Satisfied — Consistent treatment of Sponsors — Firm project cost estimate — Non-Federal cash requirement and LERRD value — Financing Plan — Credits Model PPAs - Found on Legal Services homepage

Typical PPA Problems: — Decision Document not approved! — District/Sponsor deviations on PPA overruled — Incomplete “shaky” 3rd Party Agreement — Changes in project definition — Poorly defined relocation and disposal area responsibilities

PPA Approval — HQ notification to District that PPA package is approved by HQ and OASA(CW) — Project has received construction authorization from Congress — Project is included as a new start in the President’s budget or is included in Appropriations Act.

STEP 18 Congressional Appropriations

See Module 10

The Appropriations Bill becomes law upon signature by the President

STEP 19 PPA Execution

PPA Execution — Construction funds have been included in the Appropriations Act — Is a media event on many projects — Signed by the local sponsor and a representative of the Army (varies)

PPA Execution — After PPA execution the local sponsor can be instructed to begin acquisition of real estate needed for the project. — Real estate acquisition can be time consuming and a major headache for the sponsor, so many sponsors will begin acquiring real estate prior to PPA execution (even before Congressional authorization). — Early acquisition of real estate is legal, but the sponsor is assuming all of the risk that the project will ultimately be built. The Federal government will not accept any liability for early real estate acquisition.