Accademia Aeronautica Pozzuoli 3rd june 2015 Alessandro Cardi Head of Technical Regulation Directorate Remoted Piloted Aircraft System Regulation 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DIRECTION TECHNIQUE CERTIFICATION Ce document est la propriété intellectuelle de Dasssault Aviation.Il ne peut être utilisé, reproduit, modifié ou communiqué
Advertisements

1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
EUROCAE WG 73: UAS integration Elements for the European Commission UAS panel Presentation at Workshop 2 UAS insertion into airspace Gérard Mardiné (SAFRAN-Sagem)
1 UAS INTEGRATION & FREQUENCY SPECTRUM Mike Lissone EUROCONTROL UAS FOCAL POINT 2nd EU UAS PANEL WORKSHOP 2011 September , 2011.
Unmanned Aircraft Systems EUROCONTROL ATM Integration
Experiences on the road to Fatigue Risk Management Regulation
Loftur Jónasson, ICAO 11 March 2013
General introduction to the New Approach and CE marking Contribution to workshop in Sofia, Bulgaria on 19 and 20 april 2006 by Annette Dragsdahl, Senior.
Casa RPAS regulatory Development
COSCAP -NAApril direction générale de l ’Aviation civile 8th Steering Commitee meeting COSCAP- NA (Beijing, April 2008) direction générale de l’Aviation.
Gregory S. Winton, Esq. The Aviation Law Firm
1 Global Real Estate Valuation Policy Update: the European Perspective The principle: the EU Treaty does not provide the European institutions with direct.
Opening the European market for civil drones in an appropriate way: the role of the EU Jean-Pierre LENTZ European Commission DG Growth.
The Canadian Federal Pilots Association Presentation to Conciliation Board Ottawa, ON - May 30 - June 2, 2002.
ICAO Provisions for Safety Management
6th Framework Programme Thematic Priority Aeronautics and Space.
International Civil Aviation Organization WRC-15 Agenda Item 1.5 Fixed Satellite Service spectrum to support the safe operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.
IAOPA Europe Regional Meeting Athens, 27. September 2014 GA Roadmap Update.
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness certificates - general Airworthiness Certificates – General introduction Peter Corbeel Rulemaking Directorate.
Safe Working Procedure – First Aid Learning Objectives: By the end of this program participants will be able to demonstrate their understanding of the.
International Civil Aviation Organization Unmanned Aircraft Systems International Standards Progress Leslie Cary Secretary UAS Study Group Technical Officer,
UAS in civil applications – New challenges - General Aviation Safety Program Diana Dumitrache – President.
Pilotless Aircraft / Remotely Piloted Aircraft Instructor Seminar August 2011.
Unmanned Aircraft Systems
Putting it all Together Discussion with Designated Examiners Commercial.
FAA ICAO ANNEX 6 PROPOSAL & OVERSIGHT ISSUES IN DISPATCH
International Civil Aviation Organization Remotely-Piloted Aircraft Systems Saulo Da Silva Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology (Bangkok,
1 Small Unmanned Aircraft – Regulations and Safety Threats AOA Safety Conference – 23 Jun 2015 Gerry Corbett UK CAA UAS Programme Lead.
Joint ACAC/ACI Seminar on Certification of Aerodromes Marrakech, 5–6 September 2003 David Gamper, Director, Technical/Safety Airports Council International.
Presented to: 2012 Pacific Aviation Director’s Workshop, Guam By: Juan S.A. Reyes, A.C.E., ACSI Date: March 13-15, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration.
MARPA and You Working Together to Make PMA Successful March 31, 2011 Gorham Conference 1 Modification and Replacement Parts Association (MARPA)
Proposal to the MDM.032 Working Group Y Morier Meeting
Can our ATM systems cope?
6-1 Design of UAV Systems UAV operating environmentsc 2002 LM Corporation Lesson objective - to discuss UAV Operating Environments including … National.
5/26/20161 AUDIT SERVICES PRIVATE/CORPORATE Captain Iain Tulloch tel /
10/31/06 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Civil Aviation.
WORKSHOP, Nicosia 2-3rd July 2008 “Extension of SAFETY & QUALITY Common Requirements to the EMAC States” Item 3 : Regulatory Context Peter Stastny EUROCONTROL.
Presented to: Central Florida Pilots By: FAASTeam Date: 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Downloaded from FAASTeam Presentation The Flight.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: 2008 US/Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: Robert W. Reich, Asst Manager (Operations), Seattle.
Presented to: CFI Workshops By: FAASTeam Date: April 1, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration CFI Workshop 7 Core Topic 14 Flight Review.
08 June 2006 Portland 2006: aircraft certification session Yves Morier The EASA Advance -NPA for UAV systems Certification Presentation by: Y Morier EASA.
U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: James Ballough, FAA, and Claude Probst, EASA Date: June 4, 2008 “Global Safety Management: Revolution.
FAA sUAS ARC Support Documentation © ASTM International. All Rights Reserved. The Unmanned Aircraft System Initiative F38 on Unmanned Aircraft Systems.
European Aviation Safety Agency Head of Aircraft Product Certification
Ensuring the Safety of Future Developments
8 June 2006Portland, Oregon, USAE. Sivel EASA Working Group on regulation of non-complex motor aircraft engaged in non-commercial operations E Sivel (EASA)
Deputy Head of Federal Accreditation Service Sergey V. Migin Approximation of accreditation systems of European Union and Russia.
Bringing an SMS Manual to Life Simon Roberts SMS Programme Lead UK CAA.
High Fidelity Simulation as a Route to Certification Autonomous Systems: Legal / Regulatory Aspects and V&V Workshop 22 nd February 2016 Dr. M. Jump.
© International Road Transport Union (IRU) IRU Academy Seminar, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsPage 1 5 th International IRU Academy Seminar on Driver.
Authority Requirements Margit Markus Tallinn, 7 May 2009.
~ RPAS use and regulation of civil Air Traffic Control point of view Acceptable and reasonable rules are needed Mr. Kornél Szepessy CEO 3-4th of November.
Module 02 Essential Requirements for ATCOs. Training Objectives  Appreciate the content of the essential requirements for ATCOs as described within EASA.
EU rules for Third Country operators ??
REGULATING DRONES AND LIABILITY ISSUES
Drones, RPAS, UAV’s, UAS Unmanned aircraft.
Remotely-Piloted Aircraft Systems
Juan Vázquez Sanz EUROCONTROL SRU
UAV Center Finland date of opening
ICAO Circular 323 Guidelines for Aviation English Training Programmes
Sri Lanka's Experience with ICAO TCB Projects
Loftur Jónasson, ICAO 11 March 2013
TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE
Session – 4: Existing ICAO Standards relating to Air Traffic Control
1 Million+ UAS Registrations
Remotely-Piloted Aircraft Systems
An RPAS perspective for regulation of future aerospace operations
WRC-15 Agenda Item 1.5 Fixed Satellite Service spectrum to support the safe operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems Aeronautical Spectrum Workshop Preparation.
WRC-15 Agenda Item 1.5 Fixed Satellite Service spectrum to support the safe operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems Aeronautical Spectrum Workshop Preparation.
Presentation transcript:

Accademia Aeronautica Pozzuoli 3rd june 2015 Alessandro Cardi Head of Technical Regulation Directorate Remoted Piloted Aircraft System Regulation 1

2 Setting the scene  Started as an amatorial segment, RPAS are progressively developing new and innovative fields of application and creating opportunities for new business.  RPAS are gathering every day a wider interest in the aviation community.  RPAS definitely comply with ICAO aircraft definition and as an aircraft they must be dealt with.  Even if we are dealing today with low mass RPAS these specific aircraft range from few Kgs to tons and use the common airspace.

3 Setting the scene  The range of application is really wide from basic initial operations in taking pictures or filming in social events to the use in agriculture, building and monument status for restoration or energy savings, environment control, monitoring of territory, film production, etc.  Number of RPAS professional operators is unknown, today around 150 are recognized by ENAC; an estimation made by the main Associations envisage around 500 operators.  ENAC is putting any effort to let them emerge from the grey area.

The need of Regulation  Ensure acceptable level of safey for overflown people, specifically unaware people;  Provide minimum standards to use the airspace without creating hazard to other airspace users;  Provide a regulated environment for aviation industry to develop their business;  Ensure a level playing field in a liberalised market. 4

The existing Regulation “Mezzi aerei a pilotaggio remoto” Published on 17th December 2013 Applicable from 30th April 2014 For SAPR with maximum mass of less than 150 Kg 5

6 The need for change  Adherence to market needs  Use of different concept of operations – conops  Proportionate approach for a risk based regulation  Commision Communication dated 8th April 2014  RIGA Declaration on march 2015  EASA line of actions

The new Regulation  New CONOPS iaw with European principles;  Revised approach for RPAS level of safety;  Exemptions for very low weight RPAS;  New approach for remote pilots qualification, education and training;  Revised provisions for use of airspace and interfaces with airports;  Improved provisions for security. 7

The new CONOPS  Identify operational scenario in terms of risk exposure, from less to more critical;  Uses all fundamental elements on wich safety is built, i.e. aircraft and its technical characteristics, operator and its safety procedures, pilot and its own skill, flight conditions, operation conditions;  Establishes a level of safety for the entire operation and not a fixed one for any single element. 8

The new CONOPS  Recognises that contribution of any single element can differ according to the operational scenario;  Identifies different levels of reliability for SAPR, very low if the operation is not critical, when no person is overflown, higher for operations conducted on populated areas, like cities;  Recognises that contribution of pilots for a safe conduct of operations is fundamental. 9

Reliability of SAPR  No specific level of reliability for SAPR < 25 kg used in VLOS for operations conducted in unpopulated areas;  If operations require to overfly populated areas: - compliance with EUROCAE ED12 level D, -management of data link failure, - independent flight termination system.  Operations conducted with SAPR < 2 kg are considered non critical, can fly over populated areas, if considered not offensive. Construction material, frangibility, shape, protection from rotating blades, etc. 10

The remote pilot From a process of qualification managed by the Operator to a professional “licence”. Need to create a fully responsible actor in the safety value chain. Establishment of a training network where the student pilot receives standardized education and training, including the acquisition of flight skill, and can be examined by a RPAS examiner to get his own class rated “licence”. 11

The remote pilot New Regulation provisions:  approval of the training centres by ENAC;  granting of RPAS examiner rating by ENAC;  issuance of a “licence” under the format of “Attestato di Pilota remoto di APR” by training centre;  type rating under pilot/Operator responsibility;  currency under pilot responsibility; 12

The remote pilot  issuance of a Remote Pilot Licence for SAPR > 25 kg or operated in BLOS by ENAC;  separate training for operation conducted beyond the visual line of sight and for SAPR > 25 kg for wich a type rating is envisaged;  different medical standards for remote pilots, class 3 for licence, used for BLOS operations, and LAPL standards for Attestato, used in VLOS. 13

Regulatory benchmark operations categorization EASA line of actions categorizes SAPR operations as: OPEN SPECIALIZED REGULATED 14

The new Regulation  For “non critical operations” (Open category) the Operator of SAPR < 25 kg used in VLOS conditions has the only requirement to register himself to ENAC web site, receiving in real time a certificate of registration for that type of operations;  The Operator has to comply with the rules regulating the use of airspace, the use of licenced pilots and has to operate his SAPR iaw limitations of its certificate. 15

The new Regulation  For critical operations (Specialized category), the Operator must be authorized by ENAC;  Authorization issued by ENAC on the basis of a satisfactory review of organization and operational procedures, capacity to run a risk assessment and risk management techniques;  Operations conducted in BLOS are addressed in the text but requirements will be defined on specific applications. 16

The future Regulation  For operations conducted with heavier SAPR, in BLOS conditions and in a non segregated airspace (common use of airspace with piloted aircraft) a full certification of all elements of the chain is envisaged as in the traditional aviation environment;  Full opening of airspace to SAPR is waiting for the certification of safe and secure “detect/sense and avoid” systems and data link, either based on radio signal or on satellite system. 17

QUESTIONS? 18