© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

PJM ©2008 Regional Round-up of Demand Response Developments Susan Covino PJM Interconnection A National Town Meeting on Demand Response Washington, DC.
Demand Response Commissioner Suedeen Kelly June 3, 2008.
PG&Es 2009 Participating Load Pilot. 2 Overview Regulatory Context Pilot Characteristics Lessons Next Steps.
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
MISO Day 2: A Transmission Users (Marketers) Perspective Leon White August 8, 2007.
Definition of Firm Energy and Interruptible Transmission Two Issues Causing Problems for Business in the Western Interconnection.
Summary of Proposed Market Rules For Transition Period Price-Responsive Demand and Active Demand Resources in the Forward Capacity Market Henry Yoshimura,
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
PJM©2014www.pjm.com Winter 2014 Overview & Recent and Upcoming Market Rule Changes Adam Keech Director, Market Operations.
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
Resource Adequacy in PJM
Reliability Risks and Lessons Learned In The Wake Of The Polar Vortex OPSI Annual Meeting October 14, 2014.
Robert G. Ethier, Ph.D. Director, Market Monitoring May 4, 2005 ISO New England State of the Market Report 2004.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Electricity Markets Overview Lo-Cal seminar, 09/21/2010.
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
INTEGRATION COST. Integration Cost in RPS Calculator While “Integration Cost” is included in NMV formulation, the Commission stated that the Integration.
Market Overview in Electric Power Systems Market Structure and Operation Introduction Market Overview Market Overview in Electric Power Systems Mohammad.
Overview of LMP Markets Features of ISOs / RTOs David Withrow Senior Market Economist Fall 2007 Meeting of the NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
EnergyConnect, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of EnergyConnect is proud to be an ENERGY STAR PARTNER. George Barnes – Director Business Development.
ERCOT Tool to manage unexpected incremental load November 16, 2006.
Building the Energy Markets of Tomorrow... Today The Market Value of Demand Response Aaron Breidenbaugh Demand Response Program Coordinator New York Independent.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
Main Office Other Locations 540 Broadway 38 High Rock Avenue, #2C767 Third Avenue, btwn 48 th & 49 th 601 Pennsylvania Avenue HQ Hartford, 100 Pearl Street,
Demand Response Products. Discussion Points 1.Setting the scene….. 2.Virtual Power Station 3.Reserves deployment order 4.Demand Response Products.
PJM©2009www.pjm.com Implications of Electric Transportation for the National Grid Ken Huber PJM Interconnection February 19, 2010.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
NYISO Demand Side Programs and Issues
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Reliability Demand Response Product February 25, 2011
Demand Side Products in PJM Joseph BowringCornell University January 17, 2011.
Demand Response: Next Steps OPSI Annual Meeting October 1, 2012 Howard J. Haas.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
Demand Response as Capacity in New York National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Winter Committee Meetings Washington, DC February 17,
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
©2005 PJM 1 APEx The Mature PJM Market Kenneth W. Laughlin PJM October 31, 2005 Orlando, FL.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
October 02, 2009 Austin, Texas Quick Start Task Force Meeting 1.
Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM Southern California Edison Company’s Proposal to Participate in Convergence Bidding August 23, 2010.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
© 2015 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, 2015 Session 6 – Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary?
Business Case NPRR 351 Floyd Trefny Amtec Consulting Brenda Crockett Champion Energy Services.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 8 th Should all capacity resources be paid the same? -Demand Response operational deployment.
Role Of ERC in the WESM To enforce the rules and regulations governing the operations of the WESM and monitors the activities of the Market Operator and.
INTEGRATING WIND ENERGY WITH ELECTRIC SYSTEMS ERIC HIRST Consultant in Electric-Industry Restructuring Bellingham, WA December.
PJM©2014www.pjm.com State of Demand Response Stu Bresler Vice President- Market Operations PJM Interconnection 10 th OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, 2014.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
CPUC Resource Adequacy Program – LAO briefing May 25, 2009.
SMECO Demand Response filing
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
penetration of wind power
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Benefits of New England’s Proposed Capacity Market
Demand resource emergency energy measurement and verification
30 Minute Reserves EPFSTF January 4,
Presentation transcript:

© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA – Columbus, OH – State College, PA Lancaster, PA – Washington, DC – Scranton, PA

© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC PJM DEMAND SIDE RESPONSE  The purpose of PJM Demand Response is to enable Demand Resources under the direction and control of Curtailment Service Providers to respond to economic prices and/or emergency conditions  Demand Response can participate within the various PJM markets: Energy  Day Ahead Market  Real Time Market Ancillary Services  Synchronized Reserve  Regulation  Day Ahead Scheduling Reserve Capacity  Offer into auction up to 3 years in advance 2

© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC ENERGY MARKETS - PJM ECONOMIC LOAD RESPONSE PROGRAM ("ELRP")  All ELRP participation defined as: Clearing in the Day-Ahead ("DA") Market Dispatched by PJM in the Real-Time Market  ELRP participant or CSP must submit load reduction bid offer to PJM  Curtailment must clear in the DA market or be dispatched by PJM in real-time to be eligible for settlement revenue  Load reductions eligible to be paid full LMP if LMP is at or above the Net Benefits Price (a.k.a. threshold price)  Net Benefits Price expected to correlate to energy cost of an efficient combined cycle natural gas plant o Adjusts monthly o Price has ranged from approximately $23.00-$30.00/MWh 3

© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC ENERGY MARKETS - PJM DEFAULT CUSTOMER BASELINE  A Customer Baseline ("CBL") is a proxy for what the load would have been absent the load reduction  All ELRP registrations require Customer Base Line ("CBL") certification  All customers must use a CBL with an error (relative root mean square error – "RRMSE") no greater than 20%  CBLs for customers with on-site generation are being determined mostly on a case-by-case basis  ELRP reduction is determined by the CBL minus the meter readings during PJM dispatched curtailment hours 4

© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC ENERGY MARKETS - ELRP SUMMARY AND CAUTION  ELRP Revenue is determined by CBL Calculation  CBL Calculation represents a moving target Presents some risk to curtailment amount Could be manipulated to inflate ELRP revenue  Baseline manipulation viewed by FERC as manipulation of electric energy markets Potential penalties of $1 million per day per violation  Daily decisions when/if to participate in the ELRP program must not consider impact to future CBLs  No payment for load reduction if LMP is less than Net Benefits Price Historically, LMP has been greater than the Net Benefits Price about 50% of the time 5

© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC ANCILLARY SERVICES MARKETS  Synchronous Reserve Market Paid for standby service  Emergency reserve that PJM can call quickly after a large generator suddenly trips off-line  Hourly payment just for being available to respond  25 – 40 events typically occur annually  Total performance requirement of about 6 hours per year Must reduce load/increase generation within 10 minutes when ordered by PJM Requires 1-minute scan rate metering Data submission within 24 hours Consequences for non-performance 6

© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC ANCILLARY SERVICES MARKETS  Synchronous Reserve Market Hourly market participation  Hourly synchronous reserve offer must clear the market to receive payment  Not all hours require PJM to procure Synchronous Reserves from Demand Resources or result in a clearing price greater than $0 7

© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC ANCILLARY SERVICES MARKETS  Regulation Market Hourly market correcting for constantly occurring small load changes Requires 5-minute response time Requires both load reduction and load increase Sub-metering permitted  Performance not measured based on change to AEP pull Consequences for non-performance Cannot simultaneously be participating in the Synchronized Reserves Market 8

© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC ANCILLARY SERVICES MARKETS  Day Ahead Scheduling Reserve Market ("DASR") Reserves are additional capacity above the expected load The purpose of the DASR market is to encourage and incent generation and demand resources to provide the flexible capability to provide 30-minute reserves If a Resource is called-on in Real-Time, it must respond in 30 minutes Reserves are scheduled on a day-ahead basis in order to ensure that differences in forecasted loads and forced generator outages do not negatively impact system reliability The Day-Ahead Scheduling Reserve Requirement is calculated on an annual basis and is set at 6.91% for 2013 The DASR market clears simultaneously with the DA Energy Market Limited revenue potential 9

© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC INTERACTION OF RESERVE MARKET PRODUCTS  Resources can be capable of providing all three products: Synchronized Reserve, Regulation, and Day- Ahead Scheduling Reserve  All three cannot be provided simultaneously, only two products, at most 10

© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC DEMAND RESOURCES IN THE CAPACITY MARKET  Demand Resources can offer curtailment capability as a forward capacity resource three years in advance of delivery year DR providers are required to provide the cleared demand response amount as capacity during the delivery year and will receive the capacity resource clearing price for this service  Must reduce load when requested by PJM All Call system within 2 hours of notification  Must provide customer-specific compliance and verification information within 45 days after the end of the month in which Load Management event occurred  Can participate in both ELRP and Capacity DR Programs  Note: Many aspects of RPM rules are being proposed to change, particularly those relating to DR 11

© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC DEMAND RESOURCES 12

© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC DR REGISTRATIONS 13

© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC EMERGENCY DR EVENTS Delivery Year# of PJM Events 2005/ / / /2009No Events 2009/ / / / / /2015Est. 5 to /2016Est. 5 to 9 14

© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC RPM AUCTION CLEARING PRICES (ANNUAL PRODUCT) 15

© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC RPM AUCTION CLEARING PRICES (ANNUAL PRODUCT) 16

© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC 17 DR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS (PENALTIES)  Three penalties are applicable to customers participating in RPM as Demand Resources ("DR") 1. RPM Commitment Compliance 2. Load Management Event Compliance 3. Load Management Test Compliance  PJM penalties applied on pro-rata basis and may result in forfeiture of expected revenue or the forfeiture of expected revenue plus a penalty  DR performance for on-site generation typically measured using Guaranteed Load Drop ("GLD") method

© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC RPM TIMETABLE  A complete listing of RPM activities and dates can be found at: auction-schedule.ashx 18

© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC 19 Any Questions? Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC Suite N. Capitol Street, NE Washington, DC (fax)