2014 E DUCATIONAL T ECHNOLOGY P LAN P ROJECT K ICKOFF.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
CONFIDENTIAL: Presented under NDA, do not redistribute EDU Windows EDU Proof of Concept (POC) Program Program Overview for Schools Partner Name Partner.
Global Congress Global Leadership Vision for Project Management.
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
Enterprise Security A Framework For Tomorrow Christopher P. Buse, CPA, CISA, CISSP Chief Information Security Officer State of Minnesota.
+ Project IDEAL in Minnesota: Building a Community of ABE DL Practice Minnesota ABE DL Toolkit.
Corporate Responsibility Index 14 April Athens A tool for improving management of and performance in corporate responsibility.
Division of School Effectiveness1 Common Core State Standards: Transitioning from Awareness to Implementation December 1, 2011 Rutledge Conference Center.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 3-1.
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
1 Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Communications Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council (CSRIC) Working Group 1A - Public Safety Consolidation.
Strategic Technology Planning for Nonprofits 2009 Pacific Northwest Digital Inclusion Summit David Forrester January 28, 2009.
+ Distance Learning PD History and Development Model: Building a Community of ABE DL Practice Minnesota ABE DL Toolkit.
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
Microsoft Confidential Building Reusable InfoPath forms for US Government Jonny Chambers WW Lead – SSN Program Microsoft Corp.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
2014 South Carolina Educational Technology Plan “Have a VOICE in technology”
Technology Leadership
Campaign Readiness Project Overview Enabling a structured, scalable approach to customer-centric campaigns.
College Board EXCELerator Schools Site Visit Preparation.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
The Evaluation of IMPACT V Jeni Corn, Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College of Education.
Quarterly Update Blue Ribbon Commission’s Recommendations of the 2009 Criterion Referenced Competency Test (CRCT) Erasure Investigation Dr. Beverly L.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Certificate IV in Project Management Certificate IV in Project Management Course Structure Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
1-2 Training of Process Facilitators 3-1. Training of Process Facilitators 1- Provide an overview of the role and skills of a Communities That Care Process.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Office of Performance Review (OPR) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Stephen Dorage.
Lighthouse Junior Our School Metaphor. Governance Curriculum Climate Staffing WE WILL EXAMINE THE FOLLOWING TOPICS:
Nancy Steele Kelly Vanderbosch The Power of Teams in RtI as a Multi-Tiered System of Support.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
Data Analysis Superintendents Trust. Increase test scores and graduation rates through targeted efforts and investments that lead to student success Proactively.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Marv Adams Chief Information Officer November 29, 2001.
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Audit Program - The Audit Process.
SOLUTION What kind of plan do we need? How will we know if the work is on track to be done? How quickly can we get this done? How long will this work take.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
2009 An Overview of programmes. Overview Current country programmes – Ghana, Rwanda Transitioned country programmes – Namibia Potential new country programmes.
Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports Family & Community Team Member Network Meeting Thank you for coming! Please make yourself comfortable.
State of Georgia Release Management Training
1 CREATING AND MANAGING CERT. 2 Internet Wonderful and Terrible “The wonderful thing about the Internet is that you’re connected to everyone else. The.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
The Importance of Professional Learning in Systems Reform AdvancED Performance Accreditation Bev Mortimer Concordia Superintendent
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Overview and Update.  LBUSD is currently facing a unique set of challenges and opportunities. It is imperative that we look intensely and thoroughly.
TECHNOLOGY MASTER PLAN Our Children, Our Schools, Our Future Technology Master Plan.
A Professional Development Series from the CDC’s Division of Population Health School Health Branch Professional Development 101: The Basics – Part 1.
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
ISLLC Standard #3 Implementing Effective Meetings Name Workshop Facilitator.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15) November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker Meagan Steiner David LeBlanc.
April 23, A shared commitment to provide the most effective education to all students so they live successful lives. We envision using technology.
Home Base Partnership Team
MEGAN HOOPES-MYERS BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY EDTECH
Technology Department Annual Update
A Guide to the Sharing Information on Progress (SIP)
MEGAN HOOPES-MYERS BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY EDTECH
Presentation transcript:

2014 E DUCATIONAL T ECHNOLOGY P LAN P ROJECT K ICKOFF

Agenda  Introductions  Project Scope & Objectives  Team Structure, Roles and Responsibilities  Critical Success Factors  Tasks Already Accomplished  Common Themes Already Identified  Upcoming Key Tasks  Project Timelines  Breakout Into Work Groups Agenda

Introductions Our Core Team :  Wendy Spivey-Executive Sponsor  Claudette Flynn- Project Manager  Rob Cardelli- Facilitator & Industry Expert  Christian Heneghan- Facilitator & Industry Expert

Dramatic advances have been made in technology since the last educational technology plan was conducted in The goal of this planning meeting is to: Use our time most effectively Collaboratively write a state educational technology plan that can be used as the baseline for the district’s educational technology plans Identify opportunities for schools, districts, local businesses and state agencies to collaborate to identify common goals, objectives, issues and opportunities to better leverage technology Finalize the schedule of events necessary to complete the writing of this plan Purpose of Today’s Meeting

Interview key personnel to determine how they interact with technology Teachers and instructional professionals Educational technology experts Administrators Higher education representatives Local businesses State Agencies Examine how technology is currently utilized What tools and services are being used? How and why are these specific technology assets being used? Are these technologies still relevant and cost effective? Is there standardization and/or redundancy in their application and use? What Will We Focus On?

Evaluate the latest technology products and services, asking: What potential do they hold for us? Would they make sense for us, and if so, why? Are they cost effective and sustainable? What is the viability of their associated companies? Who else is either already using these technologies or plans to, soon? Technology integration - How should we integrate new technologies? Technology support - How can we properly support all of our technologies? *We will also examine policies, procedures and business processes What Will We Focus On? (continued)

Modern Educational Technology Framework

1. Create working groups 2. Review past evaluations and discuss lessons learned 3. Define roles, responsibilities and expectations 4. Finalize project scope and schedule 5. Schedule interviews and meetings 6. Conduct product evaluations and benchmarking activities 7. Write the draft technology plan 8. Review draft plan with team and incorporate feedback and changes 9. Finalize plan, present it to State Superintendent 10. Implement findings and measure success Outline Of Our Approach

 Your help in gathering data about our current use of technology  Your assistance with the identification of key issues or limitations surrounding our use of technology in South Carolina  Your thoughts on which products and/or services may be of value to you  Your honesty (all interviews and feedback will be confidential)  Your time: active participation for the remainder of the year: You will decide your level of participation We will schedule calls and meetings to make them as convenient as possible We will set aside times to work directly with you to keep you updated in the event that you are unable to attend a specific meeting  Your commitment to help us to complete our assigned tasks on time What Do We Need From You?

Who do We Need? RoleResponsibility Teachers Tell us what teachers, instructional support and students need Technologists Tell us what technology can provide Developers Tell us what we can build for ourselves Leaders Tell us what our educators need most Writers Help us to paint a picture about how we will use technology to educate our students over the next three years Editors Improve our story by making it clear, concise and compelling Visionaries Make our story’s message one that we are all inspired to achieve

 Interviews and surveys to gather data and perspectives  Identification of additional team members  Thorough review of lessons learned from 2003 & 2009 technology plans  Research and documentation of education trends and predictions Other states Product analysis Peer benchmarking and identification of success stories  Discussions with local vendors  Discussions with higher education institutions  Identification of common themes  Creation of the technology plan outline Tasks Already Underway

Disparate network capabilities create the perception of haves and have-nots Wireless issues/limitations lead to problems utilizing classroom technology Issues with desktop support directly impact education process Outdated computers and lack of standard technology refresh process Outdated software (i.e. Microsoft XP) Multiple types of computers complicate support model Decentralized website ownership leads to multiple complications Security is complex and creates risks for all districts Technical support staff are reactive and unable to be proactive Common Themes- Infrastructure

Districts and schools are proactively identifying, purchasing, implementing and utilizing classroom technology at an increasing rate. For the most part districts and schools are having great success leveraging classroom technology. Vendors target different districts and schools with the same products and there doesn’t appear to be standardized evaluation and purchasing process. Different products exist across school districts and within school districts. This complicates training and support and reduces our ability to collaborate. Technical support staff have limited ability to support the multitude of products and services in use. This sometimes requires teachers to have to provide their own support. Common Themes- Classroom Technology

Multiple school districts stated they could benefit from assistance in the following areas: E-Rate counseling and consulting Grant writing and counseling Regional technical training Assistance auditing, monitoring and supporting security requirements Creation of online communities for districts and schools to network and share lessons learned, best practices and locally developed content Standardized technology and refresh cycles Collaborative purchasing agreements Other Common Themes

Overview of Schedule

Next Steps  Breakout into working groups Classroom Technology & Professional Development Collaboration Opportunities & Research Infrastructure & Security Writing team Discuss the information that has already been obtained Examine common themes, raise additional challenges and explore opportunities to improve Identify additional resources we should interview or ask to participate Plan next meetings

Regional Meeting Schedule 17

For more information please contact Wendy Spivey  Title: Total Quality Management Officer  Phone: (803) 