A Preliminary Study of Loran-C Additional Secondary Factor (ASF) Variations International Loran Association 31st Annual Convention And Technical Symposium.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using Seasonal Monitor Data to Assess Aviation Integrity Sherman Lo, Greg Johnson, Peter Swaszek, Robert Wenzel, Peter Morris, Per Enge 36 th Symposium.
Advertisements

Loran Integrity Performance Panel The Loran Integrity Performance Panel Sherman Lo, Per Enge, & Lee Boyce, Stanford University Ben Peterson, Peterson Integrated.
Loran Integrity Performance Panel Analysis of ASF for RNP 0.3 Sherman Lo, Stanford University International Loran Association Boulder, CO, Nov 3-7, 2003.
Long RAnge Navigation version C
Hazardously Misleading Information Analysis for Loran LNAV Dr. Ben Peterson, Peterson Integrated Geopositioning Dr. Per Enge, Dr. Todd Walter, Dr. Sherman.
Differential Loran Ben Peterson, Ken Dykstra & Peter Swaszek Peterson Integrated Geopositioning & Kevin Carroll, USCG Loran Support Unit Funded by Federal.
1 Integrated GPS/Loran Navigation Sensor for Aviation Applications by James H. Doty, David A. Anderson and Patrick Y. Hwang, Ph.D., Rockwell Collins, Inc.,
Transitioning to Time of Transmission Control in the U.S. Loran System ILA 2003 Boulder, CO Mr. Gene Schlechte CAPT Curtis Dubay, P.E. U. S. Coast Guard.
LORAN-C Band Data Collection Efforts at Ohio University Presented by Curtis Cutright to the International LORAN Association 32 nd Annual Convention and.
The Game Plan for Loran-C Modernization John J. Macaluso U. S. Coast Guard Mitchell J. Narins U. S. Federal Aviation Administration International Loran.
Summer Vacation 2003 – ASF Spatial Mapping in CO, AR, FL, and CA 32 nd Annual Technical Symposium International Loran Association 5 Nov 2003 Boulder, CO.
32 nd International Loran Association November 3-7, 2003 Predicting Differential Loran-C Performance in Boston Harbor Erik Johannessen Andre Grebnev Wouter.
Loran Integrity Performance Panel Loran Integrity & Performance Panel (LORIPP) Per Enge, Stanford University, November 2003 Based on the work of: Federal.
Avionics Engineering Center Characterization of Atmospheric Noise in the Loran-C Band Presented to the International Loran Association (ILA-32) November.
FAA Tests An H-Field Antenna To Increase Loran-C Availability During P-Static Events R. Erikson, FAA WJ Hughes Technical Center and Dr. R. Lilley, Illgen.
1 Loran Timing ILA – 36 th Convention and Technical Symposium Orlando, Fl., Oct Arthur Helwig Gerard Offermans Christian Farrow.
Global Positioning Systems (GPS) for Precision Farming
Avionics Engineering Center ILA-36 Orlando, FL October 2007 Computer Modeling of Loran-C Additional Secondary Factors Janet Blazyk, MS David Diggle, PhD.
Antenna Baseline Measurement System 29 January 2010 Mark Phillips, Research Assistant Ohio University, Athens OH Research Intern Naval Research Laboratory.
Background Accessibility Popularity of GPS and INS –Cell phones Apple iPhone, Blackberry, Android platform –Nintendo Wii Wii Remote, MotionPlus.
Global Positioning System. The History of GPS Feasibility studies begun in 1960’s. Pentagon appropriates funding in First satellite launched in.
ILA 32 (Boulder, CO) - Page 1.
How Global Positioning Devices (GPS) work
Loran Integrity Performance Panel Integrity Fault Tree for Loran Sherman Lo Second LORIPP Meeting Portland, OR September 23-24, 2002.
Mitigation of the Effects Early Skywaves Ben Peterson, Peterson Integrated Geopositioning & Per Enge, Stanford University Funded by Federal Aviation Administration,
Radio Interference Calculations
© David Last, University of Wales, Bangor 31st Annual Convention & Technical Symposium International Loran Association October, 2002 Washington,
ELoran Maritime Service Provision: Initial Thoughts By Dr Sally Basker, Professor David Last, Dr Paul Williams Date: International Loran Association, Orlando,
CNS Systems, Inc. Communication, Navigation and Surveillance © 2002 CNS Systems, Inc. GPS Receiver Test Bed at USNO Prepared for the 34th Annual Precise.
USNO Report CGSIC Timing Subcommittee April 19, 2002 Lisa Nelson Time Service Department ; DSN
V-1 Common-View LORAN-C for Precision Time and Frequency Recovery Tom Celano, Timing Solutions Corp LT Kevin Carroll, USCG Loran Support Unit Michael Lombardi,
Multiplexing GPS & eLoran on single RF cable for retrofit installations Benjamin Peterson Peterson Integrated Geopositioning International Loran Association.
Loran Integrity Performance Panel The Loran Integrity Performance Panel Sherman Lo, Per Enge, & Lee Boyce, Stanford University Ben Peterson, Peterson Integrated.
Differential eLoran Reference Station for Maritime and Precise Time Applications Gerard Offermans, Arthur Helwig, Reelektronika NL International Loran.
EGNOS TRAN: Broadcasting EGNOS messages over the Eurofix Datalink
October 5, 2007 By: Richard L. Day, Vice President En Route and Oceanic Services (ATO-E) Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services.
GPS based time synchronization of PC hardware Antti Gröhn
LORAN-C in Paradise International Loran Association 31 st Annual Convention and Technical Symposium October 27-30, 2002 Washington, DC Written and Presented.
Making a Silk Purse from a Sow’s Ear, Loran Style David H. Gray Canadian Hydrographic Service Ottawa Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this paper are.
New Loran-C Receiver Performance Levels for Extended Range Eurofix and Kinematic Applications G.W.A. Offermans, A.W.S. Helwig, R. Kellenbach, W.J. Pelgrum,
Getting a Bearing on ASF Directional Corrections 32 nd Annual Technical Symposium International Loran Association 5 Nov 2003 Boulder, CO.
KICKOFF OF ASF DISCUSSIONS 1000 km  sec to 6  sec 400 to 1800 meters on a 1310 km --- up to 8  sec.
James T. Doherty Institute for Defense Analyses 16 October 2007
Enhanced LORAN Receiver (ELR) Kirk Montgomery – Symmetricom/Advanced Timing Solutions 2007 Convention and Technical Symposium - ILA-36 Orlando, Florida.
CGSIC Timing Subcommittee March 11, 2004 USNO Report U.S. Naval Observatory Washington, DC Francine Vannicola
LORAN TRANSITION Briefing to National PNT Advisory Board Captain Curtis Dubay, PE Department of Homeland Security U. S. Coast Guard Friday, October 5,
Hazardously Misleading Information Analysis for Loran LNAV Dr. Ben Peterson, Peterson Integrated Geopositioning Dr. Per Enge, Dr. Todd Walter, Dr. Sherman.
Timing Augmented GPS Update Eddie Byrne, Symmetricom January 23, 2008.
1 Loran-C User Position Software (LUPS) Navigation Performance with the August 2001 Cross-Country/Alaska Flight Test Data Jaime Y. Cruz and Robert Stoeckly.
Introduction To Localization Techniques (GPS)
Status – U.S. Maritime Backup Issues Session 2, 28 October 2002 –Status & Plans of LORAN-C Service Providers 31st Annual Convention & Technical Symposium.
Lecture 5 – Differential Correction
ILA 36 – Orlando Florida October 2007 Dr. Gregory Johnson, Ruslan Shalaev, Christian Oates, Alion Science & Technology Capt. Richard Hartnett, PhD,
Loran Integrity Performance Panel The Loran Integrity Performance Panel (LORIPP) The LORIPP Team Loran Team Meeting McLean, VA July 30, 2002.
F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N Loran Update Mitchell Narins (US FAA) G. Thomas Gunther.
Global Positioning System Overview
“An Investigation into the Temporal Correlation at the ASF Monitor Sites” by Prof. Peter Swaszek, URI/USCGA Dr. Gregory Johnson, Alion Capt. Richard Hartnett,
Space-Based Navigation Systems
1 Purpose of the Evaluations To determine whether Loran-C can provide the: Accuracy Availability Integrity Continuity, and Coverage to support Lateral.
“Status of the Loran Recapitilization Project” FAA Team Meeting – July 2002 CDR G. K. Weeks Jr., U. S. Coast Guard, Commanding Officer USCG Loran Support.
Roshene McCool SKADS Workshop 2007 DS3 – T1 Network Infrastructure and Data Transmission Roshene McCool Simon Garrington University of Manchester.
Transmitter Performance Section Participants –LSU –NAVCEN –NAVCEN (West) –Peterson Integrated Geo-positioning, Inc –BAH LORIPP Meeting #2 Portland, OR.
LORAN Modernization Loran Data Channel Mr. Raymond Agostini International Loran Association Orlando, FL October 15, 2007.
Data Collection Effort Objectives Time of Transmission (TOT) monitors Time of Arrival (TOA) monitors Pulse Analysis Measurements re UTC, & sign of delay.
LORIPP Meeting July 24-25, Implementing a LORIPP-Compliant Option in the Loran-C User Position Software (LUPS) LORIPP Meeting July 24-25, 2002 Jaime.
How Does GPS Work ?. The Global Positioning System 24+ satellites 20,200 km altitude 55 degrees inclination 12 hour orbital period 5 ground control stations.
Younis H. Karim, AbidYahya School of Computer University Malaysia Perlis 1.
Timing applications of GPS Time for GPS Vivekanandanmurugan Sivaraman Gaurav Sharma John Hannah.
Master independent, multi-chain navigation Requirement –Resolution of 200 usec cross chain lane ambiguities Ambiguities are 20 usec in Europe Would also.
Loran Integrity & Performance Panel (LORIPP)
Presentation transcript:

A Preliminary Study of Loran-C Additional Secondary Factor (ASF) Variations International Loran Association 31st Annual Convention And Technical Symposium October 27-30, 2002

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-312 Authors  CAPT Richard Hartnett  US Coast Guard Academy  Gregory Johnson  John J. McMullen Assoc. Inc.  Peter Swaszek  University of Rhode Island  Mitchell J. Narins  US Federal Aviation Administration

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-313 Outline  Introduction  Methodology of Data Collection  Error Sources and Bounds  August Flight Tests  Highlights of ASF Corrected Loran data  Conclusions  Future work

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-314 Introduction  Concept:  LORAN-C as “the” backup for GPS  NPA – RNP 0.3  Obvious issues: accuracy, availability, integrity, and continuity  USCGA Goal: Improve our understanding of those variations in TOA that could be mitigated (ASFs)

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-315  This report:  Report on flight tests (August 2002) to collect concurrent LORAN and WAAS GPS position data (equipment, methodology, variation characteristics)  From ground data estimate TOA ASF in the vicinity of an intended approach  (post-)Process some approach flight data to determine feasibility of 1/6 NM accuracy using local correction

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-316 Data Collection Methodology  Use USCGA PC-104 TOA ASF Measurement System  Run receiver in reference mode at a known location (surveyed or DGPS/WAAS position)  Save TIC and RAW TOA, SNR, ECD measurements for each station at 2 sec. intervals  Collect data over 1-2 hr period  Post-process to calculate ASF’s at 2 sec. intervals  ASF, SNR, and ECD are used to determine if ASF is valid  Average ASF’s over the 2 hr period

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-317 TOA ASF Measurement System H-field antenna Novatel OEM-4 WAAS GPS PC-104 Rcvr 1 PPS DS-345 Signal Generator 10 MHz 12.8 MHz2 Channels RF Save to disk: TIC, RAW TOA, ECD, SNR, etc.

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-318 PC-104 Based TOA ASF Measurement System  CPU board, Gatefield DSP board, oscillator board (opt), Power and I/O boards  Provide stabilized clock frequency  12.8 MHz from Cesium clock stabilized signal source  GPS 1PPS signal  H-field antenna  Two crossed loops

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-319 ASF Calculation (TIC + Raw TOA - Rcvr Delay - Emission Delay - Predicted TOA ) mod 200 μsec = EDC + ASF

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-3110 ASF Definition  Define TOA ASF as the additional propagation delay due to a non-seawater path  Need to separate out system timing errors from ASF value  Need to know exactly when stations transmit, relative to UTC (use GPS 1 PPS as time reference).  Master: existing TTM equipment  Secondary: LSU/PIG installed TOTM equipment  Difference between measured and calculated TOA is ASF + time offsets

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-3111 Nantucket TOTM  Secondary TOTM data for time period of flight tests (Julian days , 2002)  X-axis = hours starting from midnight of first day  Y-axis = offset from UTC in ns

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-3112 Carolina Beach TOTM

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-3113 ASF Measurement Error Sources  Timing Errors  Master and Secondary  Receiver Errors  1 PPS stability  Sampling resolution  Receiver tracking accuracy  Receiver calibration  Cross-coupling in H-field antenna

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-3114 Error Bounds Error Source Notes Error bounds Master timingTOTM equip.Unknown, 23 hr avg. only Secondary timingPIG/LSU TOT monitors2/4 minute samples, vary +/- 50 ns 1 PPS stabilityUniversal Counter referenced to Cesium +/- 1 ns for Novatel OEM-4 PowerPak Sampling resolution12.8 MHz+/- 39.1ns resolution Tracking accuracySNR dependent~20 ns for strong signal Receiver calibrationFixed offsetApprox. 100 ns Loop cross-couplingFixed offset for given heading +/- 145 ns

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-3115 Loop cross-coupling Nantucket Carolina Beach Seneca Caribou Dana Variation in TOAs as aircraft antenna is rotated 720 degrees.

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-3116 Loop cross-coupling Close-up of Nantucket data from previous slide

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-3117 Ohio University King Air

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-3118 CG Equipment on King Air

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-3119 August 2002 Flight Test Date Location and Airport Designator 21 Aug Hyannis, MA (HYA) 22 Aug Sandy Hook, NJ (BLM) 26 Aug Cape Elizabeth, ME (PWM) 27 Aug Bay Bridge area (W29) Mayport, FL (CRG) 28 Aug Plumbrook, OH (5A1) Westerly, RI (WST) 29 Aug FAA Tech Ctr (ACY)

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-3120 Flight routes Dana Malone Carolina Beach Seneca

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA August, 9960 Data

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA August, 8970 Data

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA August, 5930 Data

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA /22 BLM TOA Distributions

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA /27 W29 TOA Distributions

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-3126 Portland ME, 26 Aug 02 Loran (red), Corrected Loran (green) and DGPS (blue) positions during approach to Portland, PWM. Corrected Loran is the raw TOA’s corrected with measured ASF values, ED offsets, and Master TOT offsets.

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-3127 Portland ME, 26 Aug 02 Radial error measured from WAAS GPS position

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-3128 Conclusions  ASF collection procedure:  Methodology works  Further resolution of error sources  Sample flight tests:  TOA All-In-View receiver (with timing corrected and static, local ASF correction) provided <1/6 NM accuracy on approaches (to 20 miles out)  Potential for LORAN to achieve RNP 0.3

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-3129 Future Work  Examine spatial and temporal ASF variations  Daily data collection at USCGA (multi-week)  Collect additional spatial data in December and January  Receiver improvements  Increase sampling rate to 25.6 MHz to increase resolution  Resolve receiver calibration  Apply ASF corrections to Locus receiver TOAs

10/30/02USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA-3130 Acknowledgments  Christian Oates, George Sanders, Ken Dykstra  JJMA, Inc.  Dave Diggle, Brian Branham, Jamie Edwards  Ohio University  Ben Peterson  P.I.G.  USCG Loran Support Unit  USCG NAVCEN