Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 1 Helen Dacre 1, Alan Grant 1, Natalie Harvey 1, Helen Webster 2, Ben Johnson 2, David Thomson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The University of Reading Helen Dacre The Prediction And Observation Of Volcanic Ash Clouds During The Eyjafjallajökull Eruption Helen Dacre and Alan Grant.
Advertisements

The University of Reading Helen Dacre AGU Dec 2008 Boundary Layer Ventilation by Convection and Coastal Processes Helen Dacre, Sue Gray, Stephen Belcher.
Vertical distribution of ash at source Time-height plots of mass concentration at Chilbolton. The height above the summit into which ash particles are.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre AMS 2010 Air Quality Forecasting using a Numerical Weather Prediction Model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth Drizzle comparisons.
Robin Hogan, Richard Allan, Nicky Chalmers, Thorwald Stein, Julien Delanoë University of Reading How accurate are the radiative properties of ice clouds.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 A Cloud Object Based Volcanic.
Volcanic Ash Operator Experience Eyjafjallajokull Eme Tillema Dep VP ATM KLM Flight Operations Belgrade 7 Sept 2010.
Volcanic Ash - developments since 2010 © Crown copyright Met Office Ian Cameron, Met Office Executive Head Aviation, June 2014.
Rapid Update Cycle Model William Sachman and Steven Earle ESC452 - Spring 2006.
Satellite-based Global Estimate of Ground-level Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Aaron van Donkelaar1, Randall Martin1,2, Lok Lamsal1, Chulkyu Lee1.
Frascati nov 2009 A.-C. Engvall, A. Stohl, N. I. Kristiansen, A. Fahre Vik, K. Tørseth, and others Norwegian Institue for Air Research NILU Dept.
Tianfeng Chai 1,2, Alice Crawford 1,2, Barbara Stunder 1, Roland Draxler 1, Michael J. Pavolonis 3, Ariel Stein 1 1.NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, College.
A Comparison of Two Volcanic Ash Height Estimation Methods and Their Affects on the HYSPLIT Volcanic Ash Model Output Kyle Wodzicki (SUNY Oswego), Humberto.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Natalie Harvey | Helen Dacre Figure 1 Future Work Conduct sensitivity experiments to understand the relative importance.
Weather Satellite Data in FAA Operations Randy Bass Aviation Weather Research Program Aviation Weather Division NextGen Organization Federal Aviation Administration.
Cyclone composites in the real world and ACCESS Pallavi Govekar, Christian Jakob, Michael Reeder and Jennifer Catto.
Discrepancies Between Satellite Detection and Forecast Model Results of Ash Cloud Transport: Case Study of the 2001 Eruption of Mt. Cleveland Volcano,
Environment Canada Meteorological Service of Canada Environnement Canada Service météorologique du Canada Modeling Volcanic Ash Transport and Dispersion:
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
© Crown copyright Met Office PRESENTATION DELIVERED WITH EXPERT COMMENTARY. PLEASE CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY Modelling and Forecasting of the Eyjafjallajökull.
© Crown copyright Met Office The UK Met Office Met Office Science ClimateWeather Dispersion Satellite OBR etc Core, etc ObservationsOperations Forecasting.
Prevention of Volcanic Ash Encounters in the Proximity Area Between Active Volcanoes and Heavy Air Traffic Routes Prevention of Volcanic Ash Encounters.
FOREST FIRE AEROSOLS Optical and microphysical properties from EARLINET observations D. Balis Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics, Aristotle University of.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 Cirrus Measurements during the EAQUATE Campaign C. Lee, A.J. Baran, P.N. Francis, M.D. Glew, S.M. Newman and J.P. Taylor.
1991 Pinatubo Volcanic Simulation Using ATHAM Model Song Guo, William I Rose, Gregg J S Bluth Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan Co-Workers.
Faculty of Physics and Earth Sciences Vertical thermodynamic phase distribution in convective clouds derived from cloud side observations Evelyn Jäkel.
1 Using the GOES-R AWG Volcanic Ash Algorithm to Track Eyjafjallajökull Volcanic Ash: Impacts on Operations and Research Michael Pavolonis (NOAA/NESDIS/STAR)
08/20031 Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office Helen Champion, Sarah Watkin Derrick Ryall Responsibilities Tools Etna 2002 Future.
Using Remote Sensing to Track the 2010 Eruptions of Eyjafjallajökull (Icelandic Volcano) Using Remote Sensing to Track the 2010 Eruptions of Eyjafjallajökull.
Operational assimilation of dust optical depth Bruce Ingleby, Yaswant Pradhan and Malcolm Brooks © Crown copyright 08/2013 Met Office and the Met Office.
Global Satellite Observations of Volcanic Plumes for Aviation Hazard Mitigation Kai Yang (GSFC/NASA and GEST/UMBC) Nick Krotkov (GSFC/NASA) Simon Carn.
© Crown copyright Met Office London VAAC The Eyjafjallajökull volcanic eruption.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Aviation Application Team – Volcanic Ash Mike Pavolonis (STAR)
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Aviation Application Team – Volcanic Ash Mike Pavolonis (STAR)
Len Hearnden Manager Safety, Operations & Infrastructure Europe 2.2 Volcanic Ash Eyjafjallajokull Eruption Airlines dealing with crisis - the IATA role.
Determination of atmospheric structures, aerosol optical properties and particle type with the R-MAN 510 Raman dual polarization lidar super ceilometer.
ICELAND’S VOLCANO HEKLA ABOUT TO ERUPT MARCH 17, 2014 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
The Darwin VAAC Volcanic Ash Workstation R Potts, M Manickam, A Tupper and J Davey Bureau of Meteorology, Australia Volcanic ash – aviation hazard mitigation.
Modelling the radiative impact of aerosols from biomass burning during SAFARI-2000 Gunnar Myhre 1,2 Terje K. Berntsen 3,1 James M. Haywood 4 Jostein K.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre The Eyjafjallajökull eruption: How well were the volcanic ash clouds predicted? Helen Dacre and Alan Grant Robin.
CBH statistics for the Provisional Review Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Steve Miller and Dan Lindsey CIRA/Colorado State University 12/27/2013.
Introduction 1. Advantages and difficulties related to the use of optical data 2. Aerosol retrieval and comparison methodology 3. Results of the comparison.
Snapshots of WRF activities in the GFI/Iceland groups.
Reducing the risk of volcanic ash to aviation Natalie Harvey, Helen Dacre (Reading) Helen Webster, David Thomson, Mike Cooke (Met Office) Nathan Huntley.
Page 1© Crown copyright Modelling the stable boundary layer and the role of land surface heterogeneity Anne McCabe, Bob Beare, Andy Brown EMS 2005.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre The Prediction And Observation Of Volcanic Ash Clouds During The Eyjafjallajökull Eruption Helen Dacre and Alan Grant.
UCLA Vector Radiative Transfer Models for Application to Satellite Data Assimilation K. N. Liou, S. C. Ou, Y. Takano and Q. Yue Department of Atmospheric.
ICELAND’S GRIMSVOTN ERUPTS SATURDAY, MAY 21, 2011 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North Carolina, USA.
Aerosol Pattern over Southern North America Tropospheric Aerosols: Science and Decisions in an International Community A NARSTO Technical Symposium on.
- 1 - Satellite Remote Sensing of Small Ice Crystal Concentrations in Cirrus Clouds David L. Mitchell Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada Robert P.
Japan Meteorological Agency, May 2014 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Volcanic ash algorithm testbed by JMA for validation and.
CAS/GAW/SSC March 2016 Aeronautical Meteorology.
1 UWG Meeting, November 16, 2010 UWG Member: Nickolay Krotkov Affiliation: NASA Contact Information: NASA-NOAA-FMI-KNMI project.
What Are the Implications of Optical Closure Using Measurements from the Two Column Aerosol Project? J.D. Fast 1, L.K. Berg 1, E. Kassianov 1, D. Chand.
Slide 1 Investigations on alternative interpretations of AMVs Kirsti Salonen and Niels Bormann 12 th International Winds Workshop, 19 th June 2014.
Services & Products of Tokyo VAAC Jun Ryuzaki 30 October, 2012 FPAW in Orlando Tokyo Volcanic Ash Advisory Center Japan Meteorological Agency.
Support to Aviation for Volcanic Ash Avoidance – SAVAA
Challenges associated with ice and large particles in the TTL
Seamless turbulence parametrization across model resolutions
A New Method for Evaluating Regional Air Quality Forecasts
Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office
Quantifying uncertainty in volcanic ash forecasts
WRF Modelling of Volcanic Ash Dispersion
Estimating volcanic ash emissions by assimilating satellite observations with the HYSPLIT dispersion model Tianfeng Chai1,2, Alice Crawford1,2, Barbara.
Modelling the radiative impact of aerosols from biomass burning during SAFARI-2000   Gunnar Myhre, Terje K. Berntsen, James M. Haywood, Jostein K. Sundet,
Turbulence-Related Products Robert Sharman NCAR/RAP
Mike Pavolonis (NOAA/NESDIS/STAR)
I. What? ~ II. Why? ~ III. How? Modelling volcanic plumes with WRF
Presentation transcript:

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 1 Helen Dacre 1, Alan Grant 1, Natalie Harvey 1, Helen Webster 2, Ben Johnson 2, David Thomson 2, Franco Marenco 2 1 University of Reading 2 UK Met Office The largest airspace shutdown since WWII: Volcanic ash prediction and its challenges Eyjafjallajokull eruption, 2010

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 2 Impact on aircraft Volcanic ash is hard and abrasive Volcanic ash can cause engine failure > 126 incidents of encounters with ash clouds since 1935 Ash-encounter (AE) severity index ranging from 0 (no notable damage) to 5 (engine failure leading to crash) Difficult to predict what a safe level of ash concentration is for aircraft to fly through

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 3 Impact on the ground

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 4 Talk Outline Volcanic ash impacts Volcanic ash advisory centres (VAAC’s) Volcanic ash transport and dispersion models Safe volcanic ash concentrations Model evaluation Summary Current and future work

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 5 Volcanic Ash Advisory Centres (VAAC)

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 6 Volcanic Ash Graphics

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 7 Volcanic Ash Transport and Dispersion Models (VATD)

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 8 Volcanic Ash Prediction Challenges Plume height and vertical profile may be unknown at onset of eruption and/or time varying MER is not obtainable by direct observation Mass fraction of fine ash (< 100μm) is not obtainable by direct observation The possibility of aggregation of particles exists, but little detailed information is known

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 9 Defining Safe Ash Concentrations April Closure of European airspace caused huge economic difficulties -Aircraft manufacturers pressed to define limits on how much ash a jet engine can ingest without damage -CAA set the safe upper limit of ash density to be 2mg/m 3 May 2010: -CAA revised the safe limit upwards to 4mg/m 3 – no fly zone -CAA created a Time Limited Zone between 2 and 4mg/m 3

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 10 Predicting Safe Ash Concentrations Model simulation 14 th April – 20 th April 2010

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 11 00UTC 16 th April Model column Integrated mass Leipzig lidar model Comparison with ground-based lidar DFAF = 4% ( Dacre et al. 2011, JGR)

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 12 Comparison with Airborne Lidar Vertical cross-section of ash concentration, Lidar (black), NAME (grey) Column Integrated Mass Loading lidar model DFAF = 1.2% ( Grant et al. 2012, ACP)

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 13 Comparison with In-situ Particle Probes Location of FAAM aircraft profiles Profile of ash concentration Measured (black), model (red) DFAF = 2.6% ( Dacre et al. 2013, ACP)

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 14 Summary so far … Q. Can VATD models predict the structure of volcanic ash clouds? -Horizontally to within ~100km -Vertically peak to within ~ 1km but ash layers too thick -Elevated source gives the best simulated ash clouds if information on the plume height is available Q. Can VATD models predict the concentration of volcanic ash clouds? -Reasonably when combined with an appropriate distal fine ash fraction of ~ 2-6% -Peak concentrations underestimated by a factor ~2

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 15 Why are volcanic ash layers so thin? Location of EARLINET lidars Observed Ash Layer Depth Observations NAME NAME: varying turbulence scheme NAME: narrow/wide emission profile

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 16 Quantifying Uncertainty in Volcanic Ash Forecasts

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 17 Outlook and Future Work Icelandic volcanic activity is very likely to occur in the next years so we need to develop a system that minimises disruption Existing VATD can be used to provide reasonable guidance for aviation but there are still large uncertainties We need to effectively communicate the uncertainty in ash forecasts so they can be used in risk based decisions Assimilation of satellite observations Ensemble forecasting

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 18 EXTRA SLIDES

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 19 Qualitative Evaluation 12 UTC 16 th April MODIS visible 10 UTC 16 th April IASI Volcanic Ash 12:24UTC 16 th April