Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group, Atlantic City By: Rich Lyon, AJP-6320 Date: October 21, 2009 Federal Aviation Administration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 Flammability Assurance for Printed Wiring Boards Certification by Similarity Analysis Proposal Boeing Commercial Airplanes Group PWB Material Working.
Advertisements

Marcelo M. Hirschler GBH International
Effect of Moisture on Ignitability of Polymers. Natallia Safronava a, Richard E. Lyon b, Sean B. Crowley b, Stanislav I. Stoliarov c a Technology and Management.
E-Tablet Fire Tests Systems Meeting FAA Fire Safety [1]
Federal Aviation Administration HEAT RELEASE RATE Updates 2014 June Materials Meeting Switzerland Materials Working Group Michael Burns, FAA Tech Center.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Electric Wire Insulation Study: Flammable Properties and Testing Methods Materials Working Group.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Test Results for Proposed Cargo.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Discussion of Filling Compounds IAMFT.
Environmentally Conscious Design & Manufacturing (ME592) Date: April 14, 2000 Slide:1 Environmentally Conscious Design & Manufacturing Class 17: Plastics.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Discussion on Format of New Test.
Aircraft Cargo Compartment Fire Detection
Surrogate Testing and Proposed Certification Procedures for Altered Interior Surfaces Tim Marker FAA Technical Center.
High Temperature Composites Rutgers University Federal Aviation Administration Advanced Materials Flammability Atlantic City, NJ October 24, 2001.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
Modeling Wing Tank Flammability Dhaval D. Dadia Dr. Tobias Rossmann Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Piscataway, New Jersey Steven Summer Federal.
Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center.
ENGINEERING PLASTICS APPLICATIONS INTRODUCTION Advancements made in engineering materials technology have resulted in a situation where metallic materials.
Enclosure Fire Dynamics
Review of Polymers Highlights from MY2100.
A Modeling Study of Ice Accretion on a NACA 4412 Airfoil Daniel Shields.
Presented to: International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group By: Date: April 2-3, 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Next-Generation Oil.
Polymers for heavy engineering applications. PEEK Chemical Resistance Since PEEK™ polymer is semi-crystalline, it is insoluble in all common solvents.
Aircraft Cargo Compartment Fire Detection David Blake FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center Atlantic City Airport, NJ Phone:
ULTRA FIRE RESISTANT THERMOSET POLYMERS Richard E. Lyon Fire Research Program Fire Safety Section AAR-440 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION W.J. Hughes Technical.
Alex WANG R&D Manager Asia Pacific Performance Plastics Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics.
Concept Equipment design and manufacture fire testing instruments according to international test methods. Our range of products are used to test the fire.
RANKING FLAMMABILITY OF AIRCRAFT MATERIALS USING MICROSCALE COMBUSTION CALORIMETRY Richard E. Lyon and Richard N. Walters* Fire Safety Branch AAR-440 FAA.
Understanding the Basics of the IAPD Thermoplastics Rectangle
132,000 sq ft  Fabrication  Composite Structures  Cabin Interiors  Structural Bondments  Compression Molding  Vacuum Forming  NDI  Composite Assembly.
What is a DSC? What is DSC? Differential: measurement of the difference in heat flow from sample and reference side Scanning: the common operation.
Charring Model: Transport within the structure is based on a homogenization theory description of porous media. Volume fractions of each constituent are.
Parameters for the thermal decomposition of epoxy resin/carbon fiber composites in cone calorimeter 4 th ICHS Conference, September 14, 2011 D. Quang Dao.
International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting
Design & Thermo Chemistry of Turbo Combustor P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Design for performance, safety and Reliability…..
Molecular Transport Equations. Outline 1.Molecular Transport Equations 2.Viscosity of Fluids 3.Fluid Flow.
Federal Aviation Administration RTCA Update 0 RTCA Update Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Bremen,
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on New Flammability.
Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group, Atlantic City, NJ By: Robert Ian Ochs Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 Federal Aviation.
Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group – Köln, Germany By: Robert Ian Ochs Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 Federal Aviation.
Design Analysis of Furnace Of A Steam Generator P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Perfection of Primary Cause for All that Continues…..
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration In-Flight Burn- Through Tests Aluminum vs. composite materials Aircraft Systems Fire Working Grp.
Federal Aviation Administration Radiant Panel Test for Thermal/Acoustic Insulation 0 Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire.
Flammability Standardization Task Group 1 IAMFTWG UPDATE.
ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 1 FAA PERSPECTIVE Airfield Pavement Roughness Presentation to: ASTM E17 Committee.
Federal Aviation Administration HRR 2 Development Task Group 2011 March Materials Meeting Savannah, GA Materials Working Group Michael Burns, FAA Tech.
Toulouse Aeronautical Test Centre (CEAT)
Federal Aviation Administration COMPOSITE MATERIAL FIRE FIGHTING Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Atlantic City,
Smoke transport in an aircraft cargo compartment
Presented to: IAMFTWG, Renton, WA By: Robert Ochs Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing.
Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Ducting 0 Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Savannah, GA.
Background Numerous FAR’s mandate fire protection in aircraft powerplant fire zones Parts 23, 25, 27, 29, 33… FAR Part 1 Section 1.1 – Definitions and.
Federal Aviation Administration COMPOSITE MATERIAL FIRE FIGHTING Presented to:International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Renton, Washington,
Federal Aviation Administration RTCA Update 0 RTCA Update Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Savannah,
Federal Aviation Administration Wiring Test 0 Federal Aviation Administration Pat Cahill AJP-632; Fire Safety Team Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
LST SAFETY FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC) 10/21/03. SAFETY ISSUES Seismic Fire Electrical Environmental.
J Developments in: - Low Smoke Fire Resistant Floor Coverings - Low Smoke Fire Resistant Interior Repair Compounds.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Discussion of Full-Scale Testing of Leather.
Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center.
Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Ducting 0 Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Atlantic City,
DIFFERENT TYPES OF PLASTICS
Shanghai Research Institute of Building Sciences
Response to Aircraft Ducting Working Group Members’ Questions
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Fire properties under heat fluz
Post-fire Structural Integrity of Composite Gratings for Offshore Platforms Fire Resistance and Fire Reaction of Bio-Composite Sandwiches for Building.
Mechanical Concept MOLDFLOW KOREA
Fire Characteristics.
International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting
AIRCRAFT FIRE REGULATIONS
Presentation transcript:

Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group, Atlantic City By: Rich Lyon, AJP-6320 Date: October 21, 2009 Federal Aviation Administration QUALIFICATION TEST FOR A/C PANEL ADHESIVES

International Materials Fire Test Working Group October 21, Federal Aviation Administration Establish similarity of bonded details. OBJECTIVEOBJECTIVE PURPOSEPURPOSE Develop a qualification test for flammability of adhesives used in bonded details. APPLICATIONSAPPLICATIONS Certification of New Parts

International Materials Fire Test Working Group October 21, Federal Aviation Administration ADHESIVES TASK GROUP 3M American Airlines Boeing Bombardier Bostik C&D Aerospace Dassault FAA Henkel

International Materials Fire Test Working Group October 21, Federal Aviation Administration INDUSTRY-PROPOSED METHODS OF COMPLIANCE FOR CERTIFICATION OF INTERIOR MATERIALS BONDED DETAILS (a) Bunsen Burner Similarity Bunsen Burner Similarity25.853(d) Heat and Smoke Similarity Testing detail without adhesive* to Appendix F substantiates the bonded configuration Test required if: A > 2 ft 2 Possible Test if: 1 < A < 2 ft 2 No test required* if: A < 1 ft 2 Ref. No. Feature / Construction Part 2: Methods That Will Require Supporting Data *For FAA Qualified Adhesives?

International Materials Fire Test Working Group October 21, Federal Aviation Administration ADHESIVE QUALIFICATION TEST ISSUES FAR 25 versus Other Measurement Method Sample Form Effect of Adherends Effect of Thickness: Does thinner substantiate thicker?

International Materials Fire Test Working Group October 21, Federal Aviation Administration Thickness, inches Peak Heat Release Rate, kW/m 2 Total Heat Release, kW-min/m 2 Peak HRR Total Heat Release Example: Thermoplastic Thickness Ranges OSU Peak HRR of  does not substantiate.080   EUROPLEX PPSU Clear Proposed range

International Materials Fire Test Working Group October 21, Federal Aviation Administration Combustor Mixing Section Pyrolyzer Sample Cup Scrubber Flow Meter O 2 Sensor Exhaust Purge Gas Inlet Sample Post & Thermocouple Oxygen Inlet Standard Test Method for Measuring Flammability Properties of Plastics and Other Solid Materials Using Microscale Combustion Calorimetry, ASTM D 7309

International Materials Fire Test Working Group October 21, Federal Aviation Administration Heat Release Rate (J/g-K) Temperature (°C) cc hchc TpTp  Noncombustible Fraction (g/g) THERMAL COMBUSTION PROPERTIES FROM MCC Peak Heat Release Rate = Heat Release Capacity (J/g-K) Total Heat Release (J/g)  Burning Temperature

International Materials Fire Test Working Group October 21, Federal Aviation Administration PP PE PS PET ABS PMMA Epoxy POM NYLON 66 PC PPO PU PAR PPSU PPS PES PEI LCP PAI PEK PEEK Materials Cost* ($/lb) Phenolic KAPTON PVF Heat Resistant Plastics PSU PVC (rigid) Commodity Plastics *Truckload Prices, 2001 Engineering Plastics Heat Release Capacity (  c ), J/g-K TYPICALLY PASS FAA HRR TEST HEAT RELEASE CAPACITY VERSUS COST OF PLASTICS

International Materials Fire Test Working Group October 21, Federal Aviation Administration Probability of Passing VBB, p Heat Release Capacity  c, J/g-K  *= 448 J/g-K n = 4.46 R = 0.97  *= 448 J/g-K n = 4.46 R = 0.97 ASTM D 3801 VERTICAL BUNSEN BURNER TEST (114 plastics) Probability of Passing the UL 94 V-0 Requirement

International Materials Fire Test Working Group October 21, Federal Aviation Administration HAND LAY-UP OF ADHESIVE / RESIN OSU SAMPLES Fiberglass-reinforced adhesive samples are made by hand lay-up. Samples cured between two Teflon-coated aluminum plates in heated press. Cured samples trimmed to 6  x 6  for OSU HRR testing. Resulting samples ~ 40% resin by weight.

International Materials Fire Test Working Group October 21, Federal Aviation Administration OSU TESTING OF ADHESIVE RESINS 2-min HR (kW-min/m 2 ) Peak HRR (kW/m 2 ) Resin 44111BPA Epoxy 2688BPAE + MDA 2872BPA CE 2848BPC Epoxy 1233Silicone Resin 13 BPC CE

International Materials Fire Test Working Group October 21, Federal Aviation Administration (R = ) avg  pHRR , kW/m 2  c , J/g-K OSU PHRR (binned data) 101 RESINS AND PLASTICS) Maximum Heat Release Capacity from Curve Fit

International Materials Fire Test Working Group October 21, Federal Aviation Administration HRR  65 kW/m 2 = Pass = P HRR > 65 kW/m 2 = Fail = F pHRR /10 = /10 = /10 = /10 = /10 = 0.00 cc p = P/(P + F)  c  Etc. y OSU Data for AIRCRAFT CABIN MATERIALS Transform Quantitative Data into Qualitative Data Using Pass/Fail Criterion 14 CFR PPPPFPPPPFPPFPPFPPFFFPFPFFPPFPFFFFPPFFFFFFFFFPPPPFPPPPFPPFPPFPPFFFPFPFFPPFPFFFFPPFFFFFFFFF

International Materials Fire Test Working Group October 21, Federal Aviation Administration Probability of Passing OSU pHRR, p Heat Release Capacity (  c ), J/g-K  *= 140 J/g-K n = 2.4 R = 0.97  *= 140 J/g-K n = 2.4 R = CFR 25 OSU PHRR (101 RESINS AND PLASTICS) Probability that pHRR  65 kW/m = 102 J/g-K

International Materials Fire Test Working Group October 21, Federal Aviation Administration Adhesive Part Substrate  p,  p  a,  a  s,  s  i = Areal Density of Layer i, g/m 2  i = Heat Release Capacity of Layer in MCC i, J/g-K m i = Mass Fraction of Layer i =  i /  i EFFECT OF ADHERENDS and THICKNESS (Additive Approach Using MCC Data)  construction = m p  p + m a  a + m s  s

International Materials Fire Test Working Group October 21, Federal Aviation Administration Adhesive Part Substrate T i, , h c, E, A, etc. T i = Thickness of Layer i, cm  i = Density of Layer i, g/m 3 h i = Heat Release of Layer, J/g E i, A i = Thermal Decomposition Kinetic Parameters of i EFFECT OF ADHERENDS and THICKNESS (ThermaKin Numerical Burning Model) T i, , h, E, A, etc. Transient energy and mass balance calculation

International Materials Fire Test Working Group October 21, Federal Aviation Administration OSU HRR OF BONDED CONSTRUCTION (ThermaKin Simulation) Heat Flux = 35 kW/m 2 (OSU) + 15 kW/m 2 (Flame) Heat Flux = 35 kW/m 2 (OSU) + 15 kW/m 2 (Flame) Adhesive Layer Thickness = 0.2, 0.5, 1 and 1.5 mm h c = 2X Substrate Substrates = 1/16  (1.5 mm) Thick Charring Plastic (Polycarbonate)

International Materials Fire Test Working Group October 21, Federal Aviation Administration mm Adhesive Layer mm Adhesive Layer mm Adhesive Layer HRR (arbitrary units) HR (arbitrary units) Time, min mm Adhesive Layer Time, min OSU HRRs of BONDED CONSTRUCTIONS (ThermaKin)