Elastic and inelastic relations..... mx+cx+Q(x)= -ma x Q x Q Q=kx elasticinelastic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Passive Vibration Control
Advertisements

Coulomb or Dry Friction Damping.
Outline CH1.Introduction CH2.Preliminary Design CH3.3D Model.
GTStrudl Damping Models for Dynamic Analysis
An-Najah National University
Lecture 2 Free Vibration of Single Degree of Freedom Systems
Reinforced Concrete Flexural Members
Chp-6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation
Wind loading and structural response Lecture 19 Dr. J.D. Holmes
Lesson 1 - Oscillations Harmonic Motion Circular Motion
Lecture 2 Free Vibration of Single Degree of Freedom Systems
Oscillations Simple Harmonic Motion Velocity and Acceleration in SHM
Lecture 2 January 19, 2006.
by: Jon Heintz, S.E. & Robert Pekelnicky
Mechanical Vibrations
Ground Motion Intensity Measures for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Hemangi Pandit Joel Conte Jon Stewart John Wallace.
ECIV 724 A Dynamics of Structures Instructor: Dr. Dimitris C. Rizos 300 Main St. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering (803)
Yousef Bozorgnia, Mahmoud Hachem, Kenneth Campbell PEER GMSM Workshop, UC Berkeley October 27, 2006 Attenuation of Inelastic Spectra and Its Applications.
Partially Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls
Overview of GMSM Methods Nicolas Luco 1 st Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification (GMSM) for Nonlinear Analysis – 27 October 2006.
Dynamics Free vibration: Eigen frequencies
Problmes-1.
Prof. Sarosh H Lodi NED University of Engineering and Technology What Works and Does not Work in the Science and Social Science of Earthquake Vulnerability,
1 HOMEWORK 1 1.Derive equation of motion of SDOF using energy method 2.Find amplitude A and tanΦ for given x 0, v 0 3.Find natural frequency of cantilever,
S1-1 SECTION 1 REVIEW OF FUNDAMENTALS. S1-2 n This section will introduce the basics of Dynamic Analysis by considering a Single Degree of Freedom (SDOF)
Forced Oscillations and Magnetic Resonance. A Quick Lesson in Rotational Physics: TORQUE is a measure of how much a force acting on an object causes that.
Preliminary Investigations on Post-earthquake Assessment of Damaged RC Structures Based on Residual Drift Jianze Wang Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Kaoshan.
SHEAR IN BEAMS. SHEAR IN BEAMS Introduction Loads applied to beams produce bending moments, shearing forces, as shown, and in some cases torques. Beams.
University of Palestine
Seismic Design of Concrete Structure.
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ARTIFICIAL ACCELEROGRAMS
Task 3—Development and verification of simplified design tools Juan Vargas – Junior in Civil Engineering – Vice President SCU SHPE Mark Aschheim – Professor,
Chapter 19 MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS
Oscillations & Waves IB Physics. Simple Harmonic Motion Oscillation 4. Physics. a. an effect expressible as a quantity that repeatedly and regularly.
Static Pushover Analysis
Inelastic Seismic Response of Structures
Feb 18, /34 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech What to bring and what to study One 8.5 X 11 formula sheet, one side only, no examples. Save.
1. 2 CE-312 Engineering Geology and Seismology Instructor: Dr Amjad Naseer Lecture#15 Department of Civil Engineering N-W.F.P University of Engineering.
University of Palestine
1 NEESR Project Meeting 22/02/2008 Modeling of Bridge Piers with Shear-Flexural Interaction and Bridge System Response Prof. Jian Zhang Shi-Yu Xu Prof.
Chapter 14 - Oscillations
Presented by: Sasithorn THAMMARAK (st109957)
Nonlinear Performance and Potential Damage of Degraded Structures Under Different Earthquakes The 5 th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering “Facing.
Simple Harmonic Motion: SHM
Response of MDOF structures to ground motion 1. If damping is well-behaving, or can be approximated using equivalent viscous damping, we can decouple.
Composite Construction
System Models.
Phys 250 Ch14 p1 Chapter 13: Periodic Motion What we already know: Elastic Potential Energy energy stored in a stretched/compressed spring Force: Hooke’s.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 18 Force Vibration Response Spectrum.
1 10. Harmonic oscillator Simple harmonic motion Harmonic oscillator is an example of periodic motion, where the displacement of a particle from.
Basics of Earthquakes Frequency
Force Vibration Response Spectrum
1 March 22, 2002Singapore, Elgamal Response Spectrum Ahmed Elgamal.
CIVL471 DESIGN OF RC STRUCTURES
Aristotelis Charalampakis and Vlasis Koumousis
Seismic analysis of Bridges Part II
Mechanical Vibrations
10. Harmonic oscillator Simple harmonic motion
(PERFORMANCE-BASED PLASTIC DESIGN)
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering
Seismic Moment Dr. Syed Mohamed Ibrahim M.Tech., Ph.D.,
An-Najah National University
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering
Outline CH1.Introduction CH2.Preliminary Design CH3.3D Model.
Earthquake resistant buildings
STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS SEYE NIGUSSIE. Introduction WHAT IS STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS ?  Dynamics concerned with the study of force and motion which are time dependent.
Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
Structure II Course Code: ARCH 209 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
November 5, 2002 SE 180 Final Project.
Presentation transcript:

Elastic and inelastic relations..... mx+cx+Q(x)= -ma x Q x Q Q=kx elasticinelastic

Exercise 1 (A hysteretic energy dissipation index E h ) A hysteretic energy dissipation index E h corresponds to equivalent viscous damping factor h. Derive the equation (3.1) by calculating energy dissipation ΔU by viscous damping per cycle under the ‘resonant steady-state’ and putting ΔU = ΔW. E h = ΔW/2πF m D m (3.1) c: damping coefficient(=2hm ), m: mass of the system : natural circular frequency(= ) k=F m /D m y: amplitude, a: maximum amplitude(=D m ) p: input frequency, : phase difference ‘Resonant steady-state’ means p=.

Example 2 (A hysteretic energy dissipation index E h in the case of elasto-plastic model) Derive the equation shown below by calculating energy dissipation ΔW under the ‘resonant steady-state’ in the case of elasto-plastic model.

Excercise 2 (A hysteretic energy dissipation index E h in the case of Clough model) Derive the equation (3.8) by calculating energy dissipation ΔW under the ‘resonant steady-state’ in the case of modified Clough model. (3.8)

Simple method to get elastic period of SDOF system w: a unit weight(=12000N/m 2 ), Σ A f : sum of whole floor area of the building(m 2 ), g: gravity(cm/s 2 ), F c : compressive strength of concrete (N/mm 2 ), b: width of a column(cm), D: depth of a olumn(cm), h: story height(cm), n: number of story stiffness of concrete (N/mm 2 ) moment of inertia of a column (cm 4 )

Simple method to get base shear coefficient of SDOF system τ c : ultimate shear strength of columns(N/mm 2 =F c /15), A c : sum of 1st story column section area(cm 2 ), w : a unit weight(=12000N/m 2 ), Σ A f : sum of whole floor area of the building(m 2 )

Example 3 (Simple method to get fundamental parameters of SDOF system ) 3-story building: column size: 60cm x 60cm Fc= 24(N/mm2) plan elevation story height: 3.6m ⇔ longitudinal direction

Exercise 3 (Simple method to get fundamental parameters of SDOF system ) 12-story building: column size: 95cm x 95cm Fc= 48(N/mm 2 ) plan story height: 3.5m elevation ⇔ longitudinal direction

Newmark’s design criteria ・ property of energy conservation: For short period systems (T<0.5s) the energy dissipation is constant. ・ property of displacement conservation: For long period systems (T>0.5s) the response displacement is constant. Newmark’s design criteria was used to decide strength of the system for each input strong ground motion.

Property of energy conservation For short period systems (T<0.5s) The area of trapezoid OBCE = the one of △ OAD (μ δ y +(μ-1) δ y )Q y /2= δ L* Q L /2 δ y = Q y /k, δ L = Q L /k

Property of displacement conservation For long period systems (T>0.5s) inelastic response displacement is the same as elastic response displacement. μ δ y = Q L /k δ y = Q y /k

Example 5 (Newmark’s design criteria) Calculate response displacement in the case that 1) elastic period=0.3 sec., base shear coefficient= 0.4, elastic response acceleration=0.8g at 0.3 sec. 2) elastic period=1.0 sec., base shear coefficient= 0.1, elastic response acceleration=0.2g at 1.0 sec.

Exercise 5 (Newmark’s design criteria) Calculate response displacement under the input of El-Centro NS using elastic spectra (damping factor=0.05, Fig.4.3,(b), p.139) and Newmark’s design criteria in the case that 1) 7-story reinforced concrete building (base shear coefficient= 0.3, story height=2.8(m)) 2) 20-story steel building (base shear coefficient= 0.05, story height=3.5(m)) T=0.02H (T: period of the building (s), H: height of the building(m)) for reinforced concrete building T=0.03H (T: period of the building (s), H: height of the building(m)) for steel building

Tripartite response spectra Response spectra which show response acceleration, velocity and displacement simultaneously using the relations: S V =ωS D S A =ωS V =ω 2 S D S D : response displacement S V : response pseudo-velocity S A : response pseudo-acceleration

Ductility factor Ductility factor μ is defined as the ratio of the maximum response displacement x to the yielding displacement x y. Ductility factor is used as the index of representing the damage level.

Ductility factor of short and long period system Short period systemlong period system μ=dm/dy=5μ=dm/dy=2

Response ductility factor spectra Ductility factors were calculated in the case of bilinear Takeda model under the input of El-Centro NS and Fukiai (Kobe EQ.) changing the base shear coefficient.

Response ductility factor spectra Input: El-Centro NS Bilinear Takeda model

Response ductility factor spectra Input: Fukiai (Kobe EQ.) Bilinear Takeda model

Comparison of response ductility factor spectra Input: Fukiai (Kobe EQ.) Bilinear Takeda model Input: El-Centro NS Bilinear Takeda model

Required strength Required strength which give maximum response ductility factors within constant values is important, because we need design base shear coefficient in the structural design. ↑ Allowable ductility factor μa

Required strength spectra Input: El-Centro NS Bilinear Takeda model

Required strength spectra Input: Fukiai (Kobe EQ.) Bilinear Takeda model

Comparison of required strength spectra Input: El-Centro NS Bilinear Takeda model Input: Fukiai (Kobe EQ.) Bilinear Takeda model

Example 8 (Calculation of required strength spectrum from response ductility factor spectra) Calculate required strength (base shear coefficient) spectrum from response ductility factor spectra in the case that allowable ductility factor=4, model: bilinear Takeda model (α=0.5, β=0.01 ) under the input of El-Centro NS. Response ductility factor spectra changing base shear coefficient of the system input motion: El-Centro NS T(s) Cy= : greater than 100

Example 8 (Calculation of required strength spectrum from response ductility factor spectra) Calculate required strength (base shear coefficient) spectrum from response ductility factor spectra in the case that allowable ductility factor=4, model: bilinear Takeda model (α=0.5, β=0.01 ) under the input of El-Centro NS. Response ductility factor spectra changing base shear coefficient of the system input motion: El-Centro NS T(s) Cy= : greater than 100

Required strength spectrum (allowable ductility factor=4 ) by El-Centro NS required T(s) strength (base shear coefficient)

Exercise 8 (Calculation of required strength spectrum from response ductility factor spectra) Calculate required strength (base shear coefficient) spectrum from response ductility factor spectra in the case that allowable ductility factor=4, model: bilinear Takeda model (α=0.5, β=0.01 ) under the input of Taft EW and compare it with El-Centro NS. Response ductility factor spectra changing base shear coefficient of the system input motion: Taft EW T(s) Cy= : greater than 100

Exercise 8 (Calculation of required strength spectrum from response ductility factor spectra) Calculate required strength (base shear coefficient) spectrum from response ductility factor spectra in the case that allowable ductility factor=4, model: bilinear Takeda model (α=0.5, β=0.01 ) under the input of Taft EW and compare it with El-Centro NS. Response ductility factor spectra changing base shear coefficient of the system input motion: Taft EW T(s) Cy= : greater than 100

Required strength spectra (allowable ductility factor=4 ) by El-Centro NS and Taft EW required strength (base shear T(s) coefficient) El-Centro Taft NS EW

Equivalent linear system Inelastic responses can be estimated by equivalent linear systems with equivalent period and equivalent viscous damping. x Q x Q inelastic with equivalent viscous damping elastic equivalent period

Method to calculate inelastic responses by equivalent linear systems How to decide equivalent period and damping equivalent period: period corresponding maximum displacement equivalent damping: equivalent viscous damping

Example 9 (Required strength spectrum by equivalent linear system) Calculate required strength (base shear coefficient) spectrum (T=0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 3.0 s) by equivalent linear system in the case that allowable ductility factor=4, model: bilinear Takeda model (α=0.5, β=0.01 ) under the input of El-Centro NS from elastic response spectra (h=0.05)→ using the damping reduction factor in Equation shown below and compare it with required strength spectrum by inelastic system and Newmark’s design criteria. F h : reduction factor from h=0.05, h: damping factor response T(s) acceleration (cm/s 2 )

Required strength spectrum (allowable ductility factor=4 ) by El-Centro NS using equivalent linear system comparing with actual spectrum Required strength (base shear coefficient) Inelastic Equivalent Newmark ’ s T(s) system linear design system criteria ,

Required strength spectrum (allowable ductility factor=4 ) by El-Centro NS using equivalent linear system comparing with actual spectrum Required strength (base shear coefficient) Inelastic Equivalent T(s) system linear system

Exercise 9 (Required strength spectrum by equivalent linear system) Calculate required strength (base shear coefficient) spectrum (T=0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 3.0 s) by equivalent linear system in the case that allowable ductility factor=4, model: bilinear Takeda model (α=0.5, β=0.01 ) under the input of Taft EW from elastic response spectra (h=0.05)→ using the damping reduction factor in Equation shown below and compare it with required strength spectrum by inelastic system and Newmark’s design criteria. F h : reduction factor from h=0.05, h: damping factor response T(s) acceleration (cm/s 2 )

Required strength spectrum (allowable ductility factor=4 ) by Taft EW using equivalent linear system comparing with actual spectrum Required strength (base shear coefficient) Inelastic Equivalent T(s) system linear system

Required strength spectrum (allowable ductility factor=4 ) by Taft EW using equivalent linear system comparing with actual spectrum Required strength (base shear coefficient) Inelastic Equivalent Newmark ’ s T(s) system linear design system criteria ,

Example & Excersise10 (Prediction of response ductility factor from elastic response using equivalent linear system and comparison with actual structural damage) Calculate response ductility factor in the case of longitudinal direction of Kuoshing National Elementary School Building B under the input of recorded strong ground motion of 1999 Chi-chi, Taiwan earthquake using equivalent linear system and compare with actual structural damage.

Building A (Shikang Natl. Elem. Sch.)

Elastic response spectrum at Shikang National Elementary School Building A

Building B (Kuoshing Natl. Elem. Sch.)

Elastic response spectrum at Kuoshing National Elementary School Building B

Shikang N.E.S. Kuoshing N.E.S. Building A Building B unit of weight 1.2 tonf/m2 Fc kgf/cm2 No. of story 3 3 column1 depth(longitudinal) cm column1 depth(transvers) cm column2 depth(longitudinal) cm column2 depth(transvers) cm column3 depth(longitudinal) cm column3 depth(transvers) cm span length1(transvers) cm span length2(transvers) cm span length(longitudinal) cm story height cm No. of span(longitudinal) 16 5 No. of span(transvers) 2 5 column1 transvers column2 column3 span length (longitudinal) span length1 (transvers) span length2 (transvers) longitudinal Information of the buildings

Simple method to get elastic period of SDOF system w: a unit weight(=12000N/m 2 ), Σ A f : sum of whole floor area of the building(m 2 ), g: gravity(cm/s 2 ), F c : compressive strength of concrete (N/mm 2 ), b: width of a column(cm), D: depth of a olumn(cm), h: story height(cm), n: number of story stiffness of concrete (N/mm 2 ) moment of inertia of a column (cm 4 )

equivalent period T’

Simple method to get base shear coefficient of SDOF system τ c : ultimate shear strength of columns(N/mm 2 =F c /15), A c : sum of 1st story column section area(cm 2 ), w : a unit weight(=12000N/m 2 ), Σ A f : sum of whole floor area of the building(m 2 )

Equivalent viscous damping and damping reduction factor Decide μso that response acceleration is equal to base shear coefficient at equivalent period T’ and equivalent viscous damping factor E h from elastic response spectrum of damping factor 0.05.