+ What Should I Expect to See During Mathematics Instruction? Helping Secondary Principals Recognize and Support Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Empowering Learners through the Common Core State Standards
Advertisements

Office of Curriculum, Instruction and School Support 2012 Mathematical Practice 3: Construct Viable Arguments and Critique the Reasoning of Others Mathematics.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Functions A Close Look at Grade 9 Module.
Student Learning Targets in the CCSS Classroom: Mathematics.
Explicit Instruction: when, where, and how?
Implementing the CCSS Through Coaching Atomic Conference December 2, 2014.
Digging into the Instructional Design Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez MTL Session, September 20, 2011.
EngageNY.org Highlighting a Module 2 Lesson: Secondary.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
CCSS Mathematics Leadership Team Tamara Smith Regional Mathematics Coordinator Olympic ESD Complete the Math Task on the Table.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Kindergarten- Module.
Dr. Laura McLaughlin Taddei
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Application and Concept Development.
Theories of Action: What are they, why are they important, and how are they created? January 2015 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell,
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Theme 2: Expanding Assessment and Evaluation for FNMI Students Goal #1: First Nations, Métis and Inuit student achievement is increased as measured by.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Functions A Close Look at Grade 9 Module.
Measured Progress ©2011 ASDN Webinar Series Spring 2013 Session Four March 27, 2013 New Alaska State Standards for Math: Connecting Content with Classroom.
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Day 6. Agenda Just how is this thing supposed to go? Math! Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability.
Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.
Mathematics Teacher Leader Session 1: The National Mathematics Strategy & Modelling Exemplary Teaching 1.
Achievethecore.org 1 Implementing Standards and Incorporating Mathematical Practices Sandra M. Alberti AMTNJ October 24, 2013.
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 5 Module 2.
1 Getting to Know the CMSP Three Components of the CMSP- Mathematics Curriculum Guides Pacing Guides Lesson Design Template.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Mathematics Professional Development Senior School Teachers Session 1: Teaching Through Problem Solving 1.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
ELA: Focus on Collaborative Conversations & Writing FCUSD Instructional Focus Meeting Sara Parenzin September 20, 2012 Welcome! Please sign in and start.
01.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 16 SEPTEMBER 2015 EMBARKING ON A LEADERSHIP JOURNEY.
District Learning Day August 5, 2015
CCSS Mathematics Fellows Tamara Smith Regional Mathematics Coordinator Olympic ESD Complete the Math Task on the Table.
A Closer Look I6: Differentiation to Support Content Language Objectives.
Session 2 Objective You will synthesize your knowledge of Mathematical Practice Standard 4 Model with Mathematics.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions High School
Integrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice with the Standards for Mathematical Content Part One – K-5 Math Oct. 23,
CCSS Mathematics Fellows Tamara Smith Regional Mathematics Coordinator Olympic ESD Complete the Math Task on the Table.
CFN 204 · Diane Foley · Network Leader CMP3 Professional Development Presented by: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach CFN204 1.
Inquiry Based Learning District Learning Day 1:45-2:45 August 5, 2015.
Professional Growth Systems And Nevada Academic Content Standards Strengthening teacher capacity through powerful feedback March 20, 2015.
Instructional Coaching February 1, Welcome! Please Do Now: Take 2 minutes to write 3 lines: How would you define Instructional Coaching? What is.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
Effective Practices and Shifts in Teaching and Learning Mathematics Dr. Amy Roth McDuffie Washington State University Tri-Cities.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 3.
13.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION APR 2015 MARGINS: GREAT FOR ERRORS, NOT SO GOOD FOR.
Connections and Actions Utilizing coaching skills to enhance mathematics instruction Astrid FossumLee Ann Pruske Laura MalyCynthia Rodriguez MTL Sessions,
Effective mathematics instruction:  foster positive mathematical attitudes;  focus on conceptual understanding ;  includes students as active participants.
Kent School District Middle School Math Curriculum Review TAMI OHOYO COORDINATOR OF SECONDARY MATH TEACHING & LEARNING.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus- Grade 3.
Take a few minutes to complete the survey on your desk.
+ What Should I Expect to See During Mathematics Instruction? Helping Elementary Principals Recognize and Support Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning.
© Crown copyright 2006 Renewing the Frameworks Driving Improvement.
+ Washington State Mathematics Fellows Andrew Hickman NCESD Math Fellows.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Principles to Actions Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices The Case of Wobberson Torchon and the Calling Plans 1 Task Algebra I Principles to Actions.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
Module II Creating Capacity for Learning and Equity in Schools: The Mode of Instructional Leadership Dr. Mary A. Hooper Creating Capacity for Learning.
Common Core State Standards Mathematics
Core Math Instruction RtI Innovations in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI October 12-13, 2017.
Welcome! Session 2 Theme: Instruction and Assessment
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Elementary Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

+ What Should I Expect to See During Mathematics Instruction? Helping Secondary Principals Recognize and Support Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning

+ At your table… Introduce yourselves. a) Name b) District/School c) Role d) What brought you to this session Also make appointments with a “salt” and “pepper” partner who is not at your table for later conversations.

+ Boston Public Schools: A Snapshot

+ District Context Curriculum materials currently in place in the district; Instructional approaches currently in place in secondary mathematics classrooms; Opportunities for communication with principals; and Current capacity of the Mathematics Office.

+ Goals  Consider strategies and experiences to help principals understand the expectations of the CCSSM;  Reflect on how we can help prepare principals to look for mathematical thinking and reasoning in classrooms; and  Identify next steps with principals that can help prepare them to be instructional leaders in mathematics.

+ BPS Core Actions for K-12 Mathematics

+ Read through the indicators for Core Actions 1, 2, and 3. Highlight words and/or statements that you believe principals would struggle to visualize. Turn and talk to a partner about your thoughts.

+ CORE ACTION 1: Ensure the work of the lesson reflects the content shifts required by the CCSS for Mathematics. A.The lesson focuses on the depth of course-level cluster(s), course-level content standard(s) or part(s) thereof. A.The lesson intentionally relates new concepts to students’ prior skills and knowledge. A.The lesson intentionally targets the aspect(s) of rigor ( conceptual understanding, Procedural Fluency, Application) called for by the standard(s) being addressed. Starting points

+ CORE ACTION 2: Employ instructional practices that provide opportunities for all students to master the content of the lesson. A.The teacher makes the mathematics of the lesson explicit by using explanations, representations, and/or examples. A.The teacher provides time for students to work with and practice course-level problems and exercises. A.The teacher strengthens all students’ understanding of the content by sharing a variety of in students’ representations and solution methods. B.The teacher deliberately checks for understanding throughout the lesson and adapts the lesson according to student understanding. C.The teacher summarizes the mathematics with references to student work and discussion in order to reinforce the focus of the lesson.

+ CORE ACTION 3: Provide all students opportunities to exhibit mathematical practices in connection with the content of the lesson. C. The teacher establishes a classroom culture in which students explain their thinking. Students elaborate with a second sentence (spontaneously or prompted by the teacher or another student) to explain their thinking and connect it to their first sentence D. The teacher creates the conditions for student conversations where students talk about each other’s thinking. Students talk about and ask questions about each other’s thinking, in order to clarify or improve their own mathematical understanding.

+ 20 x 20

+ How much would a 100 x 100 burger cost? How much would an N x N burger cost? A 2 x 2 has 2 slices of meat, and 2 slices of cheese.

+ Structure of the Activity ① Principals worked on the problem in groups of 3. ② We selected 3 solution pathways while monitoring their progress. ③ We explored connections and ultimately established equivalence among the approaches. ④ We elicited their justifications and thinking as they explained their solutions.  Implications for Planning? “Thinking Through a Lesson Protocol”

+

+ In’n’Out Activity/Thinking Through a Lesson Protocol In your table groups, discuss: 1 What important ideas emerged for you as you went through the activity and read through the planning framework? 2 How will this impact your work with principals?

+ What does it look like, sound like, feel like when students are reasoning through a problem? Please read the 2 student dialogues: Fitting a Polynomial and Rational Exponents

+ Find your Salt Partner. Have a brief conversation about these questions. What was helpful about the student dialogues? What questions might principals have?

+ What are multiple representations? Do you think there are more lines or points? Or are the number of each equal? Provide evidence for your claim.

+ Did this activity help expand your understanding of multiple representations? Why or why not? How would principals engage with this activity?

+ Conceptual Understanding and making meaning

+ What is Pi, Anyway? Use the “Go Around” protocol again to share what you read. 1. Each person shares his or her thoughts for 1 minute. 2. Listeners jot down any questions or comments or additional thoughts. 3. After everyone has shared, take 4-5 minutes for group discussion to find common themes.

+ Find your Pepper Partner. Have a brief conversation about these questions. What would principals see in this case? What questions might they have?

+ Possible Next Steps with Principals Principal collaborations with math coaches and teachers leaders in schools. Principal visits to classrooms that include supportive conversations and questions. Principal support for participation in professional development designed to strengthen mathematics teaching practices. Principals sharing evidence or and artifacts from thoughtful mathematics instruction in their buildings. Principals creating regular and consistent collaborative planning structures for teachers Other possibilities...

+ THANK YOU!

+ Contact Information Linda Ruiz Davenport BPS Director of K-12 Mathematics Anurupa Ganguly BPS Assistant Director of K-12 Mathematics