Challenges For Realizing the ILC The View from HEPAP Fred Gilman Snowmass 2005 August 23, 2005.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Importance of the Process Barbara Iasiello Global Project, OECD.

Advertisements

Department of Energy Office of Science HEP FY08 Budget Status and Issues Robin Staffin preCRB Discussion April

30 November 2004 /EPP The View from the Larger US Scientific Community Challenges for Realizing the ILC: Funding, Regionalism and International Collaboration.

1 AAAS Meeting: February 2008  Particle Physics and the Responsible Use of Public Resources.

Beyond the ALCPG David B. MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Director for PPA.

1 Personal Perspectives “Elementary Particle Physics in the 21st Century” Barry C. Barish Caltech EPP Nov-04 International Linear Collider.

Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy Board on Physics and Astronomy Committee on Setting Priorities for NSF’s Large Research Facility Projects.

HEPAP SUBPANEL Synopsis of the Long Range Plan for U.S. High Energy Physics Jon Bagger / Barry Barish Presentation to HEPAP October 29, 2001.

Department of Energy Office of Science Report from DOE Office of High Energy Physics Report from DOE Office of High Energy Physics Dr. Robin Staffin Associate.

1 August 7, 2006 David Hitlin DOE Annual Program Review David Hitlin DOE Annual Program Review August 7, 2006.

Department of Energy Office of Science Yet Another Report from DOE Office of High Energy Physics Presented to SLUO September 10, 2006 Dr. Robin.

1 1 David Hitlin DOE Program Review August 10, 2005 David Hitlin DOE Annual Review August 10, 2005 David Hitlin DOE Program Review August 10, 2005.

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy SLAC Users Organization Meeting July 6, 2004 Dr. Robin Staffin, Associate Director Office of High Energy Physics.

J. BrauJune 8, Fermilab Users Meeting ILC Related Talks Congressional Perspective Judy Biggert, US Congress News from the NSF Jon Kotcher, NSF ILC/T2K.

Interdisciplinary and Interagency Cooperation in High Energy Physics Barry Barish BPA 5-Nov-02.

ILC Spanish Meeting – Gandía, 1 de Diciembre de /25 ILC Communication and Outreach ILC Communication and Outreach Perrine Royole-Degieux

ALCC Americas’ Linear Collider Committee Andy White University of Texas at Arlington.

Class Directors and Committee Chairs Spring Zone Rally Training Workshop.

A national science policy challenge: access to major research facilities abroad in an era of increased globalization Homer A. Neal University of Michigan.

International collaboration in high energy physics experiments  All large high energy physics experiments today are strongly international.  A necessary.

Asian View Point as ACFA Chair and Global View Point as New ILCSC Chair Shin-ichi Kurokawa KEK 2 nd ILC Workshop August 23, 2005 Snowmass, Colorado Shin-ichi.

The Future of US Accelerator Science – Comments from NSF Tony F. Chan Assistant Director MPS/NSF AAAS Chicago February 13, 2009.

1 Albrecht Wagner, Snowmass 0805 Albrecht Wagner DESY and Hamburg University Challenges for Realising the ILC.

HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.

ICFA Report to KILC12 January 2011 to April 2012 Pier Oddone – ICFA Chair Pier Oddone; 23 April 2012ICFA Report to KILC121.

Office of High Energy Physics View on Dark Energy Collaborations Kathleen Turner Office of High Energy Physics (HEP) Office of Science (SC), U.S. Department.

STRATEGIC PLANNING AND COMMUNITY PROCESS 15/23/2013

Organizing the Linear Collider. Steps toward the ILC 1989 – 1996: Operation of the world’s only linear collider, the 90 GeV SLC at Stanford Linear Accelerator.

BNL Overview DOE Annual HEP Program Review Brookhaven National Laboratory April 17-19, 2006 Sam Aronson.

Department of Energy Office of Science High Energy Physics Briefing to the Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee Dr. Robin Staffin Associate Director,

Physics Priorities S. Dawson July 11, 2007 Fermilab Steering Committee Meeting.

Hitoshi Yamamoto, 15-Mar-2013, ILC detector monthly meeting, KEK 1 Detector Introduction.

P5 and the Particle Physics Roadmap A. Seiden UC Santa Cruz Chair of P5.

Remarks at the 2005 International Linear Collider Workshop Dr. Robin Staffin Associate Director DOE Office of High Energy Physics August 23, 2005.

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science High Energy Physics Advisory Panel Meeting FY 2009 Budget Request.

P5 and the HEP Program A. Seiden Fermilab June 2, 2003.

Class Directors and Committee Chairs Key Club Kick Off Conference Training Workshop.

ILC in Japan A 10 minute introduction H.Weerts Argonne National Lab March 24, 2014 University of Chicago.

FALC Funding Agencies for Large Colliders. We will soon enter the era of The Fermi energy scale The origin of mass – the Higgs paradigma The ratio between.

11 DOE Office of Science High Energy Physics Program AAAC Meeting October 15, 2009 National Science Foundation Dennis Kovar Associate Director of the Office.

THE INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FUTURE ACCELERATORS (ICFA) Roy Rubinstein2nd International Conference on New Frontiers in Physics - 4 September

Report from ILCSC Shin-ichi Kurokawa KEK ILCSC Chair GDE meeting at Frascati December 7, 2005.

Some Words from the New ILCSC Chair Shin-ichi Kurokawa KEK 8 th ACFA LC Workshop July 12, 2005 Daegu, Korea.

Pathways to Explore Neutrino Physics Fred Gilman NuFact03 New York June 5, 2003.

FALC Was “Funding agencies for linear collider” Now “funding agencies for large colliders” WHY ??

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 ILC R&D Program Dr. David Sutter, Senior Program Manager Office of High Energy Physics Office of Science.

1 GUTs and Branes DESY Theory Workshop 2003 A brief introduction to the future of particle physics at DESY Albrecht Wagner Hamburg, 23 September 2003.

Summary Comments and Discussion Pier Oddone 40 th Anniversary Users’ Meeting June 8, 2007.

WWSWWS Report of the World Wide Study J. Brau June 4, 2008 Dubna ILCSC Meeting.

Welcome and Presentation of Charge Steve Holmes Accelerator Advisory Committee ( May 10-12, 2005.

Introduction and Charge Barry Barish GDE Meeting Frascati 7-Dec-05.

Atsuto Suzuki (KEK), Chair ICFA Report from ICFA ICFA mission and membershipICFA PanelICFA Activity.

Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.

News Y2K June 25, Summary of June 12 Face-to-Face Meeting.

DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop December, 2007 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK,

P5 Report: The Particle Physics Roadmap 1 A. Seiden Fermilab May 14, 2007.

BNL Overview DOE Annual HEP Program Review Brookhaven National Laboratory April 17-19, 2006 Sam Aronson.

ICFA Report to New Frontiers in Physics January 2011 to April 2012 Pier Oddone – ICFA Chair Pier Oddone; June 15, 2012New Frontiers in Physics1.

Perspective on the Future of HEP By Jonathan Dorfan, SLAC Director Snowmass 2001 Sunday, July 1, 2001.

Philip Burrows HEP Forum, Coseners House, 6/05/06 Elementary Particle Physics in the 21 st Century Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University.

The ILC Outlook Barry Barish HEP 2005 Joint ECFA-EPS Lisbon, Portugal 23-July-05.

Revealing the Hidden Nature of Space and Time Charting the Course for Elementary Particle Physics (in the U.S.) Committee on Elementary Particle Physics.

HEPAP Facilities Subpanel and the Cosmic Frontier SLAC Snowmass Cosmic Frontiers Meeting March 6, 2013 Josh Frieman Fermilab and University of Chicago.

FNAL SCRF Review R. Kephart. What is this Review? FNAL has argued that SCRF technology is an “enabling” accelerator technology (much like superconducting.

ILC Communications Perrine Royole-Degieux in2p3

Yet Another Report from DOE Office of High Energy Physics

U.S. High Energy Physics ̶ A Perspective from the DOE Program Office

Yasuhiro Okada, Executive Director, KEK

DOE-HEP NSF-EPP …NASA, etc HEPAP P5 Collider PAC Tev/LHC/ILC

ICFA Report to FALC June to November 2015 J. Mnich (DESY)

Presentation transcript:

Challenges For Realizing the ILC The View from HEPAP Fred Gilman Snowmass 2005 August 23, 2005

Prologue Particle Physics Has Changed Particle physics is in revolutionary times. Along with the exhilarating achievement of a deep and beautiful understanding of the matter around us, we have the humbling appreciation that 95% of the universe is made of something else whose secrets could be as surprising and fascinating as all that has come before. The changing science of particle physics has been realized in what particle physicists are doing and preparing to do; it is reflected as well in the plans for the field of the subpanels of HEPAP and the recent expositions Quantum Universe and Discovering the Quantum Universe: The Role of Colliders.

Prologue HEPAP Has Changed An evolving field and agencies ready to ask for HEPAP’s help have made for subpanels simultaneously working at multiple levels: specific experiments (RSVP); sub-areas (TFCR, DETF, NuSAG, AAR&D); setting priorities across the whole field (P5); bringing the science of particle physics to broader audiences (Quantum Universe, LHC-ILC). The advice often involves multiple agencies (DOE, NSF, NASA) and multiple advisory committees (HEPAP, NSAC, AAAC).

Progress US/HEPAP-centric Milestones Gilman Subpanel 1998 Snowmass 2001 Bagger-Barish Subpanel Report 2002 USLCSG 2002 DOE HEP Facilities Recommendations 2003 DOE Office of Science Twenty-Year Facilities Plan 2003 Involvement in the Global Science Forum Consultative Group on High-Energy Physics

Progress Informing EPP2010 The US National Academies have convened EPP2010, a broad-based committee on particle physics, that will make a prioritized fifteen-year plan. EPP2010 asked HEPAP specific questions on the physics case, the R&D plan, and the international-project aspects of the linear collider. The latter questions were answered by reports from the USLCSG and Barry Barish for the GDE. The questions on the physics case were answered - by a special report from a HEPAP subpanel, Discovering the Quantum Universe: The Role of Colliders, plus - a cover letter answering specific questions with pointers to Discovering the Quantum Universe.

Prospects Some Personal Opinions Without being host to the ILC, in the next decade the US will no longer be among the world leaders in particle physics. US particle physics, much of it carried out off-shore and with stiff competition from other science opportunities, will be supported accordingly. We need an affirmation from EPP2010 and from the Secretary of Energy that the US is to be among the world leaders and will prepare a bid-to-host the ILC.

Prospects Some Personal Opinions (2) But the real job falls on us. We must dramatically reprogram the field, assuming the current level of funding, in the next few years in order to free up new resources to ramp up the ILC effort and make the US a credible host. Among other things, that means decisions to give up on some near-term science in favor of going for the ILC; that would be tough even if we knew the ILC was sure to be built. The ILC is not for sure. The course is risky, but the alternatives are worse.