Submitting a Proposal: Best Practices By: Anu Singh Science Assistant 703-292-7141.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strengths of Funded & Weaknesses of Unfunded MRI Proposals
Advertisements

 Introductions  Webinar etiquette ◦ Please place your phone on MUTE if you are not asking a question or not responding to the presenters. ◦ If you encounter.
Proposal Preparation. Life Cycle of a Proposal Funded! Conceptualize Declined Try again What next? Write & Revise.
INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES WRITING GRANT PROPOSALS Thursday, April 10, 2014 Randy Draper, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Room 125, IBS.
Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney Division of Environmental Biology
NSF Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney, Ph.D Adjunct, Department of Biology New Mexico State University 24 September 2008.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
NSF East Asia and Pacific Summer Institutes (EAPSI) Shelley Hawthorne Smith UA Graduate College Office of Fellowships and Community Engagement
NSF Merit Review Criteria Revision Background. Established Spring 2010 Rationale: – More than 13 years since the last in-depth review and revision of.
Preparation/Content of an NSF proposal NSF proposals are uploaded to the Fastlane website prior to submission (NIH uses Grants.gov): 1.Cover sheet (basic.
Paperwork Many think that it’s just Junk! No!!! It’s just icing on the cake! But you have to have a cake to decorate it! But you have to have a well-baked.
National Science Foundation (NSF) January 19, 2010 Kellie Buss Kim Codere Pete Larsen Carol Wiitanen Sponsored Programs Sponsored Programs Office Enhancement.
I got this great idea! What’s next? Time to start preparing a proposal.
(from 2003 workshop presentation on NSF funding mechanisms & proposal strategies)
The RUI proposal: Research in Undergraduate Institutes Mark Lubkowitz Saint Michael’s College.
CAREER Proposal Budgeting Workshop Sponsored Programs Office May 17, 2011.
I got this great idea! What’s next? Time to start preparing a proposal.
I got this great idea! What’s next? Time to start preparing a proposal.
Two Year College Bert E. Holmes Carson Distinguished Chair of Science at UNC-Asheville and formerly Program Officer in Division of Undergraduate Education.
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 9, 2014 Required Elements of the Proposal Beth Hodges Director, Office of Proposal Development FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY.
Grant Writing/Comprehensive Workshop Paul R. Albert, Ph. D
Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) Changes & Clarifications.
Navigating Research Funding Cynthia Sagers Office of the Vice Provost for Research and Economic Development UA.
Effective proposal writing Session I. Potential funding sources Government agencies (e.g. European Union Framework Program, U.S. National Science Foundation,
SEPTEMBER 16, 2014 SERIES 4, SESSION 7 OF APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES (AAPLS) What You Need to Know Before Applying for National.
Emily Lynn Grant Administrator Office of Sponsored Projects and Research Administration.
NSF FastLane Division of Sponsored Research Presents:
Office of Sponsored Programs November  Focus on What is Important  Proposal Structure  Proposal Development Process  Proposal Review.
National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site Program.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.
NSF Bev Sherman Division of Information Systems National Science Foundation.
NSF CAREER Program & CAREER Proposals Claudia Rankins Program Director, Directorate of Education and Human Resources NSF CAREER Program.
NSF CAREER Program & CAREER Proposals Claudia Rankins Physics (PHY) NSF CAREER Program.
Writing More Effective NSF Proposals Jeanne R. Small Oklahoma City, Oklahoma March 2, 2006 Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) National Science Foundation.
S L I D E 0 An Introduction to National Science Foundation (NSF) Grants Development Office 23 Bacon Hall, Morris Conference Center Staff Members:Kathy.
This Thursday (November 30, 2006) You will individually select an agency where you actually would like to send your proposal. Read their instructions and.
NSF Grants for Graduate Students Mary Boulton, College Grants Officer An Equal Opportunity University.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
USING FASTLANE AND NSF PROPOSAL FORMS Presented by: Maya S. Anderson Program and Technology Analyst Division of Integrative Organismal Biology.
NSF Early Career Award Submission Preparation March 21, 2014 Prepared by: Shelly Baczkowski
FEDERAL UPDATE Jeff Warner Senior Contract and Grant Officer Alisia Ford Contract and Grant Officer Spring QRAM - Tuesday, March 12, 2013.
NSF: Proposal and Merit Review Process Muriel Poston, Ph.D. National Science Foundation 2005.
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 6, 2015 Required Elements of the NSF Proposal Beth Hodges Director, Office of Proposal Development FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY.
J.P. Hornak, , 2004 Research Practices http://
National Science Foundation. Seeking Doctoral Dissertation Support from the National Science Foundation: Do’s and Don’ts Program Officer Political Science.
The Review Process o What happens to your proposal o Two Review Criteria.
Richard MocarskiLauren Wilson Coord. of Res. Comms.Senior Associate Dir.OSP.
Proposal Preparation NSF Regional Grants Conference October 4 - 5, 2004 St. Louis, MO Hosted by: Washington University.
Research Administration Forum Changes to NSF & NIH Proposal Submission and Award Documents December 8, 2015.

How to Prepare Your NIA Proposal Vincent Lau, Ph.D. VP of Research and Graduate Education Chief Science Officer.
21 October Administrative Review Michelle Kelleher Science Assistant Division of Environmental Biology 21 October 2005.
OCTOBER 18, 2011 SESSION 9 OF AAPLS – SELECTED SUPPORTING COMPONENTS OF SF424 (R&R) APPLICATION APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module.
NSF Funding Opportunities Anthony Garza. General Funding Opportunities Standard proposals or investigator-initiated research projects (submission once.
NSF Core Documents and Online Resources for Proposal Preparation and Post-Award Activities Jeffrey G. Ryan School of Geosciences Former NSF Program Director.
How to Obtain NSF Grants Review of Proposal Pieces A workshop providing information on the process of applying for external research awards. Sponsored.
Pre-Submission Proposal Preparation Proposal Processing & Review.
Data Infrastructure Building Blocks (DIBBS) NSF Solicitation Webinar -- March 3, 2016 Amy Walton, Program Director Advanced Cyberinfrastructure.
PROPOSAL REVIEW AND SUBMISSION FYAP May 5, 2016 Julie Wammack Sponsored Research Administration.
Office of Proposal Development Florida State University Mike Mitchell, Proposal Development Coordinator NSF CAREER Ten Things to Know NSF CAREER Workshop.
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Grant Writing Information Session
Tammy Custer Grant and Contract Officer
Proposal Preparation.
Grant writing Session II.
NSF Tribal College Workshop
I want to submit a grant. What do I do?
Presentation transcript:

Submitting a Proposal: Best Practices By: Anu Singh Science Assistant

Best Practices in Proposal Preparation Start with a Good Idea! The best proposals have a high “WOW” factor or have a “HIGH IMPACT” in the field.  Talk to a Program Director  PD’s can assist in program identification

Best Practices in Proposal Preparation  Follow the Rules! Grant Proposal Guide – GPG  Allow Plenty of Time  Examine previous awards in your area. “Awards” Hyperlink from NSF homepage

Typical Components of an NSF Proposal  Cover Sheet  Table of Contents  Project Summary  Project Description  References Cited

Proposal Supporting Documents  Biographical Sketches  Proposal Budget  Budget Justification  Current and Pending Support  Facilities, Equipment & Other Resources  Supplementary Documentation

Best Practices: Cover Sheet  Cover Sheet NSF Unit Organization PI and Co-PI’s Information  Table of Contents – Done Automatically

Best Practices: Project Summary  Introduction/Overview  Intellectual Merit  Broader Impact

Best Practices Project Description:  Appearance Matters  Must address: Results from prior NSF funding (Required) Intellectual Merit and Broader Impact Brief response to reviewer comments (recommended)

Best Practices Project Description:  Results from prior NSF funding Basic findings, training, outcomes, publications  Organization Clearly apparent Aims/Goals/Hypotheses Separate sections for both Merit Criteria  Integration Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts

 Aims/Goals/Hypothesis New insights Rationale Inter-relationships between aims Timeline Best Practices: Project Description - Intellectual Merit

What if it doesn’t work?  Anticipate criticisms  Provide backup plans  Include alternative hypotheses. Best Practices: Project Description - Intellectual Merit

 Methodology Competence Collaborations Experimental System Best Practices: Project Description - Intellectual Merit

 Don’t Forget Broader Impacts! High impact Education/Outreach are important Your record Your plan Your budget pubs Best Practices: Project Description – Broader Impacts

Best Practices: References  Provide current background information  Cite literature accurately

Best Practices: Biographical Sketches:  Maximum length: 2 pages  Maximum publications: 10  Synergistic activities  Mentors and Mentees  Collaborators and Other Affiliations

Best Practices: Proposal Budget  Amounts Reasonable for work – Realistic In-line with program guidelines  Eligible costs Personnel (PI, Co-PIs, Senior Personnel, Techs, Post-docs, Graduate and Undergraduate students) Equipment Travel – Consider student support Participant Support Supplies – Varies depending upon discipline Other Direct Costs (including sub awards, consultant services, computer services, publication costs)

Best Practices: Budget Justification  Well justified - Needs established  Done line by line basis

Best Practices: List of Suggested Reviewers  Well qualified reviewers  Program Director discretion  Potentially disqualifying conflicts include:  Organization with which reviewer has/seeks business relationship  Institution at which reviewer is enrolled or serves as visiting scientist

Best Practices: Supplementary Documents  Letters of support or collaboration  RUI Impact Statement (certification)  Limit these to minimum necessary. Avoid introducing addition informational content (Not allowed)

 Font size must satisfy all GPG requirements.  Follow page limit.  Fill out all forms honestly and accurately.  Spell check and grammar check.  Double check AFTER FastLane upload. Poorly Written or Organized Proposals DO NOT Review Well Even with Excellent Science! Best Practices: General Notes

Submitting the Proposal:  The Sponsored Research Office (SRO) or equivalent submits the proposal to NSF electronically.  The Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) is required to electronically sign the proposal.

Questions or Concerns??  NSF website:  GPG hyperlink:  Contact the Program Director  Procedure questions: Contact the Fastlane Help Desk by sending an to or call